Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
ResearchEffects of Labor Support from Close Female Relative on Labor and Maternal Satisfaction in a Thai Setting
Section snippets
Methods
A randomized, two‐group, controlled, clinical trial was conducted in a 782‐bed regional teaching hospital in the eastern part of Thailand. The primary outcome was length of labor, and secondary outcomes were incidence of unassisted birth and levels of maternal satisfaction. Given the nature of this study, “blinding” of the research participant (laboring woman), nurse‐midwives, and the investigator was not possible. However, a research assistant blind to group assignment used a known tool to
Findings
Data were collected from 120 participants during the 7‐month recruitment period. In keeping with the “intention‐to‐treat” approach, 114 (95%) women were included in the final analysis: 58 (48.3%) in the experimental group and 56 (46.7%) in the control group. The flow of the participants through the study is presented in Figure 1.
Discussion
The results demonstrated that those in the experimental group had a shorter duration of active labor and were more satisfied with the childbirth experience than those in the control group. In our initial analysis, duration of active labor was not correlated with measures of satisfaction (r = .01) so we are confident that duration of labor was not a mediating variable for maternal satisfaction. Differences between groups in the incidence of spontaneous or assisted delivery were not found.
The
Conclusions
A close female relative was an important person who provided supportive care during labor and birth for women who volunteered to take part in this study. Her presence was associated with a shorter duration of active labor and enhanced maternal satisfaction with the childbirth experience although a higher incidence of spontaneous delivery was not found.
The integration of a close female relative into the care of laboring and birthing women is an important nurse‐midwifery intervention that can
Acknowledgment
Supported by the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University and Thailand Nursing Council Fund. The authors thank Jean Chaw‐Kant for editing and formatting this manuscript.
REFERENCES (29)
- et al.
A randomized control trial of continuous support in labor by a lay doula
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing
(2006) - et al.
Effects of providing hospital‐based doulas in health maintenance organization hospitals
Obstetrics & Gynaecology
(1999) - et al.
Fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth experiences of women who have recently given birth
Midwifery
(1999) Supporting women in labor: Analysis of different types of caregivers
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
(2004)- et al.
A comparison of intermittent and continuous support during labor: A meta‐analysis
American Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology
(1999) - et al.
Continuous labor support from attendant for primiparous women: A meta‐analysis
Obstetrics & Gynaecology
(1996) The duration of labor in healthy women
Journal of Perinatology
(1999)- et al.
Satisfaction with childbirth: Theories and methods of measurement
Birth
(1993) - et al.
Female relatives or friends trained as labor doulas: Outcomes at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum
Birth
(2007) Patient satisfaction with health care services received during intrapartum in one regional hospital in the southern part of Thailand
(2002)
Childbirth policy in Thailand: Is it a time to change?
Songkhla Medical Journal
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Childbirth without fear: The principle and practice of natural childbirth
Factors related to childbirth satisfaction
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Cited by (29)
A randomized trial assessing the impact of educational podcasts on personal control and satisfaction during childbirth
2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyThe effects of not having continuous companion support during labour on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic
2022, MidwiferyCitation Excerpt :Similarly, Bruggemann et al. (2007) found no difference in the mode of delivery, labour duration, use of analgesics, neonatal outcomes and breastfeeding rate with or without the presence of a companion of the woman's choice Gordon et al. (1999). and Yuenyong et al. (2012) also showed comparable findings. Although there were no differences in these outcomes, these studies revealed that women with continuous companion support were more satisfied with the labour experiences, however, this was not examined in our study.
Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Support From a Layperson During a Woman's First Two Births
2019, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal NursingCitation Excerpt :This type of research design has been used to evaluate a number of other topics, including the cost-effectiveness of infection prophylaxis after cesarean (Skeith, Niu, Valent, Tuuli, & Caughey, 2017), the cost-effectiveness of prenatal genetic testing (Ohno & Caughey, 2013), and latent versus active labor management (Tilden, Lee, Allen, Griffin, & Caughey, 2015). An additional strength of our work is the heterogeneity (i.e., diversity) of the designs and settings of the five randomized controlled trials used to evaluate the rates of cesarean birth and the lengths of labor when comparing women who had continuous layperson support versus no continuous layperson support (Bruggemann et al., 2007; Campbell et al., 2006; Klaus et al., 1986; Madi et al., 1999; Yuenyong et al., 2012). This heterogeneity is reflective of the varied maternity practices of the different countries in which the five trials were conducted.
Client and provider factors associated with companionship during labor and birth in Kigoma Region, Tanzania
2019, MidwiferyCitation Excerpt :The White Ribbon Alliance and the World Health Organization (WHO) have recognized the need for companionship (including women's choice of companion) as an important component of quality and respectful maternity care (White Ribbon Alliance, 2011; WHO, 2017). The presence of a companion provides laboring women with a greater feeling of control and reassurance (Banda et al., 2010; Isbir & Serçeku, 2017), increases satisfaction (WHO, 2018; Yuenyong et al., 2012), decreases anxiety (Akbarzadeh et al., 2014) and perceived pain (Isbir & Serçeku, 2017; Safarzadeh et al., 2012), and may have a positive influence on how staff treat and interact with women (Dynes et al., 2018; Kabakian-Khasholian & Portela, 2017). A recent Cochrane systematic review (Bohren et al., 2017) indicates that women with the support of a companion have labors that are shorter (Akbarzadeh et al., 2014; Kashanian et al., 2010; Safarzadeh et al., 2012; Yuenyong et al., 2012), require less need for analgesia (McGrath & Kennell, 2008), and result in fewer cesarean sections (Kashanian et al., 2010; McGrath & Kennell, 2008).
Comparison of maternal outcomes in caring by Doula, trained lay companion and routine midwifery care
2023, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth