The closer the better: does better access to outpatient care prevent hospitalization?

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):801-817. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01043-4. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Abstract

In 2010-2012, new outpatient service locations were established in poor Hungarian micro-regions. We exploit this quasi-experiment to estimate the extent of substitution between outpatient and inpatient care. Fixed-effects Poisson models on individual-level panel data for years 2008-2015 show that the number of outpatient visits increased by 19% and the number of inpatient stays decreased by 1.6% as a result, driven by a marked reduction of potentially avoidable hospitalization (PAH) (5%). In our dynamic specification, PAH effects occur in the year after the treatment, whereas non-PAH only decreases with a multi-year lag. The instrumental variable estimates suggest that a one euro increase in outpatient care expenditures produces a 0.6 euro decrease in inpatient care expenditures. Our results (1) strengthen the claim that bringing outpatient care closer to a previously underserved population yields considerable health benefits, and (2) suggest that there is a strong substitution element between outpatient and inpatient care.

Keywords: Administrative panel data; Inpatient care; Outpatient care; Potentially avoidable hospitalization; Quasi-experiment; Substitution.

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care / economics*
  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Chronic Disease / economics
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Health Care Costs
  • Health Services Accessibility / economics*
  • Health Services Accessibility / statistics & numerical data*
  • Hospitalization / economics*
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitalization / trends*
  • Humans
  • Hungary