Antibacterial honey for the prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections (HONEYPOT): a randomised trial

Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;14(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70258-5. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of evidence to guide the best strategy for prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections. Antibacterial honey has shown promise as a novel, cheap, effective, topical prophylactic agent without inducing microbial resistance. We therefore assessed whether daily application of honey at the exit site would increase the time to peritoneal-dialysis-related infections compared with standard exit-site care plus intranasal mupirocin prophylaxis for nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus.

Methods: In this open-label trial undertaken in 26 centres in Australia and New Zealand, participants undergoing peritoneal dialysis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio with an adaptive allocation algorithm to daily topical exit-site application of antibacterial honey plus standard exit-site care or intranasal mupirocin prophylaxis (only in carriers of nasal S aureus) plus standard exit-site care (control group). The primary endpoint was time to first infection related to peritoneal dialysis (exit-site infection, tunnel infection, or peritonitis). The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number 12607000537459.

Findings: Of 371 participants, 186 were assigned to the honey group and 185 to the control group. The median peritoneal-dialysis-related infection-free survival times were not significantly different in the honey (16·0 months [IQR not estimable]) and control groups (17·7 months [not estimable]; unadjusted hazard ratio 1·12, 95% CI 0·83-1·51; p=0·47). In the subgroup analyses, honey increased the risks of both the primary endpoint (1·85, 1·05-3·24; p=0·03) and peritonitis (2·25, 1·16-4·36) in participants with diabetes. The incidences of serious adverse events (298 vs 327, respectively; p=0·1) and deaths (14 vs 18, respectively; p=0·9) were not significantly different in the honey and control groups. 11 (6%) participants in the honey group had local skin reactions.

Interpretation: The findings of this trial show that honey cannot be recommended routinely for the prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections.

Funding: Baxter Healthcare, Queensland Government, Comvita, and Gambro.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Topical
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Australia
  • Bacterial Infections / prevention & control*
  • Carrier State / drug therapy
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Honey*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mupirocin / administration & dosage
  • New Zealand
  • Peritoneal Dialysis / adverse effects*
  • Peritonitis / prevention & control*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Mupirocin