Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252827. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly developed into a global epidemic. To control its spread, countries have implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as school closures, bans of small gatherings, or even stay-at-home orders. Here we study the effectiveness of seven NPIs in reducing the number of new infections, which was inferred from the reported cases of COVID-19 using a semi-mechanistic Bayesian hierarchical model. Based on data from the first epidemic wave of n = 20 countries (i.e., the United States, Canada, Australia, the EU-15 countries, Norway, and Switzerland), we estimate the relative reduction in the number of new infections attributed to each NPI. Among the NPIs considered, bans of large gatherings were most effective, followed by venue and school closures, whereas stay-at-home orders and work-from-home orders were least effective. With this retrospective cross-country analysis, we provide estimates regarding the effectiveness of different NPIs during the first epidemic wave.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bayes Theorem
  • COVID-19 / prevention & control*
  • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
  • Disease Outbreaks / statistics & numerical data
  • Epidemics / prevention & control
  • Epidemics / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Physical Distancing
  • Quarantine / methods*
  • Quarantine / trends*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 / pathogenicity

Grants and funding

NB, EvW and SF acknowledge funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) as part of the Eccellenza grant 186932 on “Data-driven health management”. The funding bodies had no control over design, conduct, data, analysis, review, reporting, or interpretation of the research conducted.