Abstract
Introduction Early and adequate prenatal care is important for patients to obtain health education, risk reduction, psychosocial support, and necessary medical interventions during the prenatal period. High-quality prenatal care encourages adequate care throughout pregnancy by increasing patients’ desires to return for subsequent visits. This study aims to investigate the prenatal care experiences, desires, and needs of women in Florida.
Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted from April to December 2019 with postpartum women (n=55) who received no or late prenatal care and delivered in [City], Florida. Eligible women completed a survey and a semi-structured interview. The interview contextualized conditions shaping perceptions of the quality of prenatal care. Univariate analysis was conducted on the demographic characteristics and prenatal care locations. Qualitative analysis was performed using MAXQDA software and modified grounded theory. The analysis was based on Donabedian’s quality of care model.
Results The participants self-identified as Hispanic (52%), White (48%), and Black (21%). Sixty-nine percent had Medicaid while 22% were self-pay. In the qualitative analysis, three core themes emerged. Clinical care processes included provision of health education and medical assessments. Structural conditions included language barriers, clinic availability, and ancillary staff presence. Lastly, interpersonal communication included impersonal care and multiple providers. The overarching conclusion from this analysis was the desire for patient-centered care. Participants wanted the care they received to be informative, tailored to their needs, and to work within the realities of their everyday lives.
Discussion Investigating women’s experiences with seeking and receiving prenatal care are necessary to inform future interventions. Fostering a positive and patient-centered healthcare environment is necessary to improve the quality of care.
What is already known on this subject?
Racial and ethnic disparities exist in prenatal care access, utilization and both maternal and infant mortality and morbidity.
Timely and adequate prenatal care is an important determinant for maternal and infant birth outcomes.
What this study adds
This study identified process, structure, and interpersonal factors associated with prenatal care access and utilization from the perspectives of a diverse group of postpartum women.
Specific recommendations for patient-centered prenatal care for diverse women in the context of patient expectations and perceptions of quality are provided.
Introduction
Maternal and infant morbidity and mortality are rising in the United States (US).1 Prenatal care offers an opportunity to screen, diagnose, and address risk factors and medical issues that may arise during pregnancy, with the goal of improving maternal and infant health outcomes. In the US, about 1 in 16 live births (6.2%) were to women who had late or no prenatal care, and about 1 in 7 live births (14.8%) were to women who had inadequate prenatal care.2 Late initiation of prenatal care and inadequate prenatal care have been found to be associated with preterm births, low birth weight, and neonatal mortality.3–5
While there has been a predominant focus on prenatal care adequacy, which consists of the timing of the first prenatal visit and the number of prenatal visits throughout pregnancy, limited research focuses on women’s perceptions of the quality of prenatal care and their preferences for prenatal care.6–12 The quality of prenatal care may be more crucial than prenatal care adequacy, especially to encourage women to participate. Therefore, inclusion of women’s perceptions of the quality of prenatal care they receive and preferences to meet their prenatal care needs, may potentially promote timely initiation and consistent prenatal care with the goal of improving infant and maternal health outcomes. This is particularly important in Florida which has a high number of undocumented women, uninsured women, and lower than average prenatal care initiation and adequacy rates 13,14. In this study, using Donabedian’s model of health care quality,15 we sought to assess how women in Florida perceive the quality of their prenatal care and to identify women’s preferences in prenatal care delivery to meet their needs.
Methods
This study was conducted from April to December 2019 with 55 postpartum women who received late or no prenatal care and delivered at [hospital]. A retrospective mixed-methods study design explored participants’ views on the quality of their prenatal care. Participants completed open-ended surveys followed by semi-structured interviews that contextualized their survey responses to questions on prenatal care in terms of needs and desires. We used MAXQDA 2020 for analysis and codebook development.16 Donabedian’s conceptualization of health care quality15 as modified by Sword,17 informed the thematic analysis of the combined quantitative and qualitative data.
Data Collection
Individuals eligible to participate were women over the age of 18 years who delivered a live-born infant, were able to speak or read either English or Spanish, and did not receive first-trimester prenatal care, defined as care prior to 14 weeks. We employed an identical sampling design whereby the quantitative and qualitative samples are the same.18 A purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit women on-site at the postpartum floor of one hospital from a list of participants whose eligibility was established through an initial EPIC electronic medical record (EMR) chart review.19
A total of 1,687 women were screened for eligibility through the initial chart review in EPIC EMR. Of the 210 individuals who both met the inclusion criteria and agreed to be approached by a member of the research team, 59 consented to participate in the study, and 4 were excluded due to not meeting inclusion criteria after enrollment. All participants signed informed consent to be enrolled in this study, which was approved by the University of [BLINDED] Institutional Review Board. We then implemented data collection as follows: 1) open-ended self-report survey administered to the participants by a member of the research team; 2) semi-structured interviews conducted to elaborate on participants’ meaning behind survey results, and 3) in-depth chart reviews of participants’ pregnancy characteristics. We collected the estimated date of delivery, delivery date, number of prenatal care appointments attended, and date of first prenatal care appointment from EMR chart reviews. Chart review data and survey responses were uploaded to Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap).20 To understand participants’ perceptions of the quality of prenatal care received, participant characteristics and corresponding interview data were combined and coded using MAXQDA 2020 analytical software.16 Each participant received a $25 Wal-Mart gift card as compensation for participation.
Open-Ended Surveys
Open-ended surveys, administered in English or Spanish, included: 1) demographic questions about age, race, ethnicity, nativity, acculturation (Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics),21 marital status, income, education level, parity, insurance type (before, during, and after pregnancy), and substance abuse during pregnancy; 2) pregnancy characteristics, clinic conditions and communication dynamics; and 3) an in-depth examination of the likes and dislikes related to prenatal care, and potential changes in prenatal care experience.
Interviews
Participants were asked a series of questions relating to their perception of their prenatal care experience (Table 1). Open-ended semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded by a member of the research team upon survey completion. Confidentiality concerns were addressed before initiating audio-recordings and participants were asked to refrain from using their names during the interview and told about the de-identification process.19 Almost all the participants consented to have their interviews audio-recorded (n=51). Three participants (i.e., ID 15, ID 55, and ID 58) declined audio-recording and detailed handwritten notes were taken during interviews.
Quantitative Analysis
All chart review and survey data were entered into Redcap and analyzed with STATA (version 16). Sociodemographic variables were re-coded to facilitate univariate analysis of demographic characteristics. We conducted univariate analyses to examine sociodemographic characteristics of participants, and the prevalence of health, pregnancy, and health care measures in this population.
Study variable manipulation
The following variables were re-coded to facilitate analysis: the substance abuse variable from the chart review; and, self-reported survey and interview data were collapsed into a variable that measures how many participants used any substances during pregnancy. The variables for nativity and ethnicity were collapsed and re-coded as yes/no to foreign-born (country of birth that is not the US or Puerto Rico). Years spent in school were re-coded and collapsed into categorical values: 1) some high school or less (0-11 years in school), 2) high school (12 years in school), 3) some college (13-15 years in school), and 4) college or higher education (≥ 16 years in school).
Spanish language interviews were translated directly from the Spanish recordings to English transcripts. These transcripts were then checked for accuracy by a native Spanish-speaking research assistant.
Qualitative Analysis
All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service and potential identifiers were removed. During the first review, emergent codes were identified and then collapsed into subthemes. We used MAXQDA 2020 to support thematic coding. We drew on components of modified grounded theory (mGT) to identify key text segments using priori and in-vivo codes to develop a coding scheme 22–24. The code definitions were grounded in Donabedian’s evaluation of the quality of care15 as modified by Sword17 regarding how women view their prenatal care experience in terms of the structural conditions, clinical processes, and health outcomes they were subjected to while seeking or navigating clinic visits. We recorded analytic and structural memos to develop a codebook grounded in the theoretical framework.24 During later stages of this phase, earlier transcripts were reexamined for new codes, and the codebook was updated accordingly. Theoretical saturation was achieved in the analysis.
Validation strategy
Credibility for this study was achieved using the validation strategies of triangulation and peer debriefing.19 Data were triangulated between chart reviews, surveys, interviews, and field notes. Additionally, about a fifth (n = 10) of the transcripts were independently coded by another research team member to ensure reliability. Comparison of the inter-coder agreement computed for the first ten interviews was 92%. Coding discrepancies were identified and discussed to achieve consensus on the final codebook.
Results
A total of fifty-five women took part in the study of mothers who had late or no prenatal care (n = 5; 9%) before delivering at [Hopsital]. Women were, on average, 29 years old (SD = 6.03) (Table 2). Most women preferred to communicate in English (n = 43; 78%); were born in the United States or Puerto Rico (n = 36; 67%); identified as White (n = 25; 45%), considered themselves Hispanic/Latinx (n = 28; 51%); and had a high school education or less (n = 38; 69%). Among those who affirmed “yes” to a Hispanic/Latinx heritage, most respondents self-identified as Mexican or of Mexican descent (43%). Moreover, twenty-two women were born outside the U.S. or Puerto Rico. Of the thirteen respondents who took the survey in Spanish, all used Spanish to speak, write, think, and interact with family and friends. On average, participants had their first prenatal care appointment 19 weeks (SD = 6.31) into their pregnancy; and went to eight prenatal care appointments (SD = 3.3). Although 22 women (41%) had no insurance a month before confirming their pregnancy status, 37 (67%) had Medicaid during delivery (Table 2). In this study, the most often used substance during pregnancy was marijuana (n = 12; 22%).
Themes
Table 4 summarizes the main themes and sub-themes drawn from Donabedian’s model of quality of care15 as modified by Sword.17 Structure of care (at the clinic level), clinical care processes, and interpersonal communication were the three overarching themes that emerged from the data. In presenting the findings, we used supporting quotes to illustrate the patient’s perspectives in Table 4 represented by (theme acronym, quote #).
Structure of Care
Structural conditions frame environments of care, which in turn influence how individuals perceive access to and quality of the care available to them. The relevant sub-theme included attitudes to clinic availability.
Clinic availability
The sub-theme of clinic availability encompasses attitudes and lingering desires among women who could not schedule their first prenatal care visit earlier in their pregnancy or subsequent prenatal visits. Most participants complained of long wait times to be scheduled for their first and subsequent prenatal visits because clinics were fully booked, and this was attributed to several factors. Particularly, Black, and Hispanic women reported limited and inconvenient clinic hours that were not compatible with their schedule, and the unavailability of preferred providers or clinics when they wanted to schedule their appointments (SC1). However, based on the perceived quality of care and rapport with doctors, most of these participants opted to wait until their desired clinic became available. Additionally, Black and Hispanic women experienced difficulties navigating who to talk to about and how to schedule an appointment (SC2). The time taken to receive Medicaid and the acceptance of Medicaid by providers was also associated with delays in scheduling the first prenatal appointment especially for Hispanic participants and an Asian participant (SC3). Furthermore, a White participant attributed the requirement of the clinic that her pregnancy be confirmed before scheduling her first prenatal visit to be the cause of her delay in prenatal care (SC4). Overall, participants reported long wait times experienced during prenatal visits as a negative experience of prenatal care.
Clinical Care Processes
Clinical care processes refer to the application of medical knowledge and clinical procedures implied in the provision of care.15 Relevant sub-themes within clinical care are 1) screening and medical assessments, and 2) health education concerns. Interviews prompted discussions on attitudes and lingering desires for health promotion, information sharing, clinical testing, and medical assessments expected during prenatal care.
Screening and medical assessments
This sub-theme frames attitudes towards screening tests and health assessments, and lingering concerns about the types of knowledge and health assessments available to pregnant women resulting in later prenatal care. Overall, participants across all races desired to know the health status of their baby and themselves during pregnancy through screenings and medical assessments. Participants reported that awareness of their baby’s health status was mainly by hearing the baby’s heartbeat and having several ultrasounds done throughout the pregnancy, attributing this to quality of prenatal care (CCP1). However, some women reported only hearing their baby’s heartbeat but not receiving what they regarded as sufficient ultrasounds to ensure the health of their baby (CCP2). Perceived barriers to receiving these ultrasounds were described by White participants as being a result of lacking health insurance and being scheduled for tests and ultrasounds separately from regular prenatal appointments. Similarly, blood draws though understood to be necessary, were of concern to White participants, who complained that they were uncomfortable, and results were not discussed in a timely manner. The ability to address maternal health issues and fears were expressed by participants across all races. For example, an Asian participant discussed how her elevated blood pressure was mismanaged, while another White participant expressed how her fears related to past drug use and mental health issues were not addressed appropriately (CCP3). On the other hand, the availability of prescribed medication at the clinic where prenatal care was being received was of importance to minority participants, (CCP4).
Health education concerns
Transparency and information on treatments and services during prenatal care appointments improve perceptions of approachability to health care services during pregnancy.25 Generally, all participants valued and desired health information. Health information concerns were related to pregnancy, prenatal care, Medicaid, and access to health services. Some participants reported receiving desired information and having concerns related to pregnancy addressed. For example, a multiracial participant who was diagnosed with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia during prenatal screening found her providers helpful in educating her about her diagnosis, medication, and depression associated with her illness (CCP5). However, despite some participants’ positive experiences with receiving information on their health and available services, participants across racial groups felt uninformed about the clinical care processes. For instance, participants desired more information about disease risk factors, medication risks in pregnancy, nutritional information, services offered, and desired for information to be delivered in a clear manner (CCP6). Participants also preferred to have access to information earlier and did not like receiving repetitive information at each visit (CCP7). Although some minority women relied on Medicaid as a source of information for health and services, some had difficulty comprehending Medicaid benefits and coverage (CCP8).
Interpersonal Communications
Interpersonal communication dynamics reflect negative and positive interactions with providers that encourage or discourage participants in seeking or staying in prenatal care.
Impersonal care
Impersonal care encompassed the negative interactions and relationships encountered with healthcare providers when receiving prenatal care. Provider professionalism and lack of continuity of care with the same provider were related to quality of prenatal care. Lack of provider professionalism described as the provider being rude (IC1), dismissive, or being judgmental was reported by participants across all races, except by Black participants. For example, a White participant felt judged by staff at several clinics regarding her pregnancy situation, thereby affecting how she viewed the quality of prenatal care she received (IC2). Also related to provider professionalism was the desire by minority participants to not feel rushed or juggled around during their prenatal visits (IC3).
An emphasis on the lack of continuity of prenatal care providers was perceived negatively towards quality of prenatal care. Participants across all races valued seeing the same provider at each prenatal visit and attributed one-on-one doctor-patient visits as more personal, relating this to building trust and rapport with their provider (IC4).
Positive relationship dynamics
Positive relationships include efforts to promote health and knowledge sharing in a positive and welcoming environment. Generally, participants reported that providers and staff being nice, friendly, and supportive fostered a positive environment for prenatal care. For a Black participant this positive environment encouraged her adherence to prenatal care visits (IC5). Likewise, providers who were considered understanding and shared needed information in a comprehensible manner were valued by participants receiving prenatal care (IC6). However, Hispanic women perceived themselves as having a more positive relationship dynamic with nurses compared to doctors because nurses were deemed more helpful and understanding (IC7a). Similarly, this sentiment was also shared by a White participant (IC7b). As described by a Black participant, a history of building a relationship with a provider from prior pregnancy prenatal visits reinforced continued positive relationship dynamics with the same provider (IC8).
Language barriers
Language barriers (in this case Spanish) hinder one’s ability to understand the information shared. The language barriers sub-theme encompassed language-related issues in obtaining prenatal care through communication with providers and clinical staff. Some Spanish-speaking participants had difficulty communicating with clinic staff in English (IC9), while for some it was not an issue because clinic staff spoke Spanish. Equally important, language barriers might also contribute to confusion and miscommunication of health information for women seeking prenatal care (IC10).
Synthesis of Findings
After synthesizing the responses, the overarching conclusion from this analysis was the desire for patient-centered care. Patient-centered care is care which is consistent with the values and preferences of patients and includes shared decision making between the provider and patient (Figure 1).26,27 Participants wanted the care they received to be informative, tailored to their needs, and work within the realities of their everyday lives. When care was instead focused on the needs of the healthcare system instead of the patients, the quality of care suffered. For example, rigid clinic schedules and long wait times due to limitations imposed by the healthcare system did not meet the needs of the patients and was not patient-centered care. When a participant found a provider who took time to explain their care plan and focus on their emotional needs, the care was considered high quality. Not having access to providers who could speak Spanish or interpreters interfered with patients’ understanding of care and communication. Interpersonal dynamics were an important feature called out by patients, which may be even more critical for women of color.
Discussion
Using Donabedian’s model of health care quality,15 we sought to assess how women in Florida perceive the quality of their prenatal care and to identify women’s preferences in prenatal care. We found that women wanted care which included screening and medical assessments, provided health education, included easy clinic access, and was offered their native language with providers who were personal and supportive. These elements align with the framework of patient-centered care.26,27
Compared to research by Sword in Canada,17 our participants wanted similar elements in prenatal care. Both populations desired providers that interacted with them with a respectful attitude, took the time to talk with them and did not rush through the visit, and provided emotional support. Both populations also valued sharing of health information, screenings and assessments, and continuity of care. Unlike in the research by Sword et.al, our participants noted more issues with scheduling such as long wait times for appointments and for being seen once in clinic, which may be related to the different healthcare delivery systems in each study. We also noted several issues with access; those themes and analysis are presented more fully in a separate paper.28 Due to our diverse sample, we also found that language barriers for Spanish-speakers were an important element to effective prenatal care.
This research provides new elements for further improvement in prenatal care and modifiable factors in the clinical setting. We noted many areas for quality improvement in the provision of prenatal care which could be incorporated into new models of prenatal care or improve existing models. For example, the predominant model of care, individual prenatal care, could be improved through promoting interpersonal care, relationship building and modifying scheduling to allow for provider continuity. Additionally, adding after-hour clinical appointments or more flexible appointment scheduling could improve care and increase uptake of prenatal care visits. Women of color experienced particular issues with competing life demands that precluded fitting with clinic times, but health education concerns were experienced more evenly across groups.
These elements of quality prenatal care also create patient-oriented outcomes for new models of prenatal care such as virtual prenatal care, group prenatal care or enhanced prenatal care models. Overall, while some Black and Hispanic participants may have reported different issues than White, our findings are not generalizable. As such, further research is needed to delve deeper into each of these elements to determine measurable outcomes, but ensuring that future evaluations of models of care include patient-centered outcomes will allow for improved quality of care and prenatal care that women want to access and utilize during their pregnancy. It is also imperative that we better understand if specific needs of women of color are different from those of white women beyond the overt such as language. For example, cultural nuances of beliefs related to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes may need to be incorporated once understood in more detail, however, these were not identified in our study. These patient-oriented outcomes can be combined with the research by Peahl,10 on patient preferences for prenatal care delivery to develop enhanced models of prenatal care that are patient-centered.
Our study included several strengths and weaknesses. Participants were very diverse and included non-English speakers. As many models of care and studies on prenatal care have excluded non-English speakers,10,29,30 we sought to include these women and other low-income women of color as these subgroups have the highest maternal mortality in the United States.31 Limitations include recall bias and a single-site design. As we approached women postpartum, we relied on their recall of their prenatal care experiences. Our sample was from one, large tertiary care hospital. We acknowledge that women in different communities may have different preferences for prenatal care, and all models and methods of prenatal care must be tailored to each community.
Conclusions
In our study, perceptions and expectations of quality prenatal care were aligned with the constructs of patient-centered organizational structures, clinical care, and interpersonal communication. The assessment of barriers to unique specific minority groups should be extended to better understand cultural nuances and avoid stereotyping women seeking prenatal care. To improve early and sufficient access to prenatal care for diverse patients, providers and organizations should attend to the ease in which patients access care appointments, align the services provided during the visit in the context of patient expectations, and practice effective interpersonal communication and relationship-building.
Data Availability
Data Use Agreement with the University of South Florida is required for data access.
Footnotes
↵* co-1st authors
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Precis: Timely and adequate prenatal care is an important determinant for maternal and infant birth outcomes. Patients desire patient-centered care consistent with their values and preferences.
