Factors Associated With Illness Perception Among Critically Ill Patients and Surrogates

doi:10.1378/chest.09-2124

Chest

Volume 138, Issue 1, July 2010, Pages 59-67

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2124 Get rights and content

Background

We investigated illness perceptions among critically ill patients or their surrogates in a university medical ICU using a prospective survey. We hypothesized that these would vary by demographic, personal, and clinical measures.

Methods

Patients (n = 23) or their surrogates (n = 77) were recruited. The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) measured six domains of illness perception: timeline-acute/chronic, consequences, emotional impact, personal control, treatment efficacy, and illness comprehension. Multiple variable linear regression models were developed with IPQ-R scores as the outcomes.

Results

African Americans tended to perceive the illness as less enduring and reported more confidence in treatment efficacy (P < .01 for each). They also tended to report the illness as less serious, having less emotional impact, and having greater personal control (P = .0002 for each). Conversely, African Americans reported lower illness comprehension (P = .002). Faith/religion was associated with positive illness perceptions, including less concern regarding consequences (P = .02), less emotional impact (P = .03), and more confidence in treatment efficacy (P < .01). Lower patient quality of life (QOL) precritical illness was associated with negative perceptions, including greater concern about illness duration and consequences as well as perception of less personal control and less confidence in treatment efficacy (P < .01 for each). These variables were independently associated with illness perceptions after controlling for race, faith/religion, and survival to hospital discharge, whereas clinical measures were not.

Conclusions

Illness perceptions among critically ill patients and surrogates are influenced by patient/surrogate factors, including race, faith, and precritical illness QOL, rather than clinical measures. Clinicians should recognize the variability in illness perceptions and the possible implications for patient/surrogate communication.

Section snippets

Study Design and Subjects

This prospective, descriptive study was conducted in a university tertiary care medical ICU (MICU). All MICU admissions were recorded in a study log and the patients' progress tracked prospectively. When the MICU length of stay (LOS) reached 3 days, all potential subjects were approached. Subjects were either the MICU patient or their surrogate decisionmaker. If the patient lacked capacity a surrogate was invited to participate. Because the aim of this study was to examine illness perceptions

Results

Figure 1 reports participant accrual. During the study period, 126 MICU admissions were study eligible and 79% (n = 100) completed the survey. Respondents were compared with eligible nonrespondents. There were no significant differences with respect to age, sex, race, insurance, APACHE II score, primary organ failure, and LOS (data not shown).

Table 1 includes all patients' demographic and personal measures and demonstrates the heterogeneity in our patient population. These parameters did not

Discussion

This work offers insight into several important issues in critical care medicine and to our knowledge is the first description of illness perceptions within a population of critically ill patients and their surrogates. A pervasive and important finding that has not been previously reported is the impact African American race has on illness perceptions, with African Americans being more optimistic than whites on five of six domains of illness perception even after adjusting for faith/religion.

Conclusions

In this study we found that African American race, faith/religion, surrogate respondent, and precritical illness QOL were independent determinants of illness perception in an MICU. These data support other calls for more attention to eliciting patient and family perspectives as well as emphasizing the importance of exploring patient and family background and values in health decision making.

Acknowledgments

Author contributions: Dr Ford: contributed to designing and conducting this research and writing the manuscript.

Dr Zapka: contributed to designing and conducting this research and writing the manuscript.

Dr Gebregziabher: contributed to data management, statistical analyses, and writing the manuscript.

Dr Yang: contributed to data management, statistical analyses, and writing the manuscript.

Dr Sterba: contributed to validation reporting for the IPQ-R, design of the Appendix, and writing the

References (42)

JR Curtis
Communicating about end-of-life care with patients and families in the intensive care unit
Crit Care Clin
(2004)
WA Knaus et al.
The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults
Chest
(1991)
LJ Blackhall et al.
Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology
Soc Sci Med
(1999)
RJ Wall et al.
Family satisfaction in the ICU. Differences between families of survivors and nonsurvivors
Chest
(2007)
DC Angus et al.
Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study
Crit Care Med
(2004)
DK Heyland et al.
Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study
Crit Care Med
(2002)
RM Arnold et al.
Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations
Crit Care Med
(2003)
E Azoulay et al.
Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians
Crit Care Med
(2000)
H Leventhal et al.
Illness representations and coping with health threats
H Leventhal et al.
The common-sense representation of illness danger

AL Back et al.

Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care

Arch Intern Med

(2007)

R Moss-Morris et al.

The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R)

Psychol Health

(2002)

B Lo et al.

Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians

JAMA

(2002)

AS Brett et al.

“Inappropriate” treatment near the end of life: conflict between religious convictions and clinical judgment

Arch Intern Med

(2003)

TG Plante et al.

The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

Pastoral Psychol

(2002)

AL Stewart

Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach

(1992)

J Weinman et al.

The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness

Psychol Health

(1996)

M Scharloo et al.

Quality of life and illness perceptions in patients with recently diagnosed head and neck cancer

Head Neck

(2005)

A Covic et al.

Illness representations and quality of life scores in haemodialysis patients

Nephrol Dial Transplant

(2004)

DI Helder et al.

Living with Huntington's disease: illness perceptions, coping mechanisms, and spouses' quality of life

Int J Behav Med

(2002)

R Horne et al.

Patients' interpretation of symptoms as a cause of delay in reaching hospital during acute myocardial infarction

Heart

(2000)

Cited by (35)

Addressing spirituality during critical illness: A review of current literature
2018, Journal of Critical Care
Citation Excerpt :
Surrogates' religious and spiritual beliefs have been shown to influence their decision making process, as well as their understanding of the prognosis. Responses ranged from 69 to 94% of surrogates reporting religion or spirituality to be very or fairly important in their everyday life in the eight studies [11,19-25]. Boyd et al. found that less than 2% (3 of 179) of surrogates relied solely on information provided by physicians in their decision-making [22].
The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of research on spirituality and religiosity in the intensive care setting that has been published since the 2004–2005 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Support of Family in the Patient-Centered Intensive Care Unit with an emphasis on its application beyond palliative and end-of-life care.
ACCM 2004–2005 guidelines emphasized the importance of spiritual and religious support in the form of four specific recommendations: [1] assessment and incorporation of spiritual needs in ICU care plan; [2] spiritual care training for doctors and nurses; [3] physician review of interdisciplinary spiritual need assessments; and [4] honoring the requests of patients to pray with them. We reviewed 26 studies published from 2006 to 2016 and identified whether studies strengthened the grade of these recommendations. We further categorized findings of these studies to understand the roles of spirituality and religiosity in surrogate perceptions and decision-making and patient and family experience.
Spiritual care has an essential role in the treatment of critically ill patients and families. Current literature offers few insights to support clinicians in navigating this often-challenging aspect of patient care and more research is needed.
Illness perception and cardiovascular health behaviour among persons with ischemic heart disease in Indonesia
2018, International Journal of Nursing Sciences
Citation Excerpt :
Broadbent [16] explained that illness perception could be linked to behaviour, specifically cardiovascular health behaviour. Illness perception among persons with IHD is influenced by various factors, including race, faith, and preclinical illness quality of life, rather than clinical measures [18]. The findings of these previous studies might not be applicable to persons with different cultural backgrounds, especially in the Muslim context.
A study was conducted to explore the level of illness perception, the level of cardiovascular health behaviour and the relationship between illness perception and cardiovascular health behaviour among persons with ischemic heart disease (IHD) in a community setting.
The participants comprised 235 persons with IHD. The instruments used were as follows: 1) Demographic Data and Health Information, 2) The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), 3) The Open-ended Questionnaire (OEQ), and 4) The Modified Cardiac Health Behaviour Scale (MCHBS). Findings from the OEQ are used to assess in-depth illness perception and to extend the information obtained from the Brief IPQ. The design of the study was descriptive correlational. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics to present the demographic data and health information. Inferential statistics was used to resolve the relationship between illness perception and cardiovascular health behaviour by using Pearson's Product Moment Correlation.
The mean score of illness perception was at a moderate level (M = 43.65, SD = 3.93), whereas the mean score of cardiovascular health behaviour was at a high level (M = 80.29, SD = 5.42). A significant positive relationship existed between illness perception and cardiovascular health behaviour among persons with IHD (r = 0.38, P < 0.01).
Persons with higher illness perception showed a positive correlation with higher cardiovascular health behaviour at a significant level of 0.01. Results provided important information for nurses to develop an intervention program to promoting appropriate illness perception and cardiovascular health behaviour among persons with IHD.
Factors affecting quality of life in Hungarian adults with epilepsy: A comparison of four psychiatric instruments
2017, Epilepsy and Behavior
We investigated the impact of 19 factors on life quality in Hungarian patients with epilepsy. Wellbeing was evaluated by several inventories to investigate the impact of factors in more detail.
A cross-sectional study was performed in 170 patients. Wellbeing was evaluated with the WHO-5 Well-being Index (WHOQOL-5), Diener Satisfaction with Life Scale (SwLS), and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 Questionnaire (Qolie-31). We investigated their association with demographic characteristics, general health status, epilepsy, and its treatment. The impact of these factors on illness perception (Illness Perception Questionnaire, IPQ) was also studied.
The four measures correlated highly significantly. In addition, the predictive power of factors was comparable with the four inventories as evaluated by Multiple Regression. Factors explained 52%, 41%, 63% and 46% in the variance of WHOQOL-5, SwLS, Qolie-31, and IPQ scores, respectively. However, associations with particular factors were instrument-specific. The WHOQOL-5 was associated with factors indicative of general health. SwLS scores were associated with health-related and several demographic factors. Neither showed associations with epilepsy-related factors. All four categories of factors were associated with Qolie-31 and IPQ scores. Factors had an additive impact on IPQ, but not on Qolie-31.
Our findings reveal interactions between the method of life quality assessment and the factors that are identified as influencing life quality. This appears to be the first study that analyses the factors that influence illness perception in epilepsy patients, and suggests that the IPQ may become a valuable tool in epilepsy research.
Factors Affecting Patients’ Preferences for and Actual Discussions About End-of-Life Care
2016, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Citation Excerpt :
We were also interested in specific patient characteristics, patients' symptoms of depression and anxiety, and patients' self-reported health status, each of which have been identified as predictors of end-of-life care preferences.17,18 Finally, because religion and spirituality have been associated with communication about end-of-life care,19,20 we investigated the role of religious and spiritual beliefs on patients' preferences about end-of-life care. The goal of this report is to understand factors that influence patients' preferences for, and actual occurrences of, patient-clinician discussions about end-of-life issues.
Discussions about end-of-life care are often difficult for patients and clinicians, and inadequate communication poses a barrier to patients receiving the care they desire.
To understand factors that facilitate end-of-life care discussions that guide interventions to improve care.
We examined baseline data from an ongoing randomized trial to evaluate associations between patients' self-reported desire for, and occurrence of, discussions about end-of-life care and factors influencing these discussions. Factors included emotional symptoms and barriers and facilitators to discussions. The sample included patients with serious illness (n = 473) and their primary or specialty care clinicians (n = 128). Regression analyses were adjusted for confounders and clustered patients under clinicians.
Patients who endorsed each of three barriers to discussions were less likely to have had a discussion with their clinician (P-values ranging from <0.001 to 0.046). One facilitator (having had family/friends who died) was associated with past discussions (P = 0.037), and two facilitators were associated with wanting future discussion (P < 0.001): 1) concerns about future quality of life, 2) worries about being a burden on friends/family. Depression and anxiety were not associated with past discussions. However, patients with more anxiety were more likely to want future discussions (P = 0.001), as were patients with more depressive symptoms who had had discussions in the past (P < 0.001).
The occurrence of, and desire for, patient-clinician communication about end-of-life care is associated with patient factors including communication barriers and facilitators and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Understanding these factors may facilitate design of effective communication interventions.
Care of the Family in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
2012, Anesthesiology Clinics
Citation Excerpt :
In addition, after being told in these specific terms about likelihood of death, a patient’s surrogate still perceived the chance of survival as higher than the physician’s estimate.21 Families’ perception of illness among the critically ill is more influenced by their own emotional and cognitive beliefs—faith, sense of personal control, belief in success/failure of medical therapy—than by prognostications of physicians.22,23 These perceptions, in turn, clearly will affect a family’s ability to set appropriate goals of care and treatment plans for the patient.
From barriers to assets: Rethinking factors impacting advance care planning for African Americans
2019, Palliative and Supportive Care

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality EXCEED [Grant PO11HS10871] and the South Carolina Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestpubs.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml).

View full text

Chest

ORIGINAL RESEARCHCRITICAL CARE MEDICINEFactors Associated With Illness Perception Among Critically Ill Patients and Surrogates

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Section snippets

Study Design and Subjects

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Crit Care Clin

Chest

Soc Sci Med

Chest

Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study

Crit Care Med

Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study

Crit Care Med

Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations

Crit Care Med

Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians

Crit Care Med

Illness representations and coping with health threats

The common-sense representation of illness danger

Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care

Arch Intern Med

The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R)

Psychol Health

Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians

JAMA

“Inappropriate” treatment near the end of life: conflict between religious convictions and clinical judgment

Arch Intern Med

The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

Pastoral Psychol

Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach

The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness

Psychol Health

Quality of life and illness perceptions in patients with recently diagnosed head and neck cancer

Head Neck

Illness representations and quality of life scores in haemodialysis patients

Nephrol Dial Transplant

Living with Huntington's disease: illness perceptions, coping mechanisms, and spouses' quality of life

Int J Behav Med

Patients' interpretation of symptoms as a cause of delay in reaching hospital during acute myocardial infarction

Heart

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Factors Associated With Illness Perception Among Critically Ill Patients and Surrogates