Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endometrial but not Ovarian Response is Associated With Clinical Outcomes and can be Improved by Prolonged Pituitary Downregulation in Patients With Thin and Medium Endometrium

  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of ovarian and endometrial response on live birth rates (LBRs) in young normal and high responders and prolonged pituitary downregulation on endometrial receptivity and clinical outcomes in patients with different endometrial thickness. Between January 2013 and December 2017,9511 patients underwent first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with age ≤35 years, follicle stimulating hormone < 10 IU/l, and ≥4 retrieved oocytes were conducted. The estradiol (E2) levels on the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) day were classified into 4 groups: group 1 (<3000 pg/mL); group 2 (3000-5000 pg/mL); group 3 (5000-7000 pg/mL), and group 4 (≥7000 pg/mL). Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the independent variables for live birth. Clinical outcomes between gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol and GnRH-a prolonged protocol in patients with different endometrial thickness (EMT) were compared. There were no significant differences among the 4 groups in implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBRs (P >.05). Binary logistic regression analysis suggested that EMT but not E2 levels was one of the independent predictive factors of LBRs (odds ratio 0.889, 95% confidence interval, 0.865-0.914, P <.001). The prolonged protocol had significantly higher implantation rates and clinical pregnancy rates in patients with medium (7 < EMT < 14 mm), especially thin endometrium (≤7 mm) compared to short GnRH-a long protocol. Our study showed that endometrial response but not ovarian response was associated with LBRs in young normal and hyper responders. Prolonged pituitary downregulation was an effective treatment to improve endometrial receptivity in patients with medium, especially thin endometrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broer SL, Dolleman M, van Disseldorp J, et al; IPD-EXPORT Study Group. Prediction of an excessive response in in vitro fertilization from patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests and comparison in subgroups: an individual patient data meta-analy-sis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(2):420–429e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cakmak H, Tran ND, Zamah AM, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. A novel “delayed start” protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1308–1314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1768–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, et al. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(4):476–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu LZ, Gao MZ, Yao LH, Liang AJ, Zhao XM, Sun ZG. Effect of high ovarian response on the expression of endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (EG-VEGF) in peri-implantation endometrium in IVF women. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(8):8902–8911.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. De Geyter C, Schmitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, Schneider HP. Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1.186 infertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kilicdag EB, Haydardedeoglu B, Cok T, Hacivelioglu SO, Bagis T. Premature progesterone elevation impairs implantation and live birth rates in GnRH-agonist IVF/ICSI cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(4):747–752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1616–1624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Satwik R, Kochhar M, Gupta SM, Majumdar A. Anti-mullerian hormone cut-off values for predicting poor ovarian response to exogenous ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(2):206–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bozdag G, Polat M, Yarali I, Yarali H. Live birth rates in various subgroups of poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(6):639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, et al. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(4): 967–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):370–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scheffer JB, Scheffer BB, De Carvalho RF, Rodrigues J, Grynberg M, Mendez Lozano DH. Age as A Predictor of Embryo Quality Regardless of The Quantitative Ovarian Response. Int J Fertil Steril. 2017;11(1):40–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh N, Malik N, Malhotra N, Vanamail P, Gupta M. Impact of progesterone (on hCG day)/oocyte ratio on pregnancy outcome in long agonist non donor fresh IVF/ICSI cycles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(4):503–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Levi AJ, Drews MR, Bergh PA, Miller BT, Scott RT Jr. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(4):670–674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Ghamdi A, Coskun S, Al-Hassan S, Al-Rejjal R, Awartani K. The correlation between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kovacs P, Matyas S, Boda K, Kaali SG. The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11): 2337–2341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Noyes N, Liu HC, Sultan K, Schattman G, Rosenwaks Z. Endo- metrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(4): 919–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Chen CH, Confino E, Barnes R, Milad M, Kazer RR. Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):336–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McWilliams GD, Frattarelli JL. Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(1):74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ. Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dain L, Bider D, Levron J, Zinchenko V, Westler S, Dirnfeld M. Thin endometrium in donor oocyte recipients: enigma or obstacle for implantation?. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1289–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(1):147–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Noyes N, Hampton BS, Berkeley A, Licciardi F, Grifo J, Krey L. Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):92–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laasch C, Puscheck E. Cumulative embryo score, not endometrial thickness, is best for pregnancy prediction in IVF. JAssist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(2):47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Caligara C, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Simon C. Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baruffi RL, Contart P, Mauri AL, et al. A uterine ultrasonographic scoring system as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19(3):99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Remohi J, Ardiles G, Garcia-Velasco JA, Gaitan P, Simon C, Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(10):2271–2276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rinaldi L, Lisi F, Floccari A, Lisi R, Pepe G, Fishel S. Endome-trial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization but not after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(7):1538–1541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bodri D, Colodron M, Vidal R, Galindo A, Durban M, Coll O. Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipient pairs showing a discordant outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(6):1548–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A, Luo ZC, Mahutte N. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1883–1888.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Casper RF. It's time to pay attention to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):519–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gleicher N, Kim A, Michaeli T, et al. A pilot cohort study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium resistant to standard therapies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):172–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, et al. Changes in tissue inflammation, angiogenesis and apoptosis in endometriosis, ade-nomyosis and uterine myoma after GnRH agonist therapy. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(3):642–653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim YA, Kim MR, Lee JH, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist reduces aromatase cytochrome P450 and cyclooxygenase-2 in ovarian endometrioma and eutopic endometrium of patients with endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;68(2):73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakamoto Y, Harada T, Horie S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced interleukin-8 (IL-8) expression in endometriotic stromal cells, probably through nuclear factor-kappa B activation: gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment reduced IL-8 expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(2):730–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ruan HC, Zhu XM, Luo Q, et al. Ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially restores the expression of endometrial integrin b3 and leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improvesu terine receptivity in mice. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(10):2521–2529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schachter M, Friedler S, Ron-El R, et al. Can pregnancy rate be improved in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles by administering GnRH agonist before oocyte retrieval?. A prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4): 1087–1093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the outstanding support provided by the whole staff of our reproductive medicine center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Medicine Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Jianyuan Song & Kun Qian

  2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Xuejiao Sun

Authors
  1. Jianyuan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuejiao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kun Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Qian.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Sun, X. & Qian, K. Endometrial but not Ovarian Response is Associated With Clinical Outcomes and can be Improved by Prolonged Pituitary Downregulation in Patients With Thin and Medium Endometrium. Reprod. Sci. 26, 1409–1416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118816835

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118816835

Keywords

Search

Navigation