ABSTRACT
Aquamin, a calcium-, magnesium-, and multiple trace element-rich natural product has polyp prevention efficacy based on preclinical studies. The overall goal of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability of Aquamin when used as a dietary chemopreventative in humans. Additionally, we determined the effects of Aquamin on the colonic microbial community and attendant metabolomic profile. Thirty healthy male and female human participants were enrolled in a 90-day trial in which the effects of Aquamin (delivering 800 mg of calcium per day) were compared to those of calcium alone or placebo. Before and after the interventional period, colonic biopsies and stool specimens were obtained. All 30 participants completed the study without serious adverse events. There were no changes in liver function markers. Compared to pretreatment values, intervention with Aquamin led to a reduction in total bacterial DNA and a shift in the microbial community. Treatment with calcium alone also produced a decline in total bacteria, but smaller than seen with Aquamin, while no reduction was observed with placebo. In parallel with microbial changes, a reduction in bile acid levels and a slight increase in the level of the short chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetate in stool specimens from Aquamin-treated participants was noted. No change in bile acids or SCFAs was observed with calcium alone or placebo. We conclude from these studies that Aquamin is safe and tolerable in healthy human participants and may produce beneficial alterations in the colonic microbial community and the attendant metabolomic profile.
INTRODUCTION
Epidemiological studies have shown an inverse relationship between calcium intake and colon cancer incidence (1). Experimental studies in animals have substantiated anti-tumor efficacy in the colon (2) and in vitro studies have provided mechanistic insight into how calcium influences epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation (3). In spite of these data, interventional trials with calcium have had only modest success in reducing colon polyp formation, with some trials demonstrating a reduction in incidence (4,5), while others showing essentially no protection (6,7) or an increase in incidence of a more-aggressive sessile-serrated colon polyp phenotype (8). This complicated picture supports the idea that adequate or optimal calcium intake throughout life may be beneficial, but in a realistic dietary setting, the efficacy of supplementation by calcium alone may be limited by dietary complexity. Potentially adverse effects at higher dose levels further complicate the picture (9).
Recent evidence suggests that the anti-neoplastic activity of calcium supplementation may be enhanced by concomitant inclusion of additional trace minerals along with calcium. This has been demonstrated in our own studies using Aquamin, a calcium- and magnesium-rich multi-mineral product obtained from mineralized red marine algae. In two long-term (15-18 month) studies in mice, Aquamin more effectively suppressed colon polyp formation than calcium alone (10,11). Further, Aquamin was more effective than calcium alone at suppressing proliferation and inducing differentiation in human colon carcinoma cells in monolayer culture (12,13), and human adenoma-derived colonoids (14). Thus, Aquamin (as a source of calcium along with magnesium and additional trace minerals) may, ultimately, prove to be a more effective dietary colon polyp chemopreventative than calcium alone.
Exact mechanisms by which calcium alone or multi-mineral supplementation exert anti-neoplastic activity are currently unknown. In addition to direct anti-proliferative and pro-differentiating effects on colonic epithelium, beneficial activity may be mediated indirectly through effects on the gut microbial population and/or changes in gut microbial metabolic activity. The bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract plays several important roles that contribute to health. A “healthy” microbiome is important for food digestion and production of important metabolites. In addition, a healthy microbial community helps maintain the tissue barrier, regulates the host immune response and provides protection against pathogen overgrowth (15). Dysbiosis, especially in the colon, can lead to barrier breakdown and initiate a chronic inflammatory response. Dysbiosis has been directly linked to inflammatory bowel diseases and indirectly to the formation of premalignant colon polyps (15-17). In previous studies in mice, dietary calcium supplementation has been shown to cause a shift in the gut microbial community in comparison to control (18,19). In another study, Aquamin itself induced gut microbial changes (20).
Metabolic changes may also be important. At high concentrations, bile acids are membrane-active agents and can be cytotoxic (21). In addition, certain bacterially-derived secondary bile acids have carcinogenic properties (22). Alterations in the gut microbial population can affect bile acid profiles (23). In our own murine study (19), calcium supplementation altered the gut microbiome and reduced the level of total bile acids and certain microbially-derived secondary bile acids. In addition to bile acids, gut microbes also produce short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (e.g. acetate, propionate and butyrate) in the colon. SCFAs have demonstrable protective effect against colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis (24). Thus, a shift in the gut microbial community may affect colon health through alterations in bacterially-derived metabolites.
Whether similar microbial/metabolomic changes might also be seen in human participants is not known. To test the feasibility of using dietary Aquamin as an interventional strategy in humans, we conducted a 90-day, FDA-approved pilot study, comparing daily supplementation with Aquamin to calcium alone and placebo in healthy human participants. While the primary purpose of this study was to assess Aquamin’s tolerability and safety, we also evaluated microbial community structure and assessed bile acid, SFCA and eicosanoid profiles at endpoint in comparison to baseline values in participants from all three groups. Elucidating the microbial and metabolic changes resulting from intervention is important for identifying potential mechanisms of action with Aquamin. Identifying measurable alterations in microbial and metabolomic parameters and determining effect-size with intervention will also be helpful for determining the necessary sample size going forward in a larger-scale clinical trial. Initial results from the current study are reported herein.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Aquamin and control interventions
Aquamin is a calcium- and magnesium-rich natural product obtained from the skeletal remains of red marine algae of the Lithothamnion genus. In addition to calcium and magnesium, Aquamin contains detectable levels of 72 additional trace minerals including trace elements from the lanthanide family (essentially all of the minerals accumulated by the algae from seawater). Aquamin is sold as a food supplement (GRAS 000028) (Marigot Ltd, Cork, Ireland) and is used in various products for human consumption in Europe, Asia, Australia, and North America. A single batch of Aquamin-Food Grade® was used for this study. Mineral composition was established via an independent laboratory (Advanced Laboratories; Salt Lake City, Utah). Supplement Table 1 provides a complete list of elements detected in Aquamin and their relative amounts. Calcium carbonate was used for comparison and maltodextrin was used as placebo.
Study participants
This study was a pilot, double-blind, parallel assignment, randomized clinical interventional trial in which thirty participants were included. Participants were male or non-pregnant female, in general good health, but having “an increased risk for colon cancer” based on i) a personal history of colorectal polyp, early stage (stage I or II) colon cancer treated by surgical removal without recommendation for adjuvant therapy, or stage III colon cancer treated with surgery > 5 years prior or ii) a first degree relative diagnosed under the age of 60 with colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria included history of kidney disease or kidney stones, Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, gastrointestinal hemorrhagic disorders, or coagulopathy, hereditary non-polyposis coli or familial adenomatous polyposis. The participants were recruited through the Michigan Medicine web portal and by posting flyers in the hospital.
This clinical interventional trial was conducted with FDA approval of Aquamin as an Investigational New Drug (IND#118194) and with oversight by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan Medical School (IRBMED)-IRB#HUM00076276. The study was registered as an interventional clinical trial with details at Clinicaltrials.gov (study identifier NCT02647671). All participants provided written informed consent prior to inclusion. This phase I trial involving human participants was carried out in accordance with recognized ethical guidelines, for example, Declaration of Helsinki, International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (CIOMS), the Belmont Report and the U.S. Common Rule.
Study design
Supplement Figure 1 summarizes the study design of this trial in a flowchart. Briefly, at screening participants were given the NIH Diet History Questionnaire II (DHQ II) a food frequency questionnaire which includes portion size and dietary supplement questions as a way to evaluate baseline calcium levels in the past year (25). Participants were also asked about use of dietary supplements, antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. No participants were on antibiotics at or in close proximity to the time of screening. Individuals ingesting supplements containing calcium and / or vitamin D were required to undergo a two-week “wash out” period prior to starting and to not use these supplements during the study participation.
Thirty participants underwent baseline flexible sigmoidoscopy (unprepped; i.e., without bowel cleansing procedure). Twelve 2.5 mm colonic biopsies were obtained along with two stool specimens from within the sigmoid colon (20 cm above the anus). Tissue and stool samples were saved in 10% formalin, cryopreserved for cultures or snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and saved at −80°C. Blood was drawn for liver function / liver injury markers (total albumin, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALKP).
After baseline sigmoidoscopy, participants were randomized to one of three groups. Ten participants were treated daily for 90 days with Aquamin providing 800 mg of calcium per day. Ten participants received 800 mg of calcium carbonate daily and ten participants received maltodextrin as placebo. During the interventional period, participants were contacted by study coordinators on a monthly basis to assess study progress / adherence to the study protocol and to identify unwanted side effects. Compliance was assessed by capsule log entries and by counting unused capsules returned at the end of the study.
At the end of the 90-day intervention period (90±5 days), participants again underwent unprepped flexible sigmoidoscopy and eight colonic biopsies along with two stool specimens were collected and stored as at baseline. Blood was also taken for the same serum markers as at baseline. For each of the two time-points, one biopsy and one stool specimen from each participant was utilized for microbiome analysis and one biopsy and one stool specimen was utilized for metabolomic analysis. The remaining tissue samples were retained for backup, or were used for histological, immunohistochemical and proteomic analyses. The results of the latter analyses will be reported separately.
Microbial analysis
DNA was isolated from colon and stool samples using the Qiagen MagAttract PowerMicrobiome DNA/RNA kit. Total bacterial DNA levels were estimated using qPCR with broad-range primers BSF8 (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and BSR357 (CTGCTGCCTYCCGTA), targeting bacterial 16S rRNA genes (26). Each 10 μl qPCR reaction contained 5 μl PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific), 4 μl sample DNA (1:40 dilution) and 0.4 μM of primers. The following cycles were run on a Light Cycler 96 (Roche): 1x(2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C), 40x(15 s at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C). Each sample was run in duplicate.
Microbial community profiles were generated by Illumina® MiSeq sequencing of the V4 region of 16S rRNA-encoding genes after amplifying the extracted DNA (27). Samples were amplified, normalized and sequenced on the MiSeq and analysis was performed using the MiSeq SOP (28) for the software mothur (v.1.39.0 and v.1.39.5) as described in our earlier study (19). In case of low bacterial biomass, 3μl of DNA were amplified by touchdown PCR method [1×(2 min at 95°C), 20x(20 s at 95°C, 15 s at annealing temperature (starts at 60°C, decreases 0.3°C/cycle), 5 min at 72°C), 20x(20 s at 95°C, 15 s at 55°C, 5 min at 72°C), 1x(10min at 72°C)]. Thirteen samples, including 8/10 post-interventional Aquamin colon samples, required touchdown PCR (with 40 amplification cycles versus standard PCR with 30 cycles) to achieve sufficient sample amplification for sequencing. After processing, sequences were binned into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on 3% difference in sequence using the OptiClust method (29). Comparisons between groups included differences in community structure using OTU-based Yue and Clayton distance metric (θYC) (30). θYC distances were visualized using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA). Specific OTUs driving community differences were identified by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (31), as was done in our previous study (19). LEfSe utilizes both statistical significance and effect size (linear discriminant analysis score, or LDA) to determine the features (OTUs, in this case) that are differentially abundant between groups (i.e., pre-post differences). Alpha diversity was assessed by change in the Shannon diversity index from baseline. To evaluate Aquamin-associated microbial community differences in major gut phyla, we sorted the 1000 most abundant OTUs in each of the baseline and final visit samples into phyla and compared inter-group differences in each of these phyla at endpoint. The DNA isolation and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were done by the University of Michigan Microbial Systems Molecular Biology Laboratory.
Metabolomic analysis
Bile acids, SCFAs and eicosanoid composition were quantified in colon biopsies and stool specimens from a randomly chosen subset of participants (n=6 per group) at each time point (pre- and post-intervention). Bile acids were quantified using Liquid Chromatography-Mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in a two-step solvent extraction (32) as performed in the Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Cores (RCMRC) at the University of Michigan. Supernatants were combined, dried, and re-suspended for LC-MS separation by reverse-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) and measured by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Sample identification was performed by comparison of retention times and mass to an in-house library of bile acids. SCFA analysis was performed by the RCMRC by electron ionization-gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (EI-GCMS) as described recently (33). Compound identification was performed against a library of known SCFAs. Colon tissue was also utilized to analyze a profile of eicosanoids. Eicosanoids were extracted and concentrated using solid phase extraction in colon biopsies. The eluent was dried and re-suspended for LC-MS separation by RPLC and measurements by MRM methods (34). Stool specimens were not analyzed for eicosanoids since these metabolites are not bacterial products. All analytes were reported as pmol/mg, after normalization to the sample weight.
Statistical analysis
Pre (baseline) vs post (endpoint) comparisons were conducted for each microbial or metabolomic endpoint for individual participants in each of the three treatment groups (placebo, calcium, Aquamin). Group means and standard deviations were then calculated for baseline and endpoint measures. Intergroup differences for normally distributed continuous data were made by ANOVA followed by pairwise group comparisons with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. Microbial community distances were compared by AMOVA (analysis of molecular variance) within the program mothur (v.1.39.0 and v.1.39.5) (35). For continuous data that failed normality testing intergroup comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA followed by Mann Whitney-Wilcoxon pairwise comparison. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version8) and R computing software (R version 3.5.3 and RStudio Version 1.1.463). Due to a small cohort size, analyses were not adjusted to any baseline sociodemographic or clinical characteristics or dietary calcium intake.
RESULTS
Participant characteristics
Thirty-six participants were randomly enrolled. Six subjects were lost to follow-up prior to intervention and a total of 30 participants (10 per arm) completed the study. This included of 22 female and 8 male participants. Participants were randomized to study arms without regard to age or gender (placebo: 4 males and 6 females; calcium: 2 males and 8 females; Aquamin: 2 males and 8 females). Ages ranged from 20-66 years. Compliance (capsule intake) was 96% across the three groups. Complete Demographic characteristics are presented in Supplement Table 2. Based on responses to DHQ II, the average dietary calcium intake (mg/day) values for the three groups at baseline were estimated to be: placebo = 817±245; calcium = 964±412 and Aquamin = 919±545. There were no statistical differences in calcium intake among the groups.
Safety and tolerability
Self-reported adverse events over the course of study are shown in Supplement Table 3. All adverse events were minor (i.e., headache, gastrointestinal symptoms) and did not preclude any individual from completing the study. The number of individuals reporting adverse events in the Aquamin group was the same as in the placebo group (3 of 10) while 6 of 10 individuals in the calcium group reported one or more events. No serious adverse events (defined as necessitating cessation of study participation or medical intervention / hospitalization) occurred. Serum liver function / liver injury markers are presented in Supplement Table 4. No significant change in any individual marker was observed over the course of the study. Likewise, there was no difference among the treatment groups in serum calcium levels before and after intervention (Supplement Table 4).
Effects on bacterial DNA in colon biopsy and stool specimens
qPCR was used to assess bacterial 16S rRNA gene levels in colon biopsy and stool specimens as a way to estimate total bacterial DNA. Figure 1 demonstrates that in both colon biopsy and stool specimens, post-treatment Aquamin samples had higher cycle quantification (Cq) values, indicating lower amounts of total bacterial DNA than at baseline. There was also a decrease in total bacterial DNA in specimens from calcium-treated participants, although, on average, the decrease was not as great as that seen with Aquamin. Placebo specimens showed no (average) decline in DNA content at endpoint.
Alterations in gut microbial communities
To determine if Aquamin altered the composition of the gut microbiota in the participants, we analyzed bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from colon and stool specimens to explore pre-post-interventional differences. After sequence processing and exclusion of 2 samples for low sequence counts, a total of 7,081,672 sequences from 118 samples (median: 59233 ± 23618 (SD) sequences/sample; range 2338 - 114235 sequences/sample) were included in this analysis. Shifts in gut microbial community composition were assessed by calculating θYC distances between the pre- and post-supplementation communities for each individual. Individual pre-post-distance values, grouped by intervention, are shown in Figure 2. Colonic microbial communities demonstrated a bigger shift in the Aquamin-supplemented group than was observed for either the placebo or calcium-supplemented group. The difference between Aquamin and calcium in the colon biopsy specimens reached the level of statistical significance (p=0.0087). Both figure insets show that the majority of the Aquamin samples (8 of 10 in colon and 7 of 10 in stool) were above the median value for all samples.
Figure 3 presents principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) data for all three treatment groups in both colon and stool specimens. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the colon bacterial communities (Figure 3A), but following the 90-day intervention period, microbial communities in the colon biopsies from participants treated with Aquamin segregated from those in the placebo or calcium groups (Aquamin versus placebo: AMOVA p=0.005 and Aquamin versus calcium: AMOVA p=0.009). Further, colonic microbial communities from the post-treatment Aquamin biopsy samples segregated from their own baseline communities (AMOVA p=0.022) (Figure 3B), while there was no difference in pre- vs post-supplementation communities for placebo- or calcium-treated participants. In contrast to these results in colon biopsy material, stool sample microbial communities were not different between or within groups either at baseline or at endpoint (Figure 3C and 3D).
Effects on diversity in microbial communities
Alpha diversity was assessed in both colon and stool samples. In Aquamin-treated participants, there was a decrease in diversity (Figure 3E and F). For colon samples, it was significantly low with p=0.0037 as compared to the placebo.
Alterations in the relative abundance of major gut phyla
We assessed alterations in the relative abundance of individual OTUs representing the major gut phyla to compare inter-group differences in each of these phyla at endpoint. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Verrucomicrobia were decreased with Aquamin while Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were increased (Figure 4). Trends were similar in both colon and stool specimens. Firmicutes OTUs also showed a drop with calcium intervention (colon biopsies only) but there was little change in the other phyla. Little change in OTU relative abundance in any of the major phyla was seen with placebo.
Identification of specific OTUs driving differences
The specific OTUs were identified by LefSe to explain the pre-post-supplementation differences with Aquamin treatment. In the Aquamin supplemented group, 36 OTUs with an LDA score >3 and significance p<0.05 were identified in colon samples as shown in Tables 1A and 1B. Overall, more genera decreased than increased after supplementation. Differences between pre- and post-supplementation were driven principally by an increases in OTUs within the normally less abundant phyla Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, along with three OTUs of phylum Firmicutes. (Tables 1A) and a decrease in OTUs within the normally higher abundance phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Tables 1B). A complete list of altered OTUs in colon and stool samples with an LDA score >2.0 and significance p<0.05 are presented in Supplement Table 5.
Effects on bile acid concentrations
Alterations in bile acid levels were assessed in stool samples from Aquamin- and calcium-treated participants in comparison to placebo as shown in Figure 5. Aquamin treatment resulted in a net decline in total bile acids with the major portion of this change being in unconjugated forms (the major components of the fecal bile acid pool). The major unconjugated primary bile acids - i.e., cholic acid (CA) and, particularly, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) (measured concurrently with deoxycholic acid [DCA]) - were significantly lower in post-treatment Aquamin stool samples. This was not observed with calcium.
Of the measurable secondary bile acids, taurine-conjugated ursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), measured concurrently with taurohyodexycholic acid (THDCA) was decreased, as were the muricholic acids (minor secondary bile acid components). Two other unconjugated secondary bile acids (hyocholic acid [HCA] and hyodeoxycholic acid [HDCA]) were significantly decreased with Aquamin as compared to placebo. HDCA is a byproduct of gut microbial metabolism (36), utilizing HCA and muricholic acids after microbial deconjugation and enzymatic modification. Overall, these Aquamin-associated bile acid changes in stool are consistent with both a decreased bile acid pool and decreased bacterial conversion of primary to secondary bile acids. Of interest, these effects were unique to Aquamin. Calcium supplementation did not show a measurable effect on total fecal bile acids and only HDCA was significantly decreased.
Bile acid levels were also assessed in colon samples from Aquamin- and calcium-treated groups in comparison to placebo (Supplement Figure 2). Similar trends to those seen in stool specimens were observed but none of the changes with Aquamin or calcium intervention reached statistical significance in comparison to placebo except HDCA which was significantly reduced as compared to placebo.
Effects on SCFA concentrations
SCFA levels were assessed in both stool and colon samples. Apart from a modest (but statistically significant) increase in acetate in stool samples from Aquamin-treated individuals relative to calcium, no other statistically significant alterations were observed in either stool (Figure 5D) or colon (Supplement Figure 2) specimens.
Effects on colonic eicosanoid concentrations
There was no significant change from baseline detected for any eicosanoid apart from an increase in 13S-hydroxy-octadecadienoic acid (13S-HODE) in calcium-supplemented colon samples (Supplement Figure 3).
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated that 90-day dietary intervention with Aquamin was well-tolerated by healthy individuals, and resulted in measurable changes in the colonic microbial community and the attendant bile acid profile. Although the primary purpose of this small phase I trial was safety and tolerability rather than efficacy or mechanisms of action, the identification of Aquamin-associated microbial and metabolomic alterations suggest hypotheses for future studies investigating potential mechanisms of efficacy. The microbial and metabolomic findings should also prove useful as biomarkers going forward in a longer-term interventional trial.
The microbial population present in the colon of an individual is sensitive to environmental influences, especially diet (37,38). Past studies have demonstrated that calcium (18,19) and Aquamin itself (20) can influence the colonic microbial community in mice. In this study, we found that Aquamin supplementation in human participants resulted in a decrease in total colonic microbial DNA and an overall decrease in OTUs within the major gut phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, with a decrease in gut microbial diversity. Thus the major impact may simply be a decrease in total gut bacteria. The impact of the decrease in bacteria on colonic health is unknown at this time but poses interesting questions for future exploration. Germ-free mice have shown increased resistance to chemical or dietary-induced colon cancers (39). Since our own previous studies have shown that Aquamin-treated mice have decreased incidence of colon polyps (10,11) as well as fewer liver tumors (40), the possibility that Aquamin-associated microbial decreases may play a mechanistic role in these observations warrants further exploration. Of interest, many of the observations made with samples from Aquamin-treated participants were not seen in samples from individuals ingesting calcium alone. This argues that while calcium is the major mineral component in Aquamin, the effects of Aquamin on the gut microbial community cannot be attributed to calcium alone.
The changes we observed in the post-Aquamin-treatment specimens are similar to the effects of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, which have been shown to cause a significant reduction in the proportions of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes and an increase in Proteobacteria (41). As a follow-up to the observations reported here, it would be informative to assess the potential anti-microbial activity of Aquamin supplementation directly in a minimum inhibitory concentration assay. Metals, particularly cations, have previously been utilized as antimicrobial agents (42). For example, colloidal or nanoparticulate silver and mineral-rich clays are known to have broad-spectrum anti-microbial effects (43,44). Notably, in our study, the administration of Aquamin did not result in diarrhea but there was a drop in bacterial diversity in colon samples; both common adverse effects of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Thus the anti-microbial effects of Aquamin may be mild in comparison to antibiotics and may allow some of the benefit of reduced gut microbial populations (e.g. reduced potentially carcinogenic secondary bile acids).
In parallel with microbial changes, Aquamin administration decreased the levels of total bile acids and selected primary and secondary bile acids. This finding is consistent with the decrease in total bacteria and may be potentially beneficial to colon health. At high concentrations, bile acids are membrane-damaging and cytotoxic (21). In addition, several secondary bile acids, most notably LCA and DCA (22,23), are known to be carcinogenic. Although these species could not be individually measured in this study for methodological reasons, the combination of DCA and CDCA (the primary bile acid precursor of LCA) was significantly lower in the Aquamin-supplemented group. This suggests that one beneficial effect of Aquamin supplementation might be through effects on bile acid metabolism. A caveat in the interpretation of bile acid data is that it is not currently known whether the reduction in gut bile acid pools is due to altered bacterial composition or, potentially, to a direct effect on the bile acids, themselves. Previous studies have shown that calcium, the major component of Aquamin, has the capacity to precipitate bile acids (45). While mineral binding and precipitation might interfere with detection, this could be beneficial if it prevented potentially harmful secondary bile acids from binding to colonic epithelium or entering the circulation. Arguing against direct binding and precipitation is the finding that calcium alone did not mimic the effects of Aquamin on the total bile acid pool.
A decrease in gut bacteria could, potentially, be harmful to colon health if it resulted in decreased concentration of protective bacterial metabolites, such as the colon-protective SCFAs (24). However, in this study there was no decrease in the colonic concentration of butyrate in the Aquamin-treated group and an actual increase in acetate. Thus, even with the apparent decline in total bacteria, the size and / or composition of the microbial pool was sufficient to maintain pre-supplementation levels of certain SFCAs.
While the data strongly suggest an Aquamin-associated decrease in gut microbial bacteria, the specific shifts in gut microbial populations are harder to interpret. One complication of low microbial biomass samples during microbial sequencing is greater likelihood of detecting reagent or laboratory contaminant microbes in the amplification step. This has been seen in low-biomass samples such as glacier ice, air, rocks, etc (46). While it is not likely to be a major issue in the normal high biomass of the colon, it may be an issue in samples where the biomass has been reduced by antibiotics or other intervention. For this reason, it remains to be seen in further studies whether the elevation in Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria seen here have relevance as a specific Aquamin-related effect in vivo or whether the more important finding is the overall reduction in major gut phyla and decreased overall colonic bacterial biomass.
It should be noted that the antimicrobial effect of Aquamin might not be a direct consequence of the mineral components making up the supplement. Our recent studies employing colonoid culture technology demonstrated up-regulation of proteins having anti-microbial activity upon treatment with Aquamin (47). These included lactotransferrin and natural resistance-associated macrophage protein-1. Lactotransferrin has bacteriostatic activity related to sequestration of free iron and bactericidal properties leading to the release of lipopolysaccharides from the bacterial outer membrane (48). Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein-1 is a divalent transition metal (iron and manganese) transporter involved in iron metabolism. It has been reported to promote host resistance to certain pathogens (49). Thus it is possible that the antimicrobial effects seen with Aquamin in vivo are mediated, in part, through its effects on the colonic mucosa, itself. Finally, decreased bacteria, especially as it relates to colon biopsy specimens, might reflect altered bacterial adhesion. In our colonoid culture study (47), numerous proteins involved in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesive function were altered by Aquamin. Studies by others have noted that alterations in mucosal surface proteins affect microbial interactions with the mucosal wall (15,16).
In addition to the microbial and metabolomic changes, there are other, direct, beneficial effect of Aquamin on the epithelium of the colonic mucosa. Specifically, Aquamin suppressed colon epithelial proliferation and induced differentiation in colonoid culture. Effects on proliferation were seen, primarily, in colonoids derived from large adenomas (14) while improved differentiation – including up-regulation of multiple cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion molecules and barrier proteins - was observed in normal tissue-derived colonoids (47) as well as in adenoma colonoids (14). Direct effects on the colonic mucosa and indirect effects resulting from changes in microbial / metabolomic profiles are, of course, not mutually exclusive. Further, as noted above, the indirect effects (i.e., anti-microbial activity) may reflect changes induced in the colonic mucosa.
Limitations in this study include the small sample size and short duration, which were by design, as this was an initial tolerability study rather than an efficacy study. Although the study was too short and too small to assess efficacy as a colon cancer preventative, it was sufficiently powered to detect significant differences in several microbial and metabolomic (bile acid) endpoints in Aquamin-treated participants relative to the other two interventions. To better define effects on efficacy-related endpoints like inflammatory markers and epithelial differentiation / proliferation indices over a longer period, we are currently beginning a 180-day interventional trial with Aquamin in participants with ulcerative colitis in remission.
In summary, this pilot study demonstrated that 90-day dietary intervention with a calcium- and magnesium-rich multi-mineral supplement was well-tolerated in healthy human volunteers. Adverse events were mild, and largely consisted of gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation, diarrhea etc.) that did not preclude completion of the study. Reports of adverse events were actually less frequent with Aquamin than with calcium alone. Consistent with this, liver function / liver injury markers did not vary significantly with intervention. With respect to microbial and metabolomic findings, Aquamin supplementation resulted in an overall decrease in gut microbial numbers and a decrease in bile acids, including potentially carcinogenic secondary bile acids or their precursors. Despite the anti-microbial-like effects, concentrations of the colon-protective SCFAs were maintained. These findings, along with previous in vitro and animal data (10-14,47) showing a beneficial effect of Aquamin on colonic health, support future longer-term interventional studies in human participants. Finally, the observation that Aquamin had a more pronounced effect on gut microbial populations and bile acid levels than calcium alone supports the view that the beneficial activity of Aquamin (calcium in conjunction with additional trace elements) cannot be attributed to calcium alone. This conclusion supports findings from a recent epidemiological study suggesting that calcium in combination of additional minerals may be linked with the lower risk of colorectal cancer (50).
Data Availability
Microbial sequencing data will be available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database, accession number is pending. Raw bile acid (metabolomic) data will be available in UCSD Metabolomics Workbench, a metabolomic repository, study ID is pending.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by NIH grants CA201782 to JV, UL1TR002240 to the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research and 2 P30 DK089503-06 to the Michigan Nutrition and Obesity Research Center (MNORC). Metabolomic work was supported by Pilot/Feasibility Grant from MNORC to IB and MNA. This study also used services at University of Michigan which were supported by NIH funding (UL1TR002240; KL2TR002241; and TL1TR002242) to the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research (MICHR). We thank MICHR, the Michigan Clinical Research Unit (MCRU), the University of Michigan Microbial Systems Molecular Biology Laboratory and the Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Cores (RCMRC) at the University of Michigan for help with various aspects of the study. We thank our study coordinators (Elaine Brady and Deepa Chandhrasekhar) for their assistance with the study. We also thank Marigot LTD (Cork, Ireland) for providing Aquamin® as a gift.
Footnotes
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest: Authors have no financial or personal conflict of interest.
Bile acid abbreviations
- aMCA
- alpha-Murocholate
- bMCA
- beta-Muricholate
- CA
- Cholate
- CDCA
- Chenodeoxycholate
- DCA
- Deoxycholate
- GCA
- Glycocholate
- GCDCA
- Glycochenodeoxycholate
- GDCA
- Glycodeoxycholate
- GHCA
- Glycohyocholate
- GHDCA
- Glycohyodeoxycholate
- GUDCA
- Glycoursodeoxycholate
- HCA
- Hyocholate
- HDCA
- Hyodeoxycholate
- LCA
- Lithocholate
- TaMCA
- Tauro-alpha-muricholate
- TbMCA
- Tauro-beta-muricholate
- TCA
- Taurocholate
- TCDCA
- Taurochenodeoxycholate
- TDCA
- Taurodeoxycholate
- THCA
- Taurohyocholate
- THDCA
- Taurohyodeoxycholate
- TLCA
- Taurolithocholate
- TUDCA
- Tauroursodeoxycholate
- UDCA
- Ursodeoxycholate
- wMCA
- omega-Muricholate