Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Jul;110(1):368-79. doi: 10.1121/1.1375140.

Abstract

Many modern cochlear implants use sound processing strategies that stimulate the cochlea with modulated pulse trains. Rubinstein et al. [Hear. Res. 127, 108 (1999)] suggested that representation of the modulator in auditory nerve responses might be improved by the addition of a sustained, high-rate, desynchronizing pulse train (DPT). In addition, activity in response to the DPT may mimic the spontaneous activity (SA) in a healthy ear. The goals of this study were to compare responses of auditory nerve fibers in acutely deafened, anesthetized cats elicited by high-rate electric pulse trains delivered through an intracochlear electrode with SA, and to measure responses of these fibers to amplitude-modulated pulse trains superimposed upon a DPT. Responses to pulse trains showed variability from presentation to presentation, but differed from SA in the shape of the envelope of the interval histogram (IH) for pulse rates above 4.8 kpps (kilo pulses per second). These IHs had a prominent mode near 5 ms that was followed by a long tail. Responses to modulated biphasic pulse trains resembled responses to tones in intact ears for small (<10%) modulation depths, suggesting that acousticlike responses to sinusoidal stimuli might be obtained with a DPT. However, realistic responses were only observed over a narrow range of levels and modulation depths. Improved coding of complex stimulus waveforms may be achieved by signal processing strategies for cochlear implants that properly incorporate a DPT.

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Stimulation
  • Animals
  • Cats
  • Cochlear Implants*
  • Cochlear Nerve / physiopathology*
  • Deafness / physiopathology*
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory / physiology
  • Loudness Perception / physiology
  • Nerve Fibers / physiology*
  • Pitch Perception / physiology
  • Psychoacoustics