skip to main content
10.1145/2939672.2939715acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Computational Drug Repositioning Using Continuous Self-Controlled Case Series

Published:13 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computational Drug Repositioning (CDR) is the task of discovering potential new indications for existing drugs by mining large-scale heterogeneous drug-related data sources. Leveraging the patient-level temporal ordering information between numeric physiological measurements and various drug prescriptions provided in Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we propose a Continuous Self-controlled Case Series (CSCCS) model for CDR. As an initial evaluation, we look for drugs that can control Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) level in our experiments. Applying CSCCS to the Marshfield Clinic EHR, well-known drugs that are indicated for controlling blood glucose level are rediscovered. Furthermore, some drugs with recent literature support for the potential effect of blood glucose level control are also identified.

References

  1. Ted T Ashburn and Karl B Thor. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. MR Hurle, L Yang, Q Xie, DK Rajpal, P Sanseau, and P Agarwal. Computational drug repositioning: from data to therapeutics. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiao Li, Si Zheng, Bin Chen, Atul J. Butte, S. Joshua Swamidass, and Zhiyong Lu. A survey of current trends in computational drug repositioning. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Justin Lamb. The connectivity map: a new tool for biomedical research. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Kuhn, Monica Campillos, Ivica Letunic, Lars Juhl Jensen, and Peer Bork. A side effect resource to capture enotypic effects of drugs. Molecular Systems Biology, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yanbin Liu, Bin Hu, Chengxin Fu, and Xin Chen. Dcdb: drug combination database. Bioinformatics, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig Knox, Vivian Law, Timothy Jewison, Philip Liu, Son Ly, Alex Frolkis, Allison Pon, Kelly Banco, Christine Mak, Vanessa Neveu, et al. Drugbank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for omics research on drugs. Nucleic Acids Research, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hua Xu, Melinda C Aldrich, Qingxia Chen, Hongfang Liu, Neeraja B Peterson, Qi Dai, Mia Levy, Anushi Shah, Xue Han, Xiaoyang Ruan, Min Jiang, Ying Li, Jamii St Julien, Jeremy Warner, Carol Friedman, Dan M Roden, and Joshua C Denny. Validating drug repurposing signals using electronic health records: a case study of metformin associated with reduced cancer mortality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shawn E Simpson, David Madigan, Ivan Zorych, Martijn J Schuemie, Patrick B Ryan, and Marc A Suchard. Multiple self controlled case series for large scale longitudinal observational databases. Biometrics, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vito MR Muggeo. Estimating regression models with unknown break points. Statistics in Medicine, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stanley Xu, Chan Zeng, Sophia Newcomer, Jennifer Nelson, and Jason Glanz. Use of fixed effects models to analyze self-controlled case series data in vaccine safety studies. Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Prakash M Nadkarni. Drug safety surveillance using de-identified EMR and claims data: issues and challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. PB Ryan. Establishing a drug era persistence window for active surveillance. White Papers, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Robert Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Edward W Frees. Longitudinal and panel data: analysis and applications in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. AACE. Management of common comorbidities of diabetes. http://outpatient.aace.com/type-2-diabetes/management-of-common-comorbidities-of-diabetes. (Visited on 02/06/2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. RM Daniel, SN Cousens, De BL Stavola, MG Kenward, and JAC Sterne. Methods for dealing with time dependent confounding. Statistics in Medicine, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephanie J Reisinger, Patrick B Ryan, Donald J O'Hara, Gregory E Powell, Jeffery L Painter, Edward N Pattishall, and Jonathan A Morris. Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jean-Louis Montastruc, Agnès Sommet, Haleh Bagheri, and Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre. Benefits and strengths of the disproportionality analysis for identification of adverse drug reactions in a pharmacovigilance database. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. OMOP. Ground truth for monitoring health outcomes of interest. http://omop.org/sites/default/files/ground%20truth.pdf, 2015. (Visited on 09/28/2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin J Wainwright. Sharp thresholds for high-dimensional and noisy recovery of sparsity using l1-constrained quadratic programming. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. DiabetesInControl. Drugs that can affect blood glucose levels. http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/www.diabetesincontrol.com_images_tools_druglistaffectingbloodglucose.pdf, 2015. (Visited on 09/28/2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Patrick J Lustman, Monique M Williams, Gregory S Sayuk, Billy D Nix, and Ray E Clouse. Factors influencing glycemic control in type 2 diabetes during acute-and maintenance-phase treatment of major depressive disorder with bupropion. Diabetes Care, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jose A Vazquez and Jack D Sobel. Fungal infections in diabetes. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. ADA. Skin complications. http://www.diabetes.org/living-with-diabetes/complications/skin-complications.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/. (Visited on 01/19/2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. CDC. Smoking and diabetes. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/diseases/diabetes.html. (Visited on 01/19/2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Emmanuelle Vermes, Anique Ducharme, Martial G Bourassa, Myriam Lessard, Michel White, and Jean-Claude Tardif. Enalapril reduces the incidence of diabetes in patients with chronic heart failure insight from the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (solvd). Circulation, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Taner Damci, Serkan Tatliagac, Zeynep Osar, and Hasan Ilkova. Fenofibrate treatment is associated with better glycemic control and lower serum leptin and insulin levels in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertriglyceridemia. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Pitchai Balakumar, Rajavel Varatharajan, Ying Nyo, Raja Renushia, Devarajan Raaginey, Ann Oh, Shaikh Akhtar, Mani Rupeshkumar, Karupiah Sundram, and Sokkalingam A Dhanaraj. Fenofibrate and dipyridamole treatments in low-doses either alone or in combination blunted the development of nephropathy in diabetic rats. Pharmacological Research, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Bacon F Chow and Howard H Stone. The relationship of vitamin b12 to carbohydrate metabolism and diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rose Zhao-Wei Ting, Cheuk Chun Szeto, Michael Ho-Ming Chan, Kwok Kuen Ma, and Kai Ming Chow. Risk factors of vitamin b12 deficiency in patients receiving metformin. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Murat Kesim, Ahmet Tiryaki, Mine Kadioglu, Efnan Muci, Nuri Ihsan Kalyoncu, and Ersin Yaris. The effects of sertraline on blood lipids, glucose, insulin and hba1c levels: A prospective clinical trial on depressive patients. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: the Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Junichi Kodama, Shigehiro Katayama, Kiyoshi Tanaka, Akira Itabashi, Shyoji Kawazu, and Jun Ishii. Effect of captopril on glucose concentration: possible role of augmented postprandial forearm blood flow. Diabetes Care, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tetsuo Satoh, Shuichi Hara, Midori Takashima, and Haruo Kitagawa. Hyperglycemic effect of hydralazine in rats. Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. FDA. Consumer updates: FDA expands advice on statin risks. http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm293330.htm, 2014. (Visited on 09/28/2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Dilys J Freeman, John Norrie, Naveed Sattar, R Dermot G Neely, Stuart M Cobbe, Ian Ford, Christopher Isles, A Ross Lorimer, Peter W Macfarlane, James H McKillop, et al. Pravastatin and the development of diabetes mellitus evidence for a protective treatment effect in the west of scotland coronary prevention study. Circulation, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Aleesa A Carter, Tara Gomes, Ximena Camacho, David N Juurlink, Baiju R Shah, and Muhammad M Mamdani. Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study. BMJ, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jay D Amsterdam, Justine Shults, Nancy Rutherford, and Stanley Schwartz. Safety and efficacy of s-citalopram in patients with co-morbid major depression and diabetes mellitus. Neuropsychobiology, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Joep HG Scholl, Rike van Eekeren, and Eugène P van Puijenbroek. Six cases of (severe) hypoglycaemia associated with gabapentin use in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Khanh vinh quoc Luong and Lan Thi Hoang Nguyen. The impact of thiamine treatment in the diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. GLJ Page, David Laight, and MH Cummings. Thiamine deficiency in diabetes mellitus and the impact of thiamine replacement on glucose metabolism and vascular disease. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. T Inukai, Y Inukai, R Matsutomo, K Okumura, K Takanashi, K Takebayashi, K Tayama, Y Aso, and Y Takemura. Clinical usefulness of doxazosin in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated by hypertension: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism. The Journal of International Medical Research, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. FDA. Premarin (conjugated estrogens tablets, usp). http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2006/004782s147lbl.pdf. (Visited on 02/08/2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Paul Samuel. Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with neomycin-a time for reappraisal. New England Journal of Medicine, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. YA Kesaniemi and Scott M Grundy. Turnover of low density lipoproteins during inhibition of cholesterol absorption by neomycin. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. David JA Jenkins, Cyril WC Kendall, Maryam Hamidi, Edward Vidgen, Dorothea Faulkner, Tina Parker, Nalini Irani, Thomas MS Wolever, Ignatius Fong, Peter Kopplin, et al. Effect of antibiotics as cholesterol-lowering agents. Metabolism, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. David Madigan, Shawn Simpson, Wei Hua, Antonio Paredes, Bruce Fireman, and Malcolm Maclure. The self-controlled case series: Recent developments. Submitted, 2015. URL http://www.stat.columbia.edu/ madigan/PAPERS/DrugSafety.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computational Drug Repositioning Using Continuous Self-Controlled Case Series

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader