Concurrent malaria and dengue fever in (sub-Saharan) Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tewelde T. Gebremariam, Zeleke Mekonnen, Jonas B. Danquah
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.24.22275526

ABSTRACT

Objectives To determine the prevalence of concurrent malaria and dengue fever, aetiologies, and the association between the two infections in Africa.

Methods We assessed evidence from previous studies in Africa that were available in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between January 01, 2005, and March 30, 2022.

Results A total of 3942 studies were identified from the databases of which 30 studies from 13 African countries, including 25,241 febrile patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The result of the meta□analysis showed a 4.0% pooled prevalence of concurrent malaria and dengue fever in (sub-Saharan) Africa, and the highest rate was recorded in Central Africa (5.8%) followed by East Africa (4.7%) and West Africa (2.8%). Children <18 years old (57%) and females (52.8%) were more affected by the co-infection than adults and females, respectively. The dengue virus serotypes identified were DENV-2, DENV-3, DENV-1, and DENV-4 in descending order with a proportion of 39%, 31%, 27%, and 3%, respectively. Moreover, Plasmodium falciparum was the only specified malaria parasite in the co-infection among the included studies. Significantly higher odds of malaria infection were documented due to dengue fever when compared with malaria mono-infection. However, no significant odds of acute dengue co-infection were recorded due to malaria in contrast to dengue mono-infection.

Conclusion This study showed a high prevalence of concurrent malaria and dengue fever in Africa. Healthcare workers should bear in mind the possibility of dengue infection as differential diagnoses for acute febrile illness as well as the possibility of co-existent malaria and dengue in endemic areas. Also, high-quality multi-centre studies are required to verify the above conclusions.

Protocol registration number: CRD42022311301.

INTRODUCTION

Acute undifferentiated febrile illness (AUFI) is one of the most frequent reasons for healthcare seeking in Africa.1 AUFI usually begins with non-specific symptoms such as the sudden onset of fever which fewer progresses to prolonged duration, headache, chills, and myalgia which may later involve specific organs. It can range from mild and self-limiting illness to advancing, deadly disease.2 Malaria and dengue fever are leading causes of AUFI.3

Africa carries the highest global malaria burden, with 2000 million cases (92%) in 2017 alone.4 Human malaria is mainly caused by four Plasmodium species, namely P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, and P. ovale with variable geographic distribution. P. falciparum accounts for nearly all malaria deaths in sub-Saharan Africa, which bears over 90% of the global malaria burden.5 Likewise, the prevalence of dengue in the region has dramatically increased over the past few decades although this specific infection is neither systematically investigated nor generally considered by clinicians.6 In 2013, about 16 million apparent and over 48 million inapparent dengue were estimated to have occurred, and most countries in the continent reported recurrent outbreaks.7 Similarly, dengue fever is caused by four genetically distinct dengue viruses (serotypes 1-4).8

Though malaria or dengue virus mono-infection can be severe, concomitant infections could be even more fatal.9, 10 The two mosquito-borne diseases have an overlapping epidemic pattern in Africa.11 Due to their similar clinical presentation, possible concurrent malaria-dengue fever is often neglected 12 and generally misdiagnosed as malaria only.6, 13 Misdiagnosis is more probable during co-infection than mono-infection and this may result in slow identification of dengue fever outbreaks with potentially high morbidity and mortality.6, 14

This review aimed to gather evidence to answer the question: how common is Plasmodium and dengue virus co-infection in Africa could be? The specific review objectives were (1) to determine the prevalence of concurrent malaria and acute dengue in Africa (by region and demographic characteristics), and (2) to describe the dengue virus serotypes in the concurrent infection.

METHODS

The protocol of the review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42022311301) and followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)15 and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)16 checklists (see online supplementary research checklists).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Case report, cross-sectional and case-control studies that reported concurrent malaria and dengue fever among uncomplicated febrile cases in African regions were included. According to the United Nations, Africa is divided into five regions: Northern Africa, Central or Middle Africa, Southern Africa, East Africa, and Western Africa.17 Similarly, the World Bank lists a total of 48 countries in the sub-Saharan African region.18

Malaria might be diagnosed by malaria rapid diagnostic tests or microscopy and/or polymerase chain reaction while dengue fever might be identified through antigen/antibody test and/or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Acute dengue or dengue fever was defined as positive for dengue IgM or NS1 antigen test or RT-PCR.

Articles of which full texts could not be obtained or were not available in English were excluded.

The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of concurrent malaria and dengue infection in Africa. The secondary outcomes were: (1) the proportion of males and females with concurrent malaria and acute dengue, and (2) the proportion of dengue virus serotypes in th co-infection. The literature screening and selection process is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Flowchart showing the identification and selection process of articles for inclusion in the review.

Databases and search strategy

The CoCoPop mnemonic (condition, context, and population)19 was used to formulate the review question and systematically search all relevant studies published between January 01, 2005, to March 30, 2022, from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The search strategy used was: (exp Malaria, Falciparum/ or Malaria/ or ((Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium infect* or malignant tertian or (malaria or marsh or remittent)) adj3 fever).ti,ab.) and (exp Dengue/ or exp Dengue Virus/ or ((dengue or Break?bone) adj3 fever).ti,ab.).

Study quality appraisal and data extraction

The Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) tool20 was used to screen each article and extract relevant data for the review. Two of the authors (TT, JD) independently screened each article at an abstract and full-text level. The discrepancy between the two reviewers was resolved through discussion. Articles endorsed in the full-text screening were subjected to JBI critical appraisal tool. Those with good quality scores were undergone data extraction. Data extraction included the first author’s last name, publication year, country/region of study, sample size, number of concurrent malaria and dengue infections, demographic characteristics (age, gender) of patients with concurrent infections, and dengue serotypes in the concurrent infections. The JBI criteria were used to score the quality of each study. Studies with a score greater than or equal to four were seen as good quality to be included in the meta-analysis.

Statistical analysis

The meta-analysis was performed using Jamovi software (version 2.2.5)21, OpenMeta-analyst22, and the JBI SUMARI tool.20 The random-effect model (DerSimonian-Laid) and the effect size model measures of raw proportion/Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformed proportion were used to determine the prevalence/proportion estimates. The heterogeneity of included studies was measured using Tau, Tau2, I2 statistic, and Cochran’s Q-test. Forest plot was used to visually assess the prevalence and odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s regression test and Rank Correlation Test. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Patient and public involvement

This study was done without patient or public involvement.

RESULTS

Literature retrieval and article characteristics

A total of 3942 records were identified during literature retrieval from the databases. A total of 30 studies from (sub-Saharan) Africa involving 25,241 febrile patients were included in this meta-analysis 23-53 (Figure 1, Table 1). The quality score of the included studies ranged from 4 to 7 on a maximum scale of quality scores of 8 for case reports, 9 for cross-sectional studies, and 11 for case-control studies using the JBI criteria (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1.

Basic Characteristics and quality score of included studies.

Concurrent falciparum malaria and dengue fever

The random-effect (DerSimonian-Laird) model estimator and raw proportion and/or Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformed proportion were used in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of malaria and dengue co-infection in (sub-Saharan) Africa per 1000 febrile cases was 40 (95% CI, 32 – 48, SE = 0.004) with significant heterogeneity (Tau= 0.018, Tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 95.52%, and Q = 625.28, p < 0.001) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Forest plot delineating prevalence of malaria and acute dengue co-infection in (sub-Saharan) Africa.

The prevalence significantly varies across the three African regions (χ2 = 537.13, p < 0.00001 and ranges from 28.5 per 1000 febrile cases (95% CI, 18 – 39, SE = 0.0052) in West Africa (Figure 3), 47 (95% CI, 19 – 75, SE = .0142) in East Africa (Figure 4) to 58 (95% CI, 30 – 86, SE = 0.0143) in Central Africa (Figure 5) (Table 2). A case report23 was excluded from the prevalence estimation.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Forest plot showing the prevalence of malaria and acute dengue co-infection in West Africa.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Prevalence of malaria and dengue co-infection in East Africa.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Forest plot depicting prevalence of concurrent malaria and acute dengue in Central Africa.

View this table:
Table 2

Meta-analysis of concurrent malaria and acute dengue prevalence among febrile patients in three African regions.

Twenty-two studies examined the association between acute dengue virus infection with malaria. The peto’s odds ratio54 was used to pool the odds ratio of individual studies. In our meta-analysis (Figure 6), cross-sectional studies in Cameroon38, 53, and Kenya30 revealed significantly lower odds of co-infection in contrast with the absence of acute dengue infections (OR: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 – 0.87). Cross-sectional studies in Nigeria24, 26, 28, 33, 40, 41, 43, Tanzania25, Sierra Leone31, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)42, Cameroon39, Sudan48, 50, and Senegal29 indicated no significant odds of co-infection in comparison with acute dengue negatives (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.58, 1.94). Studies in Ethiopia52, Nigeria37, Tanzania44, Cameroon51, and Kenya47, on the other hand, indicated significantly higher odds of concurrent infection to acute dengue negatives (OR = 4.56; 95% CI = 3.29, 6.33). There was no indication of a potential outlier (studentized residuals >±3.0654) and overlay influence (cook’s distance) among the studies. Above all, the summary estimate derived from 22 studies showed significantly higher odds of malaria infection among patients in the absence of acute dengue than acute dengue virus co-infection (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.75) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 89; p < 0.001). The 95% prediction interval for the true outcomes (log peto’s odds ratio) was -1.41 to 2.46.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Forest plot: the difference in the prevalence of malaria due to acute dengue virus infection and malaria mono-infection.

Similarly, the odds of acute dengue virus infection were also compared with the presence and absence of malaria infection (Figure 7). Cross-sectional studies in Kenya30, 47 and Cameroon38, 53 reported significantly low odds of acute dengue in the presence of malaria than in its absence (OR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.40 – 0.82). Similar studies Nigeria26, 28, 33, 40, 41, 43, Tanzania25, Sierra Leone31, DRC42, Cameroon39, Sudan48, 50, and Senegal29; however, showed no notable odds of acute dengue infection in the presence of malaria when compared to the absence of malaria (OR = 1.07, 95% CI, 0.58 −1.94). On the contrary, cross-sectional studies in Ethiopia52, Nigeria24, 37, Tanzania44, and Cameroon51 indicated higher odds of acute dengue infection in the presence of malaria than in its absence (OR = 6.98, 95% CI, 2.89 – 16.85). The overall estimate based on 22 studies showed no significant odds of acute dengue co-infection in contrast to malaria mono-infection (OR = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.87 – 1.16) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 86, P <0.0001). The 95% prediction interval for the true outcomes (log peto’s odds ratio) was -1.45 – 2.127.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Forest plot showing the difference in the prevalence of acute dengue co-infection due to malaria and acute dengue mono-infection.

The gender distribution among malaria and acute dengue virus co-infection showed that the proportion of females was 52.8% (95% CI, 44.1 – 61.5, SE = 0.044) without evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.62), while the proportion of males was 47.2% (95% CI, 38.5 – 55.9, SE = 0.044) with no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.62) (Table 3). Furthermore, the proportion age category of the coinfection was 57.0% (40.9-73.1, SE = 0.082) among children <18 years old and 40.9% (95% CI, 24.5 – 57.0, SE = 0.082) in adults with significant heterogeneity (p <0.001).

View this table:
Table 3

Meta-analysis of demographic characteristics of patients with concurrent malaria and dengue virus infection in (sub-Saharan) Africa.

The meta-analysis on the proportion of aetiologies of concomitant malaria and acute dengue is shown in Table 4. All the four dengue virus serotypes were identified, where DENV-2, DENV-3, DENV-1, and DENV-4 were documented in descending order with a proportion of 39.5% (95% CI, 16.8-62.2, SE = 0.116), 31.6% (95% CI, 16.0 – 47.2, SE = 0.080), 27.3% (95% CI, 14.6 – 40.1, SE = 0.065), and 3.7% (95% CI, 1.0 – 6.3, SE = 0.014), respectively. The aetiology of malaria among the co-infection was specified in 50.7% (95% CI, 29.6 – 71.9, SE = 0.108) of the patients, and all were due to P. falciparum.

View this table:
Table 4

Meta-analysis of the proportion of aetiologies of concomitant malaria and acute dengue in (sub-Saharan) Africa.

Publication bias

The publication bias of included studies was evaluated using the funnel plot asymmetry tests: the Egger’s regression test and rank correlation test based on the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformed proportion effect size model measures for prevalence/proportion estimates and log odds ratio peto’s method for the difference in the prevalence rates. Both tests showed nonsignificant publication bias (p >0.05) among the studies included in all the analyses.

DISCUSSION

The first report of malaria and dengue virus co-infection in Africa was documented in 2005.23 Our meta-analysis included 25,241 febrile patients from 30 studies conducted in 13 African countries (Ghana, Sudan, Senegal, Nigeria, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Cameroon, DRC, Burkina Faso, and Madagascar) for over around 17 years. As far as we know, this is the first description and analysis of the prevalence, demographic characteristics, and dengue virus serotype profiles of concurrent malaria and dengue infection in (sub-Saharan) Africa.

Based on our analysis, the pooled prevalence of concurrent malaria and dengue was 4.0%, and the highest rate was recorded in Central Africa (5.8%), followed by East Africa (4.7%) and West Africa (2.8%). This result is lower than the finding of a study55 on a meta-analysis of severe malaria and dengue co-infection which estimated a prevalence of 32%. The variation could be due to the differences in the study population, model estimator employed, and/or geography of the primary studies included, where our analysis was focused on studies from Africa while the other study included studies from all over the globe. Besides, uncomplicated febrile cases were included in our analysis, unlike above the study which estimated severe malaria prevalence among the co-infection.

In our study, women and children were more affected groups by the concomitant infection than males and adults, respectively. Women and children are more susceptible to mosquito-borne illnesses because they are exposed to mosquito bites for longer periods during dangerous hours 56. Moreover, malaria57 and dengue58 mainly affect children due to underdeveloped specific immunity to infection.57

In our analysis, the most prevalent dengue virus serotypes present in the concurrent infection were serotypes 2 and 3. The DENV-2 serotype is divided into six genotypes: Asian I, Asian II, American, Asian/American, Cosmopolitan, and Sylvatic.59 The cosmopolitan genotype of DENV-2 is the most widely distributed dengue virus worldwide. The DENV-3 serotype of genotype III is found in Africa.60 Furthermore, Plasmodium falciparum was the only malaria parasite specified in the coinfection among the included studies. It is known that nearly all malaria cases in (sub-Saharan) Africa are caused by P. falciparum.5

Our study also reported significantly higher odds of malaria infection among patients with malaria mono-infection than acute dengue virus co-infection. This could be due to the inter-species cross-protection of dengue virus infection against malaria.11 Our finding does not corroborate the reports of Kotepui et al. 201955 and Kotepui et al. 202061. Kotepui et al. 2019 showed significantly lower odds of co-infection while Kotepui et al. 2020 reported no notable difference in co-infection due to acute dengue compared to malaria mono-infection. Our study further elucidated no significant odds of acute dengue virus co-infection infection due to malaria than acute dengue virus mono-infection. Our report is in disagreement with the findings of Kotepui et al. 202061 which indicated higher odds of acute dengue due to malaria co-infection in contrast to dengue virus mono-infection. The discordant findings could be attributed to the variation in model estimator/effect size model measures and/or quality/geography of included studies.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study are its large sample size, the good□quality score of studies included in the analysis, and no evidence of publication bias among the included studies. Some of the study limitations include: (1) Our search was restricted to those published in English only, so language bias could have flawed our findings, (2) The analysis was dependent on single-centred studies, which may not accurately reflect the true prevalence of the concurrent infection on the African continent, (3) The sample sizes for six studies 23, 28, 33, 35, 45, 48 were relatively small, so the sampling error could lead to substantial bias in the meta-analysis, (4) Our analysis showed significant heterogeneity among the studies due to too many outcomes, and (5) Subgroup analysis was not performed which could affect the accuracy of the results presented.

CONCLUSION

In general, our study found a high prevalence of concurrent malaria and dengue fever among febrile patients in (sub-Saharan) Africa with significant variation across regions. Women and children were more affected population groups by the coinfection than men and adults, respectively. P. falciparum and dengue virus serotype 2 and 3 were the predominant aetiologies of this coinfection in the region. Healthcare workers should bear in mind the possibility of dengue infection as one of the differential diagnoses for acute febrile illness as well as the possibility of co-existent malaria and dengue in endemic areas. Our study also showed significantly higher odds of malaria infection were documented due to acute dengue co-infection in contrast to malaria mono-infection. Furthermore, no notable odds of acute dengue infection were reported due to malaria co-infection as compared to dengue mono-infection. Besides, high-quality multi-centre prospective studies are required to verify the above conclusions and to gain more insights into malaria and dengue virus co-infection in the continent.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Contributorship

TG designed the study, wrote the statistical analysis plan, monitored the review process, interpreted the data, cleaned and analysed the data, and wrote the draft manuscript. TG and JD assessed studies for inclusion. ZM and AH reviewed and commented the draft paper. All authors have approved the final version. TG is the guarantor and takes responsibility for the content of this article.

Funding

No funding has been received to conduct this study.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare; no support was obtained from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Patient consent

Consent was not required when conducting a systematic review.

Ethics approval

This study did not require ethical approval as the data used have been published previously, and hence are already in the public domain.

Data sharing

Extracted data will be available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

Footnotes

  • E-mail addresses: TG: ttesfayg{at}gmail.com

    ZM: zeleke.mekonnen{at}gmail.com

    JD: jonydan4{at}gmail.com

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Escadafal C, Geis S, Siqueira AM, Agnandji ST, Shimelis T, Tadesse BT, et al. Bacterial versus non-bacterial infections: a methodology to support use-case-driven product development of diagnostics. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(10):e003141.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Bhargava A RR, Chatterjee B, Bottieau E. Assessment and initial management of acute undifferentiated fever in tropical and subtropical regions. BMJ. 2018;363:k4766.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Prasad N, Murdoch DR, Reyburn H, Crump JA. Etiology of severe febrile Illness in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127962.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2018 [Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/halth_topics_infographics/WHO_infographics_malaria.pdf.
  5. 5.↵
    Snow RW, Omumbo JA. Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2nd edition. Chapter 14 Malaria. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2006 [Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2286/.
  6. 6.↵
    Gainor EM, Harris E, LaBeaud AD. Uncovering the burden of dengue in Africa: considerations on magnitude, misdiagnosis, and ancestry. Viruses. 2022;14(2):233.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue.: WHO; 2022 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue.
  9. 9.↵
    Epelboin L, Hanf M, Dussart P, Ouar-Epelboin S, Djossou F, Nacher M, et al. Is dengue and malaria co-infection more severe than single infections? A retrospective matched-pair study in French Guiana. Malar J. 2012;11:142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Ward DI. A case of fatal Plasmodium falciparum malaria complicated by acute dengue fever in East Timor. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(1):182–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Bygbjerg IC, Simonsen L, Schiøler KL. Elimination of falciparum malaria and emergence of severe dengue: an independent or interdependent phenomenon? Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1120.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Wiwanitkit V. Concurrent malaria and dengue infection: a brief summary and comment. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(4):326–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Abdul-Ghani R, Mahdy MAK, Alkubati S, Al-Mikhlafy AA, Alhariri A, Das M, et al. Malaria and dengue in Hodeidah city, Yemen: High proportion of febrile outpatients with dengue or malaria, but low proportion co-infected. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253556.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Charrel RN, Brouqui P, Foucault C, de Lamballerie X. Concurrent dengue and malaria. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(7):1153–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    JBI. Critical appraisal tools. 2020 [Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools.
  16. 16.↵
    PRISMA. PRISMA 2020 Checklist. 2020 [Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.
  17. 17.↵
    Pitt. African Studies and African Country Resources: University of Pittsbergh; 2022 [Available from: https://pitt.libguides.com/.
  18. 18.↵
    World B. All countries of Sub-Saharan Africa. : World Bank; 2022 [Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/pages/focus-sub-saharan-africa.
  19. 19.↵
    Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Sumari J. End to end support for developing systematic reviews. 2022 [Available from: https://sumari.jbi.global/.
  21. 21.↵
    Project TJ. Jamovi (version 2.2), computer software. 2021 [Available from: https://www.jamovi.org.
  22. 22.↵
    Wallace BC, Dahabre IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid CH. Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. J Stat Softw. 2012;49(5):1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Charrel RN, Brouqui P, Foucault C, de Lamballerie X. Concurrent dengue and malaria. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(7):1153–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Baba M, Logue CH, Oderinde B, Abdulmaleek H, Williams J, Lewis J, et al. Evidence of arbovirus co-infection in suspected febrile malaria and typhoid patients in Nigeria. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(1):51–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Chipwaza B, Mugasa JP, Selemani M, Amuri M, Mosha F, Ngatunga SD, et al. Dengue and chikungunya fever among viral diseases in outpatient febrile children in Kilosa District Hospital, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(11).
  26. 26.↵
    Oyero OG, Ayukekbong JA. High dengue NS1 antigenemia in febrile patients in Ibadan, Nigeria. Virus Res. 2014;191:59–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    Stoler J, Delimini RK, Bonney JHK, Awandare GA. Evidence of recent dengue exposure among malaria parasite-positive children in three urban centers in Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91(5 SUPPL. 1):427.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Ayorinde AF, Oyeyiga AM, Nosegbe NO, Folarin OA. A survey of malaria and some arboviral infections among suspected febrile patients visiting a health centre in Simawa, Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2016;9(1):52–9.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Sow A, Loucoubar C, Diallo D, Ndiaye Y, Senghor CS, Dia AT, et al. Concurrent malaria and arbovirus infections in Kedougou, southeastern Senegal. Malar J. 2016;15(1):47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Vu DM, Ripp K, Mutai N, Ndenga BA, Heath C, LaBeaud AD. Plasmodium falciparum co-infection modulates dengue disease severity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(5 Supplement 1):32.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Dariano DF, Taitt CR, Jacobsen KH, Bangura U, Bockarie AS, Bockarie MJ, et al. Surveillance of vector-borne infections (chikungunya, dengue, and malaria) in Bo, Sierra Leone, 2012-2013. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(4):1151–4.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.
    Kolawole OM, Seriki AA, Irekeola AA, Bello KE, Adeyemi OO. Dengue virus and malaria concurrent infection among febrile subjects within Ilorin metropolis, Nigeria. J Med Virol. 2017;89(8):1347–53.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    Miri MF, Mawak JD, Chukwu CO, Chuwang NJ, Acheng SY, Ezekiel T. Detection of IgM and IgG dengue antibodies in febrile patients suspected of malaria attending health centre in Jos, Nigeria Annals of Medical Laboratory Science. 2017;1(1):27–35.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.
    Boillat-Blanco N, Klaassen B, Mbarack Z, Samaka J, Mlaganile T, Masimba J, et al. Dengue fever in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: clinical features and outcome in populations of black and non-black racial category. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):644.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Monamele GC, Demanou M. First documented evidence of dengue and malaria co-infection in children attending two health centers in yaounde, cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;29:227.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.
    Obonyo M, Fidhow A, Ofula V. Investigation of laboratory confirmed dengue outbreak in north-eastern Kenya, 2011. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Onyedibe K, Dawurung J, Iroezindu M, Shehu N, Okolo M, Shobowale E, et al. A cross sectional study of dengue virus infection in febrile patients presumptively diagnosed of malaria in Maiduguri and Jos plateau, Nigeria. Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi. 2018;30(4):276–82.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    Tchuandom SB, Tchouangueu TF, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Lissom A, Djang JON, Atabonkeng EP, et al. Seroprevalence of dengue virus among children presenting with febrile illness in some public health facilities in Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:177.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    Yousseu FBS, Nemg FBS, Ngouanet SA, Mekanda FMO, Demanou M. Detection and serotyping of dengue viruses in febrile patients consulting at the New-Bell District Hospital in Douala, Cameroon. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204143.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    Nassar SA, Olayiwola JO, Bakarey AS, Enyhowero SO. Investigations of dengue virus and Plasmodium falciparum among febrile patients receiving care at a tertiary health facility in Osogbo, south-west Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Parasitology. 2019;40(1):18–24.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Otu AA, Udoh UA, Ita OI, Hicks JP, Egbe WO, Walley J. A cross-sectional survey on the seroprevalence of dengue fever in febrile patients attending health facilities in Cross River State, Nigeria. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215143.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Proesmans S, Katshongo F, Milambu J, Fungula B, Mavoko HM, Ahuka-Mundeke S, et al. Dengue and chikungunya among outpatients with acute undifferentiated fever in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: A crosssectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(9):e0007047.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    Abdulaziz MM, Ibrahim A, Ado M, Ameh C, Umeokonkwo C, Sufyan MB, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with dengue fever among febrile patients attending secondary health facilities in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. African J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2020;21(4):340–8.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Ali MA, James OC, Mohamed AA, Joachim A, Mubi M, Omodior O. Etiologic Agents of Fever of Unknown Origin Among Patients Attending Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar. J Community Health. 2020;45(5):1073–80.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Ihahi JW, Oyugi E, Owiny M, Ogutu J, Serech H. Investigation of outbreak of malaria and other febrile illnesses in a remote Semi-Arid County, Kenya, 2019. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(5 SUPPL):69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.
    Mouiche MMM, Ntumvi NF, Maptue VT, Tamoufe U, Albert B, Ngum Ndze V, et al. Evidence of Low-Level Dengue Virus Circulation in the South Region of Cameroon in 2018. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2020;20(4):314–7.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Shah MM, Ndenga BA, Mutuku FM, Vu DM, Grossi-Soyster EN, Okuta V, et al. High dengue burden and circulation of 4 virus serotypes among children with undifferentiated fever, Kenya, 2014-2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(11):2638–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    Ahmed A, Eldigail M, Elduma A, Breima T, Dietrich I, Ali Y, et al. First report of epidemic dengue fever and malaria co-infections among internally displaced persons in humanitarian camps of North Darfur, Sudan. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;108:513–6.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.
    Galani BRT, Mapouokam DW, Simo FBN, Mohamadou H, Chuisseu PDD, Njintang NY, et al. Investigation of dengue-malaria coinfection among febrile patients consulting at Ngaoundere Regional Hospital, Cameroon. J Med Virol. 2021;93(6):3350–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    Marks F, Liu J, Soura AB, Gasmelseed N, Operario DJ, Grundy B, et al. Pathogens that cause acute febrile illness among children and adolescents in Burkina Faso, Madagascar, and Sudan. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73(8):1338–45.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    Nkenfou CN, Fainguem N, Dongmo-Nguefack F, Yatchou LG, Kameni JJK, Elong EL, et al. Enhanced passive surveillance dengue infection among febrile children: Prevalence, co-infections and associated factors in Cameroon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(4):e0009316.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Akelew Y, Pareyn M, Lemma M, Negash M, Bewket G, Derbew A, et al. Aetiologies of acute undifferentiated febrile illness at the emergency ward of the University of Gondar Hospital, Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2022;27(3):271–9.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    Tchetgna HDS, Yousseu FS, Kamgang B, Tedjou A, McCall PJ, Wondji CS. Concurrent circulation of dengue serotype 1, 2 and 3 among acute febrile patients in Cameroon. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;116(Supplement):S125.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    Brockhaus AC, Bender R, Skipka G. The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure. Stat Med. 2014;33(28):4861–74.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    Kotepui M, Kotepui KU. Prevalence and laboratory analysis of malaria and dengue co-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1148.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    Quaresima V, Agbenyega T, Oppong B, Awunyo JADA, Adomah PA, Enty E, et al. Are malaria risk factors based on gender? A mixed-methods survey in an urban setting in Ghana. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021;6(3).
  57. 57.↵
    Schumacher RF, Spinelli E. Malaria in children. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2012;4(1):e2012073.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    Tantawichien T. Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in adolescents and adults. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012;32 Suppl 1(s1):22–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    Waman VP, Kolekar P, Ramtirthkar MR, Kale MM, Kulkarni-Kale U. Analysis of genotype diversity and evolution of Dengue virus serotype 2 using complete genomes. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2326.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    Dorji T, Yoon IK, Holmes EC, Wangchuk S, Tobgay T, Nisalak A, et al. Diversity and origin of dengue virus serotypes 1, 2, and 3, Bhutan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(10):1630–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Kotepui M, Kotepui KU, Milanez GJ, Masangkay FR. Prevalence of and risk factors for severe malaria caused by Plasmodium and dengue virus co-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):134.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted June 27, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Concurrent malaria and dengue fever in (sub-Saharan) Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tewelde T. Gebremariam, Zeleke Mekonnen, Jonas B. Danquah
medRxiv 2022.05.24.22275526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.24.22275526
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area