Take a look at the Recent articles

Abstract

During the present public health emergency caused by COVID-19 spreading rapidly worldwide, the focus is mainly on containing the epidemic to provide relief to hospitals meeting unprecedented demands. Primary care physicians, especially in low- and middle-income countries, are therefore now frequently requesting advice on how to treat their COVID-19 patients at home in the early phase of the disease. Here, we provide recommendations for treating the illness at home, based on the pharmacological rationale and the available clinical evidence of efficacy in COVID-19 patients, including results from published clinical trials, for each recommended class of drugs. Moreover, we have drawn on the experiences of one of us who has used his extensive background in the field of infectious diseases, as well as common

sense, to treat COVID-19 patients at home.

Key words

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulant agents, antibiotics, oxygen therapy

Introduction

How can I take care of my patients with initial symptoms of COVID-19 at home?

This is a recurrent question from primary care physicians, particularly in less fortunate parts of the world. We have received several questions about this from Latin America, for instance, and just yesterday from Bolivia. Our first answer is always, do not expect to rely on results from controlled trials. If you are fortunate, it will take you 3 years to find an answer, which will then be contradicted by the next trial. By then, either the virus will have disappeared or a vaccine will have become available. So, what to do? You can only rely on the very scarce evidence you may find in the literature and your own knowledge to manage your patients’ symptoms, and take advantage of the experience gained by one of us (F.S.), who is a long-term scholar of infectious diseases and who used his experience and common sense to treat over 15 COVID-19 patients at home, most of whom needed oxygen for transient respiratory distress, and only 3 of whom needed to be admitted to hospital.

To guarantee the minimum protection and safety of patients, healthcare workers, and visitors to hospitals, the World Health Organization (WHO) has provided a set of standard minimum requirements that must be put in place both at the national level and in all health facilities to prevent and control infections [1]. This approach could also be useful for managing COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries, where it should be ensured as soon as possible that these minimum prerequisites are in place [2].

The newly recognised disease COVID-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which by early December 2019 had spread from China to the rest of the world, especially Europe and the United States [3], with over 3 million confirmed cases and over 211,000 deaths in 177 countries (28^th April, 2020) [3]. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infections is wide, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and even death [4]. According to retrospective data from China regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 [5], at the time of admission to hospital, the most common symptoms were a cough (67.8%), fever (43%), and fatigue (38.1%), and less frequently myalgia/arthralgia (14.9%), a sore throat (13.9%) and headache (13.6), while nausea or vomiting (5.0%) and diarrhoea (3.8%) were uncommon. Similar clinical characteristics are also encountered in European and US COVID-19 patients in the early phase of the infection.

Given the rising global death toll associated with the pandemic, in the past few months we have witnessed a race to find drugs/biologic treatments to save the lives of hospitalised, severely ill patients, as well as to develop vaccines [6,7]. To this end, randomised clinical trials are underway, including the SOLIDARITY trial launched on 20^th March by WHO which is characterised by its simplicity, to test experimental drug candidates or repurposed medicines. Therapeutic approaches to the early, mild phase of COVID-19 are also being debated, and here, too, there is an emphasis on the need for randomised clinical trials. However, there are times, like the present, when the focus is mainly on containing the epidemic and providing relief to hospitals dealing with unprecedented demands being made on their workforce in caring for COVID-19 patients. At this time, it is crucial to provide recommendations to primary care physicians, especially those practicing in resource-poor settings, on treating patients in the early phase of COVID-19 with initial mild symptoms at home. These measures may apply to conditions beyond the in-depth pathophysiology of the illness.

Our recommendations focus on a combination of two drug classes that target the most common symptoms and prophylactic therapy and oxygen therapy, when needed. These are based on the pharmacological rationale and the available clinical evidence of efficacy in COVID-19 patients, including results of published randomized clinical trials, for each of our recommended class of drugs (Figure 1).

Anti-inflammatory drugs

Fever, myalgias and arthralgias are common symptoms of a mild COVID-19 infection that highlight the systemic inflammatory process. Thus, the rationale for the use of anti-inflammatory agents is to limit host inflammatory responses to the viral infection.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Should the patient have a fever (≥ 37.3 °C) and/or myalgias/arthralgias or other painful symptoms, our advice is to administer a cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitor, including nimesulide and celecoxib. Nimesulide is more readily available, even in low-income countries, and at a high dose it inhibits the COX-2 enzyme [8]. Therefore, we recommend this drug at the oral dose of 200 mg/day (after a meal) for a maximum of 15 days. Alternatively, celecoxib is recommended at an initial oral dose of 400 mg, followed by a second dose of 200 mg on the first day of therapy. In the following days, up to a maximum of 400 mg/day - 200 mg twice a day - should be given as needed. Less preferable is the use of paracetamol (acetaminophen) given its relatively mild anti-inflammatory activity.

NSAIDs are a class of medicines that act by inhibiting two enzymes, prostaglandin synthase 1 and 2 (also known as cyclooxygenase-1, COX-1, and cyclooxygenase-2, COX-2) [9]. Upon their activation, COX-1 and COX-2 produce, from the cell membrane lipid arachidonic acid, a series of prostaglandins that, in addition to having vasoactive effects, also participate in the process that eventually triggers fever and pain [10]. Concerns regarding the use of NSAIDs in respiratory tract infections were raised by a recent review of case-controlled studies in community-acquired pneumonia in adult and paediatric patients [11]. The results show higher rates of complications after respiratory tract infections in patients given NSAIDs than in those not treated with these medicines, including pleural effusion, prolonged illness, peritonsillar abscess, and the spread of infection to more than one site. Case-controlled evidence is limited by confounding by indication, whereby NSAIDs are prescribed to treat the early symptoms of complications and are not causally related to these complications [12]. However, there is also trial evidence from primary care settings that suggests that NSAIDs may prolong illness or cause complications when taken during respiratory tract infections [13]. Nevertheless, there is no scientific evidence to indicate that NSAID consumption puts patients who might otherwise have mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections at risk of developing a more severe form of the disease [14,15]. Moreover, in patients with mild respiratory tract illness, anti-inflammatory therapies may prevent fatal cytokine storms induced by SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs. This can at least be hypothesised for the NSAID ibuprofen, which in other clinical settings, such as osteoarthritis in the knee and in cystic fibrosis, was found to reduce interleukin-6 (IL-6) in human tissues [16] and in the sputum [17]. Notably, several clinical trials for treating patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with anti-IL-6 therapies are ongoing [7].

Acetaminophen (paracetamol), a NSAID that inhibits both COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes [14], has very mild anti-inflammatory activity [18,19], and is therefore less preferable for non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Nevertheless, it should be considered that COX-2 produces most of the prostaglandins relevant to inflammation and pain [11]. Thus, NSAIDs that inhibit COX-2 (nimesulide or celecoxib) could be more valuable in treating mild fever, myalgia and/or arthralgia or other painful symptoms in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, intermittent use of NSAIDs could help these patients to sleep by relieving musculoskeletal symptoms at night. Notably, recent evidence has highlighted crosstalk between sleep and immune system function that is relevant to sustaining immune defences [20].

Physicians may be aware of the finding that long-term use of NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and naproxen, has been associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke [21], although these findings are debated [22]. What has been established is that long-term NSAID treatment may cause nephrotoxicity, which is exacerbated by fever and dehydration [23,24]. This is particularly true for elderly people, who may already have reduced kidney function related to ageing or concomitant chronic kidney disease, and the maintenance of renal blood flow is critically dependent on vasodilator prostaglandins. In Europe, COVID-19 largely – though not exclusively – affects elderly individuals, so family physicians should counsel elderly patients to hydrate adequately while taking NSAIDs, and possibly use these drugs intermittently.

Corticosteroids: When myalgias, arthralgias or fever persist, corticosteroids could be considered as add-on treatment at home to further decrease the underlying inflammatory processes in COVID-19 patients.

We recommend corticosteroids not only as add-on treatment to manage musculoskeletal symptoms and fever, but also for their anti-inflammatory properties in the presence of inflammatory markers, such as higher than normal C-reactive protein (CRP). Thus, our advice is that physicians prescribe oral dexamethasone (16 mg for 3 days, then tapered to 8 mg for another 3 days, and then to 4 mg for 3 days, and to 2 mg for another day. This makes 86 mg dexamethasone total over 10 days).

Corticosteroids exert their anti-inflammatory effects mainly by inhibiting many pro-inflammatory genes that encode cytokines, chemokines, cell adhesion molecules, inflammatory enzymes and receptors to control the inflammatory process and restore homeostasis [25]. In viral pneumonia, corticosteroids are often also used as an auxiliary treatment to decrease the host inflammatory response in the lung, which may lead to acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, delays in viral clearance, and the increased risk of secondary infections and other complications, could outweigh the benefits of steroid treatment. This concern has been anticipated in earlier observational studies in patients with other severe community-acquired coronavirus pneumonias, such as those induced by SARS and MERS, which showed improved survival with corticosteroids, but also prolonged presence of viruses in the respiratory tract and blood and a high incidence of complications, including hyperglycemia, psychosis, and avascular necrosis [26-28]. At variance, a meta-analysis of over 6500 patients with influenza pneumonia documented that there was a higher risk of mortality and secondary infections in those given corticosteroids [29]. This is confirmed by results from a very recent meta-analysis of 15 studies (5270 patients) on the effects of corticosteroid treatment on critical and non-critical patients with coronavirus pneumonia (mainly SARS and MERS infections), including a small subgroup with SARS-CoV-2 infection [30]. The results, which are limited by the heterogeneity of these studies, showed that patients with severe conditions were more likely to require corticosteroid therapy which, however, was associated with a higher rate of mortality and bacterial infection. This conclusion is at variance with a retrospective study in a cohort of 201 Chinese patients that reported that, in those who developed ARDS, methyprednisolone administration was linked to a lower risk of death than for patients who did not receive corticosteroid treatment [31]. Moreover, there is anecdotal evidence from three patients hospitalised for COVID-19 pneumonia, who were successfully treated with the corticosteroid ciclesonide, by inhalation [32]. With the conflicting evidence surrounding the use of corticosteroids for severe ARDS, mainly associated with SARS-CoV and MERS viral infection, interim guidance from WHO on the clinical management of ARDS in SARS-CoV-2 patients advises against the use of corticosteroids unless there are compelling indications for other reasons [33]. At variance, a consensus statement from the Chinese Thoracic Society recommended a short course of corticosteroids at a low-to-moderate dose for critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [34,35]. Other investigators have also reported that low-dose corticosteroid treatment that is of brief duration can be beneficial in the clinical management of hospitalised critical patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia [36]. Moreover, the Italian Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases has released updated recommendations for the clinical management of COVID-19 that include the administration of methyprednisolone or dexamethasone in patients with ARDS or severe respiratory failure [37]. All these observations, however, relate to hospitalised patients with severe pneumonia and respiratory failure. In contrast, during the early phase or in mild forms of COVID-19, when patients were not hospitalised, there appeared to be some evidence that corticosteroids may have been beneficial [38]. Indeed, the initial lesions in the lungs of most of these patients may be minimal at chest radiography, but the lesions can spread to the entire lung fields within a day. Prompt intervention with corticosteroids can reverse or at least attenuate these initial events [39]. Because the pathogenesis of pneumonia may be the same in all infected patients regardless of age, early control of immune/inflammatory-mediated lung injury can also be helpful in reducing morbidity and possibly mortality for these patients [40,41].

Anticoagulant/anti-platelet agents

Low-molecular weight heparin: COVID-19 is a particularly debilitating illness, even for patients with mild symptoms, so patients are often bedridden for several weeks. They are therefore exposed to the risk of thromboembolic events, independently of age, and anticoagulant prophylaxis with heparin may be recommended. Our suggestion is to administer low-molecular weight (LMW) heparin, enoxaparin, at the prophylactic dose (daily dose of 4000 U.I subcutaneously – i.e. 40 mg enoxaparin. Treatment is recommended for at least 6-14 days, independently of the patient recovering mobility).

Heparin activates anti-thrombin III, which in turn inhibits thrombin, Factor X and other proteases involved in the blood coagulation cascade [42]. Thus, low-molecular weight (LMW) heparin, a glycosaminoglycan with anticoagulant activity, is commonly used prophylactically to prevent post-surgical venous thromboembolism, as well as in non-surgical patients with acute heart failure or acute respiratory failure, conditions characterised by hypo-mobility. In addition, LMW heparin is the pharmacological treatment for deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome.

Apart from causing patients to be bedridden, there is evidence that in coronavirus infections, including SARS-CoV-2, dysregulation of the coagulation cascade and fibrinolytic systems occur [43], creating a high risk of death for patients. Indeed, in a recent Dutch report on severely ill patients hospitalised in ICUs, 31% experienced thrombotic complications [44]. This is in line with a study showing that, in Irish patients admitted to hospital with severe COVID-19 infection, abnormal blood clotting occurred, causing micro-clots within the lung [45]. These patients had a significantly worse prognosis and were more likely to require ICU admission [45]. Similarly, a large retrospective study of adult COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China, that reported that blood levels of D-dimer - a marker of coagulation activation - that were higher than 1 µg/ml at hospital admission were associated with an 18-fold increase in mortality risk [4]. Others have reported that, compared to surviving COVID-19 patients, those who died had higher blood levels of D-dimer and prolonged prothrombin time at hospitalisation, and lower fibrinogen blood concentration at 10 to 14 days after hospital admission, indicating a state of hyper-coagulability [46]. Furthermore, in the autopsies of the first patients who died of COVID-19 performed in Chinese hospitals as well as in our hospital in Bergamo, Italy, microthrombi were found not only in the lungs, but also in other organs, including the liver, kidneys and heart [47,48] (A. Gianatti personal communication). In addition, fibrin deposits are found in the lung parenchyma of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and ARDS [49]. These thrombotic/thromboembolic events are promoted by the inflammatory process underlying viral infections like SARS-CoV-2. In these patients, inflammation induces excessive production of thrombin and a reduction in fibrinolysis caused by endothelial dysfunction due to the ongoing viral infection [50]. Moreover, the hypoxia that characterises SARS-CoV-2 infection also contributes to thrombosis by enhancing blood viscosity [50].

Together, these observations led us to consider using prophylactic doses of heparin in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. A retrospective study in Wuhan on 449 hospitalised COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia, 99 of whom received LMW heparin for 7 days or longer, showed that among patients with markedly elevated D-dimer (> 6-fold of the upper limit of normal) or sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) criteria > 4, the 28-day mortality was significantly lower in heparin users than in non-users [51]. The study provides evidence that anticoagulant therapy with LMW heparin is associated with a better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients with markedly elevated D-dimer or those who met the SIC criteria [51]. Similarly, a retrospective analysis of 2,733 COVID-19 patients hospitalised within the Mount Sinai Health System in New York showed that 29% among those on mechanical ventilation who received systemic anticoagulation died as compared to 63% of those who did not receive   the treatment [52]. Moreover, evidence indicates that LMW heparin therapy in COVID-19 patients improved coagulation dysfunction [53]. Therefore, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) has recommended that all COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital be treated with prophylactic doses of LMW heparin, unless contraindicated (e.g., ongoing bleeding or platelet count <25 x 10⁹/L). ISTH has also suggested monitoring D-dimer, prothrombin time and platelet count in COVID-19 patients at the time of hospital admission [54]. This recommendation is also shared by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), which on 11^th April 2020 included LMW heparin among the drugs available for the treatment of COVID-19 patients (https://aifa.gov.it/-/covid-19-scheda-informativa-aifa-su-eparine-a-basso-peso-molecolare).

The above findings suggest that in non-hospitalised patients with mild COVID-19, the benefit of prophylactic administration of LMW heparin could extend beyond the prevention of thromboembolism in bedridden patients to control the possible initial activation of coagulation in the lung and other organs. Moreover, the evidence that heparin may protect the endothelium [55-57] and decrease the level of inflammatory biomarkers further supports the recommendation that COVID-9 patients be treated with this drug at home, as it can impact microcirculatory dysfunction and possibly limit organ damage [58,59].

Anti-platelet drugs: Anti-platelet agents are also currently used to prevent thromboembolism. Nevertheless, the scarce information regarding the use of these medicines in COVID-19 patients precludes us recommending them for non-hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection for thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Dipyridamole, an old anti-platelet drug, is used to prevent cardiac valve-related thromboembolism [60]. Notably, in silico and in vitro evidence has shown that dipyridamole exhibits direct antiviral effects by binding and neutralising the SARS-CoV-2 component Mpro [61]. This is supported by results from a small clinical trial in Wuhan that demonstrate that dipyridamole had beneficial effects on preventing progression to severe stages of the disease and/or lethal outcomes when administered in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients [62]. Furthermore, dipyridamole may blunt the progressive increase in D-dimer blood levels in these patients, which closely correlates with pulmonary embolism and vascular thrombosis, eventually positively affecting the unfavourable prognosis of the disease [62]. Interestingly, dipyridamole has been also shown in vitro to suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication [63].

However, so far data supporting the use of dipyridamole in hospitalised COVID-19 patients are scanty, as it is unknown whether the drug can be safely combined with LMW heparin in these patients.

Oxygen therapy

In the early phase of the disease, possibly before pulmonary symptoms manifest, in the presence of progressively decreasing oxygen saturation – as indicated by oximeter – or following a first episode of dyspnoea or wheezing, gentle oxygen supply is recommended.

An additional helpful step for the physician in identifying initial pulmonary dysfunction, and thus the need for oxygen therapy, is the Quick Walking Test. This involves measuring SpO₂ before and after the patient has walked as fast as he/she can for 20-30 metres. The test is positive if, after the walk, SpO₂ falls by more than 5%.

Conventional oxygen therapy is suggested when the respiratory rate is > 14/min and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) <92%, but is required with SpO₂ <90% at room air [64]. With liquid oxygen, start with 8-10 litre/min and monitor SpO₂ every 3-4 hours. Titrate oxygen flow rate to reach target SpO₂ >92%. Then the rate of oxygen administration can be reduced to 4-5 litre/min (but continue SpO₂ monitoring every 3-4 hours). With gaseous O_2, start with 2.5-3.0 litre/min, but monitor SpO₂ every 30 min-1 hour, and titrate flow rates to reach target SpO₂ >92%. Should patients be poorly responsive to high O₂ administration, consider hospitalisation, if feasible.

Oxygen can be administered using nasal cannulas or mask, which does not require sedation, so patients can participate in their treatment. This treatment should be combined with training patients in techniques that are helpful for managing breathlessness, including positioning, pursed-lip breathing and breathing exercises [65]. It should also be considered that severe breathlessness often causes patients anxiety, which in turn contributes to further increasing shortness of breath [65].

Other treatments

Given the limited evidence of efficacy and many warnings about major side effects and the risk of patient death, at this stage we cannot recommend hydroxychloroquine, alone or in combination with azithromycin, to treat non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Nevertheless, the antibiotics are recommended when secondary bacterial infection of the lower or upper respiratory tract is suspected. In such instance, we advice the administration of levofloxacin (500 mg/day p.o for 7 days).

While waiting for vaccines for SARS-Cov-2 and new investigational antiviral drugs, attention has focused on repurposing agents previously used to treat SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections, though with inconsistent results [7]. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, two anti-malarial drugs that are also used to treat chronic inflammatory diseases such as lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, initially received intense consideration [66]. There is, however, little evidence of the efficacy of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine treatment in COVID-19 patients, and this evidence is mainly confined to an unpublished Chinese study on 100 patients with chloroquine, and a French trial on 20 hospitalised COVID-19 patients that demonstrated that hydroxychloroquine reduced viral load in nasal swabs, but no clinical outcomes were provided [67]. On the other hand, a recent randomized controlled trial showed that high doses of hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with COVID-19 or confirmed infection when used as post-exposure prophylaxis within 4 days after exposure [68]. In addition, hydroxychloroquine has many side effects, including QTc prolongation, hypoglycaemia, neuropsychiatric effects, and retinopathy [69]. Evidence of potential harm from these drugs is also beginning to appear in COVID-19 patients. A clinical trial in Brazil in which 81 patients hospitalised for COVID-19 were treated with chloroquine and azithromycin was halted after investigators recorded more deaths and an increased risk of arrhythmia in the group receiving the higher of two doses [70]. The increased risk of death was also documented among patients given hydroxychloroquine, compared to those not receiving this treatment, in a study of 368 US veterans treated for COVID-19 [71]. More recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also warned of the dangers of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients, citing serious adverse effects on the heart and a high risk of death. Azithromycin, a macrolide often proposed in combination with hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients, also raises concerns because this drug can block ion channels and may affect the cardiac electrical pattern [72].

Nonetheless, the antibiotics are often necessary. Indeed, several pieces of evidence indicate that many COVID-19 patients die of secondary bacterial infections rather than the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection itself. In a Chinese cohort of 247 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, 15% acquired bacterial infections; of these, 50% died [4]. This is not unique to SARS-CoV-2 infection, since secondary bacterial pneumonia was the major cause of death during other major respiratory viral outbreaks, (e.g 150 out 300 thousand people during the 2009 HIN1 Infection, and the majority of people during the 1918 Spanish flu). Moreover, bacterial co/secondary infection further increases morbidity and mortality of influenza infection, with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphyloccocus aureus reported as the most common causes [73]. Given the concerns regarding azithromycin due to the risk of serious adverse events, levofloxacin could be considered for non-hospitalised COVID-19-patients when physicians suspect a secondary bacterial infection of the lower or upper respiratory tract.

Conclusion

During the early phase of COVID-19, patients are usually not seriously ill with acute respiratory distress, but present a variety of symptoms, including fever, cough, tiredness, shortness of breath and chills, a sore throat, headache, musculoskeletal pain, and a new loss of taste or smell. For non-hospitalised patients with one or more of these symptoms, we recommend few simple treatments, as briefly summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Recommended simple treatments for non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Moreover, as a general recommendation, patients on chronic therapy with anti-hypertensive drugs, such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ARB) antagonists, should not discontinue these medicines, since they do not affect the course of COVID-19 [74]. However, blood pressure should be monitored, and drug dosing adjusted, if needed.

In addition, we recommend that physicians ask patients or relatives for the date of the first signs of illness, an important step in monitoring a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indeed, although the evolution of symptoms is different from patient to patient, days 5 through 10 tend to be the time during which respiratory complications are most likely to develop, particularly in elderly patients and patients with preexisting conditions, such as high blood pressure, obesity or diabetes. Younger Covid-19 patients who go on to develop complications may develop these at a slightly later point, potentially only on days 10 to 12. Most who reach day 14 without developing more serious symptoms are likely to have begun to recover. On this line the flow-chart reported in Figure 2 shows recommend steps for family physicians to monitor non-hospitalised patients in the early phase of COVID-19.

Figure 2. Flow chart of recommended steps for family physicians to monitor non-hospitalised patients in the early phase of COVID-19. *If feasible, according to local/national healthcare system. ** With mild dyspnoea or wheezing. *** Suspected secondary bacterial infection. ^§ Particular care to dyspnoea/wheezing (possibly SpO₂ monitoring with oximeter). ^#Useful for assessing serology tests - immune response.

These recommendations may be helpful not only to industrialised countries, which are witnessing the dramatic spread of the epidemic, but also, and probably even more so, to low- and middle-income countries in Latin America and Africa. In these countries, a lack of hospital infrastructure and access to costly treatments may exacerbate the risk of dying from the virus, further highlighting disparities in access to healthcare globally.

References

1. WHO (2020) Minimum requirements for infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes.
2. Hopman J, Allegranzi B, Mehtar S, (2020) Managing COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4169. [Crossref]
3. Johns Hopkins (2020) CSSE. COVID-19 Map - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center.
4. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y et al. (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395: 1054-1062. [Crossref]
5. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ et al. (2020) Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382: 1708-1720.
6. Kupferschmidt K, Cohen J (2020) Race to find COVID-19 treatments accelerates. Science 367: 1412-1413. [Crossref]
7. Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ, Cutrell JB (2020) Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA 323: 1824-1836.
8. Cullen L, Kelly L, Connor SO, Fitzgerald DJ (1998) Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition by nimesulide in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 287: 578-582. [Crossref]
9. Brooks PM, Day RO (1991) Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs--differences and similarities. N Engl J Med 324: 1716-1725. [Crossref]
10. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA (2011) Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31: 986-1000. [Crossref]
11. Voiriot G, Philippot Q, Elabbadi A, Elbim C, Chalumeau M et al. (2019) Risks related to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in community-acquired pneumonia in adult and pediatric patients. J Clin Med 8 doi: 10.3390/jcm8060786. [Crossref]
12. Little P (2020) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and covid-19. BMJ 368: m1185. [Crossref]
13. Little P, Moore M, Kelly J, Williamson I, Leydon G et al. (2013) Ibuprofen, paracetamol, and steam for patients with respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic randomised factorial trial. BMJ 347: f6041.
14. FitzGerald GA (2020) Misguided drug advice for COVID-19. Science 367: 1434.
15. Torjesen I (2020) Covid-19: ibuprofen can be used for symptoms, says UK agency, but reasons for change in advice are unclear. BMJ 369: m1555. [Crossref]
16. Gallelli L, Galasso O, Falcone D, Southworth S, Greco M et al. (2013) The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on clinical outcomes, synovial fluid cytokine concentration and signal transduction pathways in knee osteoarthritis. A randomized open label trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21: 1400-1408. [Crossref]
17. Chmiel JF, Konstan MW, Accurso FJ, Lymp J, Mayer-Hamblett N et al. (2015) Use of ibuprofen to assess inflammatory biomarkers in induced sputum: Implications for clinical trials in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 14: 720-726. [Crossref]
18. McKay GA, Walters MR (2013) Non-Opioid Analgesics. Lecture Notes Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Eds). Hoboken: Wiley, USA
19. Ghanem CI, Perez MJ, Manautou JE, Mottino AD (2016) Acetaminophen from liver to brain: New insights into drug pharmacological action and toxicity. Pharmacol Res 109: 119-131. [Crossref]
20. Besedovsky L, Lange T, Haack M (2019) The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease. Physiol Rev 99: 1325-1380. [Crossref]
21. Bhala N, Emberson J, Merhi A, Abramson S, Arber N et al. (2013) Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 382: 769-779.
22. Moore N (2020) Coronary Risks Associated with Diclofenac and Other NSAIDs: An Update. Drug Saf 43: 301-318. [Crossref]
23. Clave S, Rousset-Rouviere C, Daniel L, Tsimaratos M. (2019) The Invisible Threat of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Kidneys. Front Pediatr 7: 520. [Crossref]
24. Zhang X, Donnan PT, Bell S, Guthrie B (2017) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced acute kidney injury in the community dwelling general population and people with chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 18: 256. [Crossref]
25. Cruz-Topete D, Cidlowski JA (2015) One hormone, two actions: anti- and pro-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids. Neuroimmunomodulation 22: 20-32.
26. Stockman LJ, Bellamy R, Garner P (2006) SARS: systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med 3: e343.
27. Arabi YM, Mandourah Y, Al-Hameed F, Sindi AA, Almekhlafi GA, et al. (2018) Corticosteroid Therapy for Critically Ill Patients with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197: 757-767. [Crossref]
28. Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK (2020) Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet 395: 473-475.
29. Ni YN, Chen G, Sun J, Liang BM, Liang ZA (2019) The effect of corticosteroids on mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 23: 99. [Crossref]
30. Yang Z, Liu J, Zhou Y, Zhao X, Zhao Q, et al. (2020) The effect of corticosteroid treatment on patients with coronavirus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.062. [Crossref]
31. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, et al. (2020) Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med e200994. [Crossref]
32. Iwabuchi K, Yoshie K, Kurakami Y, Takahashi K, Kato Y, et al. (2020) Therapeutic potential of ciclesonide inahalation for COVID-19 pneumonia: Report of three cases. J Infect Chemother 26:625-632. [Crossref]
33. WHO (2020) Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected. Geneva: World Health Organization.
34. Shang L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Du R, Cao B (2020) On the use of corticosteroids for 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Lancet 395: 683-684.
35. Zhao JP, Hu Y, Du RH, Chen ZS, Jin Y, et al. (2020) Expert consensus on the use of corticosteroid in patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 43: 183-184. [Crossref]
36. Zhou W, Liu Y, Tian D, Wang C, Wang S, et al. (2020) Potential benefits of precise corticosteroids therapy for severe 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5: 18. [Crossref]
37. Nicastri E, Petrosillo N, Bartoli TA, Lepore L, Mondi A, et al. (2020) National institute for the infectious diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS. Recommendations for COVID-19 clinical management. Infect Dis Rep 12: 8543. [Crossref]
38. Russell B, Moss C, Rigg A, Van Hemelrijck M (2020) COVID-19 and treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids: should we be limiting their use in the clinical setting? Ecancermedicalscience 14:1023.
39. Lee KY (2017) Pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and early immune-modulator therapy. Int J Mol Sci 18: 388.
40. Lee KY, Rhim JW, Kang JH (2020) Early preemptive immunomodulators (corticosteroids) for severe pneumonia patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Clin Exp Pediatr 63: 117-118. [Crossref]
41. Zhai P, Ding Y, Wu X, Long J, Zhong Y, et al. (2020) The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. Int J Antimicrob Agents 105955. [Crossref]
42. Gray E, Hogwood J, Mulloy B (2012) The anticoagulant and antithrombotic mechanisms of heparin. Handb Exp Pharmacol 207: 43-61.
43. Giannis D, Ziogas IA, Gianni P (2020) Coagulation disorders in coronavirus infected patients: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and lessons from the past. J Clin Virol 127: 104362. [Crossref]
44. Klok FA, Kruip M, van der Meer NJM, Arbous MS, Gommers DAMPJ, et al. (2020) Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res 191: 145-147.
45. Fogarty H, Townsend L, Ni Cheallaigh C, Bergin C, Martin-Loeches I, et al. (2020) COVID-19 Coagulopathy in Caucasian patients. Br J Haematol doi: 10.1111/bjh.16749. [Crossref]
46. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z (2020) Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 18: 844-847. [Crossref]
47. Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, Ping YF, Liu HW, et al. (2020) A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimally invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 49: E009.
48. Dolhnikoff M, Duarte-Neto AN, de Almeida Monteiro RA, da Silva LFF, de Oliveira EP, et al. (2020) Pathological evidence of pulmonary thrombotic phenomena in severe COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 18: 1517-1519. [Crossref]
49. Whyte CS, Morrow GB, Mitchell JL, Chowdary P, Mutch NJ (2020) Fibrinolytic abnormalities in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and versatility of thrombolytic drugs to treat COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost doi: 10.1111/jth.14872. [Crossref]
50. Subramaniam S, Scharrer I (2018) Procoagulant activity during viral infections. Front Biosci 23: 1060-1081.
51. Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, et al. (2020) Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost 18: 1094-1099.
52. Paranjpe I, Fuster V, Lala A, Russak A, Glicksberg BS, et al. (2020) Association of Treatment Dose Anticoagulation with In-Hospital Survival Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.001. [Crossref]
53. Shi C, Wang C, Wang H, Yang C, Cai F, et al. (2020) The potential of low molecular weight heparin to mitigate cytokine storm in severe covid-19 patients: a retrospective clinical study. MedRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.03.28.20046144.
54. Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Cattaneo M, et al. (2020). ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 18 :1023-1026.
55. Iba T, Hashiguchi N, Nagaoka I, Tabe Y, Kadota K, et al. (2015) Heparins attenuated histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improved the survival in a rat model of histone-induced organ dysfunction. Intensive Care Med Exp 3: 36. [Crossref]
56. Zhu C, Liang Y, Li X, Chen N, Ma X (2019) Unfractionated heparin attenuates histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and prevents intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction in histone-infused rats. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 87: 614-622.
57. Liu Y, Mu S, Li X, Liang Y, Wang L, et al. (2019) Unfractionated Heparin Alleviates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Protecting Tight Junctions. J Surg Res 238: 175-185. [Crossref]
58. Mousavi S, Moradi M, Khorshidahmad T, Motamedi M (2015) Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Heparin and Its Derivatives: A Systematic Review. Adv Pharmacol Sci 2015: 507151.
59. Thachil J (2020) The versatile heparin in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 18: 1020-1022.
60. Renney JT, O'Sullivan EF, Burke PF (1976) Prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis with dipyridamole and aspirin. Br Med J 1: 992-994. [Crossref]
61. Verma DK, Kapoor S, Das S, Thakur K (2020) Potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Main protease (Mpro) identified from the library of FDA approved drugs using molecular docking studies. Preprints doi :10.20944/preprints 202004.0149.v1
62. Liu, X, Li Z, Liu S, Chen Z, Zhao Z, et al. (2020) Therapeutic effects of dipyridamole on COVID-19 patients with coagulation dysfunction. Preprint MedRXiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.27.20027557.
63. Liu X, Li Z, Liu S, Sun J, Chen Z, et al. (2020) Potential therapeutic effects of dipyridamole in the severely ill patients with COVID-19. Acta Pharm Sin B doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.04.008. [Crossref]
64. CDC (2020) Clinical management of critically ill adults with COVID-19. Clinical Outreach and Communication Activity (COCA) webinar.
65. NICE (2020) Managing COVID-19 symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community: summary of NICE guidelines. BMJ 369: m1461. [Crossref]
66. Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R (2003) Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect Dis 3: 722-727.
67. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, et al. (2020) Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents 105949. [Crossref]
68. Kalil AC (2020) Treating COVID-19-Off-Label Drug Use, Compassionate Use, and Randomized Clinical Trials During Pandemics. JAMA 323: 1897-1898. [Crossref]
69. Silva Borba MG, de Almeida Val F, Sousa Sampaio V, Araujo Alexandre MA, Cardoso Melo G, et al. (2020) CloroCovid-19 Team. Chloroquine diphosphate in two different dosages as adjunctive therapy of hospitalized patients with severe respiratory syndrome in the context of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection: Preliminary safety results of a randomized, double-blinded, phase IIb clinical trial (CloroCovid-19 Study). JAMA Network Open 3: e208857.
70. Magagnoli J, Narendran S, Pereira F, Cummings T, Hardin JW, et al. (2020) Outcomes of hydroxychloroquine usage in United States veterans hospitalized with Covid-19. MedRxiv doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920.
71. Lu ZK, Yuan J, Li M, Sutton SS, Rao GA, et al. (2015) Cardiac risks associated with antibiotics: azithromycin and levofloxacin. Expert Opin Drug Saf 14: 295-303. [Crossref]
72. Morris DE, Cleary DW, Clarke SC (2017) Secondary Bacterial Infections Associated with Influenza Pandemics. Front Microbiol 8: 1041. [Crossref]
73. Mancia G, Rea F, Ludergnani M, Apolone G, Corrao G (2020) Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers and the Risk of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006923. [Crossref]