ABSTRACT
Background The nail salon industry in the US comprises mostly immigrant-owned, small mom-and-pop salons that employ primarily first-generation immigrant workers from Asia. Because of the cultural and language barriers, both owners and workers may not avail themselves of the occupational safety resources. We formed an academic-community partnership to co-design a feasibility study and multi-level occupational health intervention for Vietnamese-speaking salon owners, workers, and community-based organization.
Methods The intervention for each salon included 1) two-hour in-person training covering chemical safety, infection control, musculoskeletal prevention, and workers’ rights for both the owners and their employees, 2) a tailored recommendation report for the owner, and 3) check-ins with the owners during the three-month follow-up. Community partner was trained to deliver the in-language training with technical assistance from the research team. Baseline and post-intervention individual data about health symptoms and behaviors, as well as personal chemical exposures were collected and analyzed.
Results A total of 44 participants from 12 consented salons enrolled in the study. One salon dropped out follow-up due to change of ownership. Analysis of the differences between post-and pre-intervention showed a tendency toward reduction in self-reported symptoms in the respiratory system, skin, and eyes, neurotoxicity score, as well as some chemical exposures. We could not rule out seasonality as an explanation for these trends. Increase in self-efficacy in some areas was observed post-intervention.
Conclusions Our study demonstrated a successful academic-community partnership to engage community members in the intervention study. While the intervention effects from feasibility study should be interpreted with caution, our preliminary results indicated that our community-based intervention is a promising approach to reduce work-related exposures among nail salon worker workers from Asia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Our study was generously funded by the U.S. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health through the grants K01OH011191 and R21OH011740, Drexel University Equipment Grant, and Dr. Arthur Frank, the Drexel University Urban Health Collaborative Pilot Study. This paper is the sole view of the authors and does not reflect the views of the funders.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Drexel University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study may be available upon reasonable request to the authors.