Abstract
Background The automated screening of patients at risk of developing diabetic retinopathy (DR) represents an opportunity to improve their mid-term outcome and lower the public expenditure associated with direct and indirect costs of a common sight-threatening complication of diabetes.
Objective In the present study, we aim at developing and evaluating the performance of an automated deep learning–based system to classify retinal fundus images from international and Mexican patients, as referable and non-referable DR cases. In particular, we study the performance of the automated retina image analysis (ARIA) system under an independent scheme (i.e. only ARIA screening) and two assistive schemes (i.e., hybrid ARIA + ophthalmologist screening), using a web-based platform for remote image analysis.
Methods We ran a randomized controlled experiment where 17 ophthalmologists were asked to classify a series of retinal fundus images under three different conditions: 1) screening the fundus image by themselves (solo), 2) screening the fundus image after being exposed to the opinion of the ARIA system (ARIA answer), and 3) screening the fundus image after being exposed to the opinion of the ARIA system, as well as its level of confidence and an attention map highlighting the most important areas of interest in the image according to the ARIA system (ARIA explanation). The ophthalmologists’ opinion in each condition and the opinion of the ARIA system were compared against a gold standard generated by consulting and aggregating the opinion of three retina specialists for each fundus image.
Results The ARIA system was able to classify referable vs. non-referable cases with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of 98%, 95.1% and 91.5% respectively, for international patient-cases; and an AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity of 98.3%, 95.2%, 90% respectively for Mexican patient-cases. The results achieved on Mexican patient-cases outperformed the average performance of the 17 ophthalmologist participants of the study. We also find that the ARIA system can be useful as an assistive tool, as significant sensitivity improvements were observed in the experimental condition where participants were exposed to the answer of the ARIA system as a second opinion (93.3%), compared to the sensitivity of the condition where participants assessed the images independently (87.3%).
Conclusions These results demonstrate that both use cases of ARIA systems, independent and assistive, present a substantial opportunity for Latin American countries like Mexico towards an efficient expansion of monitoring capacity for the early detection of diabetes-related blindness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was carried out thanks to the fellowships received by individual members of the team, including fellowships of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Number of registered protocol at the MIT: 1712161144
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The deep learning model was trained with an open-source database available at Kaggle:Diabetic Retinopathy Detection.
Abbreviations
- AI
- artificial intelligence
- ARIA
- automated retinal image analysis
- AUROC
- area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve
- DL
- deep learning
- DR
- diabetic retinopathy
- FPR
- false positive rate
- LRP
- layer-wise relevance propagation
- ROC
- receiver operating characteristic
- TPR
- true positive rate