Next Article in Journal
A response to the Comment on Tomaskova et al. Mortality in Miners with Coal-Workers’ Pneumoconiosis in the Czech Republic in the Period 1992–2013. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2017, 14, 269 by the Author Mei Yong
Previous Article in Journal
Toxicity of Urban PM10 and Relation with Tracers of Biomass Burning
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/ijerph15020321
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mindfulness-Based Baduanjin Exercise for Depression and Anxiety in People with Physical or Mental Illnesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Liye Zou
1,*,
Albert Yeung
2,3,
Xinfeng Quan
4,
Stanley Sai-Chuen Hui
1,
Xiaoyue Hu
1,
Jessie S. M. Chan
5,
Chaoyi Wang
6,
Sean David Boyden
2,
Li Sun
7 and
Huiru Wang
8,*
1
Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
2
Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02114, USA
3
The South Cove Community Health Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
4
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute, Chengdu 610065, China
5
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, China
6
Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
7
School of Humanities and Social Science, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China
8
Department of Physical Education, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(2), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020321
Submission received: 14 January 2018 / Revised: 9 February 2018 / Accepted: 11 February 2018 / Published: 12 February 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objectives: we used a quantitative method to systematically synthesize the emerging literature and critically evaluate the effects of Baduanjin on depression and anxiety in people with physical or mental illnesses. Additionally, we determined if the number of total Baduanjin training sessions is associated with decreased anxiety and depression levels. Methods: both English and Chinese databases were searched for potential studies published between January 1982 and October 2017. The eligible randomized controlled trials were considered for meta-analysis. Effect size (Hedge’s g) was computed for the pooled effects while the random-effect model was set. For moderator analysis; Subgroup meta-analysis for categorical variables and meta-regression for continuous variables were performed. Results: the aggregated result has shown a significant benefit in favour of Baduanjin on anxiety (Hedge’s g = −0.99; CI −1.63 to −0.74) and depression (Hedge’s g = −1.07; CI −1.3 to −0.83). For continuous potential moderators; meta-regression indicated a significant effect for total hours in Baduanjin practice (β = −0.0053; 95% CI −0.009 to −0.0014; p = 0.008). With regard to depression; meta-regression indicated a significant effect for total sessions of Baduanjin practice (β = −0.0023; 95% CI −0.006 to −0.0004; p = 0.028). Conclusions: the encouraging findings indicate the efficacy of Baduanjin exercise in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms in people with physical or mental illnesses. However; the results should be interpreted with caution because of existing methodological limitations (e.g., high risk of bias; Baduanjin combined with other behavioral interventions; and heterogeneity of control groups).

1. Introduction

Baduanjin (also called Eight Section Brocade) is a traditional Chinese mind-body exercise routine, characterized by slow, coordinative, sequential movements [1]. Many historians believe that Baduanjin was initially created by the ancient Chinese National Hero (Yue Fei) in the Song Dynasty to help his soldiers recover from their bodily injuries and prepare for future battles [1]. With the passage of time, and particularly with the establishment of the Chinese Health Qigong Association (CHQA), movements in the Baduanjin form have been developed and reinforced to meet needs of individuals for both physical and psychological wellbeing [2]. When compared to the complex movements in Tai-Chi [3,4], one of the most popular Chinese traditional Qigong exercises, Baduanjin is easy-to-learn because it involves only eight separate movements [5]. Each individual movement needs to be practiced on both the left and right sides of the body, while integrating deep rhythmic breathing, a meditative mind, and musculoskeletal stretching and relaxation [6].
In recent years, experimental and observational studies were conducted to investigate the effects of Baduanjin on health-related parameters and disease-specific symptoms in different age groups among people with physical or mental illness. Specifically, these empirical evidences indicated that Baduanjin training could be an effective intervention program for physiological benefits (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiorespiratory endurance) [7], attenuating bone mineral density loss [8], slowing down the process of cognitive decline (e.g., memory, attention, executive function) [9] strengthening physical function (e.g., postural stability, flexibility, leg power, and mobility) in aging populations [10,11], and alleviating chronic musculoskeletal pain [12]. After a growing body of research literature on this topic emerged, multiple meta-analytic reviews were conducted, indicating that Baduanjin could effectively alleviate symptoms in people with hypertension [5] and improve sleep quality [13], modulate blood lipid metabolism [14], and improve physical function [15].
The World Health Organization reported that an estimated 450 million people suffer from mental illness (e.g., stress, anxiety, depression, and mood disturbance) worldwide, and a quarter of these individuals experience these psychological symptoms for their entire life [16]. It is worth noting that mental illness is considered the primary risk factor for disability in people aged 15 or older [17]. Noteworthily, people who live with a chronic physical illness (e.g., older adults with cognitive impairment or poor postural stability, stroke, arthritis, asthma, heart disease, Type 2 Diabetic mellitus, and breast cancer) have a greater risk for developing anxiety and/or depression [18,19]. They not only generate substantial economic burdens in their families but also challenge national healthcare systems [20]. Based on Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baduanjin exercise involves mind-body integration practice, which may alleviate stress, anxiety, and depression. Cheng [21] recently attempted to evaluate the effects of Baduanjin on psychological health in a review study, but no definitive conclusion was made on Baduanjin for psychological well-being, particularly in people with physical or mental illnesses. Therefore, a quantitative method to systematically synthesize the emerging literature and critically evaluate the effects of Baduanjin on psychological well-being in people with physical or mental illnesses is needed. Additionally, we want to determine if the total number of sessions in Baduanjin practice is associated with decreased anxiety and depression levels. More importantly, we could provide scientific recommendation to health professionals for symptom management to improve quality of life in people with physical or mental illness.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Registration

The present study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (No. CRD42017074449) for eliminating duplicates. The detailed information of this systematic review and meta-analysis is reported following the Preferred Repointing items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [22].

2.2. Search Strategy

Both English (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, web of science, Psycinfo, and the Who International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and Chinese (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) databases were used for literature search. We searched for potential studies published between January 1982 and October 2017. To ensure inclusion of all relevant articles, the search terms used in a combined manner are as followed: “Baduanjin” or “eight section brocades” and “depression” or “anxiety” or “emotional well-being” or “mental well-being” or “stress” “psychological well-being.” Also, relevant studies were manually identified based on cross-referencing searches; reference lists of selected articles and reviews were further screened.

2.3. Inclusion Criteria and Study Selection

Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) were considered eligible for separate meta-analysis. Both non-randomized controlled studies (NRCT) and Pretest and posttest study (PPS) as experimental studies were included to reinforce understanding regarding the effects of Baduanjin on improving psychological outcomes. Such RCTs must include at least 20 adults diagnosed with any mental (depression, anxiety, or mood) or physical illness (e.g., fatigue, diabetic mellitus, cancer, drug addiction, heart disease, stroke, and musculoskeletal disorder). When compared to control groups (involving no intervention, educational program, drug therapy, mental therapy, or other behavioral interventions), Baduanjin as the primary component of intervention should last at least 2 weeks. Additionally, the experimental studies were only included if they reported a sum score on at least one psychological outcome. Review articles, case reports, and conference proceedings were excluded. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers independently filtered out irrelevant articles through reading titles and abstracts, and identified full-text articles, and removed duplicates, ultimately leading to the final number of eligible studies in this systematic review. A third party emerged to resolve disagreement between the two reviewers. The inter-rater agreement was 92.3%.

2.4. Quality Assessment for Each Eligible Study

Risk of bias for all selected experimental studies (RCT, NRCT, and PPS) was assessed by two independent reviewers using the 9-item Scale (because blinding of instructor and participants are not practical in non-pharmacological intervention and self-reported questionnaires for depression and anxiety were used, these three items were not considered in this systematic review) [23]. Specifically, the assessment tool involves randomization, control group, isolated Baduanjin intervention, pre-posttest design, more than 70% retention, similar baseline, intention-to-treat analysis (if missing data is present), prior sample size estimation (power analysis), and valid and reliable testing instrument relating to psychological outcomes. The maximum score of nine can be obtained for each study selected: (1) a study which scored seven or greater is considered as low risk of bias; (2) a study which scored six or lower is considered as high risk of bias.

2.5. Data Extraction and Data Synthesis

Two pre-created summary tables were used by two reviewers to extract data, specifically Table 1 for RCT and NRCT and Table 2 for PPS. The information in Table 1 involves the name of author, experimental location (language), initial sample size and attrition rate, participant characteristics (age and disease condition), Baduanjin intervention protocol (training period and dosage, exercise intensity, total hour and the number of total session), psychological outcome and instrument, and adverse events and follow-up assessment. In addition to the aforementioned information, Table 2 also contains the specific conclusion along with the p value. For both Baduanjin and control groups in the RCT, mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) of the psychological outcome and the number of participants per group at baseline and posttest were extracted. If the M and SD were not available, within-group change score from post-intervention to baseline was used. When these data were unobtainable after contacting the corresponding author of the potential studies, the individual studies were excluded.
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0 software (Bio. Stat. Inc., Englewood, NJ, USA) was employed to quantitatively synthesize the study findings relating the effects of Baduanjin on the outcomes of interest. Specifically, effect size (Hedges’ g) reflects the magnitude of the effects of Baduanjin on psychological outcomes, which was computed while the random-effect model was selected. The Q-statistic was used to determine if the heterogeneity of effect sizes across selected studies exists. If all studies shared the same effect size, the expected value of Q would be equal to or less than the degrees of freedom (the number of studies minus one). The I2 statistic (ranging from 0 to 100%, with 25% indicating low heterogeneity, 50% indicating moderate heterogeneity, and 75% indicating high heterogeneity) was computed to determine the ratio of true heterogeneity to total observed variation. For moderator analysis, Subgroup meta-analysis for categorical variables and meta-regression for continuous variables were performed. Specifically, subgroup meta-analysis involves Baduanjin intervention length (<16 weeks versus ≥16 weeks; the 8-week mind-body therapy program has been applied for mentally symptomatic management for 30 years in Massachusetts General Hospital and it is a successful mind-body intervention program. Initially, we wanted to use the 8-week Baduanjin as a cut-off, but given that study participants may miss some sessions in a Baduanjin intervention study, participants may not receive the therapeutic effect from the 8-week Baduanjin practice) [24], weekly training frequency (<5 sessions per week versus ≥5 sessions per week), session length (less than 1 h versus 1 h or longer), active (e.g., drug therapy, mental therapy, education program, and walking) and passive control (e.g., usual care, waitlist, and unaltered lifestyle) intervention, and risk of bias (low risk versus high risk). Selecting the 5-session weekly and 60-min per session was based upon the WHO recommendations on physical activity for Health (For health benefits, adults should increase their moderate intensity aerobic physical activity to 300 min per week) [25]. The number of total sessions and the total minutes of Baduanjin intervention are continuous moderator. Additionally, publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot and Egger’s regression intercept test [26].

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search

Figure 1 shows the flow of our literature search and selection process. After both electronic and manual searches, 244 articles were initially identified. One hundred and forty-nine were excluded because they were duplicates. Based on the titles and abstracts of the remaining articles, 32 irrelevant records were excluded. According to the inclusion criteria, 34 full-text articles were excluded because of the following reasons: (1) cross-sectional studies (n = 9); (2) Chinese-language review studies (n = 6); (3) No Baduanjin-based intervention (n = 7); (4) no psychological outcome (n = 5); (5) unobtainable data for meta-analysis (n = 7). Our searches resulted in 29 eligible studies, including 26 RCTs, 1 NRCT, and 2 PPS. Only RCTs were considered for meta-analysis in the present study.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The characteristics of the 26 RCTs and 1 NRCT selected are presented in Table 1 and two PPS in Table 2. These studies selected were published between 2010 and 2017. All experimental studies were conducted in mainland China and Hong Kong. Of the studies selected, only one study was published in English. A total sample of 2286 subjects (with an age range from 18 to 81 years old) was included in this systematic review, with a sample size of an individual study ranging from 25 to 150 participants (attrition rate ranges from 0% to 21.6%). Although all study participants suffered similar psychological symptoms (anxiety or depression), their medical/psychiatric illnesses varied greatly (chronic fatigue syndrome-like illness, perimenopausal women with depression, college students with depression, diabetic mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, breast cancer survivors, older adults with cognitive impairment or balance impairment, glaucoma, coronary heart disease, and heroin addiction).
When compared to Baduanjin intervention group in the RCTs, the control groups received varied interventions in the selected studies, including waitlist, unaltered lifestyles, and usual care. The active control groups (without considering a combination with usual care) involved walking, physical education program, educational program, drug therapy, mental therapy, drug therapy plus education program [43], and drug therapy plus mental therapy [28,51]. The duration of Baduanjin training in the intervention groups ranged from 2 weeks to 40 weeks, and the weekly sessions ranged from 2 to 7 (each session lasted from 20 to 90 min). The number of total sessions in individual studies ranged from 16 to 200, with 18 to 200 total hours). Only three RCTs reported average heart rate (100 bpm) during Baduanjin practice [33,35,38]. Baduanjin instructor qualification was mentioned in most of the studies. Interestingly, only two psychological outcomes (depression and anxiety) were reported across all experimental studies selected. The most commonly used instruments were the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), followed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD). The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were only used once. Only seven studies reported no adverse events during Baduanjin intervention (other studies did not mention about adverse events) [27,28,38,39,40,41,42]. Three studies used follow-up assessment (ranging from 3 to 6 months) to determine if the long-term beneficial effect of Baduanjin on psychological outcomes existed [27,28,31].

3.3. Methodological Quality

The inter-rater agreement about the eligible studies was 96.5%. According to the nine-item scale, a methodological quality across all experimental studies ranged from 4 to 9, with a higher score indicating lower risk of bias (Table 3). Specifically, 12 (35%) studies were considered high risk of bias, while 17 (65%) studies were rated as low risk of bias. Only one study scored 9 points [27]. Points in most of the RCTs were deducted because the Baduanjin intervention was combined with other components (e.g., education program, drug therapy, and mental therapy). For the ethical perspective, the combination of Baduanjin with other interventions is legitimate because the ultimate goal is to assist in symptomatic management in people with disease conditions. This is followed by absence of a priori sample size estimation (power analysis) and appropriate statistical method (intention-to-treat analysis while data is missed).

3.4. Effects of Baduanjin on Anxiety and Depression

3.4.1. Baduanjin Intervention Versus Control Group on Anxiety and Depression

While mean effect size was −1.03 (random-effect model), one study [49] reported large effect size (Hedge’s g = 2.63) beyond 2 SD. Additionally, Chan [27] reported a relatively small effect size (Hedge’s g = −0.47) with large sample size. The funnel plot also indicated significant asymmetry (Egger’s regression intercept = −6.698, p = 0.001). While these two outliers were removed for further analysis, the funnel plot of remaining studies showing no significant asymmetry (Egger’s regression intercept = −5.32, p = 0.063). For the meta-analysis, the 15 remaining RCTs examined the effects of Baduanjin versus control group on anxiety measured by different instruments. A higher negative value (effect size) for all anxiety-related tests indicates greater reduction of anxiety level. The aggregated result has shown a significant benefit in favour of Baduanjin on anxiety (a large effect size, but moderate heterogeneity: Hedge’s g = −0.99, p < 0.001, I2 = 55.41%) (Figure 2).
Four studies reported large effect sizes beyond 2.5 SD above the mean effect size (Hedge’s g = −1.49), which are as follows: Hedge’s g = −4.79 [30], Hedge’s g = −3.12 [39], Hedge’s = −2.79 [35], and Hedge’g = −2.76 [45]. While these four studies were included for meta-analysis, the funnel plot indicated significant asymmetry (Egger’s regression intercept = −9.086, p = 0.009). Thus, we removed these four outliers for further analysis. The funnel plot of the remaining 17 studies showed no significant asymmetry (Egger’s regression intercept = −2.634, p = 0.317). For the meta-analysis, the 17 remaining RCTs examined the effects of Baduanjin versus control group on depression, measured by different instruments. A higher negative value for all depression-related tests indicates greater reduction of depression level. The aggregated result has shown a significant benefit in favour of Baduanjin on depression (a large effect size, but moderate heterogeneity: Hedge’s g = −1.07, p < 0.001, I2 = 74.24%) (Figure 3).

3.4.2. Moderator Analysis

The effects of potential moderator variables were separately computed for anxiety and depression. The results of categorical and continuous moderator analysis are presented in Table 4 (anxiety) and Table 5 (depression). With regard to anxiety, there were no significant effects for type of control group (Q(1) = 0.113, p = 0.736), intervention duration (Q(1) = 0.55, p = 0.46), weekly training frequency (Q(1) = 1.51, p = 0.22), session length (Q(1) = 0.09, p = 0.76), or study quality (Q(1) = 0, p = 0.96). With regard to depression, there was a marginally insignificant effect for type of control group (Q(1) = 3.74, p = 0.053), whereas no significant effect was observed for intervention duration (Q(1) = 0.03, p = 0.87), training frequency (Q(1) = 2.8, p = 0.09), session length (Q(1) = 0.7, p = 0.4), or study quality (Q(1) = 0.44, p = 0.51).
For continuous potential moderators, meta-regression indicated a significant effect for total hours in Baduanjin practice (β = −0.0053, 95% CI −0.009 to −0.0014, p = 0.008). Specifically, a negative relationship was observed between total hours in Baduanjin practice and anxiety level. However, meta-regression indicated no significant effect for the total number of sessions in Baduanjin practice (β = −0.0009, 95% CI −0.005 to 0.003, p = 0.66) in terms of anxiety level. With regard to depression, meta-regression indicated no significant effect of total hours in Baduanjin practice (β = −0.0018, 95% CI −0.005 to −0.0015, p = 0.297), but a significant effect for total sessions in Baduanjin practice (β = −0.0023, 95% CI −0.006 to −0.0004, p = 0.028); A negative relationship was observed between total sessions and depression level.

4. Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on Baduanjin suggests that this traditional mind-body intervention reduces both anxiety and depression among clinically ill patients, including those with physical and mental conditions. The findings of this study add to the small, but growing literature on the effects of Baduanjin on psychological wellbeing in patients with physical or mental conditions. This is of important public health significance since anxiety and depression are highly prevalent among these patients, and Baduanjin is accessible to people of all ages and physical strength, easy to learn, and with little known side effects.
The findings in this systematic review are in accordance with the conclusions of four previously-published systematic reviews investigating the effects of mindfulness-based intervention programs (e.g., Yoga, meditation, Tai chi, and Qigong) on alleviating depression and anxiety [56,57,58,59]. Specifically, effect size estimates with respect to the effects of Baduanjin program ranged from −0.44 to −1.69 for anxiety levels and −0.49 to −2.04 for depression levels. The reduced anxiety level in this systematic review may be attributed to the features of Baduanjin which emphasize musculoskeletal relaxation, an empty state of mind, and breathing regulation. These elements in mindfulness-based Baduanjin exercise play a very important role in reducing anxiety [60,61,62]. For instance, a neurophysiological study by Yackle et al. [63] indicated that rhythmic breathing regulation in an adult animal model had a calming effect on stress-related behaviors (e.g., anxiety or panic). Regarding the reduced depression level, Chan et al. [64] gave a plausible explanation by measuring adiponectin (which has an antidepressant-like function) levels in 108 females with chronic fatigue syndrome-like illness. Reduced depression scores following a 9-week Baduanjin intervention was found to be associated with increased levels of plasma adiponectin. More interestingly, this systematic review indicates that as the total sessions increase, depression level decreases. This study finding is in line with a randomized controlled trial by Chan et al. [27] which indicated that the number of Baduanjin lessons attended and the amount of self-practice in Baduanjin was significantly correlated with depressive symptom improvement.
This study included recently-published randomized clinical studies in both English and Chinese which used Baduanjin as the intervention. Such an approach is appropriate and important since thus far, most of the studies on Baduanjin were performed in Asia and were published in the Chinese language. In doing so, the contributions of researchers on Baduanjin studies published in Chinese journals are acknowledged and the findings are more representative of the studies in this area. Other strengths of this systematic review include the use of a standardized tool to assess the quality of the studies, and formal statistical analyses to evaluate the heterogeneity of the effect sizes of the studies (Q Statistics), the variations in the frequency and duration of Baduanjin practice (moderator analyses), and the extent of asymmetry of effect sizes (funnel plot).
Nonetheless, these findings should be interpreted in light of the following methodological limitations. First, many of the studies included had significant flaws in their design. About one-third of the studies in this systemic review had high risk of bias. One of the most important drawbacks is that Baduanjin was offered as not as a monotherapy, but as an adjunctive treatment to the interventions received by the patients. It may be hard to tease out whether the outcomes were due to Baduanjin alone, to a combination of interventions, or to the conventional treatment received by the patients. It must be acknowledged that during the Baduanjin intervention period, people with physical or mental conditions are asked to discontinue their usual care or mental therapy/drug therapy (e.g., patients with breast cancer or moderate depression), which is impractical regardless of ethical and rehabilitation perspectives. In addition, a variety of interventions were received by control groups which made interpretations of outcomes difficult. Second, although this systematic review provided an implication that as the total hours of Baduanjin practice increases, anxiety level decreases, the duration of the Baduanjin practice varied widely among different studies. This makes it hard to make specific recommendations on how frequent and how long practices should be. Third, most of these studies examined psychological factors as secondary goals of the study, and consequently, the findings may not be applicable to patients with psychiatric disorders like major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder. In addition, the questionnaires used to assess anxiety and depression differ from study to study and they may have varying levels of reliability and validity. Fourth, all studies were performed in China or Hong Kong and the participants were predominantly Chinese. It is unclear whether the results are generalizable to non-Chinese populations. Fifth, a high number of different health conditions make the samples difficult to compare. Sixth, the wide age range can also be a confounding factor if age is not controlled for in the data analysis. Lastly, positive trials are more likely to be published than those with non-significant results. Study publication bias and outcome reporting bias might have existed in the included studies, and the effect sizes of Baduanjin might have been overestimated.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, the current literature suggests that Baduanjin may have positive psychological effects. Yet, many of the studies to date had significant methodological limitations which might have influenced the outcomes of this meta-analysis. More RCTs with rigorous research design are needed to establish the efficacy of Baduanjin in improving psychological well-being and its potential to be used in interventions for populations with various clinical conditions.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Shanghai Philosophy and sociology (No. 2017BTY002); The fund for Science and Technology Innovation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (No. JCZD005).

Author Contributions

Liye Zou, Albert Yeung and Xinfeng Quan contributed to the conception and design of the review. Liye Zou and Xinfeng Quan applied the search strategy. All authors applied the selection criteria. All authors completed assessment of risk of bias. All authors analyzed the data and interpreted data. Liye Zou and Albert Yeung wrote this manuscript. Jessie, S. M. Chan, Xiaoyue Hu, Stanley Sai-Chuen Hui, Sean David Boyden, Huiru Wang, Chaoyi Wang and Li Sun edited this manuscript. Liye Zou is responsible for the overall project.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest existed in this study.

References

  1. Zou, L.; Pan, Z.; Yeung, A.; Talwar, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Shu, Y.; Chen, X.; Thomas, G. A review study on the beneficial effects of Baduanjin. J. Alter. Comp. Med. 2017, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zou, L.; Yeung, A.; Quan, X.; Boyden, S.; Wang, H. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness-Based (Baduanjin) Exercise for Alleviating Musculoskeletal Pain and Improving Sleep Quality in People with Chronic Diseases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zou, L.; Wang, H.; Yu, D. Effect of a long-term modified Tai Chi-based intervention in attenuating bone mineral density in postmenopausal women in southeast China: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Trials Degener. Dis. 2017, 2, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zou, L.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Li, T.; Du, G.; Liu, Y. Tai chi for health benefits in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, E0170212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zou, L.; Wang, C.; Chen, K.; Shu, Y.; Chen, X.; Luo, L.; Zhao, X. The Effect of Taichi Practice on Attenuating Bone Mineral Density Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zou, L.; Wang, C.; Tian, Z.; Wang, H.; Shu, Y. Effect of Yang-Style Tai Chi on Gait Parameters and Musculoskeletal Flexibility in Healthy Chinese Older Women. Sports 2017, 5, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jing, J.; Qiu, X.; Qin, Y. Comparative study of the influences of Liu Zi Jue and Ba Duan Jin on college students. Hebei Sports Sci. 2013, 32, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, H.; Yeh, M.; Lee, F. The effects of Baduanjin Qigong in the prevention of bone loss for middle-aged women. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2006, 34, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tao, J.; Liu, J.; Egorova, N.; Chen, X.; Sun, S.; Xue, X.; Huang, J.; Zheng, G.; Wang, Q.; Chen, L.; et al. Increased Hippocampus-Medial Prefrontal Cortex Resting-State Functional Connectivity and Memory Function after Tai Chi Chuan Practice in Elder Adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xiao, C.; Zhuang, Y. Effect of health Baduanjin Qigong for mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2015, 16, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Xiao, C.; Zhuang, Y.; Kang, Y. Effect of Health Qigong Baduanjin on Fall Prevention in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2016, 64, 227–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. An, B.C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Lu, H.; Fang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dai, K. Effects of Baduanjin exercise on knee osteoarthritis: A one-year study. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2013, 19, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jiang, Y.H.; Tan, C.; Yuan, S. Baduanjin exercise for insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav. Sleep Med. 2017, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mei, L.; Chen, Q.; Li, G. Systematic review of Chinese traditional exercise Baduanjin modulating the blood lipid metabolism. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2012, 2012, 282131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zou, L.; Sasaki, J.E.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Baduanjin Qigong for Health Benefits: Randomized Controlled Trials. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017, 2017, 4548706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Levav, I.; Rutz, W. The WHO World Health Report 2001 new understanding—New hope. Isr. J. Psychiatry Relat. Sci. 2002, 39, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. The World Health Organization. Shaping the Future: Burden of disease in DALYs by cause, sex, and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002. In World Health Report; The World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; pp. 160–165. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hiroeh, U.; Appleby, L.; Mortensen, P.B. Death by homicide, suicide, and other unnatural causes in people with mental illness: A population-based study. Lancet 2001, 358, 2110–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Januzzi, J.L.; Stern, T.A.; Pasternak, R.C.; DeSanctic, R. The influence of anxiety and depression on outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000, 160, 1913–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mental Illness Statistics and Facts. Available online: http://www.selfhelparticles.net (accessed on 29 June 2009).
  21. Cheng, F. Effects of Baduanjin on mental health: A comprehensive review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2015, 19, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Peng, W.; Crouse, J.C.; Lin, J.H. Using active video games for physical activity promotion: A systematic review of the current state of research. Health Educ. Behav. 2013, 40, 171–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yeung, A.; Slipp, L.; Niles, H.; Jacquart, J.; Chow, C.; Fava, M.; Denninger, J.; Benson, H.; Fricchione, G. Effectiveness of the relaxation response-based group intervention for treating depressed Chinese American immigrants: A pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 9186–9201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. World Health Organization. A Guide for Population-Based Approaches to Increasing Levels of Physical Activity: Implementation of the WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  26. Egger, M.; Smith, G.D.; Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chan, J.S.M.; Ho, R.T.H.; Chung, K.F.; Wang, C.; Yao, T.; Ng, S.; Chan, C. Qigong Exercise Alleviates Fatigue, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms, Improves Sleep Quality, and Shortens Sleep Latency in Persons with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-Like Illness. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014, 2014, 106048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Suo, L.; Yu, H. Jieyu decotion with psychological intervention and Ba Duan Jin exercises improve depressive symptoms in perimenopausal patients. J. Changchun Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2016, 32, 131–133. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, C.; Tan, Z.; Liu, S. A research of Baduanjin exercise treating college students with depression. Sports Sci. Res. 2014, 18, 72–75. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, Q.; Huang, R. Effects of Baduanjin on psychology and life quality of type 2 diabetic patients accompanied with depression. Chin. Med. Mod. Distance Educ. China 2017, 15, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cao, C.; Guo, X.; Chen, N.; Yan, X.; Zhang, H. Research of effects of eight-brocade of TCM on treating anxiety and depression in the elderly patients with lung-spleen Qi deficiency in stable period of COPD. J. Liaoning Univ. TCM. 2016, 18, 120–123. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X. Effects of Baduanjin on emotion and life quality of breast cancer patients during post-operation radiotherapy. Chin. Gen. Practice Nurs. 2017, 15, 2257–2259. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ma, S.; Dou, N.; Chen, C.; Zhao, Y.; Li, S. Effect of the traditional Baduanjin exercise in women with peri-menopausal syndrome and depression. Chin. Gen. Practice 2010, 25. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin, Q. Effects and cognitive improvements of Baduanjin exercise on elder patients with mild cognitive impairment. Chin. J. Gerontol. 2017, 37, 3358–3360. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sun, Y. Effects of Baduanjin combined with relaxation exercise on community type 2 diabetics with dysthymic disorder. Chin. Rural Health Serv. Adm. 2015, 35, 357–359. [Google Scholar]
  36. Guan, Y.; Wang, S.; Ma, M. Effect of Baduanjin-based exercise intervention on related parameters in type 2 diabetes patients. J. Nurs. Sci. 2012, 27, 23–24. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Jiao, H. Application of eight-section brocade in postoperative rehabilitation of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Chin. Nurs. Res. 2017, 31, 3755–3759. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ma, S.; Dou, N.; Chen, C.; Zhao, Y. Rehabilitation effects of walking and Baduanjin to the perimenopausal syndrome with depression. Chin. J. Rehabilit. Med. 2011, 26, 738–741. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, L.; Luo, L. Effects of nursing intervention on sleep quality and mental health of women with perimenopausal syndrome. Mod. J. Integr. Tradit. Chin. West Med. 2016, 25, 556–557. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, L. Effects of Baduanjin Qigong on psychological state and life quality of patients with primary glaucoma. China J. Chin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 26, 234–238. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Y.; Huo, R.; Lai, Y.; Yao, Q.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y. Community-based study on effects of Chinese Qigong-Baduanjin on depression symptoms and life quality of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin. J. Sports Med. 2012, 31, 212–217. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhou, T. Observation of blood sugar and mental intervention of health Qigong on 25 cases of diabetic patients with depression. Nei. Mongol. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2014, 24, 70. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, R.; Guan, F.; Yan, X. Qigong Baduanjin rehabilitation of elderly patients with coronary artery disease. J. Changchun Univ. Chin. Med. 2016, 32, 752–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, F.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, C. Observation of clinical effect by paroxetine combined with eight trigrams boxing exercise therapy for depression patients. Chin. J. Mod. Drug Appl. 2017, 11, 109–111. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu, Y.; Chen, O.; Luo, Y.; Ji, R.; He, S. Application of Tai Ji Quan and Eight Duan Jin in improving anxiety and depression of patients with coronary heart disease. Chin. Nurs. Res. 2016, 30, 4050–4052. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ji, X.; Wang, Q.; Fang, C. Effect of exercise therapy on anxiety and depression in the patients with diabetes mellitus. Practical Geriatr. 2012, 26, 331–333. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu, X.; Xue, W.; Fang, J.; Wang, J.; Fang, X.; Ma, X.; Liu, Z.; Ye, C.; Duan, J. Baduanjin of movements on the risk of falls in community elderly people for 60 cases. Chin. Med. Mod. Distance Educ. China 2017, 3, 106–109. [Google Scholar]
  48. Han, Y.; Wang, Q.; Luo, D.; Xue, J. Effects of Baduanjin training on anxiety and anxiety-related serum protein in postoperative patients with breast cancer. J. Nurs. Sci. 2017, 48, 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; Yi, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Yu, Y.; Huang, Y. Effect of Baduanjin exercise prescription on physical and mental regulation in type 2 diabetes patients with anxiety. Hunan J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2014, 30, 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Shen, H. The effect of Baduanjin practice on the generalized anxiety disorder. Chin. J. Sports Med. 2016, 35, 231–233. [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang, X.; Wu, S.; Xu, H. Clinical observation of anxiety improvement of Baduanjin exercise combined with adanon on heroin addicts. Shenzhen J. Integr. Tradit. Chin. West Med. 2015, 25, 98–99. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yin, H.; Zhao, B.; Liao, Y. The influence of eight infantile finger loops and whorls in combination with psychomatic relaxation exercise on blood sugar and emotional disorder of patients with diabetes mellitus combined with emotional disorder. Henan Tradit. Chin. Med. 2016, 36, 2214–2216. [Google Scholar]
  53. Guan, F.; Liu, X.; Cheng, N.; Lin, Q.; Lin, Y.; Lin, X. The influence of Baduanjin and broadcast gymnastics on depression of psychiatric inpatients. China Med. Pharm. 2016, 6, 142–144. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, X.; Li, L.; Ding, P.; Li, J. Effect of Baduanjin on depression in 62 patients with coronary heart disease and depression. World Chin. Med. 2014, 9, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhou, H.; Chen, C.; Ma, S. Effect of Baduanjin intervention on depression in women with perimenopausal syndrome and depression. J. Nurs. 2011, 25, 1448–1489. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen, K.; Berger, C.; Manheimer, E.; Forde, D.; Magidson, J.; Dachman, L.; Lejuez, C. Meditative therapies for anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Depress Anxiety 2012, 29, 545–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kirkwood, G.; Rampes, H.; Tuffrey, V.; Richardson, J.; Pikington, K. Yoga for anxiety: A systematic review of the research evidence. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005, 39, 884–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Goyal, M.; Singh, S.; Sibinga, E.M.; Gould, N.; Rowland-Seymour, A.; Sharma, R.; Berger, Z.; Sleicher, D.; Maron, D.; Shihab, H.; et al. Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2014, 174, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, F.; Man, J.; Lee, E.; Wu, T.; Benson, H.; Fricchione, G.; Wang, W.; Yeung, A. The effects of Qigong on anxiety, depression, and psychological well-being: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013, 2013, 152738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cho, H.; Ryu, S.; Noh, J.; Lee, J. The Effectiveness of Daily Mindful Breathing Practices on Test Anxiety of Students. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, C.; Chan, C.; Ho, R.; Chan, J.; Ng, S.; Chan, C. Managing stress and anxiety through qigong exercise in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Chiang, L.; Ma, W.; Huang, J.; Tseng, L.; Hsueh, K. Effect of relaxation-breathing training on anxiety and asthma signs/symptoms of children with moderate-to-severe asthma: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2009, 46, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yackle1, K.; Schwarz, L.; Kam, K.; Sorokin, J.; Huguenard, J.; Feldman, J.; Luo, L.; Krasnow, M. Breathing control center neurons that promote arousal in mice. Science 2017, 355, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chan, J.; Li, A.; Ng, S.; Ho, R.; Xu, A.; Yao, T.; Wang, X.; So, K.; Chan, C. Adiponectin potentially contributes to the ant depressive effects of Baduanjin Qigong exercise in women with chronic fatigue syndrome-like illness. Cell Transplant. 2017, 26, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 15 00321 g001 550
Figure 1. The flow of our literature search and selection process.
Figure 1. The flow of our literature search and selection process.
Ijerph 15 00321 g001
Ijerph 15 00321 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Baduanjin on anxiety.
Figure 2. Effect of Baduanjin on anxiety.
Ijerph 15 00321 g002
Ijerph 15 00321 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of Baduanjin on depression.
Figure 3. Effect of Baduanjin on depression.
Ijerph 15 00321 g003
Table
Table 1. Summary table relating to study.
Table 1. Summary table relating to study.
Author [Reference]Location (Language)ISZ (AR)Study ParticipantsIntervention ProtocolExercise IntensityOutcome MeasuredAdverse Event; Follow-Up
Training Duration and Dosage (Qualification of Instructor)Total HourNo. of Session
Randomized controlled trials
Chan et al. (2014) [27]Hong Kong, China (English)150 (13.3%) CFS-like illness with mild anxiety and depression (a mean age of 39) BJ: 16 90-min sessions for 9 weeks (a Qigong master) (daily 30-min home practice);
CG: Waitlist		2416NRAnxiety and depression (HADS)No;
3-month
Suo, Yu et al. (2016) [28]Nanjin, China (Chinese)60 (0%)Perimenopasual women with depression (aged 44–56)BJ: 7 × 60 min/wk for 12 weeks (trained nurse) + mental therapy (2 × 30 min/wk for 12 weeks) + usual drug therapy;
CG: mental therapy (2 × 30 min/wk for 3 weeks) + usual drug therapy 		8484NRDepression (HAMD)No/
6-month
Li et al. (2014) [29]Hengyan, China (Chinese)45 (11.1%)College students with depression (aged 20–23)BJ: 5 × 60 min /wk for 40 weeks (an Qigong instructor);
CG: Usual physical education classes (training volume was NR) 		200200NR Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Yang et al. (2017) [30]Zhengzhou, China (Chinese)110 (4.5%)Type 2 DM patients with depression (aged 32–70)BJ: 7× 60 min/wk for 12 weeks (an Qigong instructor) + usual care;
CG: 2 × 30 min/wk for 3 weeks (educational program) + usual care		8484NRDepression (HAMD)NR
No
Cao et al. (2016) [31]Nangjin, China (Chinese)103(0.97%)COPD patients with anxiety and depression (a mean age of 70.49)BJ: 4 × 30 min/wk for 24 weeks (trained instructors) + usual care;
CG: 4 × 30 min/wk for 24 weeks (self-selected pace walking) + usual care		4896NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
12-week
Li et al. (2017) [32]ShanXi, China (Chinese)68(10.3%)Patients with breast cancer (a mean age of 45.45)BJ: 5 sessions (session length was NR; trained nurse)/wk for 12 weeks + usual care
CG: Usual care		NA60NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Ma et al. (2010) [33]Tangshan, China (Chinese)100 (0%)Perimenopasual women with depression (aged 45–55)BJ: 7 × 45 min/wk for 12 weeks (instructor qualification was NR);
CG: Unaltered lifestyle		6384AHR:100 bpmDepression (CESD)NR;
No
Lin (2017) [34]FuZhou, China Chinese94(0%)Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (aged 61–79)BJ: 6 sessions (session length was NR; instructor qualification was NR)/wk for 24 weeks + usual care;
CG: Usual care		NA144NRDepression (GDS)NR;
No
Sun (2015) [35]Jilin, China (Chinese)65 (0%)Type 2 DM patients (a mean age of 46.1)BJ: 5 × 60 min/wk for 24 weeks (trained instructor)
CG: Unaltered lifestyle		120120ARH:100 bpmAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Guan et al. (2012) [36]Hefei, China (Chinese)80(1.25%)Type 2 DM patients (aged 45–70)BJ: 7 × 60 min/wk for 16 weeks + usual care
CG: Usual care 		112112NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Li, Wang et al. (2017) [37]Shanxi, China (Chinese)70(4.3%)Patients with Non-small cell lung cancer (a mean age of 56).BJ: at least 3 × 30 min/wk for 12 weeks (trained nurse) + usual care
CG: Usual care		1836NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Ma et al. (2011) [38]Tangshan, China (Chinese)145 (0%)Perimenopausal women with depression (aged 45–55)BJ: 54 × 45 min/wk for 12 weeks (trained instructor)
CG1: 5 × 45/wk for 12 weeks (self-selected pace walking);
CG2: Unaltered lifestyle		4560THR: 100 bpmDepression (CESD)No;
No
Zhang & Luo (2016) [39]Chengdu, China (Chinese)93(0%)Perimenopausal women with depression and anxiety (aged 45–55)BJ: 7 × 45 min/wk for 12 weeks (community doctor) + educational program (twice per week);
CG: Twice per week (educational program) 		6384NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)No;
No
Zhang, Gao et al. (2016) [40]Bejing, China (Chinese)60(0%)Patients with glaucoma (aged 40–60)BJ: 7 × 30 min/wk for 12 weeks (hospital doctor) + usual care
CG: Usual care		4284NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)No;
No
Liu, Huo et al. (2012) [41]Beijing, Ching (Chinese)88(21.6%)Type 2 DM patients with depression (a mean age of 64.2)BJ: 3 × 40 min/wk for 12 weeks (trained instructor) +educational program (a total of 6 30 min educational sessions);
CG: Educational program (a total of 6 30 min sessions).		2436NRDepression (SDS)No;
No
Zhou (2014) [42]Beijing, China (Chinese)25 (0%)Type 2 DM patients with depression (aged 51–80)BJ: 7 × 60 min/wk for 12 weeks (NR) +usual care
CG: Usual care		8484NRDepression (SDS)No;
No
Wang et al. (2016) [43]Fuzhou, China (Chinese)50 (0%)Patients with coronary heart disease (aged 60–70)BJ: (Training volume was NR) for 12 weeks (NR) + usual drug therapy + educational program
CG: Usual drug therapy + educational program		NANANRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Zhang, Lin et al. (2017) [44]Liaochen, China (Chinese)124 (0%) Patients with depression (a mean age of 42.8).BJ: 7 × 60 min/wk for 6 weeks (trained instructor) +usual drug therapy
CG: Usual drug therapy		4242NRDepression (HAMD)NR;no
Wu, Chen et al. (2016) [45]Changsha, China (Chinese)60 (0%)Patients with coronary heart disease (aged 49–79)BJ: 5 × 60 min/wk for 12 weeks (NR) + usual care
CG: Usual care		6060NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Ji et al. (2012) [46]Wuxi, China (Chinese)62(0%)DM patients (aged 36–81)BJ: 7 × 45 min/wk for 8 weeks (physical therapist) + usual care + education program
CG: Usual care + educational program 		4256NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
Wu, Xue et al. (2017) [47]Beijing, China (Chinese)120(0%)Older adults with anxiety and balance impaired (aged 65–80).BJ: 2 sessions (session length was NR) per day for 30 days (hospital doctor)
CG: Unaltered lifestyle 		NA60NRAnxiety (SAS)NR;
no
Han et al. (2017) [48]TaiYuan, China (Chinese)64(6.25%)Patients with breast cancer and depression (a mean age of 46.23).BJ: 5 × 20 min/wk for 12 weeks (five trained nurses) + usual care
CG: Usual care		2060NRAnxiety (SAS) NR;
No
Liu, Chen et al. (2014) [49]Changsha, China (Chinese)40(0%)Type 2 DM with anxiety (a mean of 57).BJ: 5 × 30 min/wk for 24 weeks (NR) + usual care + drug therapy
CG: Usual care + drug therapy		60120NRAnxiety (SAS)NR;
No
Zhang, Zhang et al. (2016) [50]Beijing, China (Chinese)64(3.1%)Patients with generalized anxiety disorder (aged 22–65).BJ: 2 × 60 min/wk for 12 weeks (NR) (daily 30 min home practice) + usual care + drug therapy
CG: Usual care + drug therapy		2424NRAnxiety (SAS and HARS)NR;
No
Huang et al. (2015) [51]Zhuhai, China (Chinese)100(12%)Heroin addicts with anxiety (aged 18–50)BJ: 7 × 30 min/wk for 20 weeks (NR) + mental therapy + drug therapy;
CG: Mental therapy + drug therapy 		70140NRAnxiety (SAS)NR;
No
Yin et al. (2016) [52]Zhuhai, China (Chinese)88(0%)DM patients with mental illness (a mean age of 55.47)BJ:2 x 60 min/wk for 24 weeks (trained nurse) (daily 60min home practice) +usual care +mental therapy
CG: Usual care + mental therapy		4848NRAnxiety (SAS) Depression (SDS)NR;
No
2. Non-randomized controlled studies
Non-randomized controlled trial
Guan, Liu et al. (2016) [53]Fuzhou, China (Chinese)60 (0%)Inpatients with depression (a mean age of 41.4)BJ: 7 × 30 min/wk for 6 weeks (trained nurse) + usual care + drug therapy;
CG1: The choreographed aerobic exercise (dosage was not reported) + usual care + drug therapy
CG2: Usual care + drug therapy		2142NRDepression (HAMD)NR;
No
Note: ISZ = initial sample size; AR = attribution rate; SAR = session attendance rate; BJ = Baduanjin; CG = control group; EI = exercise intensity; THR = target heart rate; AHR = average heart rate; AE = adverse event; FU = follow-up; M = month; wk = week; reps = repetitions; NA = not applicable; NR = not reported; QOI = qualification of instructor; PPS = pretest-posttest study; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HAMD = Hamilton Depression Scale; HARS = Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; CFS-like illness = chronic fatigue syndrome-like illness; SDS = Self-Rating Depression Scale; T2 DM = Type 2 diabetes mellitus; COPD = Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SAS = self-rating Anxiety Scale; SDS = self-rating Depression Scale; CESD = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression; GDS = the Geriatric Depression Scale.
Table
Table 2. Summary table for pretest and posttest studies.
Table 2. Summary table for pretest and posttest studies.
Author [Reference]Study LocationISZ (AT)Health StatusDuration and DosageExercise IntensityQOIOutcome MeasuredConclusionpAE/FU
Wu, Li (2014) [54]Beijing, China (Chinese)68 (8.8%)Patients with coronary heart disease and depression, with a mean age of 53.BJ: 3 × 30 min/wk, 2 weeksNRTrained instructorDepression (SDS and HAMD)SDS: 68(11.34) vs. 67.63(11.46)
HAMD: 33.23(6.9) vs. 32.60(7.13)
Effectively reduced depression 		0.02
0.004		NR/No
Zhou, Chen et al. (2011) [55]Tangshan, China (Chinese)30 (0%)Perimenopausal women with depression, with a mean age of 48.05.BJ: Daily morning practice (training volume was not specifically reported), 6 monthsNRTrained instructorDepression (CESD)CESD: 25.67(5.82) vs. 19.03(4.93)
Effectively reduced depression		<0.01NR/No
Note: ISZ = initial sample size; AT = attribution rate; QOI = qualification of instructor; CESD = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression; HAMD = Hamilton Depression Scale; SDS = Self-Rating Depression Scale.
Table
Table 3. Methodological quality for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled studies.
Table 3. Methodological quality for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled studies.
Author [Reference]Item 1Item 2Item 3Item 4Item 5Item 6Item 7Item 8Item 9Score
Randomized controlled trials or non-randomized controlled studies
Chan, Li et al. (2014) [27]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes9/9
Suo, Yu et al. (2016) [28]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Li, Tan et al. (2014) [29]YesYesYesYesYesYesNoNoYes7/9
Yang, Huang et al. (2017) [30]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Cao, Guo et al. (2016) [31]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Li et al. (2017) [32]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Ma, Dou et al. (2010) [33]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYes8/9
Lin (2017) [34]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Sun (2015) [35]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Guan, Wang et al. (2012) [36]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Li, Wang et al. (2017) [37]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Ma, Dou et al. (2011) [38]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYes8/9
Zhang & Luo (2016) [39]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Zhang, Gao et al. (2016) [40]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Liu, Huo et al. (2012) [41]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Zhou (2014) [42]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Wang, Guan et al. (2016) [43]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Zhang, Lin et al. (2017) [44]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Wu, Chen et al. (2016) [45]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Ji, Wang et al. (2012) [46]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Wu, Xue et al. (2017) [47]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYes8/9
Han, Wang et al. (2017) [48]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Liu, Chen et al. (2014) [49]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Zhang, Zhang et al. (2016) [50]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Huang, Wu et al. (2015) [51]YesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoYes6/9
Yin, Zhao et al. (2016) [52]YesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes7/9
Guan, Liu et al. (2016) [53]NoYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes6/9
Wu, Li (2014) [54]NoNoYesYesYesNoNoNoYes4/9
Zhou, Chen et al. (2011) [55]NoNoYesYesYesNoNoNoYes4/9
Note: Item 1 = randomization; Item 2 = control group; Item 3 = isolated Baduanjin intervention; Item 4 = pre-posttest design; Item 5 = retention ≥ 70%; Item 6 = similar baseline; Item 7 = missing data management; Item 8 = power analysis; Item 9 = validity and reliability of measure; 1 = yes (explicitly described and present in details); 2 = no (absent, inadequately described, or unclear); NA = not applicable.
Table
Table 4. Moderator analysis for Baduanjin versus control group.
Table 4. Moderator analysis for Baduanjin versus control group.
Categorical ModeratorOutcomeLevelNo. of StudiesHedge’s g95% CII2, %Test for Between-Group Homogeneity
Q-Valuedf(Q)p-Value
Intervention durationAnxiety<16 weeks9−0.99−1.23 to −0.7545.87%0.5510.46
≥16 weeks5−1.13−1.39 to −0.8638.64%
Training frequencyAnxiety<5 sessions/week5−0.93−1.21 to −0.6544.89%1.5110.22
≥5 sessions/week10−1.20−1.52 to −0.8774.31%
Session lengthAnxietyLess than 1 h8−1.15−1.47 to −0.8367.61%0.0910.76
1 h or longer5−1.22−1.54 to −0.9047%
Control typeAnxietyActive7−0.98−1.15 to −0.800%0.11310.736
passive8−1.04−1.39 to −0.7073.19%
Study qualityAnxietyLow risk8−1−1.33 to −0.6772.68%0.0010.96
High risk7−0.99−1.17 to −0.810%
Continuous ModeratorLevelNo. of Studies β 95% Confidence IntervalQ-Valuedfp
Total hourAnxiety13−0.0053−0.009 to −0.00146.910.008
Number of total sessionsAnxiety14−0.0009−0.005 to 0.0030.210.66
Table
Table 5. Moderator analysis for Baduanjin versus control group.
Table 5. Moderator analysis for Baduanjin versus control group.
Categorical ModeratorOutcomeLevelNo. of StudiesHedge’s g95% CII2, %Test for between-Group Homogeneity
Q-Valuedf(Q)p-Value
Intervention durationDepression<16 weeks12−1.08−1.39 to −0.7778.3%0.0310.87
≥6 weeks5−1.04−1.4 to −0.6864.98%
Training frequencyDepression<5 sessions/week5−0.84−1.20 to −0.482.8222.810.09
≥5 sessions/week11−1.22−1.50 to −0.95
Session lengthDepressionLess than 1 h8−1.14−1.54 to −0.7482.75%0.710.4
1 h or longer6−0.94−1.19 to −0.6837.51%
Control typeDepressionActive8−0.84−1.02 to −0.6616%3.7410.053
passive9−1.27−1.65 to −0.8982.16%
Study qualityDepressionLow risk12−1.11−1.41 to −0.8276.8%0.4410.51
High risk5−0.95−1.34 to −0.5768.97%
Continuous ModeratorLevelNo. of Studies β 95% Confidence IntervalQ-Valuedfp
Total hourDepression14−0.0018−0.0051 to 0.00151.08810.297
Number of total sessionsDepression16−0.0023−0.006 to −0.00044.8510.028

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, L.; Yeung, A.; Quan, X.; Hui, S.S.-C.; Hu, X.; Chan, J.S.M.; Wang, C.; Boyden, S.D.; Sun, L.; Wang, H. Mindfulness-Based Baduanjin Exercise for Depression and Anxiety in People with Physical or Mental Illnesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020321

AMA Style

Zou L, Yeung A, Quan X, Hui SS-C, Hu X, Chan JSM, Wang C, Boyden SD, Sun L, Wang H. Mindfulness-Based Baduanjin Exercise for Depression and Anxiety in People with Physical or Mental Illnesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(2):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Liye, Albert Yeung, Xinfeng Quan, Stanley Sai-Chuen Hui, Xiaoyue Hu, Jessie S. M. Chan, Chaoyi Wang, Sean David Boyden, Li Sun, and Huiru Wang. 2018. "Mindfulness-Based Baduanjin Exercise for Depression and Anxiety in People with Physical or Mental Illnesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 2: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop