Abstract
The implementation of Electronic Health Records (EHR) in UK hospitals provides new opportunities for clinical ‘big data’ analysis. The representation of observations routinely recorded in clinical practice is the first step to use these data in several research tasks. Anonymised data were extracted from 11 158 first emergency admission episodes (AE) in older adults. Irregular records from 23 laboratory blood tests and vital signs were normalized and regularised into daily bins and represented as numerical multivariate time-series (MVTS). Unsupervised Hidden Markov Models (HMM) were trained to represent each day of each AE as one of 17 state spaces. The visual clinical interpretation of these states showed remarkable differences between patients who died at the end of the AE and those who were discharged. All states had marked features that allowed their clinical interpretation and differentiation between those associated with the patients’ disease burden, their physiological response to this burden or the stage of admission. The most evident relationships with hold-out clinical information were also confirmed by Chi-square tests, with two states strongly associated with inpatient mortality (IM) and 12 states (71%) associated with at least one admission diagnosis. The potential of these data representations on prediction of hospital outcomes was also explored using Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF) models, with higher prediction performance observed when models were trained with MVTS data compared to HMM state spaces. However, the outputs of generative and discriminative analyses were complementary. For example, highest ranking features of the best performing RF model for IM (ROC-AUC 0.851) resembled the laboratory blood test and vital sign variables characterising the ‘Early Inflammatory Response-like’ state, itself strongly associated with IM. These results provide evidence of the capability of generative models to extract biological signals from routinely collected clinical data and their potential to represent interpretable patients’ trajectories for future research in hypothesis generation or prediction modelling.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. VLK was funded by a MRC/NIHR Clinical Academic Research Partnership Grant (CARP; grant code: MR/T023902/1). VT is supported by Cancer Research UK. EB and TF were funded by the EMBL European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Informed consent was not required for this study since the routinely collected healthcare data presented were anonymised. The project was approved by the NHS Health Research Authority (HRA) (IRAS: 253457), North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (REC) (REC reference: 19/NE/0013) and by the EMBL Scientific Advisory Committee (BIAC).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* Joint first authorship
Data Availability
The anonymised data that support this research project are available from Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Reasonable data requests will be considered by the authors with permission of Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
