Comparison of Mental Health Symptoms Prior to and During COVID-19 among Patients with Systemic Sclerosis from Four Countries: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has caused more than 400,000 deaths and has had devastating health, social, political, and economic consequences worldwide. There are expected to be serious mental health implications during and beyond the initial outbreak, but their degree and nature are not well understood.^1-2

Many cross-sectional studies report percentages of participants above cutoff thresholds on mental health symptom questionnaires during COVID-19. Such percentages, however, vary substantially across otherwise similar populations even in normal times.³ Furthermore, they tend to dramatically overestimate prevalence obtained from validated methods, and there is too much heterogeneity to correct for differences statistically.^4,5 Thus, studies that directly evaluate changes are needed.

Based on a living systematic review,^3,6 as of June 13, 2020, only 5 studies had compared mental health prior to and during COVID-19. Four studies of university students suggest small increases in depression but minimal or no increases in anxiety. A United Kingdom general population study found small increases in general mental health symptoms but did not differentiate between anxiety and depression symptoms. No studies have evaluated mental health changes among people at risk of COVID-19 complications due to pre-existing medical conditions. Furthermore, despite important differences in pandemic responses across countries, no studies have compared mental health changes between countries.

People with the autoimmune disease systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) are representative of patients with pre-existing medical conditions that put them at risk during COVID-19. More than 40% have interstitial lung disease, many are frail, and use of immunosuppressant drugs is common.^7,8 The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort routinely collects mental health outcomes at 3-to 6-month intervals.^8-10 The SPIN COVID-19 Cohort was initiated to collect data during COVID-19 and allows comparison of mental health symptoms prior to and during COVID-19 for participants enrolled in both cohorts.

Our objective was to compare anxiety (PROMIS Anxiety 4a v1.0 scale^11,12) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8 [PHQ-8]¹³) symptoms before and after onset of COVID-19 among people with SSc, including (1) continuous score changes; (2) proportion with change scores of at least one minimal clinically important difference (MCID); (3) proportion initially under a cutoff threshold who changed by at least 1 MCID and reached the threshold; and (4) factors associated with changes, including country, comparing results from Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal study that linked pre-COVID-19 data from the SPIN Cohort^8-10 to data collected during the baseline assessment of the separate SPIN COVID-19 Cohort between April 9, 2020 and April 27, 2020 using the same measurement scales. Person-level, deterministic linking was used with participant email addresses as the indentifier. The full protocol for the SPIN COVID-19 Cohort and the present study is available online (https://osf.io/kbncx/).

RESULTS

Participants

There were 435 SPIN Cohort participants from Canada (N = 98), France (N = 159), the United Kingdom (N = 50), and the United States (N = 128) who enrolled in the SPIN COVID-19 Cohort and were included in the present study. See Figure 1 for participant flow and Supplementary Table 1 for number of participants from recruitment sites. Table 1 shows participant characteristics. Mean age was 56.9 years, and 88.5% of participants were female. Mean time since SSc diagnosis was 12.1 years; 39.8% had diffuse disease subtype, 35.2% had interstitial lung disease, and 48.1% were using immunosuppressant drugs. Participant characteristics were similar for most variables across countries.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup

Table 1. Participant Characteristics for the Full Sample and by Country.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participant enrollment and inclusion

DISCUSSION

We found that anxiety symptoms increased substantially compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic among vulnerable persons with a pre-existing medical condition, SSc, whereas depressive symptom changes were minimal. Overall, mean change on the PROMIS Anxiety 4a v1.0 was 4.9 points, greater than the MCID of 4 points. Approximately 50% of participants experienced an increase of ≥ 1 MCID. Results differed, however, by country. Anxiety symptoms increased by approximately 3 points among participants from France, 4 points among participants from Canada, 6 points among participants from the United Kingdom, and 7 points among participants from the United States. In multivariable analysis, compared to France, participants from the United Kingdom and United States scored approximately 3 and 4 points higher. Participants from the United Kingdom and the United States were also approximately twice as likely to have increased by ≥ 1 MCID, although this was not statistically significant for the United Kingdom. Another important finding was that people who used mental health services in the 3 months prior to their pre-COVID-19 assessment had adjusted anxiety symptom increases almost 4 points less than other participants.

Our study is one of the first to report mental health symptom changes during COVID-19 in a vulnerable population with a pre-existing medical condition and the first to compare symptom changes across countries. Compared to studies of university students, which suggest that depressive symptoms have increased by a small amount and anxiety minimally or not at all,^3,6 we found that depressive symptoms changed minimally, but anxiety symptoms, on average, increased substantially. This may relate to the differential effect that COVID-19 is having on different segments of the population. University students may primarily be experiencing consequences of public health interventions, including interruption of academic programs, loss of work to support their studies, and reduced social connectedness. People with SSc and others with pre-existing medical conditions who are at risk of severe complications or death if infected likely perceive a greater threat from the virus than young adults of university age.

Increases in anxiety were larger in the United Kingdom and United States than in Canada and France. Comparing across countries is fraught with complexities. Nonetheless, the magnitude of the differences we found were surprisingly large. One possible explanation may relate to the coherence, or lack of coherence, of governmental and civil responses in the countries we studied. Indeed, editorials in the Lancet have described the American response as “inconsistent and incoherent”²⁵ and the UK’s national response as “astonishingly haphazard.”²⁶ France undertook some of the most restrictive measures internationally to attempt to reduce the spread of the virus,²⁷ which may have reduced fear, relatively, among people vulnerable due to medical conditions. Canadian provinces were somewhat less restrictive but were generally consistent with a high level of political consensus on measures that have been taken.²⁸

An important finding was that people who were using mental health services pre-COVID-19 had anxiety symptom change scores almost 1 MCID less than other participants. We do not know of evidence that people who have received mental health treatments are more resilient to adversity, meaning that they are able to adapt more successfully to negative or stressful situations. However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported that psychological interventions designed to increase resilience do increase self-reported resilience.²⁹ Many treatments for common mental illnesses include developing skills in structuring time, increasing the use of positive coping strategies, staying active even when not motivated, managing stress, and restructuring negatively distorted thought patterns, all of which would help to manage anxiety during a crisis like COVID-19.

There are limitations to consider. First, the SPIN Cohort is a convenience sample, although participant characteristics are similar to other large SSc cohorts.⁸ Second, participants complete questionnaires online, which may reduce generalizability. Third, it was not possible to capture and include local variables, such as the degree participants’ communities were affected or whether public health interventions were consistently followed in those communities. Nonetheless, data were collected at a time when social isolations were generally at their most conservative. Finally, different MCID values may be chosen. The 4-point MCID we used for anxiety symptoms was conservative; others have recommended MCIDs of 2 to 3 points,³⁰ and it is possible that we may have underestimated the degree of patient-important change.

In sum, this was the first study to compare mental health symptoms prior to and during the COVID-19 outbreak. We found that anxiety symptoms increased substantially and that the magnitude was associated with country; increases were highest in the United States and United Kingdom and more moderate in France and Canada. There were minimal differences in depressive symptoms during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19. An important finding was that people who received mental health care prior to COVID-19 experienced substantially smaller anxiety symptom increases than other participants. These findings, which differ from early reports of results from younger adults, underline that people at risk from medical complications in COVID-19 are also at risk of mental health problems and that there is a need for accessible mental health interventions that are designed to meet the specific needs of different populations.

Contributors

BDT, LK, RSH, SP, SJB, JV, and ABenedetti were responsible for study concept and design. BDT, LK, RSH, SP, SH, ABourgeault, LT, SJB, JV, and ABenedetti were responsible for acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. LK, RSH, and ABenedetti were responsible for statistical analysis. BDT and RSH drafted the manuscript. All authors provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, approved the final version, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Declaration of interests

All authors have completed the ICJME uniform disclosure form. Dr. Mouthon reported personal fees from Actelion/Johnson & Johnson, grants from LFB, non-financial support from Octapharma, and non-financial support from Grifols, all outside the submitted work. All other authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. All authors declare no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Data Sharing

De-identified individual participant data with a data dictionary and analysis codes that were used to generate the results reported in this article will be made available upon request to the corresponding author and presentation of a methodologically sound proposal that is approved by the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Data Access and Publications Committee. The study protocol and analysis plan are available at https://osf.io/kbncx/. Data will be available beginning 12 months after publication. Data requesters will need to sign a data transfer agreement.

Funding

McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity Emergency COVID-19 Research Fund; Scleroderma Canada, made possible by an educational grant for patient support programming from Boehringer Ingelheim; Scleroderma Society of Ontario; Scleroderma Manitoba; Scleroderma Atlantic; Scleroderma Australia; Scleroderma New South Wales; Scleroderma Victoria; Scleroderma Queensland; Scleroderma SASK; Scleroderma Association of BC; and Sclérodermie Québec.