Automation improves repeatability of retinal oximetry measurements

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260120. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Purpose: Retinal oximetry is a technique based on spectrophotometry where images are analyzed with software capable of calculating vessel oxygen saturation and vessel diameter. In this study, the effect of automation of measurements of retinal vessel oxygen saturation and vessel diameter is explored.

Methods: Until now, operators have had to choose each vessel segment to be measured explicitly. A new, automatic version of the software automatically selects the vessels once the operator defines a measurement area. Five operators analyzed image pairs from the right eye of 23 healthy subjects with semiautomated retinal oximetry analysis software, Oxymap Analyzer (v2.5.1), and an automated version (v3.0). Inter- and intra-operator variability was investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between oxygen saturation measurements of vessel segments in the same area of the retina.

Results: For semiautomated saturation measurements, the inter-rater ICC was 0.80 for arterioles and venules. For automated saturation measurements, the inter-rater ICC was 0.97 for arterioles and 0.96 for venules. For semiautomated diameter measurements, the inter-rater ICC was 0.71 for arterioles and venules. For automated diameter measurements the inter-rater ICC was 0.97 for arterioles and 0.95 for venules. The inter-rater ICCs were different (p < 0.01) between the semiautomated and automated version in all instances.

Conclusion: Automated measurements of retinal oximetry values are more repeatable compared to measurements where vessels are selected manually.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Automation
  • Humans
  • Oximetry / methods*
  • Oxygen / analysis*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retinal Vessels / chemistry*
  • Software
  • Venules / chemistry
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Oxygen

Grants and funding

University of Iceland Research Fund (RAK), Icelandic Research Fund (VH), Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (SB). Other authors received no funding related to this study (OBO, TSE, SHH). The funders provided support in the form of salaries for authors RAK, VH and SB, but did, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the “author contributions” section.