Repurposing the clinical record: can an existing natural language processing system de-identify clinical notes?

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):37-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2862. Epub 2008 Oct 24.

Abstract

Electronic clinical documentation can be useful for activities such as public health surveillance, quality improvement, and research, but existing methods of de-identification may not provide sufficient protection of patient data. The general-purpose natural language processor MedLEE retains medical concepts while excluding the remaining text so, in addition to processing text into structured data, it may be able provide a secondary benefit of de-identification. Without modifying the system, the authors tested the ability of MedLEE to remove protected health information (PHI) by comparing 100 outpatient clinical notes with the corresponding XML-tagged output. Of 809 instances of PHI, 26 (3.2%) were detected in output as a result of processing and identification errors. However, PHI in the output was highly transformed, much appearing as normalized terms for medical concepts, potentially making re-identification more difficult. The MedLEE processor may be a good enhancement to other de-identification systems, both removing PHI and providing coded data from clinical text.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Confidentiality*
  • Humans
  • Medical Records Systems, Computerized*
  • Natural Language Processing*
  • Programming Languages*