Tuberculosis (TB) is a persistent public health concern in the Republic of Korea as the incidence rate of TB remains to be 55.0 per 100,000 population in 2017¹. TB was the leading cause of death among infectious diseases in 2016, resulting in 2,186 deaths². With enhanced efforts to decrease the TB incidence rate observed in 2010 by half in 2020, the estimated incidence rate of TB has been decreasing^1,3. As the overall incidence rate of TB decreases, however, more sporadic TB outbreak cases occurring in small groups such as in schools, nurseries, healthcare settings, prisons, and military barracks and the spread of TB through hospital settings have become a public health concern^4,5,6.

No study has revealed an age- and sex-standardized comparison between TB incidence in the military population and in the general population of Korea, but a study reported that the crude incidence rate of pulmonary TB in the enlisted soldiers was similar to that of the general population in the same age group from 2001 to 2004, ranging from 63.1 to 89.3 per 100,000 population and from 62.0 to 94.8 per 100,000 population, respectively⁷. Due to collective living environments, the military population is more vulnerable to infectious respiratory and enteric diseases including TB than is the civilian population^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14}. To control the spread of TB in military units, the Armed Forces Medical Command (AFMC) and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) have been implementing TB control programs that include proper case management, which includes the identification and preventive chemotherapy of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cases among contacts of index cases¹⁵.

To date, a number of studies were conducted to assess the impact of infectious TB cases in the Korean military settings^5,10,16. A study conducted in 2006, which used interferon γ releasing assay (IGRA), identified that 14.3% of the 175 contacts of active pulmonary TB patients had LTBI. Moreover, long exposure and laryngeal TB of an index patient were found to be the risk factors of LTBI¹¹. Choi et al.¹⁶ showed that the close contacts of a smear-positive pulmonary TB case demonstrated an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.7 during tuberculin skin test (TST) when compared with the non-exposed group. A study conducted in military hospitals demonstrated that military health workers providing TB patient care for greater than 1 year were likely to have LTBI with an AOR of 2.27⁵. A study that reviewed the TB investigation database presented that 127 outbreak investigations conducted in 145 index cases in military or police units found 30 new patients and 1,085 LTBI, which accounted for 11.6% of all contacts screened (1,085/9,335)¹⁷.

Given that the previous studies were conducted only for a single military unit or military hospitals, this study aims to measure the transmission of pulmonary TB cases to close and casual contacts in multiple Korean Army units based on contact investigation data from 2012 to 2013.

Table 1 shows the proportion of LTBI by the index case. The highest proportion was observed in a military unit with smear 4+ case and the lowest was in a unit with a non-smear-positive case (Table 1). In all subjects, the mean age of the contact group was 22.5±5.1 years, and that of the control group was 23.0±5.3 years. In both groups, 99% of all subjects were male. The proportion of subjects having no BCG scar ranges from 11.1% to 35.7%. In terms of the location of subjects with regard to an index case, 11.0% of close contacts of smear-positive cases and 22.2% of close contacts of smear-negative cases reported staying in the same room for greater than 3 months (Table 2).

Table 3 demonstrates the results of LTBI screening test that includes CXR, TST, and QFT-GIT. Only close and casual contacts underwent CXR tests. Three subjects among close contacts of smear-positive cases showing signs of active pulmonary TB infection were referred to military hospitals for further diagnosis and treatment and were excluded from further undergoing other protocols. Out of the total of 953 subjects, 286 subjects who were part of the control group underwent the first round of TST. The results showed that 41.7% of close contacts of the smear-positive cases were positive and 35.7% of casual contacts of the smear-positive cases were positive. The proportions of positive cases in close contacts of smear-negative case and the control group were 8.3% and 16.8%, respectively. As the subjects, except those in the control group, were tested with QFT-GIT to identify the recent TB infection, 16.6% of close contacts of smear-positive cases tested positive by QFT-GIT and 21.6% of casual contacts of smear-positive cases tested positive. However, only one subject of a smear-negative case's close contact was tested positive by QFT-GIT (2.8%). We performed the second round of TST to determine the subjects showing delayed response to PPD by window period. Among the subjects tested, 17 in the close contact and two in the casual contact tested positive. We identified that the overall LTBI rate among contacts screened was 14.7% (98/667). It can be divided into the following: 21.8% of close contacts of smear-positive cases, 8.5% of casual contacts of smear-positive cases, and 2.8% of close contacts of smear-negative case. Table 4 demonstrates the proportion of LTBI by residence location with regard to the index cases. The LTBI proportion of subjects who shared the same room was the highest, 43.2%, and subjects who stayed in the next room of the index case was 34.0%.

In order to identify the risk factors of LTBI, we performed a multivariate analysis that considers age, number of BCG scars, subject's relative location with an index case, and sputum test of an index case (n=667). In the model, a subject's location and sputum smear demonstrated statistical significance. If a subject had stayed with an index case in the same room for greater than 3 months, the probability of having LTBI increased tenfold. Subjects living in the next room also demonstrate an AOR of 5.19 when controlling other variables. A positive result in the sputum smear test also profoundly influenced the likelihood of having LTBI (Table 5).

This study demonstrated the impact of infectious pulmonary TB cases to contacts in the Korean military settings by reviewing the results of contact investigations in six military units. The overall positive rate of TST was 30.7% of all close and casual contacts, which was lower than the rate found by Ji et al.'s study in 2007 (40.9%)¹⁹. The positive rate of TST in the control group was 16.8%, which is similar to the positive rate of TST of military conscripts in 2011, which is 15.4%²⁰. However, this rate was lower than the rate of military medics (19.6%) who might have been exposed to TB patients in military hospital settings⁵. The overall rate (14.7%) of LTBI was similar to the rate (14.3%) identified by a study on TB outbreak investigations in 2007 using IGRA¹¹. The similarity of LTBI may suggest that the environments in the Army units have not been significantly modified in terms of preventing the spread of respiratory infectious diseases especially TB. With information on age, BCG scar, a subject's location with regard to an index case, and sputum smear test, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify and assess the risk factors. It showed that living in the same room or next room is significantly associated with LTBI, AOR of 10.93 and 5.19, respectively.

The military tuberculosis guideline in 2012 defined a contact as a person who has shared the same room with a pulmonary TB patient for greater than 3 months¹⁵. In addition to this definition, the recent national tuberculosis treatment guideline defines a close contact as a person who shares a closed space for a long duration such as greater than 40 hours with a pulmonary TB patient³. However, those guidelines also recommend that in defining a close contact, the justifications made by medical epidemiologists who conduct a contact investigation should be considered. In practice, military epidemiologists need to guide a military commander who is in charge of the unit to conduct an investigation and to ensure all military personnel who are at risk of TB exposure are included in the contact investigation. In this regard, we anticipate that the findings of this study contribute in properly defining close and casual contacts in the military context.

In this study, we address confined living settings and close proximity between military individuals who contribute to the transmission of TB. It has been highlighted that respiratory diseases such as TB are likely to spread among military recruits due to the unique environment in the military units²¹. In the U.S. military, there have been a number of reports on TB outbreaks in Naval ships and Marine units where only very confined space is provided to military individuals^22,23. A Swiss report on LTBI shows the effect of communal settings on the spread of TB infection²⁴. Military conscripts who shared the same dormitory with pulmonary TB patients displayed a LTBI rate of 94% (14/15), but other groups who never shared the same living place with pulmonary TB patients showed a LTBI rate in the range of 9.9%-22.7%. Fujikawa et al.²⁵ reported the outcomes of a contact investigation with 884 ground self-defense force members using IGRA, CXR, and computed tomography. It was found that more than one-third of subjects (39/108, 36.1%) in the LTBI group had resided on the same floor in the barrack with pulmonary TB patients.

In Korea, more than 30,000 new TB cases every year were identified, and TB caused 2,209 deaths in 2015^1,2,3. Despite the Ministry of Health and Welfare and KCDC implementing TB management programs under the strengthened new TB management policies that include minimizing treatment failure, mandatory inpatient treatment in case of multidrug-resistant TB, and enhanced contact management, the TB notification rate still remains at 55.0 per 100,000 population¹. A study that reviewed TB investigation data suggested that recent TB outbreaks were focused on congregate settings such as in the nurseries, schools, military or police units, and correctional facilities¹⁷. In the study, military or police units account for 11.6% of LTBI cases, following correctional facilities and workplaces. It emphasizes the importance of TB investigation particularly for population living and working in congregate settings such as the military. This study therefore has an implication that it assessed the results of multiple TB contact investigations in Korean military settings. It offers valuable information in defining contacts by measuring the impact of environmental risk factor. In order to minimize the impact of an infectious TB case within a military unit, there is a demand to enhance soldiers' knowledge and attitude toward the prevention of TB through education. There has been no military-wide survey assessing the Army soldiers' knowledge and attitude, but a recent survey conducted with 500 male Army soldiers shows a lack of knowledge on TB among the Army soldiers²⁶.

However, we need to note the limitations of this study. First, this study was designed and conducted to include only the Army units. This limits the generalizability of the findings as the living environment of the Navy and Air Force units is different from that of the Army units. The detailed information of military units is classified and has not been disclosed to the public, but we suspect that the more congregate environment of the Army units has a significant impact on the transmission of communicable diseases including TB. Confirming this hypothesis requires additional information to compare the physical environment of the services. Second, this study missed a portion of the study subjects due to the subjects' transfer, leave, and military drill. We could not include 17 close contacts, 163 casual contacts for the first round of TST, and 191 close contacts among the 357 subjects tested for TST and QFT-GIT. This high proportion of missing subjects may have contributed to the inaccurate rates for comparability with the other studies. Third, the design of this study did not include follow-up steps to identify subsequent TB cases in the study sites. During the study, we identified three cases of suspected active TB cases with the first CXR and another three cases by the second CXR. However, we were not able to follow up the military units regarding the presence of subsequent TB cases due to the index cases, hence limiting the assessment of a long-term effect of TB to a population where frequent transfer and move occur. It highlights a need to design a comprehensive study that integrates the military health systems and public health systems such as public health centers and KCDC where all TB cases are notified for treatment and prevention¹⁵. Fourth, the positive reaction in the second round of TST may have been caused by the recall reaction by the previous BCG vaccination. However, in the close contacts of smear-negative index cases, all the 24 subjects who had undergone the second round of TST were negative. Therefore, most of the positive reactors of the smear-positive contact group are more likely to be infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Fifth, the study could not provide further information on why the subjects who reported that they stayed in the opposite room show nonsignificant AOR. Additionally, a group of subjects who reported staying in a different floor in the same building was found to have significant AOR (3.43, 1.39-8.47). This indicates that further research should confirm this finding with a larger number of subjects in the same study environment.

In conclusion, we analyzed the data from TB contact investigations in the Korean Army from September 2012 to May 2013 to identify the impact of communal living and other risk factors. By performing TST and QFT-GIT, we identified an overall LTBI rate of 14.7% (98/667) among close and casual contacts screened. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that living in the same room or next room is significantly associated with LTBI (AOR in the same room, 10.93; AOR in the next room, 5.19). Our study demonstrated a significant impact of communal living in LTBI when exposed to a TB case and provided evidence on how to define the scope of close and casual contacts of an index TB case in Korean Army settings.