Walking speed and step length asymmetry modify the energy cost of walking after stroke

Louis N Awad; Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan T Pohlig; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Darcy S Reisman

doi:10.1177/1545968314552528

Walking speed and step length asymmetry modify the energy cost of walking after stroke

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jun;29(5):416-23. doi: 10.1177/1545968314552528. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

Authors

Louis N Awad¹, Jacqueline A Palmer¹, Ryan T Pohlig², Stuart A Binder-Macleod³, Darcy S Reisman⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
² Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Delaware Clinical and Translational Research Accel Program, University of Delware, Newark, DE, USA.
³ Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Delaware Clinical and Translational Research Accel Program, University of Delware, Newark, DE, USA.
⁴ Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA dreisman@udel.edu.

Abstract

Background: A higher energy cost of walking poststroke has been linked to reduced walking performance and reduced participation in the community.

Objective: To determine the contribution of postintervention improvements in walking speed and spatiotemporal gait asymmetry to the reduction in the energy cost of walking after stroke.

Methods: In all, 42 individuals with chronic hemiparesis (>6 months poststroke) were recruited to participate in 12 weeks of walking rehabilitation. The energy cost of walking, walking speed, and step length, swing time, and stance time asymmetries were calculated pretraining and posttraining. Sequential regression analyses tested the cross-sectional (ie, pretraining) and longitudinal (ie, posttraining changes) relationships between the energy cost of walking versus speed and each measure of asymmetry.

Results: Pretraining walking speed (β = -.506) and swing time asymmetry (β = .403) predicted pretraining energy costs: (adj)R(2) = 0.713; F(3, 37) = 34.05; P < .001. In contrast, change in walking speed (β = .340) and change in step length asymmetry (β = .934) predicted change in energy costs with a significant interaction between these independent predictors: (adj)R(2) = 0.699; F(4, 31) = 21.326; P < .001. Moderation by the direction or the magnitude of pretraining asymmetry was not found.

Conclusions: For persons in the chronic phase of stroke recovery, faster and more symmetric walking after intervention appears to be more energetically advantageous than merely walking faster or more symmetrically. This finding has important functional implications, given the relationship between the energy cost of walking and community walking participation.

Keywords: gait; oxygen consumption; stroke; symmetry.

Publication types

Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

Cross-Sectional Studies
Electric Stimulation
Energy Metabolism / physiology*
Exercise Test
Exercise Therapy / methods*
Female
Functional Laterality / physiology*
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Oxygen Consumption / physiology
Paresis / etiology
Paresis / rehabilitation*
Posture
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke / complications
Walking / physiology*

Abstract

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding