User profiles for An-Wen Chan
 | An-Wen ChanWomen's College Research Institute, University of Toronto Verified email at utoronto.ca Cited by 82455 |
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
ContextSelective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the nature or
direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is currently …
direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is currently …
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical
trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the …
trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the …
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials
The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting,
and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in …
and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in …
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot
reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot …
reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot …
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
Objective To examine the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a broad cohort of
published randomised trials. Design Retrospective review of publications and follow up …
published randomised trials. Design Retrospective review of publications and follow up …
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare
evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and …
evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and …
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
Background The increased use of meta-analysis in systematic reviews of healthcare
interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a …
interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a …
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension
The CONSORT 2010 statement provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomised trials.
Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency in the evaluation of …
Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency in the evaluation of …
[HTML][HTML] Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension
The SPIRIT 2013 statement aims to improve the completeness of clinical trial protocol
reporting by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be …
reporting by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be …
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
Comment 102 www. thelancet. com Vol 383 January 11, 2014 from governments, which are
run, at least partly, by politicians. The success of funding policy, and the job security of the …
run, at least partly, by politicians. The success of funding policy, and the job security of the …
