Abstract
Background We aimed at minimizing loss of lives in the Covid-19 pandemic in the USA by identifying optimal vaccination strategies during a 100-day period. While lethality is highest in the elderly, transmission and case numbers are highest in the young. Due to limited vaccine availability, a strategy of first vaccinating the elderly is widely used. Vaccines elicit enhanced immune responses in younger persons compared to the elderly, but even in the latter, mRNA vaccines are effective, implying that in the young, lower vaccine doses might suffice for protection, thereby increasing the number of persons that can be vaccinated.
Methods Using published immunogenicity data of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, we examined the value of tailored-dose vaccination strategies, using a modeling approach that incorporates age-related vaccine immunogenicity, social contact patterns, population structure, Covid-19 case and death rates in the U.S. in late January 2021. Reduced dose vaccination in the young multiplies the number of individuals vaccinated early.
Results Age-tailored dosing strategies led to faster case reduction and thereby shortened the pandemic, reducing the delay to reaching <100’000 cases/day from 64 to 30 days and avoiding 25’000 deaths within 100 days in the USA. While regular vaccination of the elderly can continue, the main protection of the elderly resulted from stopping the pandemic by vaccinating a large number of young persons by age-adapted dosing.
Conclusion Rapid reduction of Covid-19 case and death rate in the U.S. can be best achieved by using highly effective vaccines in an age-tailored dosing regimen. Protecting the vulnerable is most effectively achieved by dose tailored vaccination of all population segments, while an “elderly first” approach costs more lives, even in the elderly.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Self-funded study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
According the Ethical Committee of Northwestern Switzerland, this type of study, a computer modeling study, requires no ethical committee approval.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be available after publication in journal, or according to specific discussion with the author.