Abstract
Background Vaccination has been effective in preventing COVID-19 infections and related mortality. However, waning immunity after the two-dose vaccination prompted health authorities to recommend a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine to boost immunity. The aim of our study was to assess willingness to receive a third (booster) dose among patients with IBD.
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease center. Patients were recruited at the infusion room from January 1st, 2022, until March 31st, 2022. The primary outcome was the prevalence of BNT162b2 third (booster) dose in infliximab- or vedolizumab-treated patients with IBD. The secondary outcome evaluated whether the prevalence of BNT162b2 third (booster) dose differed based on type of COVID-19 vaccine, gender, age, type of biologic therapy and citizenship.
Results In total, 499 patients with IBD were included in this study. The median age was 34.5 years, and 60% had ulcerative colitis (UC). Among the study participants, 302 (60.5%) patients were vaccinated with BNT162b2, and 197 (39.5%) were vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Of the total number of participants, 400 (80.2%) were receiving infliximab, and 99 (19.8%) were receiving vedolizumab. Overall, 290 (58.1%) of the included patients were willing to receive the third (booster) dose. Patients vaccinated with BNT162b2 were more likely to receive booster dose compared to patients vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [201 (66.5%) vs 101 (33.5%), p = 0.014]. Infliximab-treated patients were more likely to receive booster dose compared to patients receiving vedolizumab [310 (77.5%) vs 62 (62.6%), p = 0.002]. There was no statistical difference in willingness to receive booster dose in terms of age, nationality, or gender.
Conclusion The percentage of patients with IBD willing or have received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 vaccine was lower compared to general population. In addition, patients who received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccines were more likely to receive a third (booster) dose compared to patients who received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Patients treated with infliximab were more likely to receive a third (booster) dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the standing committee for coordination of health and medical re-search of the Ministry of health of Kuwait (IRB 2021/1729) as per the updated guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013) and of the US Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors