Chest
Volume 110, Issue 2, August 1996, Pages 469-479
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations in Critical Care
Predicting the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: The Importance of Disease and Patient Characteristics

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.2.469Get rights and content

Study objective

To analyze the determinants of an individual patient's duration of mechanical ventilation and assess interhospital variations for average durations of ventilation.

Design

Prospective, multicenter, inception, cohort study.

Setting

Forty-two ICUs at 40 US hospitals.

Patients

A total of 5,915 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation on ICU day 1 selected from the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III database of 17,440 admissions.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and results

Utilizing APACHE III data collected on the 5,915 patients, multivariate regression analysis was performed on selected patients and disease characteristics to determine which variables were significantly associated with the duration of mechanical ventilation. An equation predicting duration of ventilation was then developed using the significant predictor variables and its accuracy was evaluated. Variables significantly associated with duration of ventilation included primary reason for ICU admission, day 1 acute physiology score (APS) of APACHE III, age, prior patient location and hospital length of stay, activity limits due to respiratory disease, serum albumin, respiratory rate, and PaO2/FIo2 measurements. Using an equation derived from these variables, predicted durations of ventilation were then calculated and compared with actual observed durations for each of the 42 ICUs. Average duration of ventilation for the 42 ICUs ranged from 2.6 to 7.9 days, but 60% of this variation was accounted for by differences in patient characteristics.

Conclusions

For patients admitted to the ICU and ventilated on day 1, total duration of ventilation is primarily determined by admitting diagnosis and degree of physiologic derangement as measured by APS. An equation developed using multivariate regression techniques can accurately predict average duration of ventilation for groups of ICU patients, and we believe this equation will be useful for comparing ventilator practices between ICUs, controlling for patient differences in clinical trials of new therapies or weaning techniques, and as a quality improvement mechanism.

Section snippets

Patient Selection and Data Collection

The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III database, comprehensively described elsewhere,9 was used for this study. Clinical and physiologic data were collected on unselected admissions to 42 ICUs at 40 US hospitals between May 1988 and February 1990; 26 of the 40 hospitals were selected randomly to be representative of US ICUs in hospitals with more than 200 beds. A patient had to remain in the ICU for at least 4 h to be included in the study, and patients admitted with

Hospital and ICU Characteristics

Among the 40 hospitals participating in APACHE III data collection, 25 were teaching institutions and 21 were affiliated with a medical school. Geographically, 7 were in the northeast, 13 in the south, 12 in the midwest, and 8 in the west. The mean number of hospital beds was 474 (range, 200 to 1,315) and 25 had 1 or more intermediate care units. Of the 42 ICUs studied, 4 were medical, 8 were surgical, and 30 were mixed medical-surgical. The average number of ICU beds was 13 and their average

DISCUSSION

We combined information about disease and severity of illness with clinical and demographic characteristics to develop an equation that predicts the duration of mechanical ventilation. Figure 2 displays the independent variables and their relative explanatory power. The principal diagnosis responsible for ICU admission is the most important determinant of duration of ventilation, and the diseases associated with substantially longer and shorter durations are listed in Table 2. Many of these

References (38)

  • KriegerBP et al.

    Initial experience with a central respiratory monitoring unit as a cost saving alternative to the intensive care unit for medicare patients who require long-term ventilator support

    Chest

    (1988)
  • WagnerDP.

    Economics of prolonged mechanical ventilation

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1989)
  • CrimC.

    The influence of respiratory failure on ICU patient outcome

    Prob Crit Care

    (1989)
  • YangKL et al.

    A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation

    N Engl J Med

    (1991)
  • LarcaL et al.

    Effectiveness of intensive nutritional regimes in patients who fail to wean from mechanical ventilation

    Crit Care Med

    (1982)
  • MahlerDA et al.

    The management of dyspnea: contents, interobserver agreement, and physiological correlates of two new clinical indexes

    Chest

    (1984)
  • KatzS et al.

    Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function

    JAMA

    (1963)
  • CullenDJ et al.

    Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS)

    Prob Crit Care

    (1989)
  • CullenDJ et al.

    Results, charges, and benefits of intensive care for critically ill patients: update 1983

    Crit Care Med

    (1984)
  • Cited by (189)

    • Early and late-recorded predictors of health-related quality of life of burn patients on long-term follow-up

      2019, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      Individuals can perceive their body as foreign and the experience of scary nightmares and increased levels of pain, anxiety and panic attacks can ensue [36]. The duration of mechanical ventilation must be considered as a surrogate marker of disease severity, initial physiologic derangement and overall patient health status at the time of admission [37,38]. Thus, one must bear in mind that multiple factors contribute to the herein presented results.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (H507137); the Department of Anesthesiology, George Washington University Medical Center, and APACHE Medical Systems, Inc. We acknowledge the data collection efforts and leadership of the hospitals involved in the APACHE III study.

    All the authors certify that affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this article are disclosed as follows: Drs. Knaus, Zimmerman, and Wagner are founders and minority equity shareholders of APACHE Medical Systems, Inc, a for-profit Delaware-based corporation that funded, in part, the research for the APACHE III study. APACHE Medical Systems markets a software-based clinical information system based on some of the concepts described in this article. Dr. Zimmerman, a full-time employee of George Washington University, is not permitted to receive any direct financial payment from APACHE Medical Systems. Elizabeth Draper is an employee and shareholder of APACHE Medical Systems, Inc.

    View full text