Menstrual Symptoms After COVID-19 Vaccine: A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the MENA Region

Introduction

Over the past year and a half, the COVID-19 pandemic has taken the world by storm, affecting every aspect of human life. As a response, numerous vaccines were developed and approved in less than a year from when the virus was first identified.¹ By mid-2021, three billion doses had been administered around the world.² Nevertheless, this rapid worldwide use of the vaccines led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to utilize a real-time Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System called V-Safe to track potential side effects of the vaccine.³ In addition, many studies reported a variety of vaccine-related side effects, ranging from mild symptoms like fever, chills, headache, fatigue, and arm pain to severe side effects such as thrombosis and anaphylaxis.^4–7 Moreover, a recent study reported several menstrual abnormalities following COVID-19 vaccination, including increased cycle length, pain, and bleeding.⁸

The menstrual cycle reflects women’s general health status, as women with irregular and longer menstrual cycles are at a higher risk of death before the age of 70.⁹ This is partially attributed to women with irregular menstrual cycles being more prone to metabolic disorders such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia.¹⁰ Therefore, menstrual abnormalities pose a significant challenge for the healthcare system, particularly when accounting for its impact on women’s daily tasks.¹⁰ In light of the prevalence of menstrual abnormalities,^11,12 the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended adding the menstrual cycle to the vital signs of adolescent females.¹³

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom reported 41,919 cases of menstrual problems, including heavier than usual periods, delayed periods, and unexpected vaginal bleeding, up to their latest update on 17/11/2021.¹⁴ This emphasizes the importance of investigating menstrual abnormalities post COVID-19 vaccination.¹⁵ Therefore, this study attempts to investigate the menstrual cycle abnormalities and their relation to the different types of COVID-19 vaccines, which will help us provide better medical care to achieve a satisfactory outcome for these patients by alleviating their concerns and helping them deal with their symptoms, thus improving their quality of life.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

This study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design that took place between July 2021 and August 2021. The study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the menstrual cycle. It involved an anonymous questionnaire distributed via social media platforms that included Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, including Jordan, UAE, KSA, Kuwait, Qatar, Turkey, Palestine, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Oman, Morocco, Al-Bahrain, Tunisia, Sudan, and Syria. Data collection did not involve direct contact with participants to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Figure 1 shows a summary of the study design.

Figure 1 Summary of the study design.

The study investigated three main associations. Firstly, the association between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual abnormalities and the associated factors. Secondly, the association between the COCID-19 infection and menstrual abnormalities. Lastly, the lifestyle and mental health change after the COVID-19 vaccination.

Study Population

The study included female participants over the age of menarche who had any type of COVID-19 vaccine. The exclusion criteria were those women who did not receive the vaccine, living outside the Middle East and North Africa, were premenopausal, postmenopausal, pregnant, lactating, had primary ovarian insufficiency, hypothalamic menopause, underwent a hysterectomy or had failed to complete at least 80% of the questionnaire.

Study Tool

The study used an online-based questionnaire created through Google Forms^® online survey development software. The questionnaire was first developed in Arabic and then translated into English and Turkish, and back-translated into Arabic to ensure comprehensibility and content validity by translating expert.

The questionnaire (available in the Supplementary materials) consists of 28 detailed self-report questions covering six integral domains. The first of which is demographics, including age, country of residence, number of children, and marital status (4 questions). The second section contains questions about menstruation and menstrual cycle, method of contraception used in the previous year, pre-existing medical diagnosis, and smoking (8 questions). The third category deals with the number of doses, the type of vaccine received, and objective scores for the severity of the COVID-19 vaccination side effects (3 questions). The fourth category is about previous COVID-19 infection, the severity of the symptoms of the infection according to NIH, and menstrual abnormalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (3 questions). The fifth category includes questions about menstrual abnormalities after vaccination, the duration of symptoms, their relationship to the dose, and their impact on life (6 questions). The sixth category consists of an open-ended question about the change in the menstruation and menstrual cycle length between baseline and after vaccination (4 questions).

A pilot study was conducted that included 30 participants to find any faults that might exist and ensure the validity and reliability of the overall questionnaire. Accordingly, the survey was reviewed again by a group of consultants from the Department of Gynecology at Jordan University Hospital (JUH) to ensure the validity of the construction prior to distribution. The 30 participants in the pilot study were excluded from the main study and subsequent analyses (Figure 1).

Data Collection Procedure

An anonymous free online survey was used to collect responses over six weeks directed at women who have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and live in the MENA region. The questionnaire was distributed and advertised across several social media groups, and participants were encouraged to share it with their peers and social circles in order to maximize the sample size. It took 7 minutes to complete all the questions.

Ethical approval was granted by The University of Jordan and this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was created to ensure that the ethical standards of voluntary participation were followed, that it was not emotionally distressing, and that the participants’ rights to privacy, anonymity, and self-determination were protected. An informed consent was obtained from all participants on the first page of the study’s questionnaire, it explained the aims of the study and emphasized on the confidentiality of the data collected.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 26.0 (Chicago, USA) was used in our analysis. The data was described using variability analysis in the form of means (standard deviation). The sociodemographic factors were calculated and provided as frequencies (percentages) using standard descriptive statistical parameters. The relationship between study factors were examined using the Chi-square test. A paired parametric t-test was used to compare the mean change in the length of the menstruation and of the menstrual cycle between baseline and after vaccination. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of less than 0.05.

Results

Demographics

Out of the 2562 participants who completed the questionnaire, 293 were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria. Eventually, 2269 female respondents were included in this analysis. Among the participants, the age ranged from 14 to 54 years, with a mean of 34.32 (± 8.53). The participants were from 16 different countries, and the majority of the participants were from Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar, accounting for 64.7%, 10.5%, 7.9%, 3.5%, and 2.4%, respectively.

Most respondents (62.4%) were married, and 59.9% had a child or more, with a mean of 1.74 (± 1.74). The majority of participants received Pfizer-BioNTech, Sinopharm, and AstraZeneca (48.4%, 35.3%, and 13.4%, respectively), and the majority (85.4%) received two doses. Concerning COVID-19 infection, 22% of participants had confirmed infection, and 11.7% of participants reported having COVID-19 like symptoms; however, they were not confirmed through laboratory testing. Table S1 demonstrates the country of residence of the participants and information on the COVID-19 immunization.

Clinical Characteristics

Among the participants, 75.1% had regular menstrual cycles before taking the vaccine for the last year, and 24.9% had irregular menstrual cycles. About a third (29.7%) of the participants were smokers, and only 6.7% had a history of coagulation disorders (including bleeding, blood clots, thrombocytopenia, or taking coagulation medication). Additionally, 20.8% of the participants reported having a history of asthma, drug allergy, or food allergy.

The vast majority (81.2%) of participants were disease-free. However, PCOS, thyroid disorders, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and adenomyosis were present in 10.1%, 6.7%, 2.9%, 1.8%, and 0% of participants, respectively. Over the last calendar year, 19.2% of the participants began using a contraceptive, predominantly combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) (8.4%). Moreover, 8.4% of women discontinued using a contraceptive within the last calendar year, with COCP (5.8%) being the most often discontinued.

Menstrual Cycle Abnormalities and COVID-19 Infection

Among patients who complained of post-vaccination menstrual abnormalities, 77.6% had no previous COVID-19 infection. When comparing menstrual abnormalities among those with a previous history of infection and those without a history of infection there was no significant associations with post-vaccination menstrual abnormalities (p = 0.136); it was found that 66.8% had menstrual abnormalities among those who did not have previous COVID-19 infection or symptoms suspected of COVID-19 infection and did not test. Similarly, 67.5% of those with confirmed previous COVID-19 infection had menstrual abnormalities. Nevertheless, the post-vaccination menstrual abnormalities were significantly associated with the severity of COVID-19 infection (p = 0.006).

Menstrual Cycle Abnormalities After COVID-19 Vaccination

Overall, 66.3% of women experienced menstrual abnormalities after vaccination. Of those, symptoms appeared after a week in 30.5%, and within a month in 86.8% (Figure 2). Furthermore, in 93.6% the symptoms resolved within 2 months (Figure 2). The majority (46.7%) had the symptoms after the first dose, while 32.4% after the second dose and 20.9% after both doses. When comparing AstraZeneca, Sinopharm and Pfizer, differences in the incidence of menstrual abnormalities were statistically insignificant, 68.4%, 66.2%, 65.4%, respectively (p > 0.05). Moreover, post-vaccination menstrual abnormalities symptoms and PCOS, thyroid disorders, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and adenomyosis were not associated (p > 0.05).

Figure 2 Timeline for the onset and resolution of post-vaccination symptoms.

There was a significantly higher prevalence of menstrual abnormalities among those who also experienced other adverse effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccination, including fever, fatigue, headache, nausea, and arm pain (17.6% vs 82.4%) (p < 0.001). In addition, there was a statistically significant association with the objective severity grade for vaccine general side effects (p < 0.001).

Almost one-third (35.3%) of the participants experienced menstrual abnormalities during the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccination. In addition, there is a significant difference between the menstrual abnormalities during the COVID-19 pandemic and menstrual abnormalities after the vaccination (35.3% vs 66.3%) (p < 0.001). Table 1 summarizes the symptoms experienced by the participants post-vaccination after each dose in detail and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Table 1 Menstrual Symptoms Post-Vaccination and During COVID-19 Pandemic n (%)

Factors Associated with Menstrual Abnormalities After COVID-19 Vaccine

Our results showed that there were no significant associated with age, number of children, marital status, vaccination type, previous history of COVID-19 infection, previous diagnosis including PCOS, thyroid disorders, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and adenomyosis, stopping or starting any king of contraceptive method, history of coagulation disorders (including bleeding, blood clots, thrombocytopenia, or taking coagulation medication), menstrual cycle length, and duration of menstruation (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant relationship with country of residence (p < 0.001), irregular cycles (p < 0.001), smoking (p < 0.001), menstrual abnormalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.001), negative impact on quality of life (p < 0.001), symptoms of COIVD-19 vaccine general symptoms (p < 0.001), objective severity grade for vaccine general side effects (p < 0.001), and severity of COVID-19 infection (p = 0.006).

Duration of Menstruation and Duration of the Menstrual Cycle After COVID-19 Vaccination

Mean duration of menstruation as reported by respondents had significantly increased from 6 ± 0.03 days pre-vaccine to 6.5 ± 0.1 post-vaccine (p < 0.001). Moreover, participants mean menstrual cycle length had significantly increased from 27 ± 6 days prior to taking the vaccine to 28.1 ± 10 days after being vaccinated (p < 0.001).

Lifestyle and Mental Health Change After COVID-19 Vaccination

After receiving the COVID-19 vaccination, 78.3% reported side effects, including fever, fatigue, headache, nausea, and arm pain, which in 14.4% were described as severe. In addition to common post-vaccination side effects, 56.2% of participants reported that the gynaecological abnormalities they experienced after vaccination significantly impacted their quality of life. This impact led 15.2% of those who experienced any menstrual abnormalities to visit a gynaecologist for regular check-up. Table 2 demonstrates the different ways participants coped with post-vaccine menstrual abnormalities.

Table 2 Participants Reaction to the Menstrual Abnormalities After Vaccination

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that 66.3% of our sample in the MENA region had complained of menstrual abnormalities after being vaccinated against COVID-19, particularly after the first dose (46.7%). Vaccine type did not influence the incidence of menstrual abnormalities among these women. However, females that were subjected to pronounced COVID-19 vaccine side effects had significantly higher rates of menstrual abnormalities. After taking the vaccine, women reported a significantly longer mean duration of menstruation and menstrual cycle length compared to their pre-vaccine status. These symptoms were alleviated in less than a month of taking the vaccine for 86.8% of respondents. Lastly, 56.2% of the participants indicated that post-vaccine menstrual abnormalities had negatively impacted their quality of life.

The menstrual bleeding pattern is an important indicator of reproductive health.¹⁶ However, menstrual symptoms, such as perimenstrual mood disorders, menstrual cramps, and heavy menstrual bleeding, are considered common gynecological problems.¹¹ One nationwide study conducted by Schoep et al, including 42,879 healthy premenopausal Dutch women, reported that 53.7% of respondents complained of heavy bleeding, 77.3% complained of perimenstrual psychological complaints, and 85.4% complained of menstrual cramps.¹¹ This can be attributed to the female menstrual cycle being affected by several factors that can be transient such as infections, weight gain, anxiety, hormonal changes, and periods of psychological stress, or long term and require treatment such as endocrinopathies, polycystic ovary syndrome,^17–19 Stressors may activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, leading to a disruption of the regularity of hormone release. These menstrual changes can impact women’s quality of life, leading to work and school limitations, hindering achievements, and affecting social and professional activities, which can further cause stress.^20,21 One source of stress that has taken the world by storm was the COVID-19 pandemic, such that several studies showed an increase in menstrual cycle abnormalities during the pandemic compared to before.^17,18,22,23 In our study, nearly one-third (35.3%) of the participants experienced menstrual changes during the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccination. However, 66.3% of women experienced abnormal periods after vaccination. Even after accounting for changes in menstrual bleeding during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a significant difference between the menstrual changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and menstrual abnormalities after the vaccination. Our results are consistent with a recent preprint study of 39,129 participants in the USA, where 42% reported heavier bleeding after vaccination.²⁴ In another preprint of a retrospective study of 4989 premenopausal vaccinated participants in the UK, only 20% did not report any menstrual cycle abnormalities up to four months after their first COVID-19 vaccine injection.²⁵

Irregular menstruation incidence in the literature ranges from 5% to 35.6%, varying with occupation, age, and area of residence.^26–31 In our study, the percentage of females with menstrual irregularities prior to vaccination lies within that range, with 24.9% having irregular menstrual cycles. According to our findings, the vaccine altered the duration of menstruation and length of the menstrual cycle in the women who received it, resulting in a significant difference between before and after vaccination. Although some participants reported a reduction in the duration of menstruation and length of menstrual cycle while others reported a prolongation, the mean duration significantly increased from 6 ± 0.03 days pre-vaccine to 6.5 ± 0.1 post-vaccine (p < 0.001). While the mean length of the menstrual cycle significantly increased from 27 ± 6 days prior to taking the vaccine to 28.1 ± 10 days after being vaccinated (p < 0.001).

In our study, 65.4% of those with symptoms after their vaccine reported not resorting to any modality to alleviate these symptoms. This percentage is comparable to a study surveying 383 women between 17 and 25 years of age, where 73.9% reported not seeking medical help for their menstrual symptoms.³² In another study, only 43.7% of respondents consulted a physician in their lifetime regarding any menstruation-related symptoms.¹¹ Although 65.4% of the participants did not seek treatment, 56.2% reported that their gynecological symptoms had negatively impacted their quality of life. Various reasons can be attributed to this observed lack of help-seeking behavior. Firstly, some may have experienced mild symptoms that did not warrant intervention, in their opinion. Additionally, the state of emergency caused by COVID-19 may have created a psychological or physical barrier that further prevented individuals from consulting about complaints not associated with COVID-19. On the organizational level, health care facilities may have resorted to tending to patients with serious conditions only, particularly in low-resource settings where medical supplies were scarce. Secondly, some individuals may lack awareness of the possible risks associated with irregular menstrual cycles. Thirdly, participants may have wanted to avoid a stressful situation out of fear that their complaint is serious.³³ Lastly, the negative attitude towards menstrual symptoms may discourage help-seeking behavior, particularly in the younger age group of a conservative society such as the MENA region.³⁴ In a qualitative study done by Flynn, the results showed that the social pressure to avoid discussing menstruation strongly influenced women’s health-related behavior.³⁵ This social pressure may also explain why only 16.9% of those with menstrual symptoms visited a gynecologist; meanwhile, 34.1% decided to seek help through relatives, online searches, or self-treatment. Fortunately, these symptoms were alleviated in less than a month of taking the vaccine for 86.8% of respondents. Similarly, in a preprint done by Alvergne et al, menstrual abnormalities resolved within two months of the vaccine in 93.6% of the cases, suggesting that such vaccine side-effects are self-limiting.²⁵

The mechanism by which the vaccine may cause menstrual symptoms is unknown. However, it is plausible that it is the result of immune-mediated vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia.³⁶ This speculation results from many other vaccines, including measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), hepatitis A and B, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP), varicella, and even influenza, being previously linked to vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia causing menstrual irregularities.³⁷ In support of this speculation, our study shows trends and factors that may suggest the symptoms are a result of an immunologic response. Firstly, the symptoms were delayed appearing after a week in 30.5% and 15.1% appearing after one month of taking the vaccine. Secondly, there was a significantly higher prevalence of menstrual irregularities among those who experienced other adverse effects associated with COVID-19 vaccination (p < 0.001). Further research is needed concerning the mechanism by which COVID-19 vaccination causes menstrual abnormalities.

The main strength of our study is that it is one of the first articles to tackle in-depth the phenomenon of post-vaccination menstrual abnormalities, despite the various reports on social media platforms and news outlets.^26,38–40 In our study, vaccinated women from different MENA countries were recruited, which allowed us to estimate the prevalence of post-vaccination menstrual abnormalities in a conservative society, which is considered a sensitive topic. Additionally, it provides a baseline for assessing the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the female menstrual cycle. Another strength lies in the data collection instrument, which has been meticulously developed and validated to encapsulate the problem accurately and comprehensively. Accordingly, we believe that our data accurately represents the menstrual abnormalities that women experience post-vaccination.

However, the study falls prey to some limitations. The study’s cross-sectional design limited our ability to determine causal relationships. Moreover, self-reported data extraction has an increased likelihood of recall bias or self-selection as those with menstrual disorders might be more interested in participating in the study. In addition, the use of an internet-based survey might have underrepresented or overrepresented certain target groups, especially older populations with limited internet access or technological awareness. Nevertheless, online questionnaires are the most effective and safest data extraction method in light of the current epidemiological status. To add to this, due to the rapid addition of papers in the COVID-19 literature, limitations to the addition of the most up-to-date papers are present. Finally, while our study reports the menstrual changes of a large, sampled population, the sample might not be representative of each country’s cluster.

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence that females subjected to COVID-19 vaccines may experience menstrual abnormalities including, but not limited to longer menstruation duration and increased menstrual cycle lengths. Such abnormalities may impact females’ daily life activities and ultimately impair their overall quality of life. Our study also provides preliminary evidence that these symptoms may be self-limited and transient. Nevertheless, due to the altered prioritization influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, women are less likely to adopt health-seeking behaviors. Therefore, it is imperative to alert healthcare professionals and women about menstrual abnormalities after vaccination. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to identify the temporal link between menstrual cycle changes and the different types of COVID-19 vaccines.