Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines

Dan-Yu Lin, Donglin Zeng, Peter B. Gilbert
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249779
Dan-Yu Lin
1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lin@bios.unc.edu
Donglin Zeng
1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter B. Gilbert
2Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutch, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Large-scale deployment of safe and durably effective vaccines can halt the COVID-19 pandemic.1–3 However, the high vaccine efficacy reported by ongoing phase 3 placebo-controlled clinical trials is based on a median follow-up time of only about two months4–5 and thus does not pertain to long-term efficacy. To evaluate the duration of protection while allowing trial participants timely access to efficacious vaccine, investigators can sequentially cross placebo recipients to the vaccine arm according to priority groups. Here, we show how to estimate potentially time-varying placebo-controlled vaccine efficacy in this type of staggered vaccination of placebo recipients. In addition, we compare the performance of blinded and unblinded crossover designs in estimating long-term vaccine efficacy.

Summary We show how to estimate potentially waning long-term efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with staggered enrollment of participants and sequential crossover of placebo recipients.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

N/A

Funding Statement

National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI029168, R01 GM124104, and UM1 AI068635.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Added an example in the Results section. Added a description of estimating vaccine efficacy at a specific time point in Supplemental Appendix 1.

Data Availability

N/A

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 21, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines
Dan-Yu Lin, Donglin Zeng, Peter B. Gilbert
medRxiv 2021.01.13.21249779; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249779
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines
Dan-Yu Lin, Donglin Zeng, Peter B. Gilbert
medRxiv 2021.01.13.21249779; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249779

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (49)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
  • Epidemiology (5216)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (194)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (750)
  • Geriatric Medicine (77)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (694)
  • Health Policy (352)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (98)
  • HIV/AIDS (162)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5816)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
  • Medical Education (102)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (758)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (475)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (93)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (139)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (854)
  • Public and Global Health (1993)
  • Radiology and Imaging (344)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (157)
  • Respiratory Medicine (283)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (75)
  • Surgery (108)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)