Chest
Clinical InvestigationsDisagreements in Chest Roentgen Interpretation
Section snippets
Case and Reader Selection
The admission chest radiographs of 100 patients, representing every fifth patient examined at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital as of March 1, 1968, were included.
Five staff radiologists served as readers for the study; they had similar training and experience (a minimum of three years beyond residency). The identity of the individual readers was not known to the panel. Each reader read five sets of 20 films so that at the end of the study the same 100 films had been read by all readers, thus
The Number and Nature of Significant Abnormalities in the One Hundred Study Films
Grade 2 and/or 3 abnormalities were found in 73 films (Table 1). The total number of these abnormalities was 173. The classification and incidence of abnormalities are given in Table 2.
Incidence of Errors Among the Five Readers
There was marked variation in the number of errors among the five readers (Table 3). Considering only more significant groups (grades 2 and 3), the number of false negatives ranged from 27 to 59 per reader. This represents 16 percent to 34 percent of the abnormalities present (Table 2). In grades 2 and 3, 73
Discussion
Because our aim was to consider all statements encountered in the reports it became necessary to develop a method for judging errors in this complex situation. We chose disagreement analysis because this approach eliminated the need for the difficult and many times impossible task of precise pathologic correlation of every radiologic finding. Our intention was to limit the role of the panel as much as possible. For these reasons, we narrowed the task of the panel to evaluation and
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to express our appreciation to our research assistant, Miss Marguerite Murphy, and to Miss Linda Tuttle for her aid in the preparation of the manuscript.
References (6)
The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows
Radiol Clin N Amer
(1969)- et al.
Tuberculosis case finding: A comparison of the effectiveness of various roentgenographic and photofluorographic methods
JAMA
(1947) - et al.
On the reliability of the reading of photofluorograms and the value of dual reading
Acta Tuberc Scand
(1952)
Cited by (0)
This work was supported in part by USPHS grants GM18674, GM01910, and GM14940.
Manuscript received December 8; revision accepted February 17.