Introduction

Previous studies have claimed that conservative political ideology is associated with better health.1–6 However, the empirical studies on this topic have been either ecological4–6 or utilised cross-sectional study data.1–3 Two ecological studies found a relationship between the proportion of conservative voters in an electorate and lower mortality rates.5 ,6 Investigators postulate that these findings are due to Labour voters being from lower socioeconomic backgrounds while conservative supporters are more likely to be drawn from higher socioeconomic backgrounds.5 However, such studies may be subject to the ecological fallacy, that is, a correlation between the fraction of conservative voters in an area and a lower mortality rate does not necessarily prove that conservative voters live longer.

Findings from cross-sectional studies conducted in Japan and Europe have reported that individuals expressing a conservative ideology (as compared to liberal ideology)1 ,2 tend to report better self-rated health. In the USA, it has been reported that Republicans are less likely to report poor health in comparison to Democrats.3 Based on findings from these ecological and cross-sectional studies, researchers have postulated that the association between political beliefs and health is due to differences in socioeconomic characteristics, such as economic deprivation.5 For example, in the UK, the Labour Party has long been identified with the working class while the Conservative Party has been aligned with the Middle and Upper Classes.4 In the USA, researchers theorised that political beliefs are a marker for religiosity,7–9 civic participation10 ,11 or values that emphasise individual responsibility,12 ,13 each of which has been shown correlated with a healthier pattern of behaviours (eg, alcohol and tobacco abstinence). Among the cross-sectional studies, researchers have attempted to control for sociodemographic covariates, such as age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), education, occupation, family income, race, marital status, religious service attendance, that could potentially confound the relationship between political ideology and health outcomes.2 ,3 They found that for each unit increase in the political ideology scale (ie, more conservative) the OR for reporting poor health decreased (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.96).2 Similarly, when looking at political party affiliation among a representative sample of American respondents, Republicans, in comparison to Democrats were significantly less likely to report poor health.3

Potential mediators between political beliefs and time to death include perceived happiness, religiosity, fundamentalism and self-rated health. Psychological studies have shown a robust relationship between being conservative and an increase likelihood of being happy.14 ,15 Findings from an American survey conducted by the Pew Research Center indicated that 45, 30 and 29% of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, respectively, reported being very happy.16 In a recent literature review, consistent findings indicate happiness is predictive of longevity and health.15 Income, age, education, sex, religiosity, marital status and other demographic differences between Republicans and Democrats16 might explain why the members who affiliate with the former political party are more likely to report being happy. Also, conservatives are more likely to be religious,17 which in turn is significantly associated with better health.9 ,18 Similarly, fundamentalism, or a strict adherence to orthodox doctrines, has shown to be related to health.18 ,19 Future studies need to identify the role of happiness and religion in the relationship between political beliefs and health.

For this investigation we use the term political beliefs to capture political ideology (conservatism vs liberalism) and political party affiliation (Republicans vs Democrats). Political beliefs might be a comprehensive marker for latent attitudes, values and beliefs that might promote health.2 Liberalism might be a marker for beliefs in equality and conservatism might be a marker for fundamentalism. Also, political beliefs might be a marker for racist beliefs. These covariates should also be included in analysis identifying the relationship between political beliefs and health.

Previous studies have not distinguished between an individual's political party affiliation and an individual's political ideology. However, there are various factors, other than political ideology, that can influence political party affiliation. US State of residence, family tradition and religious beliefs could plausibly play a role in political party affiliation somewhat independent of one's personal ideology. Thus, an examination of how political beliefs are associated with health needs to examine political party affiliation and political ideology separately. Also, social epidemiologists argue that beliefs can influence health differentially across groups. Therefore, effect modification by gender and SES should be tested.20 Since researchers have observed a gradient where certain sociodemographic groups, namely women and those from lower SES backgrounds, have differential access to power and resources, the association between political beliefs and mortality potentially are greater among these groups in comparison to men and those from higher SES backgrounds, respectively.20

The objective of this study is to determine whether political party affiliation and political ideological beliefs are predictive of time to death while accounting for several sociodemographic and economic characteristics measured at baseline. We investigate the relationship between political ideology and political party affiliation and time to death among a population-based and representative sample of adults within the USA. We extend previous studies describing the relationship between political beliefs and health outcomes by employing a prospective design that uses time to death as an outcome and by exploring potential mediators of this relationship. Also, given the results of earlier studies, we hypothesise that conservatives and Republicans are more likely to report being happier, perceive better self-rated health, and therefore less likely to experience mortality during follow-up in comparison to liberals and Democrats, respectively.

Discussion

We explored whether political party affiliations or political ideologies were associated with a greater risk of mortality during follow-up in the USA. We used a large, nationally-representative study with long-term follow-up that is rich in demographic, behavioural, and attitudinal variables, and contains both a measure of self-rated health and a measure of mortality. Previous work has been conducted in this area, but was more exploratory as those studies did not have both subjective measures coupled with long-term prospective mortality follow-up.

Although researchers argue that the association between political party affiliation and political ideology, and health is explained by sociodemographic characteristics,1 ,2 associations were held when we controlled for these variables. We observed those who identified themselves as being Independents were weakly, but statistically significantly less likely to die during follow-up in comparison to Democrats when controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. When region of residence, setting and cohort were added to the model, no significant changes in the coefficient were observed, suggesting that these area characteristics do not act as confounders. When political ideology was used as the exposure of interest, conservatives and moderates were at greater risk for mortality during follow-up in comparison to liberals. Proposed mediators such as happiness and religious fundamentalism did not explain these results. These findings from an American population-based and representative sample are discordant with previous identified relationships between political ideology and health observed in the USA,3 ,6 Europe2 ,4 ,5 and Japan.1

There are possible reasons for our unusual findings. The outcome, time to death, might be a more valid measure of health status, in comparison to other measures, such as self-rated health. Since both self-rated health and political beliefs are inherently measures of one's subjective states, the relationship between political beliefs and self-rated health could be confounded by perceptual states. For example, their health states being otherwise identical, liberals may be more or less likely to perceive themselves as sick than conservatives when in fact their objective measures of health are identical. Furthermore, results remained consistent even when self-rated health was included in the models. Those who fall ill might plausibly change their political views on partisan issues such as universal healthcare, welfare or disability payments. However, we could not test such mechanisms with the data available. Another possible reason for these findings is that there are potential confounders between political beliefs and time to death that were not included in the analyses.

When analyses were stratified by sex, we found being independent, in comparison to those who affiliated with the Democratic Party, were less likely to die during follow-up among women only. When describing the association between political ideology and mortality, among men only, those who identified as being conservative were significantly more likely to die during follow-up. This indicates that political party affiliation and political ideology might be an important marker for health status among women, while political ideology might be important for men. These differences might be due to the social construct of gender, being a consistent effect modifier with SES or other social determinants such as beliefs or gender norms on health outcomes.25

Our results indicate that happiness and self-rated health were not mediators between the relationship between political beliefs and time to death. One reason for this finding is that happiness and self-rated health were collected at baseline, and thus were not time-varying covariates. Therefore, we could not determine if political party ideology and ideology influenced a change in happiness or self-rated health, which could then lead to a change in time to death. Future analyses should include looking at repeated measures of happiness and self-rated health over time so that one may determine whether political beliefs leads to a change in happiness and self-rated health, which thus leads to an increase risk for mortality. Also, other characteristics, such as social cohesion perceived by the individual, might mediate the relationship between political beliefs and health. For example, liberals might be more likely to have stronger ties to those around them and to their community. Social cohesion has shown to be related to behaviours and health outcomes.26 ,27

Religious fundamentalism has shown to be related to poor self-rated health.18 However, our findings indicate that fundamentalism is protective against mortality. Nonetheless, there was no evidence that the association between political party affiliation or political ideology and time to death acted through fundamentalism.

Other possible explanations for our findings include differing cognitive styles and motivation between conservatives and liberals.28 Liberals have shown to seek cognitive closure, while conservatives tend to be more accepting of simple solutions and unambiguous resolutions.29 Therefore, liberals might be more dissatisfied with their lives and health since they are more likely to experience negative effects due to rumination and introspection.30 Another possible explanation is the differences in the way groups react to social and income inequality.31 Liberals are more likely to view equality as just and desirable, while conservatives are more likely to accept gaps between the rich and poor.32 As a result, in societies that have high inequalities, liberals are more likely to be dissatisfied. On the other hand, conservatives are more likely to accept and justify income inequality and are more likely to report being happier in comparison to liberals.33

Other researchers argue that political ideology is unlikely to be a causal factor for health, morbidity and mortality.2 Political beliefs could be seen as markers of latent attitudes, values, and beliefs, such as religiosity, social and civic participation and individual responsibility, which in turn could have positive influences on health.2 ,34 For example, religious involvement has been shown to be protective against mortality.7 ,8 ,9 A drawback of focusing solely on the individual is that the social environment is ignored. This simplification ignores the social and contextual factors that shape and interact with individual level factors, such as political beliefs. Social ties, such as the relationships between family, friends, and peers, throughout the lifespan might shape political beliefs. Recent findings indicate that parents who practiced strict child-rearing styles predicted conservative attitudes in those children more than 17 years later.35 Also, other researchers observed that individuals with right-wing attitudes were more likely to report that their parents had restricted their experiences during childhood and controlled over their choice of friends.36 In turn, social factors such as social capital, social trust, and group membership have shown to be associated with health and total mortality.10 ,37

Strengths of this investigation include utilisation of a large population-based and representative sample of the US population; the assessment of the outcome to death proved to be high in validity; and we were able to use longitudinal analyses. Therefore, we were able to determine if political party affiliation and political ideological beliefs reported at baseline were predictive of time to death. Another strength is that we looked at political beliefs in two separate ways; political party affiliation and political ideology. Political ideology and political party affiliation were weakly correlated, which might indicate differing concepts and thus should be included in analyses separately.

The findings from this investigation need to be interpreted with caution due to limitations. Although the study design was longitudinal, participants were assessed only at baseline. As a result, the potential relationship between time-varying covariates and time to death could not be described because all independent factors were measured at baseline. Therefore, we could not determine whether changes in time-varying predictors, such as beliefs and attitudes, were associated with time to death. More importantly, the association between changes in political party affiliation and political ideology within individuals and their subsequent effect on mortality could not be determined. Another limitation is that area level covariates were not included in the analyses. Future investigations could involve investigating cross-level interactions between political party affiliation or political ideology and state-level characteristics such as political party affiliation of the state of residence. For example, one could identify the association between being a Democrat in a state that is predominantly Republican on risk for mortality.

In conclusion our study suggests that political party affiliation and ideology is related to time to death among a population-based and representative sample of US adults. Further research is required in order to determine the potential role of attitudes, beliefs and behaviours in the relationship between political party affiliation and political ideology with time to death.