Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to
efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and …

Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of
review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, …

Objective: To identify methods to increase response to postal questionnaires. Design:
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal …

Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and
planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-…

Background Two types of treatment are being used for patients with ruptured intracranial
aneurysms: endovascular detachable-coil treatment or craniotomy and clipping. We undertook …

Background Self‐administered questionnaires are widely used to collect data in epidemiological
research, but non‐response reduces the effective sample size and can introduce bias. …

Clinical research is necessary for an effective response to an emerging infectious disease
outbreak. However, research efforts are often hastily organised and done using various …

Importance Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data (IPD) aim
to collect, check, and reanalyze individual-level data from all studies addressing a particular …

The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to
compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and …

The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials in
order to compare directly the effects of different interventions in ways that minimize bias. If …