Currently, partial hepatectomy is the treatment of choice for a wide variety of liver and biliary conditions. Among the possible complications of partial hepatectomy, acute kidney injury (AKI) should be considered as an important cause of increased morbidity and postoperative mortality. Difficulties in the data analysis related to postoperative AKI after liver resections are mainly due to the multiplicity of factors to be considered in the surgical patients, moreover, there is no consensus of the exact definition of AKI after liver resection in the literature, which hampers comparison and analysis of the scarce data published on the subject. Despite this multiplicity of risk factors for postoperative AKI after partial hepatectomy, there are main factors that clearly contribute to its occurrence. First factor relates to large blood losses with renal hypoperfusion during the operation, second factor relates to the occurrence of post-hepatectomy liver failure with consequent distributive circulatory changes and hepatorenal syndrome. Eventually, patients can have more than one factor contributing to post-operative AKI, and frequently these combinations of acute insults can be aggravated by sepsis or exposure to nephrotoxic drugs.

Currently, partial hepatectomy is the treatment of choice for a wide variety of primary liver tumors (benign or malignant), tumors of the bile ducts and secondary malignant liver tumors. The partial liver resections may also be necessary in the management of complex cystic liver diseases, benign biliary structures, some cases of hepatic trauma and more recently with living donor liver transplantation[1]. With the refinement of surgical techniques, improved selection of patients to procedure, advances in anesthetic support and perioperative care, this traditionally complex and feared operation has become a routine procedure in the past 20 years, with acceptable mortality rates ranging from 3.1% to 4.5%[2-4].

Among the possible complications of major surgical procedures, including the partial hepatectomy, acute kidney injury (AKI) should be considered as an important cause of increased morbidity and postoperative mortality[5,6], with an incidence ranging from 10% to 30% after major operations[7,8]. Literature data report an incidence of 1% of AKI in the postoperative major non-cardiac surgery without liver resection[6] about 20% after cardiac surgery[9-11] and 50% after liver transplantation[12-18].

In the specific scenario of liver resections, there are limited and heterogeneous data regarding the occurrence of AKI in the postoperative period, with an incidence ranging from 0.9% to 15.1% of the patients[19-23], and its clinical relevance (mortality, morbidity and hospital stay) were not conclusively explored and clarified.

Difficulties in the data analysis related to postoperative AKI after liver resections are mainly due to the multiplicity of factors to be considered in this surgical patients, such as general medical conditions and comorbidities, nutritional disorders, metastatic malignancy with low physiological reserve systems, immunological disorders, chemotherapy treatment, functional capacity and volume of liver parenchyma to be preserved, and the perioperative hemodynamic effects of the different modalities of partial hepatectomy. Moreover, there is no consensus of the exact definition of AKI after liver resection in the literature, which hampers comparison and analysis of the scarce data published on the subject[22].

Despite this multiplicity of risk factors for postoperative AKI after partial hepatectomy, there are main factors that clearly contribute to its occurrence. First factor relates to large blood losses with renal hypoperfusion during the operation[20], that very often can be associated by the deleterious renal effects of red blood cell transfusion[23], and in some occasions this renal hypoperfusion occurs in patients with increased renal susceptibility to ischemia, usually elderly patients with underlying cardiovascular or renal disorders, or eventually it may be drug-induced[21-24]. Second factor relates to the occurrence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PLF) with consequent distributive circulatory changes and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS)[20]. Eventually, patients can have more than one factor contributing to post-operative AKI, and frequently these combinations of acute insults can be aggravated by sepsis[20-24] or exposure to nephrotoxic drugs, such as aminoglycosides[25].

The aim of this review is to present the definition of postoperative AKI after partial hepatectomy, the different pathophysiological mechanisms for its occurrence and methods for preventing these events.

AKI is characterized by the deterioration of kidney function over a period of hours to days, resulting in the failure of the kidney to excrete nitrogenous waste products and to maintain fluid and electrolyte homeostasis[26]. In recent years, several criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of AKI in general population, particularly the “Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Renal Function and End-Stage Renal Disease” (RIFLE) criteria[27], the “Acute Kidney Injury Network” (AKIN) criteria[28] and more recently, the criteria suggested by a panel of experts, which combine the AKIN and the RIFLE criteria, thus proposing a new classification: The “Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes” criteria[29] (Table 1).

The first question regarding the definition of post-operative AKI after partial hepatectomy, would be determining which of these proposed AKI criteria is most appropriate for these patients undergoing liver resection. Whereas acute tubular necrosis (ATN), resulting from hypoxic damage to the renal medulla, is considered as a major cause of postoperative AKI[30], different from general population, liver resections are often performed in the presence of functional deficit of the hepatic parenchyma, as in fibrosis, steatosis, cirrhosis, chemotherapy-induced injury and also in biliary obstruction[2]. Moreover, the recent technical improvements in liver surgery have resulted in an expansion and more liberal indications for major hepatectomies in patients with these underlying liver conditions[2,3,31-34], however, the risk of postoperative complications, such as AKI, have remained important concerns[3,31,35].

In the specific case of hepatocellular carcinoma, the tumor generally appears in a cirrhotic liver, which is a contributor to unfavorable postoperative results in large procedures[36], regarding renal dysfunction, AKI is a common and potentially fatal event in patients with cirrhosis[37-39], with a reported prevalence of 14%-50% in patients with cirrhosis[40-45], this wide range in prevalence is likely due to different study populations and varying definitions of renal dysfunction. Studies evaluating survival predictors in cirrhosis, renal dysfunction was a powerful predictor of death, as Child-Pugh score[46-48].

Along with parenchymal dysfunction, the portal hypertension levels and its hemodynamic consequences are directly related to the degree of underlying liver injury[49-51], as it is observed in cirrhosis and others conditions, such as severe steatosis and chemotherapy-induced injury[52]. The types of chemotherapy-induced liver toxicity include steatosis[53], sinusoidal changes[54], steatohepatitis[55], and hemorrhagic central lobular necrosis[52]. Steatosis represents fatty changes in the liver, with the presence of fat droplets within the hepatocytes[56], and it has been shown that steatosis may interfere with circulation through sinusoids and impair regeneration, and in addition the liver’s protective mechanism against oxidative stress appear to be impaired[57,58]. The morbidity following liver resection associated with steatosis has been reported by Belghiti et al[2], in this study with 747 patients, the mortality rate was higher in patients having steatosis than in those with no steatosis, 22% vs 8%, respectively (P = 0.003). Likewise, according to Behrns et al[32] in 135 liver resections, morbidity was seen in 29% and 10% of the patients with steatosis and without steatosis, respectively.

Besides the fact that a significant portion of patients eligible for partial hepatectomy have underlying chronic liver disease or were exposed to systemic therapies with liver toxicity, the hemodynamic changes in patients after major liver resections may have similarities with those of patients with cirrhosis or acute liver failure, and depending on the remnant liver volume and functional quality of parenchyma (steatosis/cirrhosis) the clinical effects may be more evident[59].

In 1953, Kowalski and Abelmann[60] reported the results of a study which have demonstrated that cardiac output in cirrhotic patients was significantly higher compared with healthy volunteers. The reason for this so-called hyperdynamic state is that patients with cirrhosis develop portal hypertension with resultant splanchnic vasodilation and pooling of blood secondary to increased resistance to portal flow. This is due to (1) vasodilators such as nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, and endogenous cannabinoids[61,62]; and (2) vasodilation from inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 induced by bacterial translocation from the gut[63]. As a result, the concentration of cyclic guanosine monophosphate cyclic is increased, resulting in splanchnic vasodilation, decrease in central and arterial blood volume, low capillary pressure, low central venous pressure (LCVP), low systemic vascular resistance, and reduction of mean arterial pressure[64]. This compensatory increase in cardiac output via activation of the sympathetic nervous system by carotid baroreceptors maintains sufficient renal perfusion, however, with decompensation of cirrhosis and increasing severity of portal hypertension, the compensatory increase in cardiac output is inadequate to maintain circulatory blood volume and adequate renal perfusion[65]. Therefore, it would be reasonable that diagnostic and staging AKI criteria that consider this circulatory impairment could be better applied in patients undergoing liver resections, particularly large resections and those with chronic liver disease.

It is extremely important to point out that in the case of patients with chronic liver disease, isolated dosages of serum creatinine (sCr) levels can not reveal the actual renal function of the patient, because: (1) there is decreased creatine formation in the secondary muscles loss of muscle mass[66]; (2) is increased renal tubular secretion of creatinine (Cr)[67]; (3) increasing the circulating volume of distribution in cirrhosis can dilute the sCr[68]; and (4) interference in the measurement of Cr due to elevated bilirubin[69]. As a result, the serum levels of Cr in patients with cirrhosis overestimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Therefore, a dynamic definition referring to the elevation of serum Cr of ≥ 50% of preoperative levels to a final value ≥ 1.5 mg/dL (133 mol/L) could be more suitable for these patients, and clinical studies have shown that AKI according to these criteria was a strong predictor of hospital mortality in patients with liver disease[70-72].

Another situation relates to the measurement of urine output of patients with chronic liver disease and ascites, since these patients can often present oliguria with high sodium retention, but they can still maintain a relatively normal GFR[73]. On the other hand, these patients can also have an increased diuresis because of diuretics therapy.

Thus, the current criteria suggested by the “International Ascites Club” for definition of AKI in cirrhotic patients do not include unreal measurements for these patients[68] (Table 2), and apparently would be the most appropriate criteria for the diagnosis and management of AKI after partial hepatectomy, especially in cases of large resections and underlying chronic liver disease.

Although the extent of liver resection correlates with the magnitude of the procedure, and patients undergoing resection of more than three segments or an additional extrahepatic procedure have an increased risk of complications[74-76], this is not a rigid rule. For example, an isolated resection of segment I is technically more demanding than a right hepatectomy, similarly, resection of segments IV, V, VIII or posterior right segments (segments VI, VII) may be technically more difficult than the left or right hepatectomy, although the transection area is larger. Therefore, a minor hepatectomy should not be considered as an operation of less magnitude, and most important, the prevention of intraoperative hemorrhage should not be neglected. If excessive blood loss persists and a reduction in oxygen delivery is not corrected, the renal medulla may be susceptible to ischemic ATN[77], and as a result, patients may suffer from AKI. The results of two large studies[3,31] suggest that a blood loss of 1250 mL is the cutoff value for major complications after liver resections, such as AKI. Furthermore, red blood cell transfusion, that can be necessary in the case of haemorrhage, can be an additional risk factor for postoperative AKI[78].

Apart from blood loss, that can leads to ATN because of severe hemodynamic instability, others risk factors for postoperative AKI after partial hepatectomy would be those that favor PLF, characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, encephalopathy, ascites, and renal and pulmonary failure, all of which may become apparent only 3 to 5 d after surgery[1]. These risk factors for PLF are well described, such as a small volume of remaining liver with marked volume reduction of organ parenchyma[35,99,100] associated to parenchymal cell injury due portal hyperperfusion[59,101], liver cirrhosis or steatosis[102,103], and liver toxicity induced by chemotherapy[104]. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the postoperative liver failure may occur due the compromised liver microcirculation, with less resistance to ischemia-reperfusion injury[105] and impaired regeneration[106], in addition, portal hypertension, if present, is associated with a poor outcome because of compromised portal flow and the risk of postoperative upper gastrointestinal bleeding[107].

Liver steatosis is usually related to obesity, the presence of metabolic disorders, or the intake of alcohol or drugs, and this liver disorder increases the operative risk of partial hepatectomy[2,53,108]. The extent of liver resection in these patients with steatosis in order to avoid PLF is unclear, but the severity of fatty infiltration must be considered: Mild steatosis (up to 30% of hepatocytes containing fat) represents a minimal additional risk, in moderate steatosis (30% to 60% containing fat) caution is necessary, thus, a conservative resection should be favored, and patients with severe steatosis (more than 60% of hepatocytes containing fat) should undergo only limited resection[108].

Regarding the chemotherapy-induced liver aggression, the rates of complications and death after major liver resection are likely to be increased[55,109]. Oxaliplatin can induce a veno-occlusive syndrome, occasionally associated with nodular regenerative hyperplasia, these vascular obstructions result in a bluish appearance of the liver (blue liver syndrome)[54,110,111], and irinotecan can cause chemotherapy associated steatohepatitis[112], and liver impairment can be amplified after partial hepatectomy in both situations, triggering PLF[113].

A major concern regarding PLF is the onset of HRS. HRS is a reversible functional renal impairment that occurs in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis or hepatic failure. It is characterized by marked decrease in GFR and renal plasma flow in the absence of other cause of renal failure[114] (Table 3). The pathophysiological alterations of SHR consist of intravascular hypovolemia with activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and vasoconstrictive sympathetic nervous system, leading to renal vasoconstriction of the afferent vessels and subsequent decrease in GFR[20]. Two subtypes of HRS have been identified: SHR type 1 is characterized by a rapidly progressive renal insufficiency defined as a doubling of the initial serum creatinine to a level greater than 2.5 mg/dL or 220 μmol/L in less than 2 wk, it is associated with very poor prognosis, and SHR Type 2 is characterized by a moderate renal insufficiency (Cr greater than 1.5 mg/dL or 133 μmol/L), follows a steady course or slowly progressive, often associated with refractory ascites[114].

Despite the fact that patients can have more than one factor contributing to post-operative AKI after partial hepatectomy, eventually aggravated by sepsis[20,21-24] or exposure to nephrotoxic drugs[25], there are particular risk factors that must be controlled and specific operative and non-operative procedures that must be undertaken for prevention of post-operative renal injury in these patients (Figure 1).

Open in New Tab   Full Size Figure   Download Figure

Figure 1 Main risk factors and prevention of acute kidney injury after partial hepatectomy. LCVP: Low central venous pressure; PLF: Posthepatectomy liver failure; FLR: Future liver remnant.

In the context of liver resections, the risk assessment of postoperative AKI requires the analysis of multiple variables involved in this complex universe, but probably there are main factors which significantly influence these patients for the occurrence of AKI: The massive blood loss during operation with or without an increased renal susceptibility to ischemia, and the occurrence of PLF. Certainly, the key interventions for preventing postoperative AKI after partial hepatectomy would be an appropriate preoperative work up, careful patient selection for surgery and rigorous perioperative control of the patient hemodynamic status by the surgical team.