Abstract
The emergence of Omicron subvariants and waning immunity to initial vaccine regimens led to the authorization of updated SARS-CoV-2 bivalent vaccines containing wildtype with either Omicron BA.1 or BA.4/5. Here, we compare early serologic responses from a randomized clinical trial of a second boost with either the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 (30 mcg dose) Wildtype/Omicron BA.1 or Wildtype/Omicron BA.4/5 vaccines against homologous and heterologous strains including contemporary Omicron subvariants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.
Competing Interest Statement
ARB has research grants for Pfizer. ARF has research grants from PFizer. NGR has research grants from Pfizer. EJA has consulted for Pfizer and receives funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from Pfizer. SK has research funding from Pfizer to conduct a clinical trial of a Pfizer COVID19 vaccine. EBW and MJS has served as an investigator for vaccine studies sponsored by Pfizer. ACK reported clinical trials contract funding for vaccines or MAB vs SARS-CoV-2 with Regeneron and Pfizer.
Clinical Trial
NCT05289037
Funding Statement
The COVAIL trial has been funded in part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), under contract HHSN261200800001E 75N910D00024, task order number 75N91022F00007. This work was also supported in part with federal funds from the NIAID, NIH under contract number 75N93021C00012 and by the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium. (IDCRC) through NIAID under award number UM1AI148684.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Advarra central institutional review board gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Co-primary authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.