Research
Effects of Labor Support from Close Female Relative on Labor and Maternal Satisfaction in a Thai Setting

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01311.xGet rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of a close female relative providing emotional and physical support during active labor and birth.

Design

Randomized, two‐group controlled clinical trial.

Setting

Regional teaching hospital in the eastern part of Thailand with 782 beds.

Participants

Primiparous women (N = 120) whose gestational ages were ≥ 36 weeks and who had uncomplicated pregnancies.

Methods

Participants were randomly assigned to receive usual care and support from a chosen close female relative from admission until 2 hours after birth or usual care only. Within 24 hours of birth, labor outcomes (length of labor & type of birth) and levels of maternal satisfaction were assessed.

Results

Those in the experimental group had a significantly shorter duration of active labor and were more satisfied with their childbirth experiences than those in the control group. Differences between groups with respect to incidence of spontaneous delivery were not found.

Conclusions

A close female relative was effective in providing supportive care during labor and delivery. The integration of this nursing intervention for women and their families at public hospitals in Thailand is supported.

Section snippets

Methods

A randomized, two‐group, controlled, clinical trial was conducted in a 782‐bed regional teaching hospital in the eastern part of Thailand. The primary outcome was length of labor, and secondary outcomes were incidence of unassisted birth and levels of maternal satisfaction. Given the nature of this study, “blinding” of the research participant (laboring woman), nurse‐midwives, and the investigator was not possible. However, a research assistant blind to group assignment used a known tool to

Findings

Data were collected from 120 participants during the 7‐month recruitment period. In keeping with the “intention‐to‐treat” approach, 114 (95%) women were included in the final analysis: 58 (48.3%) in the experimental group and 56 (46.7%) in the control group. The flow of the participants through the study is presented in Figure 1.

Discussion

The results demonstrated that those in the experimental group had a shorter duration of active labor and were more satisfied with the childbirth experience than those in the control group. In our initial analysis, duration of active labor was not correlated with measures of satisfaction (r = .01) so we are confident that duration of labor was not a mediating variable for maternal satisfaction. Differences between groups in the incidence of spontaneous or assisted delivery were not found.

The

Conclusions

A close female relative was an important person who provided supportive care during labor and birth for women who volunteered to take part in this study. Her presence was associated with a shorter duration of active labor and enhanced maternal satisfaction with the childbirth experience although a higher incidence of spontaneous delivery was not found.

The integration of a close female relative into the care of laboring and birthing women is an important nurse‐midwifery intervention that can

Acknowledgment

Supported by the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University and Thailand Nursing Council Fund. The authors thank Jean Chaw‐Kant for editing and formatting this manuscript.

REFERENCES (29)

  • S. Chunuan et al.

    Childbirth policy in Thailand: Is it a time to change?

    Songkhla Medical Journal

    (2004)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • G. Dick‐Read

    Childbirth without fear: The principle and practice of natural childbirth

    (2005)
  • P. Goodman et al.

    Factors related to childbirth satisfaction

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2004)
  • Cited by (29)

    • The effects of not having continuous companion support during labour on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic

      2022, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, Bruggemann et al. (2007) found no difference in the mode of delivery, labour duration, use of analgesics, neonatal outcomes and breastfeeding rate with or without the presence of a companion of the woman's choice Gordon et al. (1999). and Yuenyong et al. (2012) also showed comparable findings. Although there were no differences in these outcomes, these studies revealed that women with continuous companion support were more satisfied with the labour experiences, however, this was not examined in our study.

    • Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Support From a Layperson During a Woman's First Two Births

      2019, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      This type of research design has been used to evaluate a number of other topics, including the cost-effectiveness of infection prophylaxis after cesarean (Skeith, Niu, Valent, Tuuli, & Caughey, 2017), the cost-effectiveness of prenatal genetic testing (Ohno & Caughey, 2013), and latent versus active labor management (Tilden, Lee, Allen, Griffin, & Caughey, 2015). An additional strength of our work is the heterogeneity (i.e., diversity) of the designs and settings of the five randomized controlled trials used to evaluate the rates of cesarean birth and the lengths of labor when comparing women who had continuous layperson support versus no continuous layperson support (Bruggemann et al., 2007; Campbell et al., 2006; Klaus et al., 1986; Madi et al., 1999; Yuenyong et al., 2012). This heterogeneity is reflective of the varied maternity practices of the different countries in which the five trials were conducted.

    • Client and provider factors associated with companionship during labor and birth in Kigoma Region, Tanzania

      2019, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The White Ribbon Alliance and the World Health Organization (WHO) have recognized the need for companionship (including women's choice of companion) as an important component of quality and respectful maternity care (White Ribbon Alliance, 2011; WHO, 2017). The presence of a companion provides laboring women with a greater feeling of control and reassurance (Banda et al., 2010; Isbir & Serçeku, 2017), increases satisfaction (WHO, 2018; Yuenyong et al., 2012), decreases anxiety (Akbarzadeh et al., 2014) and perceived pain (Isbir & Serçeku, 2017; Safarzadeh et al., 2012), and may have a positive influence on how staff treat and interact with women (Dynes et al., 2018; Kabakian-Khasholian & Portela, 2017). A recent Cochrane systematic review (Bohren et al., 2017) indicates that women with the support of a companion have labors that are shorter (Akbarzadeh et al., 2014; Kashanian et al., 2010; Safarzadeh et al., 2012; Yuenyong et al., 2012), require less need for analgesia (McGrath & Kennell, 2008), and result in fewer cesarean sections (Kashanian et al., 2010; McGrath & Kennell, 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text