Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation

Adam Ceney, Stephanie Tolond, Andrzej Glowinski, Ben Marks, Simon Swift, Tom Palser
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.20147975
Adam Ceney
1Methods Analytics Ltd, Sheffield Digital Campus, Electric Works, Sheffield, S1 2BJ United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: adam.ceney@gmail.com
Stephanie Tolond
1Methods Analytics Ltd, Sheffield Digital Campus, Electric Works, Sheffield, S1 2BJ United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrzej Glowinski
1Methods Analytics Ltd, Sheffield Digital Campus, Electric Works, Sheffield, S1 2BJ United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben Marks
1Methods Analytics Ltd, Sheffield Digital Campus, Electric Works, Sheffield, S1 2BJ United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Swift
1Methods Analytics Ltd, Sheffield Digital Campus, Electric Works, Sheffield, S1 2BJ United Kingdom
4University of Exeter Business School (INDEX)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Palser
1Methods Analytics Ltd, Sheffield Digital Campus, Electric Works, Sheffield, S1 2BJ United Kingdom
2Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
3SAPPHIRE, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Data Availability

The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide licence to the Publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known now or created in the future), to i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution, ii) translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution, iii) create any other derivative work(s) based on the Contribution, iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution, v) the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located; and, vi) licence any third party to do any or all of the above.

Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 08, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation
Adam Ceney, Stephanie Tolond, Andrzej Glowinski, Ben Marks, Simon Swift, Tom Palser
medRxiv 2020.07.07.20147975; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.20147975
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation
Adam Ceney, Stephanie Tolond, Andrzej Glowinski, Ben Marks, Simon Swift, Tom Palser
medRxiv 2020.07.07.20147975; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.20147975

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (454)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (159)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5288)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (198)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (214)
  • Health Informatics (701)
  • Health Policy (361)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (165)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5922)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (366)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (772)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (133)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (145)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (481)
  • Ophthalmology (153)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (97)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (137)
  • Primary Care Research (99)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (865)
  • Public and Global Health (2033)
  • Radiology and Imaging (354)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (159)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)