The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow
users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred …

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement,
published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why …

In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was
developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; …

Background To comprehend the results of diagnostic accuracy studies, readers must understand
the design, conduct, analysis, and results of such studies. That goal can be achieved …

Background In the era of evidence based medicine, with systematic reviews as its cornerstone,
adequate quality assessment tools should be available. There is currently a lack of a …

Incomplete reporting has been identified as a major source of avoidable waste in biomedical
research. Essential information is often not provided in study reports, impeding the …

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies of diagnostic accuracy most often report pairs
of sensitivity and specificity. We demonstrate the advantage of using bivariate meta-…

Objectives To describe the processes used to update the PRISMA 2009 statement for
reporting systematic reviews, present results of a survey conducted to inform the update, …

The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and
accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the …

Diagnostic testing can be used to discriminate subjects with a target disorder from subjects
without it. Several indicators of diagnostic performance have been proposed, such as …