Risk factors for acute respiratory infection in the Australian community

Yingxi Chen; Emlyn Williams; Martyn Kirk

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101440

Risk factors for acute respiratory infection in the Australian community

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 17;9(7):e101440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101440. eCollection 2014.

Authors

Yingxi Chen¹, Emlyn Williams², Martyn Kirk¹

Affiliations

¹ National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
² Statistical Consulting Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for ARI in the Australian community.

Methods: We used a national survey of 7578 randomly selected respondents in 2008-2009 to identify the risk factors of ARI. A case was defined as a person experiencing cold or flu with one or more symptoms of: fever, chills, sore throat, runny nose, or cough in the previous four weeks.

Results: There were 19.8% (1505/7578) of respondents who reported ARI in the four weeks prior to the survey. Age was an independent risk factor for ARI, with the risk of acquiring ARI decreasing as age increased. Respondents reporting asthma (OR 1.4, 95%CI: 1.2-1.7) or having someone in their house attending childcare (OR 1.6, 95%CI: 1.2-2.1) were more likely to report ARI.

Conclusions: It is important to identify ways of interrupting transmission of ARI amongst children. Improving identification of risk factors will enable targeted interventions for this exceedingly common syndrome.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Asthma / epidemiology
Australia / epidemiology
Child
Child, Preschool
Environmental Exposure*
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Respiratory Tract Infections / diagnosis
Respiratory Tract Infections / epidemiology*
Respiratory Tract Infections / transmission*
Risk Factors
Social Class
Surveys and Questionnaires
Weather
Young Adult

Grants and funding

The study was funded by the Commonwealth Department of Health, and study conduct was overseen by a committee comprised of representatives from Australian government agencies and departments. The funding agency had no role in data collection or analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.