Abstract
As the COVID-19 vaccination campaign unfolds as one of the most rapid and widespread in history,it is important to continuously assess the real world safety of the FDA-authorized vaccines. Curation from large-scale electronic health records (EHRs) allows for near real-time safety evaluations that were not previously possible. Here, we advance context- and sentiment-aware deep neural networks over the multi-state Mayo Clinic enterprise (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin) for automatically curating the adverse effects mentioned by physicians in over 108,000 EHR clinical notes between December 1st 2020 to February 8th 2021. We retrospectively compared the clinical notes of 31,069 individuals who received at least one dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna vaccine to those of 31,069 unvaccinated individuals who were propensity matched by demographics, residential location, and history of prior SARS-CoV-2 testing. We find that vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals were seen in the the clinic at similar rates within 21 days of the first or second actual or assigned vaccination dose (first dose Odds Ratio = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.09-1.16; second dose Odds Ratio = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93). Further, the incidence rates of all surveyed adverse effects were similar or lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals after either vaccine dose. Finally, the most frequently documented adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose were fatigue (Dose 1: 1.77%, Dose 2: 1.2%),nausea (Dose 1: 1.05%, Dose 2: 0.84%), myalgia (Dose 1: 0.67%; Dose 2: 0.66%), diarrhea (Dose 1: 0.67%; Dose 2: 0.46%), arthralgia (Dose 1: 0.64%; Dose 2: 0.57%), erythema (Dose 1: 0.59%; Dose 2: 0.46%), vomiting (Dose 1: 0.45%, Dose 2: 0.29%) and fever (Dose 1: 0.29%; Dose 2: 0.23%). These remarkably low frequencies of adverse effects recorded in EHRs versus those derived from active solicitation during clinical trials (arthralgia: 24-46%; erythema: 9.5-14.7%; myalgia: 38-62%; fever: 14.2-15.5%) emphasize the rarity of vaccine-associated adverse effects requiring clinical attention. This rapid and timely analysis of vaccine-related adverse effects from contextually rich EHR notes of 62,138 individuals, which was enabled through a large scale Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered platform, reaffirms the safety and tolerability of the FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines in practice.
Competing Interest Statement
RM, PL, ES, AP, SA, CP, VA, AJV, PA, AR, CC, KC, DD, NK, ER, GB, AM, TW, and VS are employees of nference and have financial interests in the company and in the successful application of this research. JCO receives personal fees from Elsevier and Bates College, and receives small grants from nference, Inc, outside the submitted work. ADB is a consultant for Abbvie, is on scientific advisory boards for nference and Zentalis, and is founder and President of Splissen therapeutics. JH, JCO, GJG, AWW, AV, MDS, and ADB are employees of the Mayo Clinic. The Mayo Clinic may stand to gain financially from the successful outcome of the research. This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
Funding Statement
No external funding was used for this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a retrospective study of individuals who underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Mayo Clinic and hospitals affiliated with the Mayo Clinic Health System. This study was reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB) and determined to be exempt from the requirement for IRB approval (45 CFR 46.104d, category 4). Subjects were excluded if they did not have a research authorization on file.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵+ Joint first authors
(1) Regarding vaccinated HCPs likely reporting side effects to OHS or other institutional COVID-19 response lines, we have added this point as a study limitations paragraph in the Discussion. (2) Regarding the rates of ED visits, we have added new Tables S2-S5, which summarize the number of ED notes and the number of patients contributing ED notes in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts, during the defined time intervals after the first and second actual or assigned vaccine administration dates. The vaccinated cohort is seen at similar or lower frequencies in the ED (compared to unvaccinated), which should provide encouragement to those hesitant to receive a vaccine due to the risk of emergent medical events. This message is now incorporated into the Results and Discussion sections. (3) Regarding the comparisons to side effect rates in V-safe, we have now introduced V-safe in the Introduction, and contextualize our data in light of V-safe observations in the Discussion. We have highlighted the fact that V-safe is a voluntary program among vaccinated individuals, and those enrolling to participate actually receive frequent (daily for the first 7 days) surveys to document their side effects. In this way, V-safe is more reminiscent of the solicited adverse effects in trials. However, we have also pointed out that V-safe itself is going to be an invaluable resource as it will collect clinical trial-quality data across a larger and more diverse population than was studied in the Phase 1/2 and Phase 3 trials.
Data Availability
After publication, the data will be made available upon reasonable requests to the corresponding author. A proposal with detailed description of study objectives and the statistical analysis plan will be needed for evaluation of the reasonability of requests. Deidentified data will be provided after approval from the corresponding author and the Mayo Clinic.