Effects of immunosuppressive therapy reduction and early post-infection graft function in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19

Introduction

Since SARS CoV-2 was identified in December 2019, the pandemic spreads quickly all around the world with a disruptively impact on social and economic life. This virus yielded several new challenges to our healthcare systems that had to copes with an increase of morbidity and mortality among the most vulnerable populations.[1] Kidney transplant (KT) recipients is a subset of the population at high risk of severe COVID-19 relate consequences due to comorbidities, consequences of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the burden of immunosuppressive therapy (IST), which in some subjects include also therapies administered before kidney transplantation to treat glomerulonephritis or underlying autoimmune diseases. [2]

Data collected so far reported that transplant recipients were at higher risk of morbidity and mortality compared to the general population [3, 4]. Despite the great emphasis on IST reduction to face the potentially lethal consequences of COVID-19, no confirming data supports its beneficial effect in terms of survival or clinical and laboratory manifestations. Additional uncertainty arises from recent literature when the tempered immune response is suggested to prevent COVID□19–induced systemic inflammatory syndrome leading acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis. Furthermore, few data are available regarding early graft outcomes after COVID-19 in survivors.[5]. Multiple causes, including kidney tropism of SARS-CoV-2 [6] may be responsible for non-reversible episodes of AKI[7] that can severely impair graft survival. Lastly, a concerning issue is hyporesponsiveness to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination[8, 9]. Numerous studies have confirmed that KT recipients have a blunted immune response to mRNA vaccine[10]. Only 48% of patients was able to mount a protective serologic response to SARS-CoV-2[11]. Caillard et al [12]reported that about one-third of kidney transplant patients had severe manifestations, including a fatal outcome, after completing vaccination with mRNA. This group of patients is therefore expected to remain vulnerable to the severe complications of COVID-19 until new strategies will be implemented to reduce the susceptibility of these subjects.

Considering all the uncertainties in the management of KT recipients and the still current risk of infection in this cohort of patients we report our experience in managing KT recipients with COVID-19. In particular, we will focus on the impact of early IST reduction and early graft function after the resolution of the infection.

Material and methods

Results

From the spread of COVID-in Italy, 45 KT recipients followed in at our Center contracted COVID-19. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were detailed in Table 1. This group of patients included two (4.4%) combined liver-kidney and one (2.2%) heart-kidney transplant recipient.

Age of patients ranged from 19.2 to 83.5 years and median was 56.1 (IQR, 47.3-61.1) years. COVID-19 was prevalent in males (64.4%) and occurred after a median of 10,1 (2,7-16,01) years from transplantation.

Before COVID-19 infection serum creatine sCr measured 1.45 (IQR 1.1-1.8) mg/dl corresponding a median eGFR of 48.4 ml/min. At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 55.6% of the patients was in triple standard IST. Reduction of IST was practiced in more than half (62.8) of subjects. MPA (88.8%), CNI or mTOR-i (22.2%) were the most frequent discontinued agents.

Hospitalization and death rate in patients who underwent IST reduction were 51.8% and 14.8%, respectively. However, despite IST reduction, hospitalization (P=0.71) and death (P=1) rates were not different compared to the full-dose IST group. Overall, forty patients (88.9%) developed symptoms of COVID-19 and 18 of them (45%) required hospitalization. Overall, eight patients (17.8%) died for COVID-19.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to detect predictors of mortality (Table 2). Multivariate analysis found that age (OR=1.19 [95%CI 1.01-1.39]; P=0.034) and years spent on immunosuppressive therapy (OR=1.17 [95%CI 1.01-1.35]; P=0.040) were associated with mortality in this group of patients.

Among survivors (82.2%), one patient with a CKD stage 4 (GFR=20 ml/min) before SARS-CoV-2 infection, developed irreversible graft failure requiring HD. One patient (2.7%) manifested de-novo proteinuria (4100 mg/die) after resolution of COVID-19 and graft biopsy revealed IgA glomerulonephritis (available data to did not allow to classify these histological findings as de-novo or recurrent IgA glomerulonephritis). Lastly, patients experienced symptomatic reinfection with COVID-19 after primary infection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Early post-COVID-19 follow-up of 25 (78.3%) patients showed that pre- and post-COVID variations of sCr, eGFR and 24-hour proteinuria were not statistically significant in outpatients after resolution of COVID-19. A significantly lower sCr level (P=0.019) and eGFR (P=0.028) were measured after dismission in hospitalized patients. No differences were noted in the level of proteinuria. (Table 3)

Discussion

Numerous reports have alerted the scientific community regarding the unfavorable outcome of COVID-19 in patients with a reduced immune response. [1, 15] The results of this study confirmed that COVID-19 poses KT recipients at high risk of severe consequences. In our cohort of KT recipients, COVID-19 carried a higher rate of symptoms, hospitalization and mortality compared to the general population[16, 17].

We found that in a cohort of 45 KT recipients of 56.1 years with COVID-19, 40% of them developed severe symptoms requiring hospitalization. Overall mortality was 17.8%, higher than the national mortality reported in the general population, which ranges between 0.1-9.2% among countries worldwide and account for about 2% globally[18].

Since IST portends poor outcomes in patients with infections, a new therapeutic strategy was set to reduce the burden of IST in COVID-patients. In the attempt to reconstitute the immune system against SAR-CoV-2 infection, we systematically minimized anti-rejection therapy. All KT recipients, who communicated their COVID-19 positivity, were advised to withdraw at least antimetabolite agents (MFA or AZA). In hospitalized patients, IST was reduced or suspended according to the clinical conditions of the patient. Nevertheless, hospitalization and death rate in the reduced-dose IST group was not dissimilar from full-dose IST group. A potential explanation for this result is that reduction of immunosuppressive therapy was not able to reconstitute an efficient immune response after the long-term burden of IST.

Although IST reduction did not lead to a favorable outcome, it is worth mentioning that the overall mortality estimated in our cohort was tendentially lower than that reported in several monocentric and multicentric studies where this approaching up to 32.5%[19–26]. Our results are in line with the population-based data on 1013 KT recipients affected by COVID-19 collected by French and Spain national registries, which reported a 28-day mortality of 20%[27]. In Brescia (Italy), Bossini et al.[24] reported a higher overall mortality rate among KT recipients (28%) during the first wave of the infection. Similar to our therapeutic strategy, they practiced immunosuppression cessation in all hospitalized patients and introduced or increased the glucocorticoid dose. At first glance, the causes of this different mortality rate are unknown. The different timing of enrollment made the two cohorts not perfectly comparable. The enrollment of all patients of the Brescia cohort during the first wave has probably magnified the risk of side effects of therapeutic regimens administered during the first wave[28, 29] and the challenges to delivering the standard of care in an overwhelmed and unprepared hospital. Lastly, a lower age (56.1 vs 60 years) in our cohort of patients has probably contributed to lead to a better prognosis.

Multivariate analysis showed that the predictors of death were age and time elapsed on IST, in line with previous studies.

Age is widely associate with COVID-19 severity and death in KT recipients[30, 31] as well as the general population [32]. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) claims that 8 out 10 COVID-19 death in the U.S. has been reported in adults aged more 65 years and the risk of hospitalization and death increases enormously with age.[33]

The effect of immunosuppression is still controversial in KT recipients[34]. Immunosuppression is known to dysregulate innate and adaptive immunity, exposing the patients to severe infections. On the other hand, severe COVID-19 infection has been associated with a dysregulated inflammatory response (IL-6, IL-1, and chemokines) leading to ARDS and sepsis. The new insights support a promising role of immunosuppressants in the most severe case on COVID-19 (i.e., tocilizumab, steroid)[35]. In our opinion, the interplay between immunosuppression and pathogenesis of COVID-19 should be contextualized with the stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The high rate of symptomatic disease is probably secondary to the host susceptibility due to immunodepression and the burden of CKD. If the IST is somewhat beneficial to reduce the pro-inflammatory release of cytokines in the second phase of infection, more studies are required to elucidate which molecular pathway is involved.

Lastly, we report a short-term good graft function in survival after COVID-19. These data indicate a stable early graft function (sCr and 24-hour proteinuria) in outpatients COVID-19 who were not hospitalized. Conversely, hospitalized KT recipients had a statistically significant improvement in renal function. As supported by Dacina et al[5] we speculate that lower sCr after the COVID-19 episode was due to the minimization or withdrawn of CNI, a ‘drug holiday’ without apparently dire consequences in terms of graft rejection for 95% of survivors.

Some limitations of the study should be enunciated. It is a retrospective study, with small sample size and a short follow-up after COVID-19. The small number of patients in full- and reduced-dose of IST group may have reduced the probability to observe an underlying difference between these two groups. Furthermore, we cannot exclude that in some cases, reduction of the IST occurred after a short delay from the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, all patients with symptoms or at risk of contagious underwent nasal swab as fast as possible in an ambulatory setting.

In conclusion, reduction of immunosuppression did not reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 or death. Age and time spend on kidney transplantation are independent predictors of death in our patients. Short-term follow-up after COVID-19 showed an excellent graft function in most survivors. Primary infection or vaccination does not exclude the risk of SARS-CoV-2infection in KT recipients.

Conflicts of interest

All the authors have declared no competing interest

Funding

This study was not funded