Abstract
Background At the time of this study, Massachusetts had recorded a total of 352,558 COVID-19 cases and 12,076 deaths. Few qualitative studies have been conducted that investigate the experiences of university students and employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19 in university affiliates to inform future COVID-19 policies.
Methods Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted via Zoom between December 14, 2020 and January 15, 2021. Twenty-two focus group participants included undergraduate students, graduate students and university employees who had not experienced isolation or quarantine during the Fall 2020 semester. Fourteen participants who had experienced quarantine or isolation were interviewed individually to protect confidentiality. Data were analyzed using Dedoose software via inductive thematic analysis, with reporting as per Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) guidelines.
Results Five major themes emerged from these data: COVID-19 knowledge, stress and coping, trust, decision-making, and institutional feedback. Misinformation regarding COVID-19 was common, compounding high levels of stress reported by many participants. Reported direct sources of stress included physical illness, fear of infection, and lack of access to resources while in quarantine or isolation settings. Reported indirect sources of stress included social isolation and financial constraints. Levels of trust were generally high regarding mainstream news media, scientific journals, and university-related information sources. For decision-making processes, participants described altered behaviors to socialize safely during the pandemic, which included increased testing, gathering outdoors, and limiting group sizes. Conversely, some undergraduate students reported increases in socialization behaviors after testing negative for COVID-19, while most university employees did not report altered behaviors after negative test results. While some participants described negative feedback regarding university decisions, most feedback for the institution was positive, with participants reporting appreciation for the university’s asymptomatic testing program and other on-campus health response activities.
Conclusion The university’s investment in COVID-related resources, including the asymptomatic testing program and the on-campus quarantine and isolation spaces, were reported to greatly reduce stress and increase perceived safety. Key findings from this research could guide institutional communication, public health protocols, and support for university community members.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Internal funding was used for participant incentives and student time. The funding body was not involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data for this manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Massachusetts Amherst gave ethical approval for this work (Approval 1873, Nov. 30, 2020).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available in order to preserve participant confidentiality. Data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.