Workplace measures against COVID-19 during the winter third wave in Japan: company size-based differences

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 that is easily transmitted between persons; therefore, infection prevention and control in the workplace are of major concern.¹ A previous study in Japan reported that most companies had taken individual-level precautions, such as hand washing and cough etiquette, but lagged behind in terms of organizational-level initiatives such as remote working and staggered commuting, especially in micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), because of limited resources to respond to COVID-19.² However, this previous study was conducted in mid-March 2020 during the early stages of the epidemic, and the current situation may differ.

A state of emergency was first declared in some areas of Japan on April 7, 2020; this declaration was later extended to the entire country until May 25, 2020.³ Although Japan did not impose a mandatory lockdown, many companies followed the voluntary-basis request from the government during the period, which included temporary closures and restrictions on business.⁴ One reason for the relatively low COVID-19 infection rate in Japan may be the corporate infection control efforts in the workplace.⁵ However, little is known about the current situation regarding workplace measures in Japan after the first state of emergency declaration, especially in MSMEs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the current situation of measures against COVID-19 in Japanese enterprises, taking company size into account. The findings will offer evidence on good practice for balancing business and infection control. The results will be useful for both countries and workplaces struggling during the pandemic.

Subjects and Methods

Results

Of the 27,036 participants, approximately half were men (51.1%) and around half engaged in desk work (49.8%) (Table 1). Regarding company size, 22.8% of the participants worked at micro-scale companies, 16.2% worked at small-scale companies, 35.9% worked at medium-scale companies, and 25.1% worked at large-scale companies.

Table 2 displays the number and percentage of respondents reporting each workplace measure against COVID-19 by company size. For all company sizes, the most prevalent workplace measure was encouraging mask wearing at work, followed by requesting that employees refrain from going to work when ill and restricting work-related social gatherings and entertainment. These measures were implemented by approximately 90% of large-scale enterprises and by more than 40% of micro-scale enterprises. In contrast, encouraging remote working and restricting eating and drinking at personal workspaces were implemented by less than half of large-scale enterprises and by around 15% of micro- and small-scale enterprises. There were statistically significant differences in all 10 workplace measures across companies of different sizes (all p-values < .001).

Discussion

The current study provides an overview of workplace measures against COVID-19 during the winter third wave in Japan, taking company size into account. We found that, especially in large-scale enterprises, various responses to COVID-19 had already been taken at workplaces, including encouraging mask wearing at work, requesting that employees refrain from going to work when ill, and restricting work-related social gatherings and entertainment. Our results are similar to those reported in a previous study on workplace measures conducted in mid-March 2020 (encouraging mask wearing at work: 80.2%; requesting that employees refrain from going to work when ill: 76.4%).² These measures align with recommendations of the national campaign during the first state of emergency period, which included avoiding “the 3Cs” (closed spaces, crowded places, and close-contact settings).³ Thus, these types of workplace measures have been implemented since the early stage of the epidemic.

Another remarkable finding of this study is that smaller enterprises were less likely to have implemented workplace measures against COVID-19. The finding is consistent with a previous study conducted in mid-March 2020.² This finding therefore indicates that MSMEs did not make much progress in terms of measures against COVID-19 since the first state of emergency declaration. One possible reason for this lack of progress is that MSMEs often face difficulty in implementing occupational health activities because of a lack of financial, human capital, and technological resources.⁹ In Japan, the requirements for occupational health staff members depend on the number of employees in a workplace: ≥ 1,000 employees—a full-time occupational physician, 50–999 employees—a part-time occupational physician, ≥ 50 employees—a health officer, and 10–49 employees—a health promoter.¹⁰ Therefore, the results of the present study may be attributed to the difference in occupational health staff members by company size. This finding suggests that occupational health support from external resources is urgently needed for MSMEs. For example, the development of simple tools for infection prevention, mechanisms for external occupational health experts to offer advice, and financial support for workplace measures can be considered.

Some measures, such as remote working and restrictions on eating and drinking at personal workspaces, had still not been implemented by the majority of companies—even large-scale enterprises. Few studies have investigated the proportion of companies imposing restrictions on eating and drinking at personal workspaces, but the implementation of remote working has not changed much, compared with the results of previous studies conducted around the first state of emergency period.^{2, 4} The finding suggests potential obstacles to promoting remote working, such as cultural barriers and administrative difficulties.¹¹ Cultural barriers may exist for both employers and employees.

For example, employers may excessively demand that work to be carried out on site, and workers are willing to work at the office.¹² Interestingly, the current study found that the frequency of encouraging remote work was lower in workplaces with 10–49 employees (14.9%) than in workplaces with nine or fewer employees (21.3%). We considered the possibility that administrative difficulties might be more likely to occur in small-scale enterprises than in micro-scale enterprises. However, remote working is effective not only during a pandemic but also during large earthquakes and other disasters.¹³ In terms of business continuity, future research is warranted on the further expansion of remote working, especially in small-scale enterprises.

This study has several limitations. First, the current study did not use random sampling or collect data from all companies. Consequently, the sample may not represent the national situation, and any generalization of the results should be carried out with care. For example, there is a risk of overestimation if multiple study participants were from the same organization. To cope with these problems, the current study was conducted using cluster sampling with stratification by sex, age, region, and job type. Second, the current study did not evaluate all types of workplace measures; for instance, information dissemination and actions for confirmed COVID-19 cases were not considered. However, because we focused on preventive measures listed in guidelines and relevant publications in Japan,^{2, 7, 8} we believe that these items reflect the current situation of measures against COVID-19 at each company.

In conclusion, this study revealed the current situation regarding workplace measures against COVID-19 in Japan. We found that various responses to COVID-19 have been implemented at workplaces. However, some measures, including remote working, were still not well implemented, especially in relatively small enterprises. The findings suggest that occupational health support for MSMEs is urgently needed to mitigate the current wave of COVID-19.

Disclosure