Usefulness of Health Registers for detection of bleeding events in outcome studies

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Administrative and claims databases are attractive for safety studies of anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs. However, the validity of such data is often uncertain. It was our aim to assess the usefulness of the Swedish administrative health databases for detection of major bleeding events. All individuals with atrial fibrillation in Stockholm County from 2006 to 2013 (n=78,022) were identified from the Swedish Patient register. A search for bleeding diagnoses was done in the Patient register and in the Cause of Death register. The medical records of a random sample of 761 patients were studied and classified in a blinded and pre-specified way. The highest sensitivity (99.5%) and specificity (94.0%) were obtained by counting fatal bleeding events with the bleeding diagnosis recorded as first or second cause of death, and all hospitalisations without regard to the position of the diagnosis. Codes for transfusions were unreliable and did not increase accuracy. The registries identified 99.4% of intracranial bleeding events and 82.6% of gastrointestinal bleeding events correctly. All patients classified as „no bleedings” were indeed without bleeding. Overall the sensitivity was 85.5% and the specificity 95.9% for major bleeding events. In conclusion, Swedish nationwide health registries are well suited for conducting outcome studies involving identification of bleeding events. The use of a diagnostic code for bleeding, irrespective of its position as primary or secondary diagnosis, provided the best sensitivity and specificity for detection of bleeding events, as long as it was limited to contacts resulting in hospital admission.

• References

• 1 Campbell SE, Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM. et al. A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health Med 2001; 23: 205-211.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A. et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 450.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 McCormick N, Bhole V, Lacaille D. et al. Validity of Diagnostic Codes for Acute Stroke in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0135834.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Smith JG, Platonov PG, Hedblad B. et al. Atrial fibrillation in the Malmo Diet and Cancer study: a study of occurrence, risk factors and diagnostic validity. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 95-102.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Gomes T, Mamdani MM, Holbrook AM. et al. Rates of hemorrhage during warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. Canad Med Assoc J 2013; 185: E121-127.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ray WA. Population-based studies of adverse drug effects. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1592-1594.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Schulman S, Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 03: 692-694.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP. et al. An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety 2011; 20: 560-566.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Arnason T, Wells PS, van Walraven C. et al. Accuracy of coding for possible warfarin complications in hospital discharge abstracts. Thrombosis Res 2006; 118: 253-262.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Cattaruzzi C, Troncon MG, Agostinis L. et al. Positive predictive value of ICD-9th codes for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation in the Sistema In-formativo Sanitario Regionale database. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 499-502.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material