Skip to main content
Download PDF

Diffusion MRI quantifies early axonal loss in the presence of nerve swelling

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 14, Article number: 78 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging markers have been widely used to detect and quantify white matter pathologies in multiple sclerosis. We have recently developed a diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) to distinguish and quantify co-existing axonal injury, demyelination, and inflammation in multiple sclerosis patients and animal models. It could serve as a longitudinal marker for axonal loss, a primary cause of permanent neurological impairments and disease progression.

Methods

Eight 10-week-old female C57BL/6 mice underwent optic nerve DBSI, followed by a week-long recuperation prior to active immunization for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Visual acuity of all mice was assessed daily. Longitudinal DBSI was performed in mouse optic nerves at baseline (naïve, before immunization), before, during, and after the onset of optic neuritis. Tissues were perfusion fixed after final in vivo scans. The correlation between DBSI detected pathologies and corresponding immunohistochemistry markers was quantitatively assessed.

Results

In this cohort of EAE mice, monocular vision impairment occurred in all animals. In vivo DBSI detected, differentiated, and quantified optic nerve inflammation, demyelination, and axonal injury/loss, correlating nerve pathologies with visual acuity at different time points of acute optic neuritis. DBSI quantified, in the presence of optic nerve swelling, ~15% axonal loss at the onset of optic neuritis in EAE mice.

Conclusions

Our findings support the notion that axonal loss could occur early in EAE mice. DBSI detected pathologies in the posterior visual pathway unreachable by optical coherence tomography and without confounding inflammation induced optic nerve swelling. DBSI could thus decipher the interrelationship among various pathological components and the role each plays in disease progression. Quantification of the rate of axonal loss could potentially serve as the biomarker to predict treatment outcome and to determine when progressive disease starts.

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease producing, ultimately, irreversible axonal loss and permanent neurological impairments [1–4]. The axonal pathology is complex with components directly associated with the fiber tracts (axonal injury/loss and demyelination) and those surrounding the tracts (immune cell infiltration and edema). Each of these axonal pathology components may contribute to neurological dysfunction and therefore to the clinical signs and symptoms of MS [4–6]. Although inflammation and demyelination each contributes to MS pathophysiology, axonal loss is believed to be the primary correlate of irreversible neurological disability [7, 8]. Therefore, the development of a non-invasive biomarker to reflect the extent of axonal loss and the severity of damage in surviving axons is paramount to confirmation of this notion, to better monitor individual patients, and to use as an endpoint in trials of potential therapeutics. Optic neuritis is commonly one of the first manifestations of MS [9, 10]. Optic neuritis, much like MS, is characterized by inflammatory demyelination and varying degrees of axonal injury [10]. Optic nerve dysfunction leads to impairment of visual function which can be monitored in mice in a clinically relevant manner [11]. As such, mouse models of optic neuritis present an opportunity to evaluate the connection between imaging, pathology, and function in a disorder like MS.

Several different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers have recently been evaluated in MS [12–14]. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), in particular, is one of the commonest tools for evaluating white matter disease as, under some circumstances, it can distinguish axonal injury from demyelination [15–17]. However DTI-derived metrics are obfuscated by the presence of inflammatory pathology [18, 19]. We recently developed a new diffusion MRI approach called diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) that is able to separately quantify the axonal and inflammatory pathologies [20, 21]. DBSI models the diffusion signal as a linear combination of anisotropic diffusion tensors reflecting fibers, which in white matter are predominantly axon fibers, and a spectrum of isotropic diffusion tensors which encompass cells, edema, and cerebrospinal fluid [20, 22]. In the study reported here, we applied DBSI at the onset of optic neuritis (ON) in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mouse model. DBSI is able to distinguish and quantify axon injury, demyelination, cellular infiltration and edema, and axonal loss.

Methods

EAE mouse model of optic neuritis

All experiments were performed on 10-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were housed and maintained in the Washington University animal facility and subjected to a 12-h light/dark cycle with constant access to nourishments. The EAE model of optic neuritis was induced as previously described [22]. Mice were immunized with 50 μg myelin oligodendrocyte peptide (MOG35-55) emulsified in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant with 50 μg Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mice further received 300 ng intravenous adjuvant pertussis toxin (PTX, List Laboratories, Campbell, CA) on the day of and 2 days after immunization. Eight mice were studied.

Visual acuity (VA) measurements

Visual acuity, utilized to measure visual function in parallel to clinical signs, was assessed with the Virtual Optometry System (Optomotry, Cerebral Mechanics, Inc., Canada) as previously described [23]. In short, mice were presented with virtual rotating columns displayed on four LCD screens. The spatial frequencies in cycle/degree (c/d) were changed starting from 0.1 c/d with step size of 0.05 c/d until the mouse stopped responding. VA is then defined as the highest spatial frequency to which the mouse was able to respond. Left and right eye VA can be assessed by the direction of rotating columns, clockwise for left eye and vice versa [24]. If the mouse did not respond to 0.1 c/d, VA was assigned to be 0 c/d. With this technique, it is possible to separately assess the VA of each eye by switching the rotational direction of the columns. Visual impairment was defined as VA ≤0.25 c/d, based on our previous work [22]. Normal VA was confirmed before immunization and then assessed daily after immunization.

For each mouse in our cohort, onset of optic neuritis, as indicated by impairment of visual function defined by VA, did not occur simultaneously for both eyes. We therefore defined time 1 as the day in which the first eye had a VA ≤0.25 c/d and time 2 as the day in which the second eye had a VA ≤0.25 c/d. Concordantly, for each mouse, eye 1 is the eye affected at time 1 and eye 2 is the eye affected at time 2. VA for each eye is presented in Fig. 1. Based on this experimental paradigm, time 1 and time 2 corresponded to onset and post-onset of optic neuritis for eye 1 and pre-onset and onset of optic neuritis for eye 2, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Visual acuity (VA) of EAE mice (n = 8) from baseline, pre-onset (time 1 of eye 2), onset (time 1 of eye 1 and time 2 of eye 2), and post-onset (time 2 of eye 1). Eye 1 = filled symbols; eye 2 = open symbols. The dotted line indicates VA = 0.25 c/d, which was the threshold of defined onset of optic neuritis. The results indicated that there was no visual acuity difference between eye 1 and eye 2 at time 2 (p = 0.15)

Full size image

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements

MRI experiments were performed on a 4.7 T Agilent DirectDrive™ small-animal MRI system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) equipped with Magnex/Agilent HD imaging gradient coil (Magnex/Agilent, Oxford, UK) with pulse gradient strength up to 58 G/cm and a gradient rise time ≤295 μs. Mice were anesthetized with 1% isoflurane in oxygen and placed in a custom made 3-point immobilization head holder. Breathing rate was monitored, and body temperature was maintained at 37 °C with a small animal physiological monitoring and control unit (SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY). An actively decoupled volume (transmit)/surface (receive) coil pair was used for MRI excitation and signal reception. Diffusion-weighted MRI data was acquired with a transverse slice of mouse brain with two optic nerves, as nearly orthogonal to the image slice as possible. A multi-echo spin-echo diffusion-weighted sequence [25] with an icosahedral 25-direction diffusion-encoding scheme [26] combined with one b = 0 was employed and MR acquisition parameters were TR of 1.5 s, TE of 37 ms, time between gradient pulses (Δ) of 18 ms, gradient pulse duration (δ) of 6 ms, maximum b-value of 2200 s/mm2 (each encoding direction has a unique b-value), slice thickness of 0.8 mm, and in-plane resolution of 117 μm2.

MRI data analysis

Data was analyzed with DBSI multi-tensor and conventional DTI single-tensor analysis packages developed in-house with Matlab [20, 21]. For optic nerve, we have a coherent fiber bundle, the diffusion-weighted imaging data was modeled according to Eq. 1:

$$ {S}_k= f{e}^{-\left|\overset{\rightharpoonup }{b_k}\right|{\lambda}_{\perp }}{e}^{-\left|\overset{\rightharpoonup }{b_k}\right|\left({\lambda}_{\parallel }-{\lambda}_{\perp}\right){ \cos}^2{\Phi}_k}+{\displaystyle {\int}_a^b f(D){e}^{-\left|\overset{\rightharpoonup }{b_k}\right| D} dD\kern1em \left( k=1,\ 2,\ 3,\dots,\ 25\right)}. $$
(1)

The quantities S k and \( \left|\overset{\rightharpoonup }{b_k}\right| \) are the signal and b-value of the k th diffusion gradient, Φ k is the angle between the k th diffusion gradient and the principal direction of the anisotropic tensor, λ || and λ ⊥ are the axial and radial diffusivities of the anisotropic tensor, f is the signal intensity fraction for the anisotropic tensor, and a and b are the low and high diffusivity limits for the isotropic diffusion spectrum (reflecting cellularity and edema, respectively) f(D). DBSI derived f represents retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon density (fiber fraction) in the image voxel, accounting for intra-voxel pathological and structural complications. DBSI derived λ|| and λ⊥ reflect residual axon and myelin integrity respectively: ↓ λ|| ≈ axonal injury and ↑ λ⊥ ≈ demyelination [20–22, 27]. Based on our previous experimental findings, the restricted isotropic diffusion fraction reflecting cellularity is derived by the summation of f(D) at 0 ≤ ADC ≤ 0.3 μm2/ms. The summation of the remaining f(D) at 0.3 < ADC ≤ 3 μm2/ms represents non-restricted isotropic diffusion, which putatively denotes vasogenic edema and CSF [20–22, 27].

Regions of interest (ROI) were manually drawn in the center of each optic nerve on the diffusion-weighted image, corresponding to the diffusion gradient direction perpendicular to optic nerves, to minimize partial volume effects. ROIs were then transferred to the parametric maps to calculate the mean for each of the DBSI and DTI-derived metrics.

ROI for DBSI fiber fraction

Separate ROIs encompassing the whole optic nerve were drawn on the diffusion-weighted images (DWI) with diffusion-weighting gradient orthogonal to the optic nerve, which were larger than the ROIs for measuring DBSI- or DTI-derived metrics. The partial volume effect of surrounding cerebrospinal fluid for ROIs outlining optic nerve cross-section area estimation was minimized because surrounding cerebrospinal fluid signal was eliminated via diffusion weighting. DBSI analysis models axonal fibers as anisotropic diffusion tensor components excluding any residual free isotropic CSF signal.

Immunohistochemistry

Immediately after the final MRI time point, mice were deeply anesthetized and underwent perfusion via the left cardiac ventricle with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Brains were excised after intra-cardiac perfusion fixation with 4% PFA at 4 °C and then transferred to PBS for further storage until processing. Optic nerves were then dissected, embedded in 2% agar, and then further embedded in paraffin wax [28]. Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 5-μm thick, deparaffinized, and rehydrated for immunohistochemistry analysis. Sections were blocked with 5% normal goat serum and 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min at room temperature to prevent non-specific binding. Slides were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody and then 1 h at room temperature with the appropriate secondary antibody. Primary antibodies used were anti-total neurofilament (SMI-312, BioLegend, 1:300), anti-phosphorylated neurofilament (SMI-31, BioLegend, 1:300), and anti-myelin basic protein (MBP, Sigma, 1:300). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, 1:240) with both conjugated to Alexa 488. Slides were mounted with Vectashield Mounting Medium for DAPI (Vector Laboratory, Inc., Burlingame, CA) and coverslipped. Images were acquired on a Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescence microscope with MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) at ×72 and ×84 (1.2 and 1.4 magnification of ×60 objective) magnifications. Quantification was performed on entire optic nerve images which were the combination of four to six ×72 immunohistochemistry images using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/volume-viewer.html, NIH, US). Images were then undergone background subtraction, bilateral filter for edge preservation, watershed segmentation, threshold determination, and the analyze particles macro for SMI-312, SMI-31, and MBP area calculation and then normalized by entire area of optic nerve. Background subtraction, watershed segmentation, threshold determination, and analyze particles were used for DAPI counts.

Statistics

For all the boxplots, whiskers extend to the minimum/maximum and the mean is marked as diamonds. Data were collected in a nested design where each mouse had two periods (eye 1 and 2) each containing repeated measurements at baseline, time 1, and time 2. Data were analyzed with a mixed random effect repeated measures model with period, time, and period by time interaction fixed effects. Contrasts were estimated for change from baseline to times 1 and 2, averaged over periods. Degrees of freedom were adjusted with Kenward-Rogers method. A first order auto-regressive covariance structure was used to account for repeated measures. The correlation of histology data and DBSI measurements at time 2 were analyzed by simple linear regression.

Results

Monocular visual acuity decrease at the onset of optic neuritis

After immunization, daily VA of EAE mice (n = 8) was confirmed. When VA ≤ 0.25 c/d, defined as onset of ON [22], DBSI was performed and the eye was defined as eye 1 at time 1 (12.1 ± 1.9 days post-immunization, mean ± SD, n = 8). The other eye was defined as eye 2. When the VA of eye 2 decreased below 0.25 c/d, DBSI was performed again at the same day (14.4 ± 1.7 days post-immunization, mean ± SD, n = 8, one eye 2 did not develop ON but still included in statistical analyses) defined as time 2 (Fig. 1). There was no difference between eye 1 and eye 2 at time 2 (p = 0.15).

DBSI reflected acute inflammation and axonal pathology specifically

DTI- and DBSI-derived parametric maps from EAE optic nerve revealed decreased DTI-λ∥ (1.65 ± 0.16 μm2/ms vs. control 1.79 ± 0.12 μm2/ms, p < 0.05), normal DBSI-λ∥ (1.82 ± 0.08 μm2/ms vs. control 1.79 ± 0.12 μm2/ms, p = 0.059) and normal DTI- λ⊥(0.16 ± 0.03 μm2/ms vs. control 0.16 ± 0.04 μm2/ms, p = 0.088) and DBSI-λ⊥ (0.20 ± 0.03 μm2/ms vs. control 0.17 ± 0.03 μm2/ms, p = 0.065) at time 1 (Fig. 2). Similarly, mild but not significant inflammatory cell infiltration and putative significant vasogenic edema, manifested as the increased DBSI restricted (0.03 ± 0.01 vs. control 0.01 ± 0.01, p = 0.29) and non-restricted (0.04 ± 0.03 vs. control 0.02 ± 0.01, p < 0.05) isotropic diffusion fractions, was also seen at time 1 in this particular nerve. Both DTI and DBSI measurements showed decreased λ∥ (DTI λ∥: 1.25 ± 0.32 μm2/ms vs. control 1.79 ± 0.12 μm2/ms, p < 0.005 and DBSI λ∥: 1.57 ± 0.17 μm2/ms vs. control 1.79 ± 0.12 μm2/ms, p < 0.005) and increased λ⊥ (DTI λ⊥: 0.22 ± 0.06 μm2/ms vs. control 0.16 ± 0.04 μm2/ms, p < 0.005 and DBSI λ⊥: 0.21 ± 0.03 μm2/ms vs. control 0.17 ± 0.03 μm2/ms, p = 0.16) at time 2, suggesting axonal and myelin injury, respectively [16]. Consistent with the increased DBSI restricted (0.08 ± 0.05 vs. control 0.01 ± 0.01, p < 0.005) and non-restricted (0.09 ± 0.06 vs. control 0.02 ± 0.01, p < 0.05) isotropic diffusion fractions, exaggerated DTI λ∥ and λ⊥ change at time 2 paralleled inflammatory cell infiltration and putative vasogenic edema (Fig. 2). Data from eye 1 and eye 2 were averaged at baseline, time 1 and time 2. Exaggerated changes in DTI-derived maps (Fig. 3a–c) when compared to DBSI-derived λ∥, λ⊥, and FA (Fig. 3d–f) at time 2, resulted from confounding effects from inflammation (Fig. 3g, h). For the EAE mice in this cohort, slightly increased inflammatory cell infiltration (seen as increased DBSI restricted fraction, Fig. 3h) and significant edema (as increased DBSI non-restricted fraction, Fig. 3g, p < 0.05) at time 1 were seen while axon and myelin damage was still absent (Fig. 3d–f). The EAE mice in this cohort developed axonal injury (Fig. 3d), mild demyelination (Fig. 3e), and significantly increased cell infiltration (Fig. 3g) and edema (Fig. 3h) at acute ON.

Fig. 2
figure 2

DTI- and DBSI-derived parametric maps of one representative EAE optic nerve (eye 1) from baseline (top row), time 1 (middle row, onset), and time 2 (bottom row, onset of the fellow eye). Decreased axial diffusivity (λǁ, columns 1 and 2) and increased radial diffusivity (λ⊥, columns 3 and 4) in both DTI and DBSI measurements suggest axonal injury and demyelination at time 2. DBSI distinguished and further quantified the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration (column 5, restricted diffusion fraction) and vasogenic edema (column 6, non-restricted diffusion fraction), confounding DTI estimated λǁ and λ⊥

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Box plots summarize the group distribution of DTI-derived λǁ, λ⊥, and FA (a–c) and DBSI-derived λǁ, λ⊥, FA, restricted, and non-restricted diffusion fraction (d–h) from baseline, time 1, and time 2, respectively. Axonal injury developed at time 2 suggested by the significantly decreased DTI- and DBSI-λǁ (a, d, p < 0.005). At time 1, significant decrease was only seen in DTI-λǁ but not in DBSI-λǁ reflecting the confounding effects of inflammatory cell infiltration and vasogenic edema (a, d). The same confounding effects also resulted in increased DTI-λ⊥ at time 2 but not in DBSI-λ⊥ (b, e).The distribution of DBSI results (d–f) was much tighter than DTI (a–c) since DBSI was able to separate vasogenic edema (g) and cell infiltration (h) from axon and myelin pathologies. One asterisk indicates p < 0.05. Double asterisks indicate p < 0.005

Full size image

DBSI detected and quantified axonal loss in the presence of optic nerve swelling

Onset of EAE ON was highly associated with inflammatory cell infiltration and putative edema, which led to optic nerve swelling in diffusion-weighted images (DWI, Fig. 4a–c). Group-average of nerve volume showed significant swelling at time 1 (0.10 ± 0.01 mm3 vs. control 0.08 ± 0.01 mm3, p < 0.005) and 2 (0.12 ± 0.02 mm3 vs. control 0.08 ± 0.01 mm3, p < 0.005, Fig. 4d). The corresponding DBSI-derived axon volume (nerve volume multiplying DBSI fiber fraction of corresponding ROI) demonstrated significant 16 and 17% axonal loss at time 1 and time 2, respectively (Fig. 4e). DBSI fiber fraction correlated well with VA measurement from baseline to time 2 (Fig. 4f).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) were acquired using the diffusion gradient applied perpendicular to the optic nerves (black arrows), at baseline (a, before EAE induction), time 1 (b, onset of ON in the first eye), and time 2 (c, onset of ON in the second eye) from an representative EAE mouse. Optic nerve swelling was seen at time 1 and 2 caused by inflammation associated increase in cellularity and edema. Significantly increased optic nerve volume was seen after ON (d, p < 0.005). The corresponding DBSI-derived axon volume (optic nerve volume × DBSI fiber fraction) suggested a significant axonal loss in optic nerves (e, p < 0.05 and p < 0.005 for time 1 and 2, respectively). DBSI fiber fraction, reflecting effects of axonal loss and dilution effect of axonal density from inflammation, correlated well with visual acuity (f). One asterisk indicates p < 0.05. Double asterisks indicate p < 0.005

Full size image

Immunohistochemistry of optic nerve

Post-MRI immunohistochemistry staining of optic nerves (Fig. 5) was used to assess axon (SMI-312, SMI-31) and myelin (MBP) integrity, and extent of cellularity (DAPI). The EAE optic nerves showed significant axonal swelling (yellow arrows, Fig. 5a), inflammation, and axonal injury (red and white circles, Fig. 5b, c). Both eyes from each EAE mouse was selected for the regression analyses. The regression of SMI-31, MBP, and SMI-312 area fraction and DBSI λ∥, DBSI λ⊥, DBSI fiber fraction, and DBSI restricted fraction (Fig. 6a–d) supported that DBSI indexes were able to reflect the optic-nerve pathologies. Similarly, DBSI-derived axon volume was able to reflect SMI-312 area (Fig. 6e).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Representative ×72 immunohistochemical staining images of anti-total neurofilament (SMI-312, total axons), phosphorylated neurofilament (SMI-31, intact axon), myelin basic protein (MBP, myelin sheath), and 4′, 6-dianidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, nuclei) from severe (a, column 1) and mild (a, column 3) optic neuritis nerves demonstrate the different degrees of tissue damages. The corresponding ×84 zoom-in images (covered ~50% of the optic nerve cross-section area) are displayed alongside ×72 images (a, column 2 and 4, respectively). Swollen axons, some aggregated to form enlarged staining regions (a, yellow arrows), were seen in SMI-312 and SMI-31 staining images. Axonal loss and injury (reduced SMI-312 and SMI-31 positive staining), demyelination (decreased MBP positive staining), and cell infiltration (increased density of DAPI staining) were present in optic neuritis nerves. The zoom-in ×84 DAPI and SMI-31 double-staining images from one EAE optic nerve with 200 ms (b) and 800 ms (c) exposure time revealed the multiple-axon aggregation underlying the unusually large green spots seen in the SMI-312 and SMI-31 images (b, c, red and white circles). Scale bar 50 μm

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Regression of SMI-31, MBP, SMI-312, DAPI counts, and DBSI-derived λǁ (a), λ⊥ (b), fiber fraction (c), and restricted fraction (d) suggested DBSI measurements were able to reflect specific pathologies in the optic nerves of EAE mice, respectively. The regression of DBSI-derived axon volume correlated with SMI-312 area (e, in mm2). In contrast to SMI-312 area estimated as ratio of positive area over the total nerve cross-sectional area (%, c), SMI-312 area in square millimeter reflects the extent of total axons without the dilution effect of inflammation. SE standard error

Full size image

Discussion

We examined optic nerve pathology in EAE mice at the onset of the ON when VA impairment was observed (Fig. 1). Optic neuritis in EAE-affected mice, much like in MS, is heterogeneous in pathology with a mixture of axonal injury, demyelination, cellular inflammation, and edema (Fig. 5) [22, 29–31]. We employed DBSI to monitor the evolving optic nerve pathology in EAE mice with ON by distinguishing and quantifying inflammation, demyelination, and axonal injury/loss simultaneously (Figs. 3, 4, and 6). DBSI parameters suggested the presence of prominent inflammation-associated increase in cellularity and edema at the onset of ON (Fig. 3g, h), consistent with the postmortem immunohistochemistry findings (Figs. 5 and 6). These pathological components not only contributed to the impaired visual function clinically but also confounded interpretation of DTI derived axonal injury and demyelination metrics (Fig. 3a–c).

Current MRI diagnostic approaches fail to accurately assess the progression of MS. Advanced MRI measures such as quantitative relaxation, diffusion, and magnetization transfer imaging provide more information than conventional MRI but unfortunately cannot distinguish between reversible and irreversible pathologies. Imaging markers sensitive and specific to axonal loss, which is thought to be irreversible, would provide the critical tools needed for assessing MS progression. The advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has enabled the quantification of neuronal (ganglion cell layer/inner plexiform layer, GCL + IPL) and axonal (retinal nerve fiber layer, RNFL) loss in the visual system allowing the direct correlation of structure with function [32–34]. In MS patients with or without history of clinical optic neuritis, GCL + IPL and RNFL thinning can be observed [35, 36]. Interestingly, OCT-detected RNFL thinning has also been reported to correlate with brain atrophy [37–41]. The portions of the anterior visual pathway measured using OCT have thus been considered to reflect the more global central nervous system (CNS) integrity; OCT has increasingly been suggested as an outcome measure in MS [42–45].

However, OCT is not as useful in the presence of early acute inflammation, due to the confounding presence of acute cell infiltration and vasogenic edema [46]. The posterior visual pathway (optic nerves/tracts/radiations) is not directly visualized by OCT due to the limited penetration of the technique. Moreover, the ability of OCT-detected intraocular pathologies to represent CNS pathologies outside of the visual system is indirect and imperfect in the individual patient. Thus, imaging biomarkers that can interrogate the entire CNS white matter, and distinguish and quantify different components of pathology without succumbing to their confounding interferences are greatly needed in MS. DBSI fiber fraction estimated axonal density of the optic nerve including the dilution effect of inflammation (optic nerve swelling on DWI, Fig. 4a–c) in each voxel. The correlation of VA and DBSI fiber fraction indicated that visual function was affected by inflammation (reversible) and axonal loss (irreversible, Fig. 4d). The recovery of visual function independent of initial visual loss in MS patients with optic neuritis may suggest the irreversible axonal loss is below the threshold of permanent vision loss [10, 47].

We contend that DBSI could provide the unmet needs in MS and neurological disorders in general by presenting specific pathological metrics to quantitatively reflect axonal injury, demyelination, inflammation, and axonal loss. A longitudinal DBSI measurement could assess the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory therapies on axonal preservation by longitudinally assessing axonal pathologies in real time. The axonal loss in this cohort of EAE mice occurred early (Fig. 6e). Since axonal integrity plays a crucial role in neurological disability [48, 49], longitudinal measurements of DBSI-derived axonal volume could potentially quantify the rate of irreversible axonal loss and serve as a biomarker of MS progression preceding detectable clinical symptoms.

Conclusions

Our findings support the notion that axonal loss could occur early in EAE mice. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging detected pathologies in the posterior visual pathway unreachable by optical coherence tomography and without confounding inflammation induced optic nerve swelling. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging could thus decipher the interrelationship among various pathological components and the role each plays in disease progression. Quantification of the rate of axonal loss could potentially serve as the biomarker to predict treatment outcome and to determine when progressive disease starts.

Abbreviations

CNS:

Central nervous system

DBSI:

Diffusion basis spectrum imaging

DTI:

Diffusion tensor imaging

EAE:

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

GCL + IPL:

Ganglion cell layer/inner plexiform layer

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

ON:

Optic neuritis

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

RNFL:

Retinal nerve fiber layer

VA:

Visual acuity

References

  1. Bjartmar C, Kidd G, Mork S, Rudick R, Trapp BD. Neurological disability correlates with spinal cord axonal loss and reduced N-acetyl aspartate in chronic multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:893–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kornek B, Lassmann H. Axonal pathology in multiple sclerosis. A historical note. Brain Pathol. 1999;9:651–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:278–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trapp BD, Bo L, Mork S, Chang A. Pathogenesis of tissue injury in MS lesions. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;98:49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lassmann H, van Horssen J, Mahad D. Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:647–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamm CP, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH. Multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future outlook. Eur Neurol. 2014;72:132–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bitsch A, Schuchardt J, Bunkowski S, Kuhlmann T, Bruck W. Acute axonal injury in multiple sclerosis. Correlation with demyelination and inflammation. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 6):1174–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjartmar C, Wujek JR, Trapp BD. Axonal loss in the pathology of MS: consequences for understanding the progressive phase of the disease. J Neurol Sci. 2003;206:165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck RW, Trobe JD, Moke PS, Gal RL, Xing D, Bhatti MT, Brodsky MC, Buckley EG, Chrousos GA, Corbett J, et al. High- and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:944–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shams PN, Plant GT. Optic neuritis: a review. Int MS J. 2009;16:82–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Torres-Torres R, Sanchez-Dalmau BF. Treatment of acute optic neuritis and vision complaints in multiple sclerosis. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2015;17:328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rueda-Lopes FC, da Cruz LC Jr H, Doring TM, Gasparetto EL. Diffusion-weighted imaging and demyelinating diseases: new aspects of an old advanced sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:W34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Narayana PA. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the monitoring of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging. 2005;15:46S–57S.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mallik S, Samson RS, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Miller DH. Imaging outcomes for trials of remyelination in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:1396–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Song SK, Sun SW, Ramsbottom MJ, Chang C, Russell J, Cross AH. Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage. 2002;17:1429–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Song SK, Sun SW, Ju WK, Lin SJ, Cross AH, Neufeld AH. Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1714–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song SK, Yoshino J, Le TQ, Lin SJ, Sun SW, Cross AH, Armstrong RC. Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2005;26:132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun SW, Liang HF, Trinkaus K, Cross AH, Armstrong RC, Song SK. Noninvasive detection of cuprizone induced axonal damage and demyelination in the mouse corpus callosum. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie M, Tobin JE, Budde MD, Chen CI, Trinkaus K, Cross AH, McDaniel DP, Song SK, Armstrong RC. Rostrocaudal analysis of corpus callosum demyelination and axon damage across disease stages refines diffusion tensor imaging correlations with pathological features. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69:704–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y, Wang Q, Haldar JP, Yeh FC, Xie M, Sun P, Tu TW, Trinkaus K, Klein RS, Cross AH, Song SK. Quantification of increased cellularity during inflammatory demyelination. Brain. 2011;134:3590–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Sun P, Wang Q, Trinkaus K, Schmidt RE, Naismith RT, Cross AH, Song SK. Differentiation and quantification of inflammation, demyelination and axon injury or loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138:1223–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiang CW, Wang Y, Sun P, Lin TH, Trinkaus K, Cross AH, Song SK. Quantifying white matter tract diffusion parameters in the presence of increased extra-fiber cellularity and vasogenic edema. Neuroimage. 2014;101:310–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin TH, Kim JH, Perez-Torres C, Chiang CW, Trinkaus K, Cross AH, Song SK. Axonal transport rate decreased at the onset of optic neuritis in EAE mice. Neuroimage. 2014;100C:244–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Douglas RM, Alam NM, Silver BD, McGill TJ, Tschetter WW, Prusky GT. Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22:677–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tu TW, Budde MD, Xie M, Chen YJ, Wang Q, Quirk JD, Song SK. Phase-aligned multiple spin-echo averaging: a simple way to improve signal-to-noise ratio of in vivo mouse spinal cord diffusion tensor image. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32:1335–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Batchelor PG, Atkinson D, Hill DL, Calamante F, Connelly A. Anisotropic noise propagation in diffusion tensor MRI sampling schemes. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:1143–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang X, Cusick MF, Wang Y, Sun P, Libbey JE, Trinkaus K, Fujinami RS, Song SK. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging detects and distinguishes coexisting subclinical inflammation, demyelination and axonal injury in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:843–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Blewitt ES, Pogmore T, Talbot IC. Double embedding in agar/paraffin wax as an aid to orientation of mucosal biopsies. J Clin Pathol. 1982;35:365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Diem R, Demmer I, Boretius S, Merkler D, Schmelting B, Williams SK, Sattler MB, Bahr M, Michaelis T, Frahm J, et al. Autoimmune optic neuritis in the common marmoset monkey: comparison of visual evoked potentials with MRI and histopathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3707–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gold R, Linington C, Lassmann H. Understanding pathogenesis and therapy of multiple sclerosis via animal models: 70 years of merits and culprits in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis research. Brain. 2006;129:1953–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun SW, Liang HF, Schmidt RE, Cross AH, Song SK. Selective vulnerability of cerebral white matter in a murine model of multiple sclerosis detected using diffusion tensor imaging. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;28:30–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Costello F, Coupland S, Hodge W, Lorello GR, Koroluk J, Pan YI, Freedman MS, Zackon DH, Kardon RH. Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:963–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Frohman EM, Fujimoto JG, Frohman TC, Calabresi PA, Cutter G, Balcer LJ. Optical coherence tomography: a window into the mechanisms of multiple sclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:664–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Leung CK. Diagnosing glaucoma progression with optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Walter SD, Ishikawa H, Galetta KM, Sakai RE, Feller DJ, Henderson SB, Wilson JA, Maguire MG, Galetta SL, Frohman E, et al. Ganglion cell loss in relation to visual disability in multiple sclerosis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1250–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Burkholder BM, Osborne B, Loguidice MJ, Bisker E, Frohman TC, Conger A, Ratchford JN, Warner C, Markowitz CE, Jacobs DA, et al. Macular volume determined by optical coherence tomography as a measure of neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:1366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dorr J, Wernecke KD, Bock M, Gaede G, Wuerfel JT, Pfueller CF, Bellmann-Strobl J, Freing A, Brandt AU, Friedemann P. Association of retinal and macular damage with brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2011;6, e18132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Gordon-Lipkin E, Chodkowski B, Reich DS, Smith SA, Pulicken M, Balcer LJ, Frohman EM, Cutter G, Calabresi PA. Retinal nerve fiber layer is associated with brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;69:1603–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Grazioli E, Zivadinov R, Weinstock-Guttman B, Lincoff N, Baier M, Wong JR, Hussein S, Cox JL, Hojnacki D, Ramanathan M. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is associated with brain MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008;268:12–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sepulcre J, Murie-Fernandez M, Salinas-Alaman A, Garcia-Layana A, Bejarano B, Villoslada P. Diagnostic accuracy of retinal abnormalities in predicting disease activity in MS. Neurology. 2007;68:1488–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Siger M, Dziegielewski K, Jasek L, Bieniek M, Nicpan A, Nawrocki J, Selmaj K. Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer as a potential measure of axonal loss and brain atrophy. J Neurol. 2008;255:1555–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saidha S, Sotirchos ES, Oh J, Syc SB, Seigo MA, Shiee N, Eckstein C, Durbin MK, Oakley JD, Meyer SA, et al. Relationships between retinal axonal and neuronal measures and global central nervous system pathology in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:34–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Calabresi PA, Balcer LJ, Frohman EM. Retinal pathology in multiple sclerosis: insight into the mechanisms of neuronal pathology. Brain. 2010;133:1575–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Balcer LJ. Clinical trials to clinical use: using vision as a model for multiple sclerosis and beyond. J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34(Suppl):S18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Balcer LJ, Miller DH, Reingold SC, Cohen JA. Vision and vision-related outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138:11–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Syc SB, Saidha S, Newsome SD, Ratchford JN, Levy M, Ford E, Crainiceanu CM, Durbin MK, Oakley JD, Meyer SA, et al. Optical coherence tomography segmentation reveals ganglion cell layer pathology after optic neuritis. Brain. 2012;135:521–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Beck RW, Cleary PA, Backlund JC. The course of visual recovery after optic neuritis. Experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1771–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kornek B, Storch MK, Weissert R, Wallstroem E, Stefferl A, Olsson T, Linington C, Schmidbauer M, Lassmann H. Multiple sclerosis and chronic autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a comparative quantitative study of axonal injury in active, inactive, and remyelinated lesions. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:267–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lassmann H. Axonal injury in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:695–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Bob Mikesell for excellent technical assistance.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the grants from National Institute of Health R01-NS047592 (S.-K.S.), P01-NS059560 (A.H.C.), U01- EY025500 (S.-K.S.), National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS) RG 4549A4/1 (S.-K.S.), RG-1507-05315 (T.-H. L.), and Department of Defense Idea Award W81XWH-12-1-0457 (S.-K.S.). AHC was supported in part by the Manny and Rosalyn Rosenthal-Dr. John L. Trotter MS Center Chair in Neuroimmunology of Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Authors’ contributions

THL, CWC, and CJPT conducted experiments, analyzed data, and jointly wrote the manuscript. PS designed the data processing routine and helped analyzing the DBSI data. MW helped with experiment design and conducted the statistical analyses. RES helped with tissue histological analysis design and evaluation. AHC designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. SKS designed experiments and the data processing software, helped analyzing the data, and significantly contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

S.-K. Song is the co-inventor of DBSI: USA patent Serial No. 61/345,367: Y. Wang, Q. Wang, S.K. Song, “Diagnosis of Central Nervous System White Matter Pathology Using Diffusion MRI”.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

All animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Washington University and in compliance with the NIH guidelines.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

      Tsen-Hsuan Lin, Chia-Wen Chiang, Carlos J. Perez-Torres, Peng Sun & Sheng-Kwei Song

    2. Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

      Michael Wallendorf

    3. Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

      Robert E. Schmidt

    4. Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

      Anne H. Cross

    5. Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

      Anne H. Cross & Sheng-Kwei Song

    6. Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, 1 Brookings Dr, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA

      Sheng-Kwei Song

    7. Current Address: Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine, National Health Research Institute, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan, Miaoli County, 35053, Taiwan

      Chia-Wen Chiang

    8. Current Address: School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, 550 W Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

      Carlos J. Perez-Torres

    9. Biomedical MR Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8227, Room 2313, 4525 Scott Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA

      Sheng-Kwei Song

    Authors
    1. Tsen-Hsuan Lin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Chia-Wen Chiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Carlos J. Perez-Torres
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Peng Sun
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Michael Wallendorf
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Robert E. Schmidt
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Anne H. Cross
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Sheng-Kwei Song
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Sheng-Kwei Song.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Lin, TH., Chiang, CW., Perez-Torres, C.J. et al. Diffusion MRI quantifies early axonal loss in the presence of nerve swelling. J Neuroinflammation 14, 78 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0852-3

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0852-3

    Keywords

    Journal of Neuroinflammation

    ISSN: 1742-2094