Background: It is highly desirable to terminate a clinical trial early if the emerging data suggests that the experimental treatment is ineffective, or substantially less effective than the level the study was designed to detect. Many studies have used a conditional power calculation as the basis for termination for futility. However, in order to compute conditional power one must posit an assumption about the distribution of the future data yet to be observed, such as that the original design assumptions will apply, or that the future data will have the same treatment effect as that estimated from the current 'trend' in the data. Each such assumption will yield a different conditional power value.
Purpose: The assessment of futility is described in terms of the observed quantities alone, specifically the interim Z-value or the interim confidence limit on the magnitude of the treatment effect, such that specified type I and II error probabilities are achieved. No assumption is required regarding the distribution of the future data yet to be observed.
Methods: Lachin [1] presents a review of futility stopping based on assessment of conditional power and evaluates the statistical properties of a futility stopping rule. These methods are adapted to futility stopping using only the observed data without any assumption about the future data yet to be observed.
Results: The statistical properties of the futility monitoring plan depend specifically on the corresponding boundary value for the interim Z-value. These include the probability of interim stopping under the null or under a specific alternative hypothesis, and the resulting type I and II error probabilities. Thus, the stopping rule can be uniquely specified in terms of a boundary for the interim Z-value. Alternately, the stopping rule can be specified in terms of a boundary on the upper confidence limit for the treatment group effect (favoring treatment). Herein it is shown that this approach is equivalent to a boundary on the test Z-value, from which the operating characteristics of the stopping rule can then be calculated.
Limitations: While the statistical properties described herein strictly apply to a pre-specified futility boundary, it is also shown that these methods can be applied in an ad-hoc manner. In the event that a sequence of interim assessments for futility is desired, other sequential methods with an outer effectiveness boundary and inner futility boundary would be preferred.
Conclusions: These methods allow the design of clinical trials that have specified operating characteristics with a pre-specified futility analysis based only on the interim quantities that have been observed. Examples are presented.