{"markup":"\u003C?xml version=\u00221.0\u0022 encoding=\u0022UTF-8\u0022 ?\u003E\n    \u003Chtml version=\u0022HTML+RDFa+MathML 1.1\u0022\n    xmlns:content=\u0022http:\/\/purl.org\/rss\/1.0\/modules\/content\/\u0022\n    xmlns:dc=\u0022http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/\u0022\n    xmlns:foaf=\u0022http:\/\/xmlns.com\/foaf\/0.1\/\u0022\n    xmlns:og=\u0022http:\/\/ogp.me\/ns#\u0022\n    xmlns:rdfs=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/01\/rdf-schema#\u0022\n    xmlns:sioc=\u0022http:\/\/rdfs.org\/sioc\/ns#\u0022\n    xmlns:sioct=\u0022http:\/\/rdfs.org\/sioc\/types#\u0022\n    xmlns:skos=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2004\/02\/skos\/core#\u0022\n    xmlns:xsd=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2001\/XMLSchema#\u0022\n    xmlns:mml=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\u0022\u003E\n  \u003Chead\u003E\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022 src=\u0022\/\/cdn.jsdelivr.net\/qtip2\/2.2.1\/jquery.qtip.min.js\u0022\u003E\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022 src=\u0022https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/sites\/default\/files\/js\/js_YjAJQgxDlFX6S-O02jj9jCrVbrwlY3CGgCg1FzPlvBs.js\u0022\u003E\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\u003C!--\/\/--\u003E\u003C![CDATA[\/\/\u003E\u003C!--\nif(typeof window.MathJax === \u0022undefined\u0022) window.MathJax = { menuSettings: { zoom: \u0022Click\u0022 } };\n\/\/--\u003E\u003C!]]\u003E\n\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022 src=\u0022https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/sites\/default\/files\/js\/js_waP91NpgGpectm_6Y2XDEauLJ8WCSCBKmmA87unpp2E.js\u0022\u003E\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022 src=\u0022https:\/\/www.googletagmanager.com\/gtag\/js?id=G-0K57TCX5BY\u0022\u003E\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\u003C!--\/\/--\u003E\u003C![CDATA[\/\/\u003E\u003C!--\nwindow.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments)};gtag(\u0022js\u0022, new Date());gtag(\u0022set\u0022, \u0022developer_id.dMDhkMT\u0022, true);gtag(\u0022config\u0022, \u0022G-0K57TCX5BY\u0022, {\u0022groups\u0022:\u0022default\u0022,\u0022anonymize_ip\u0022:true});\n\/\/--\u003E\u003C!]]\u003E\n\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\u003C!--\/\/--\u003E\u003C![CDATA[\/\/\u003E\u003C!--\njQuery.extend(Drupal.settings, {\u0022basePath\u0022:\u0022\\\/\u0022,\u0022pathPrefix\u0022:\u0022\u0022,\u0022highwire\u0022:{\u0022ac\u0022:{\u0022\\\/medrxiv\\\/early\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/17\\\/2025.03.14.25323836.atom\u0022:{\u0022access\u0022:{\u0022full\u0022:true},\u0022pisa_id\u0022:\u0022\u0022,\u0022apath\u0022:\u0022\\\/medrxiv\\\/early\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/17\\\/2025.03.14.25323836.atom\u0022,\u0022jcode\u0022:\u0022medrxiv\u0022},\u0022medrxiv;2025.03.14.25323836v1\u0022:{\u0022access\u0022:{\u0022full\u0022:true},\u0022pisa_id\u0022:\u0022medrxiv;2025.03.14.25323836v1\u0022,\u0022apath\u0022:\u0022\u0022,\u0022jcode\u0022:\u0022medrxiv\u0022}},\u0022processed\u0022:[\u0022highwire_math\u0022],\u0022markup\u0022:[{\u0022requested\u0022:\u0022abstract\u0022,\u0022variant\u0022:\u0022abstract\u0022,\u0022view\u0022:\u0022abstract\u0022,\u0022pisa\u0022:\u0022medrxiv;2025.03.14.25323836v1\u0022}]},\u0022instances\u0022:\u0022{\\u0022highwire_abstract_tooltip\\u0022:{\\u0022content\\u0022:{\\u0022text\\u0022:\\u0022\\u0022},\\u0022style\\u0022:{\\u0022tip\\u0022:{\\u0022width\\u0022:20,\\u0022height\\u0022:20,\\u0022border\\u0022:1,\\u0022offset\\u0022:0,\\u0022corner\\u0022:true},\\u0022classes\\u0022:\\u0022qtip-custom hw-tooltip hw-abstract-tooltip qtip-shadow qtip-rounded\\u0022,\\u0022classes_custom\\u0022:\\u0022hw-tooltip hw-abstract-tooltip\\u0022},\\u0022position\\u0022:{\\u0022at\\u0022:\\u0022right center\\u0022,\\u0022my\\u0022:\\u0022left center\\u0022,\\u0022viewport\\u0022:true,\\u0022adjust\\u0022:{\\u0022method\\u0022:\\u0022shift\\u0022}},\\u0022show\\u0022:{\\u0022event\\u0022:\\u0022mouseenter click \\u0022,\\u0022solo\\u0022:true},\\u0022hide\\u0022:{\\u0022event\\u0022:\\u0022mouseleave \\u0022,\\u0022fixed\\u0022:1,\\u0022delay\\u0022:\\u0022100\\u0022}},\\u0022highwire_author_tooltip\\u0022:{\\u0022content\\u0022:{\\u0022text\\u0022:\\u0022\\u0022},\\u0022style\\u0022:{\\u0022tip\\u0022:{\\u0022width\\u0022:15,\\u0022height\\u0022:15,\\u0022border\\u0022:1,\\u0022offset\\u0022:0,\\u0022corner\\u0022:true},\\u0022classes\\u0022:\\u0022qtip-custom hw-tooltip hw-author-tooltip qtip-shadow qtip-rounded\\u0022,\\u0022classes_custom\\u0022:\\u0022hw-tooltip hw-author-tooltip\\u0022},\\u0022position\\u0022:{\\u0022at\\u0022:\\u0022top center\\u0022,\\u0022my\\u0022:\\u0022bottom center\\u0022,\\u0022viewport\\u0022:true,\\u0022adjust\\u0022:{\\u0022method\\u0022:\\u0022\\u0022}},\\u0022show\\u0022:{\\u0022event\\u0022:\\u0022mouseenter \\u0022,\\u0022solo\\u0022:true},\\u0022hide\\u0022:{\\u0022event\\u0022:\\u0022mouseleave \\u0022,\\u0022fixed\\u0022:1,\\u0022delay\\u0022:\\u0022100\\u0022}},\\u0022highwire_reflinks_tooltip\\u0022:{\\u0022content\\u0022:{\\u0022text\\u0022:\\u0022\\u0022},\\u0022style\\u0022:{\\u0022tip\\u0022:{\\u0022width\\u0022:15,\\u0022height\\u0022:15,\\u0022border\\u0022:1,\\u0022mimic\\u0022:\\u0022top center\\u0022,\\u0022offset\\u0022:0,\\u0022corner\\u0022:true},\\u0022classes\\u0022:\\u0022qtip-custom hw-tooltip hw-ref-link-tooltip qtip-shadow qtip-rounded\\u0022,\\u0022classes_custom\\u0022:\\u0022hw-tooltip hw-ref-link-tooltip\\u0022},\\u0022position\\u0022:{\\u0022at\\u0022:\\u0022bottom left\\u0022,\\u0022my\\u0022:\\u0022top left\\u0022,\\u0022viewport\\u0022:true,\\u0022adjust\\u0022:{\\u0022method\\u0022:\\u0022flip\\u0022}},\\u0022show\\u0022:{\\u0022event\\u0022:\\u0022mouseenter \\u0022,\\u0022solo\\u0022:true},\\u0022hide\\u0022:{\\u0022event\\u0022:\\u0022mouseleave \\u0022,\\u0022fixed\\u0022:1,\\u0022delay\\u0022:\\u0022100\\u0022}}}\u0022,\u0022qtipDebug\u0022:\u0022{\\u0022leaveElement\\u0022:0}\u0022,\u0022googleanalytics\u0022:{\u0022account\u0022:[\u0022G-0K57TCX5BY\u0022],\u0022trackOutbound\u0022:1,\u0022trackMailto\u0022:1,\u0022trackDownload\u0022:1,\u0022trackDownloadExtensions\u0022:\u00227z|aac|arc|arj|asf|asx|avi|bin|csv|doc(x|m)?|dot(x|m)?|exe|flv|gif|gz|gzip|hqx|jar|jpe?g|js|mp(2|3|4|e?g)|mov(ie)?|msi|msp|pdf|phps|png|ppt(x|m)?|pot(x|m)?|pps(x|m)?|ppam|sld(x|m)?|thmx|qtm?|ra(m|r)?|sea|sit|tar|tgz|torrent|txt|wav|wma|wmv|wpd|xls(x|m|b)?|xlt(x|m)|xlam|xml|z|zip\u0022,\u0022trackColorbox\u0022:1},\u0022ajaxPageState\u0022:{\u0022js\u0022:{\u0022\\\/\\\/cdn.jsdelivr.net\\\/qtip2\\\/2.2.1\\\/jquery.qtip.min.js\u0022:1,\u0022sites\\\/all\\\/modules\\\/highwire\\\/highwire\\\/plugins\\\/highwire_markup_process\\\/js\\\/highwire_article_reference_popup.js\u0022:1,\u0022sites\\\/all\\\/modules\\\/highwire\\\/highwire\\\/plugins\\\/highwire_markup_process\\\/js\\\/highwire_at_symbol.js\u0022:1,\u00220\u0022:1,\u0022sites\\\/all\\\/modules\\\/contrib\\\/google_analytics\\\/googleanalytics.js\u0022:1,\u0022https:\\\/\\\/www.googletagmanager.com\\\/gtag\\\/js?id=G-0K57TCX5BY\u0022:1,\u00221\u0022:1}}});\n\/\/--\u003E\u003C!]]\u003E\n\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Clink type=\u0022text\/css\u0022 rel=\u0022stylesheet\u0022 href=\u0022https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/sites\/default\/files\/advagg_css\/css__uXgUByez87OKDsgffPHe7u5qNUzr7zOnqWrSJ87THKk__I8zmferlWQG1DHWX_fZmeyRd733gqStwZcOGe0mM0T4__QrrGUc7CpljPR5Aph-ukPbcwtK4AWrHGwCEXJ_k1V_c.css\u0022 media=\u0022all\u0022 \/\u003E\n\u003Clink type=\u0022text\/css\u0022 rel=\u0022stylesheet\u0022 href=\u0022\/\/cdn.jsdelivr.net\/qtip2\/2.2.1\/jquery.qtip.min.css\u0022 media=\u0022all\u0022 \/\u003E\n\u003Clink type=\u0022text\/css\u0022 rel=\u0022stylesheet\u0022 href=\u0022https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/sites\/default\/files\/advagg_css\/css__HGACIFBlu2o05y3afvqlt5wrE_5Dn6MXsexfuEpeIwg__t4SOPxucAPoV3Os7g8dXqyMB1HRXQridRJ82X7nE33E__QrrGUc7CpljPR5Aph-ukPbcwtK4AWrHGwCEXJ_k1V_c.css\u0022 media=\u0022all\u0022 \/\u003E\n\u003Clink rel=\u0027stylesheet\u0027 type=\u0027text\/css\u0027 href=\u0027\/sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/panels\/plugins\/layouts\/onecol\/onecol.css\u0027 \/\u003E\u003C\/head\u003E\u003Cbody\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022panels-ajax-tab-panel panels-ajax-tab-panel-biorxiv-tab-art\u0022\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022panel-display panel-1col clearfix\u0022 \u003E\n  \u003Cdiv class=\u0022panel-panel panel-col\u0022\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022panel-pane pane-highwire-markup\u0022 \u003E\n  \n      \n  \n  \u003Cdiv class=\u0022pane-content\u0022\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv class=\u0022highwire-markup\u0022\u003E\u003Cdiv xmlns=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\u0022 data-highwire-cite-ref-tooltip-instance=\u0022highwire_reflinks_tooltip\u0022 class=\u0022content-block-markup\u0022 xmlns:xhtml=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\u0022\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022article abstract-view \u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022highwire-journal-article-marker-start\u0022\u003E\u003C\/span\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022section abstract\u0022 id=\u0022abstract-1\u0022\u003E\u003Ch2 class=\u0022\u0022\u003EAbstract\u003C\/h2\u003E\u003Cdiv id=\u0022sec-1\u0022 class=\u0022subsection\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-3\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EBackground\u003C\/strong\u003E This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of several AI models, including Deepseek, in diagnosing corneal diseases, glaucoma, and neuro\u25a1ophthalmologic disorders.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv id=\u0022sec-2\u0022 class=\u0022subsection\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-4\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EMethods\u003C\/strong\u003E We retrospectively selected 53 case reports from the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of Iowa, comprising 20 corneal disease cases, 11 glaucoma cases, and 22 neuro\u25a1ophthalmology cases. The case descriptions were input into DeepSeek, ChatGPT\u25a14.0, ChatGPT\u25a101, and Qwens 2.5 Max. These responses were compared with diagnoses rendered by human experts (corneal specialists, glaucoma attendings, and neuro\u25a1ophthalmologists). Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement, defined as the percentage difference between each AI model\u2019s performance and the average human expert performance, were determined.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv id=\u0022sec-3\u0022 class=\u0022subsection\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-5\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EResults\u003C\/strong\u003E DeepSeek achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 79.2%, with specialty-specific accuracies of 90.0% in corneal diseases, 54.5% in glaucoma, and 81.8% in neuro\u25a1ophthalmology. ChatGPT\u25a101 outperformed the other models with an overall accuracy of 84.9% (85.0% in corneal diseases, 63.6% in glaucoma, and 95.5% in neuro\u25a1ophthalmology), while Qwens exhibited a lower overall accuracy of 64.2% (55.0% in corneal diseases, 54.5% in glaucoma, and 77.3% in neuro\u25a1ophthalmology). Interobserver agreement analysis revealed that in corneal diseases, DeepSeek differed by \u20133.3% (90.0% vs 93.3%), ChatGPT\u25a101 by \u20138.3%, and Qwens by \u201338.3%. In glaucoma, DeepSeek outperformed the human expert average by +3.0% (54.5% vs 51.5%), while ChatGPT\u25a14.0 and ChatGPT\u25a101 exceeded it by +12.1%, and Qwens was +3.0% above the human average. In neuro\u25a1ophthalmology, DeepSeek and ChatGPT\u25a14.0 were 9.1% lower than the human average, ChatGPT\u25a101 exceeded it by +4.6%, and Qwens was 13.6% lower.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv id=\u0022sec-4\u0022 class=\u0022subsection\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-6\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EConclusions\u003C\/strong\u003E ChatGPT\u25a101 demonstrated the highest overall diagnostic accuracy, especially in neuro\u25a1ophthalmology, while DeepSeek and ChatGPT\u25a14.0 showed comparable performance. Qwens underperformed relative to the other models, especially in corneal diseases. Although these AI models exhibit promising diagnostic capabilities, they currently lag behind human experts in certain areas, underscoring the need for a collaborative integration of clinical judgment.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv id=\u0022sec-5\u0022 class=\u0022subsection\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-7\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EPlain Language Summary\u003C\/strong\u003E This study evaluated how well several artificial intelligence (AI) models diagnose eye diseases compared to human experts. We tested four AI systems across three types of eye conditions: diseases of the cornea, glaucoma, and neuro-ophthalmologic disorders. Overall, one AI model, ChatGPT-01, performed the best, correctly diagnosing about 85% of cases, and it excelled in neuro-ophthalmology by correctly diagnosing 95.5% of cases. Two other models, DeepSeek and ChatGPT-4.0, each achieved an overall accuracy of around 79%, while the Qwens model performed lower, with an overall accuracy of about 64%. When compared with human experts, who achieved very high accuracy in corneal diseases (93.3%) and neuro-ophthalmology (90.9%) but lower in glaucoma (51.5%), the AI models showed mixed results. In glaucoma, for instance, some AI models even outperformed human experts slightly, while in corneal diseases, all AI models were less accurate than the experts. These findings indicate that while AI shows promise as a supportive tool in diagnosing eye conditions, it still needs further improvement. Combining AI with human clinical judgment appears to be the best approach for accurate eye disease diagnosis.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv id=\u0022sec-6\u0022 class=\u0022subsection\u0022\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EKey summary points\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cul class=\u0022list-unord \u0022 id=\u0022list-1\u0022\u003E\u003Cli id=\u0022list-item-1\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-8\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWhy carry out this study?\u003C\/strong\u003E With the rising burden of eye diseases and the inherent diagnostic challenges for complex conditions like glaucoma and neuro-ophthalmologic disorders, there is an unmet need for innovative diagnostic tools to support clinical decision-making.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli id=\u0022list-item-2\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-9\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWhat did the study ask?\u003C\/strong\u003E This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of four AI models across three ophthalmologic subspecialties, testing the hypothesis that advanced language models can achieve accuracy levels comparable to human experts.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli id=\u0022list-item-3\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-10\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWhat was learned from the study?\u003C\/strong\u003E Our results showed that ChatGPT-01 achieved the highest overall accuracy (84.9%), excelling in neuro-ophthalmology with a 95.5% accuracy, while DeepSeek and ChatGPT-4.0 each achieved 79.2%, and Qwens reached 64.2%.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli id=\u0022list-item-4\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-11\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWhat specific outcomes were observed?\u003C\/strong\u003E In glaucoma, AI model accuracies ranged from 54.5% to 63.6%, with some models slightly surpassing the human expert average of 51.5%, underscoring the diagnostic difficulty of this condition.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli id=\u0022list-item-5\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-12\u0022\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWhat has been learned and future implications?\u003C\/strong\u003E These findings highlight the potential of AI as a valuable adjunct to clinical judgment in ophthalmology, although further research and the integration of multimodal data are essential to optimize these tools for routine clinical practice.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\u003C\/ul\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Ch3\u003ECompeting Interest Statement\u003C\/h3\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-13\u0022\u003EThe authors have declared no competing interest.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Ch3\u003EFunding Statement\u003C\/h3\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-14\u0022\u003EThis study did not receive any funding.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Ch3\u003EAuthor Declarations\u003C\/h3\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-15\u0022\u003EI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and\/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-16\u0022\u003EYes\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-17\u0022\u003EI confirm that all necessary patient\/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient\/participant\/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-18\u0022\u003EYes\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-19\u0022\u003EI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-20\u0022\u003EYes\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-21\u0022\u003EI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-22\u0022\u003EYes\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022section fn-group\u0022 id=\u0022fn-group-1\u0022\u003E\u003Ch2\u003EFootnotes\u003C\/h2\u003E\u003Cul\u003E\u003Cli class=\u0022fn-others\u0022 id=\u0022fn-1\u0022\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-1\u0022\u003E\u003Ca class=\u0022rev-xref\u0022 href=\u0022#xref-fn-1-1\u0022\u003E\u21b5\u003C\/a\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022fn-label\u0022\u003E*\u003C\/span\u003E signifies first co-authorship and equivalent work performed\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\u003C\/ul\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022section data-availability\u0022 id=\u0022sec-18\u0022\u003E\u003Ch2 class=\u0022\u0022\u003EData Availability\u003C\/h2\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022p-43\u0022\u003EAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022highwire-journal-article-marker-end\u0022\u003E\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022related-urls\u0022\u003E\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E  \u003C\/div\u003E\n\n  \n  \u003C\/div\u003E\n\u003Cdiv class=\u0022panel-separator\u0022\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022panel-pane pane-biorxiv-copyright\u0022 \u003E\n  \n      \n  \n  \u003Cdiv class=\u0022pane-content\u0022\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv class=\u0022field field-name-field-highwire-copyright field-type-text field-label-inline clearfix\u0022\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022field-label\u0022\u003ECopyright\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022field-items\u0022\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022field-item even\u0022\u003EThe copyright holder for this preprint is the author\/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.\u003Cspan class=\u0022license-type-none\u0022\u003E All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E\u003C\/div\u003E  \u003C\/div\u003E\n\n  \n  \u003C\/div\u003E\n\u003C\/div\u003E\n  \u003C\/div\u003E\n\u003C\/div\u003E\n\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022 src=\u0022https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/sites\/default\/files\/js\/js_SXHPyYQMndPSjH0oAPTy1xd0XLtmYCIziRIiNb0RJd8.js\u0022\u003E\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003C\/body\u003E\u003C\/html\u003E"}