Partners’ access to scans and birth is a postcode lottery, data show
BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3876 (Published 05 October 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m3876Linked Opinion
Birth partners are not a luxury
Trusts must be more responsive to the needs of pregnant women and their partners, researchers have said, after finding that they have been slow to lift bans imposed on attending scans and births, creating a postcode lottery on access.
Most trusts in England banned partners attending antenatal scans during the first peak of covid-19 in March and most still had restrictions in place in August, show findings from freedom of information (FOI) requests from public health academics at the University of Cambridge (box 1). But the extent of these restrictions varied significantly.
Restrictions on access to maternity services
Nine out 10 (73, 90%) trusts prohibited partners attending the 12 week antenatal scans during the first peak of the virus, and 71 trusts (88%) had the same policy in place for attending the 20 week scan
At the end of August, only 20 trusts (25%) said they had lifted restrictions for 12 week scans, and 31 (38%) had done so for 20 week scans
Most trusts (77, 95%) restricted partner attendance at non-routine services—such as assessment for reduced fetal movements—during the first peak
All trusts allowed partners to attend the birth, but 70 (86%) applied some restrictions, such as banning attendance during induction of labour or the latent phase of labour, or reducing the time that partners could be present after birth. In one case this was cut to less than an hour
Some 16 trusts (20%) stopped offering women the choice of a homebirth during the first peak, and 39 (48%) restricted partner attendance at the homebirth
Most trusts (80, 99%) restricted partner attendance in some way at postnatal services, with half (40, 49%) barring partners from attending altogether
Some 35 trusts (43%) indicated that they had not yet started action to reverse their policies. And 17 trusts (24%) stated that they would reinstate restriction in their original form in the event of local lockdowns, or a significant second peak of the virus
All trusts said their policies included provisions for making exceptions, but only a third (27, 33%) had a formal process for doing so
26 trusts (32%) had neglected to work with patients or patients’ groups on the design and implementation of local policies.
Sebastian Walsh, academic public health specialty registrar, who helped collect and analyse the data,1 said, “We expected to find that there had been severe restrictions overall. But underneath that, there was a lot of discrepancy, partly during the peak, but also in the way that trusts have gone about trying to reverse them. It has created a postcode lottery.”
The academics sent FOI requests to every NHS maternity service in England on 24 August, asking for details of restrictions on partner attendance through the maternity pathway during the first peak of covid-19. They also asked about whether restrictions were still in place.
All the trusts that responded (81 out 127, 63%) reported implementing some restrictions and most still had restrictions in place at the end of August. A quarter of trusts also said they would reimpose restrictions in the event of local lockdowns or a second peak in cases.
On 8 September, NHS England published joint guidance with the Royal College of Midwives and the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology to help trusts2 reintroduce access for partners. NHS England also wrote to trusts on 19 September3 asking them to relax visiting restrictions.
An NHS spokesperson said, “Our NHS advice now is clear that wherever possible mums should be able to be accompanied by their partners for scans, antenatal visits, and for childbirth, which they have been able to do throughout the pandemic.”
Walsh said that the new advice would alleviate some of the problems. But he said the team’s data showed that the problems could resurface in the second wave, and called for a more nuanced approach from trusts. “A significant number of trusts have said that, even in light of the NHS guidance, if there’s a second major peak, we will do the same again. We need them to say, ‘we recognise that we can do better than what we did.’ It looks like there is some work still to do to persuade trusts.”
Edward Morris, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said, “We are acutely aware how difficult restrictions on birth partners attending maternity services have been for women and families throughout the pandemic. With increasing prevalence of the virus in many areas and a growing number of local lockdowns and restrictions, services are likely to need to maintain some of these restrictions for some time to come. However, we know that all services are prioritising enabling birth partners to attend labour and birth and as many key appointments, including scans, as possible.”
Lucy Watson, chair of the Patients Association, said, “The covid-19 emergency period has been extremely difficult for patients and those close to them, and we would hope that NHS services will have patients front and centre of their planning for restarting care. Pregnancy and giving birth can be both a joyful and a stressful time for women and their partners. All maternity services should be ensuring that women can be supported by their partners when they are attending appointments for scans and when they are giving birth.”