Validation and interpretation of the Dutch version of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire

J Neurol Sci. 2012 Sep 15;320(1-2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.06.024. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

Abstract

Background: The Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ) was developed for screening of MS patients at risk for cognitive impairment with a patient self-report (MSNQ-P) and an informant version (MSNQ-I). The objective of this study was to validate the Dutch versions and determine their interpretability.

Methods: The MSNQ was completed by 121 MS patients and their partners (informants). We investigated the factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. Interrater reliability between MNSQ-P and MSNQ-I was investigated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa. For interpretability of both MSNQ versions we calculated sensitivity, specificity and cut-off scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with related area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the added value of combining both versions.

Results: We found a unidimensional factor structure. Cronbach's alphas were 0.93 and 0.94 for MSNQ-P and MSNQ-I, respectively. The ICC was 0.59 and kappas were ≤0.50. No cut-off score could be defined for the MSNQ-P because of low sensitivity. For the MSNQ-I, sensitivity was 0.75 and specificity 0.71 (AUC 0.80). The cut-off score was 21. ROC curve analyses showed no added value of the MSNQ-P when used in combination with the MSNQ-I.

Conclusions: The MSNQ-I is preferred over the MSNQ-P to screen MS patients for cognitive impairment.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Cognition Disorders / complications
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Cognition Disorders / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Sclerosis / diagnosis
  • Multiple Sclerosis / psychology*
  • Netherlands
  • Neuropsychological Tests / statistics & numerical data*
  • Observer Variation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Psychometrics
  • ROC Curve
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Report
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Spouses / psychology
  • Translating