On September 28, 2018, Palestine lodged a complaint at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the United States, arguing that the latter's shifting of its Israeli embassy to Jerusalem violates the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) 1 and it should be shifted. 2 This article seeks to address the legal issues that may arise before the ICJ in this case. This article, not being an amicus curiae brief or advocacy piece, seeks to engage in academic discourse on the issues and not argue for or against the case of the disputing parties. While this is an issue where realpolitik may well be intrinsically connected with the law, the former is by no means the focus of the article and is only looked into when otherwise inevitable. President Trump's decision to move the embassy aligns him with the position taken by US Congress with the passing of Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 (EA). 3 However, although the EA required the US executive branch to shift the embassy to Jerusalem, it provided the President with an option to seek a waiver, which presidents preceding President Trump persistently availed. 4 The prior presidents also argued the power of recognition is a purely executive matter, an argument that the US Supreme Court accepted in Zivotofsky v. Kerry (Zivotofsky). 5 President Trump, however, opted to deviate from the position of his predecessors and finally moved the US embassy to Jerusalem on May 14, 2018.6