Abstract
In recent months, despite being aware of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries faced increasing epidemic of this disease. Nearly all countries tried to decrease human-to-human contact as the principal mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Other modes of transmission also need to be clarified in more depth, especially, the foodborne transmission (FBT). We assessed the effect of animal origin foods (AOF) consumption on the pandemic of COVID-19. For this purpose, we studied the relationship among 20 food supply as independent variables, and the parameter of Total Cases (TC) as dependent variable. The statistical analyses included parametric, non-parametric, frequentist, and Bayesian methods. Results showed a relationship between a group of AOF and TC. So, the role of FBT of COVID-19 should be more significant than previously thought. The possibility of Animal Origin Foodborne Transmission should be taken into more consideration. The perspective is to expand the surveillance of SARS-Cov-2 during the food production chain.
Introduction
At the time of writing this manuscript, the number of TC of COVID-19 past seven-million mark. During the pandemic, most countries around the world minimized human-to-human contact and travels (1). However, the prevalence of COVID-19 continued. Despite the awareness of many countries about the principal mode of person-to-person transmission, the rapid outbreak shows the necessity of research on other transmission routes. In Italy and the USA, for example, the chances of being surprised were low, but both countries faced epidemic dramatically. Among the various routes of transmission, FBT is most likely. We suppose the role of FBT of COVID-19 should be more significant than previously thought. Transmission of MERS, a similar pathogenic virus to SARS-Cov-2, through food has strengthened our hypothesis.
Furthermore, some researchers cited the possibility of FBT for SARS-Cov-2 (2-8). Also, FAO/WHO experts mentioned the data gap in the relationship between viruses and FB disease (9). The motivation for the present study is to find the relationship between COVID_19 and human food consumption patterns.
Finding the relevance of COVID-19 pandemics with food consumption patterns
Material and methods are included in supplementary materials.
We assessed a relationship between the consumption of some foods and TC. Accordingly, we studied TC as a dependent variable and 20 food supply data as independent variables. The statistical methods included correlation, stepwise and LASSO regression, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Bayes analysis. Food supply (kg/capita/yr) was quantity in each country. The primary purpose of the study was to find effect of AOF on TC, however, we considered six plant origin foods for comparison. Histogram of the variables, and their logarithmic transformation are presented in figs. S1 and S2. Diagnostics panels and selection criteria of regression models are presented in fig. S3-S5. The scree plot of PCA is shown in fig. S6. Visual examination of the trace plot in Bayesian analysis is shown in fig S8. Adjusted R-square and Geweke diagnostics of fitted models are presented in Tables S1 and S2, respectively.
Furthermore, the relationship between TC and animal production in each country was estimated using the same statistical methods.
Results and Discussion
Food consumption
Table 1 shows descriptive statistics of studied variables. Results of PCA show that AOF and TC are mostly grouped (Fig. 1 and fig. S7). The highest positive Pearson correlation with TC belongs to eggs. Stepwise Regression, Bayes, and Lasso results showed that eggs and fresh fish have positive coefficient. With our results in Table 2, implying the need for tracing of SARS-COV-2 in some AOF. Bayes results, e.g., show there is a 0.99 probability of a positive correlation between eggs and TC, adjusted for the other covariates. The number of AOF and their role in our results varies depending on the type of statistical method used, but all results are consistent.
The effect of a group of AOF on TC was significant in our analysis. So, we suppose a noticeable effect of AOF in FBT. At present, we are not able to interpret all significant effects and their coefficients. Interpretation of the factors could be the subject of future researches. The transmission of coronaviruses through food has been reported (8). Lake and Kingsbury (8) provided a review about potential for FBT of COVID-19, but they could not guarantee the application of the data found on other coronaviruses to SARS-CoV-2. The persistence of viruses by refrigeration temperature (WHO /FAO 2008) might be an explanation of the relationship between COVID-19 and AOF. The viral persistence of coronavirus in soft cheese (10) and raw milk (11) has been reported. We don’t know what’s going on from “Farm to Fork” about AOF. For example, SARS-CoV-2 may be more resistant to heat when cooking, as it is observed for poliovirus in beef (12). It is recommended not to consume raw or undercooked animal products (13). Kitchen utensils can transmit the virus among foods (14), accordingly, AOF may be a suitable vehicle, and the virus inside them will survive better and longer. The human pathogenic virus, such as Enterovirus, can survive in honey (14), so it is imaginable similarly for SARS-CoV-2. Honey bees deposit viruses on flowers (15). Maori (16) showed horizontal RNA flow among honey bees by the ingestion of royal jelly. Trade in raw honey bee products could pose pandemic risks for pathogen viruses of honey bees (17). The pessimist hypothesis would be the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by raw honey.
Furthermore, the methods of diagnosing the virus in food are not complete, and there are many limitations (18). In food science technology, the primary attention paid to bivalve moullouses. Nowadays, it is necessary to expand the detection of viruses to all AOF.
WHO’s recommendations state that COVID_19 have not FBT, and suitable food safety practices could prevent the probability of FBT. However, the realization of proper food safety practices for all AOF is questionable.
Animal production
The highest pair-wise Pearson correlations between the number of livestock and TC belong to poultry (0.71), turkeys (0.68), pigs (0.62), horses (0.59), and beehives (0.57) with P-value of (<0.0001) for all of them. The chosen variables in Bayesian analysis were the number of chicken, turkeys, pigs, and goats, and in Lasso analysis they were the number of chickens, pigs, and turkeys. The observed positive correlation between the number of beehives and TC should be explained by circulating viruses between animal and human. As, some zoonotic viruses first circulate in animals, and sometimes they infect humans. After that, they adapt to humans. Kujawski et al., (19) supported a recent zoonotic transmission event of SARS-CoV-2. It is crucial to characterize circulating viruses in the human working environment, especially where an interface with wildlife (20). Spread of influenza virus during commercial movement of eggs is reported by Pillai (21). Poultry production in the extensive system increases the chance of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among other species (22). Feathers detached from domestic ducks reported as a source of environmental contamination to pathogenic avian influenza virus (23). Qui et al (24) identified pigs, cows, goats, and sheep among the most likely intermediate animal hosts for SARS-CoV-2. The outbreak of COVID-19 highlights viral spillover from animals (25). There is the potential for the emergence of new coronavirus diseases in domestic birds, from both avian and mammalian sources. For example, a novel species of coronaviridae family has been identified recently (26). Coronaviridae’s family viruses are likely can cross the species barrier of viruses and infect other species, fishes, cattle, pigs, and humans (27).
In conclusion, despite the awareness and readiness of many countries for COVID-19 during early 2020, why did it spread so quickly? It seems FBT has received less attention relative to other routes. There is need to invent a pasteurization-like-processes to implicate immediately before ingestion of food. Of course, there will be challenges along the way of the revolution in the food preparation culture. The perspective is to expand the surveillance of SARS-Cov-2 during the food production chain.
Data Availability
The code including data used for our analyses is publicly available https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342047913_Corr_food_7
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QA
Author contributions
Conceptualization and Visualisation: N. S. K., Methodology: S. A. R. Writing: Both authors.
Funding
this project is supported by a research grant of the University of Tabriz (number S/856-6/3/97). Data and materials availability: All data are available in the manuscript or the supplementary materials. The code used for our analyses is publicly available at ().
SUPPLEMANTARY MATERIALS
Material and methods
Figs s1-s8
References (31-45)
Codes are provided in Auxiliary materials.