… In that way, they can resolve the skeptical paradox and avoid ancient disputes (see
Sinnott-Armstrong 2004, 2008). Contrastivism can also help to resolve other puzzles in the …

To make the issue stark, let us begin with a few assumptions. I believe that these
assumptions are probably roughly accurate, but none is certain, and I will not try to justify …

… uses in addition to its attributive uses or that when they call a world or total set of consequences
good, they are calling it good for consequences or for a world (Sinnott-Armstrong 2003a)…

… I respond to some proposed counterexamples in Sinnott-Armstrong, Moor, and Fogelin 1986;
and Sinnott-Armstrong 1999b. Even if these responses failed to validate modus ponens in …

A complete discussion would include analyses of the controver-sial terms' ought'and'can',
but I need not here undertake such enterprises. Any plausible analyses which do not beg the …

Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? To answer this
question, we must first specify legal criteria for criminal responsibility and then ask how …

For much of the twentieth century, philosophy and science went their separate ways. In
moral philosophy, fear of the so-called naturalistic fallacy kept moral philosophers from …

… Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that God is not only not essential to morality, but that our …
Sinnott-Armstrong brings to bear convincing examples and data, as well as a lucid, elegant, …

When we refer to moral intuitions, we mean strong, stable, immediate moral beliefs. These
moral beliefs are strong insofar as they are held with confidence and resist counter-evidence (…

… Some externalists still deny this, but their denial is implausible, as I have argued elsewhere
(Sinnott-Armstrong 2002b). Besides, most externalists are mainly concerned about non-…