Regular Research Articles
Quantification of Five Neuropsychological Approaches to Defining Mild Cognitive Impairment

https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31819431d5Get rights and content

Objectives:

Operational definitions of cognitive impairment have varied widely in diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Identifying clinical subtypes of MCI has further challenged diagnostic approaches because varying the components of the objective cognitive assessment can significantly impact diagnosis. Therefore, the authors investigated the applicability of diagnostic criteria for clinical subtypes of MCI in a naturalistic research sample of community elders and quantified the variability in diagnostic outcomes that results from modifying the neuropsychological definition of objective cognitive impairment.

Design:

Cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Setting:

San Diego, CA, Veterans Administration Hospital.

Participants:

Ninety nondemented, neurologically normal, community-dwelling older adults were initially assessed and 73 were seen for follow-up approximately 17 months later.

Measurements:

Participants were classified via consensus diagnosis as either normally aging or having MCI via each of the five diagnostic strategies, which varied the cutoff for objective impairment and the number of neuropsychological tests considered in the diagnostic process.

Results:

A range of differences in the percentages identified as MCI versus cognitively normal were demonstrated, ranging from 10–74%, depending on the classification criteria used. A substantial minority of individuals demonstrated diagnostic instability over time and across diagnostic approaches. The single domain nonamnestic subtype diagnosis was particularly unstable (e.g., prone to reclassification as normal at follow up).

Conclusion:

Our findings provide empirical support for a neuropsychologically derived operational definition of clinical subtypes of MCI and point to the importance of using comprehensive neuropsychological assessments. Diagnoses, particularly involving nonamnestic MCI, were variable over time. The applicability and utility of this particular MCI subtype warrants further investigation.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were community-dwelling volunteers selected from a larger group of individuals enrolled in a longitudinal study of normal aging. Ninety nondemented older adults, aged 62–92 years (mean age: 77 years) were initially assessed (Time 1) and 73 were seen for follow-up (Time 2). Based on Year 1 data (N = 90), participants were determined to be nondemented based on consensus diagnosis utilizing all available neurological, neuropsychological, and functional data. All participants were free

RESULTS

At Time 1, 10%–74% of participants were characterized as having MCI, depending on the diagnostic strategy applied. Subtype classification rates were similarly variable. Among those identified as having MCI, single domain aMCI was the resulting subtype in 8.9% (comprehensive criteria) to 12.2% (conservative criteria) of cases. Single domain non-aMCI was the clinical subtype in 2.2% (conservative) to 31.1% (liberal) of those with MCI. Multidomain aMCI was identified in 1.1% (conservative) to

CONCLUSION

Supporting the overall validity of the concept of MCI, the majority of diagnoses in the present study was consistent across diagnostic schemes and remained stable over time. However, a sizable minority of diagnoses differed across diagnostic schemes and were unstable over the follow-up interval (when variability in diagnosis of MCI subtypes was included). The diagnoses resultant from application of the liberal criteria were particularly likely to deviate from other diagnostic strategies and to

References (38)

  • JA Yesavage et al.

    Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report

    J Psychiatr Res

    (1982)
  • BW Palmer et al.

    Base rates of “impaired” neuropsychological test performance among healthy older adults

    Arch Clin Neuropsychol

    (1998)
  • RC Petersen et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome

    Arch Neurol

    (1999)
  • RC Petersen et al.

    Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment

    Arch Neurol

    (2001)
  • RC Petersen et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment as a clinical entity and treatment target

    Arch Neurol

    (2005)
  • JJ Manly et al.

    Implementing diagnostic criteria and estimating frequency of mild cognitive impairment in an urban community

    Arch Neurol

    (2005)
  • MH Tabert et al.

    Neuropsychological prediction of conversion to Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • A Busse et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes

    Neurology

    (2006)
  • HA Tuokko et al.

    An overview of mild cognitive impairment

  • H Bickel et al.

    Prevalence and persistence of mild cognitive impairment among elderly patients in general hospitals

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2006)
  • M Zanetti et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment subtypes and vascular dementia in community-dwelling elderly people: a 3-year follow-up study

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2006)
  • G Smith et al.

    A perspective from the Mayo Clinic

  • RK Heaton et al.

    Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographic Corrections, Research Findings, and Clinical Applications

    (1991)
  • RK Heaton et al.

    Revised Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms for African American and Caucasian Adults Scoring Program

    (2004)
  • M Grundman et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment can be distinguished from Alzheimer disease and normal aging for clinical trials

    Arch Neurol

    (2004)
  • S Alladi et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment: applicability of research criteria in a memory clinic and characterization of cognitive profile

    Psychol Med

    (2006)
  • JH Kramer et al.

    Multiple cognitive deficits in amnestic mild cognitive impairment

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2006)
  • OL Lopez et al.

    Neuropsychological characteristics of mild cognitive impairment subgroups

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • F Portet et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in medical practice: a critical review of the concept and new diagnostic procedure. Report of the MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer's Disease

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2006)

    • Cited by (0)

    The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Jodessa Braga, Heather Alviso, the VA/UCSD Laboratory of Cognitive Imaging as well as the staff, patients, and volunteers of the UCSD ADRC.

    This work was supported by National Institute on Aging grants R01 AG12674 (to MWB), K24 AG26431 (to MWB), P50 AG05131 (to JCB, DPS), by VA Merit Review (to DCD) and Career Development Award (to AJJ) grants, and by an Alzheimer's Association New Investigator Research Grant (to AJJ).

    Dr. Delis is a coauthor of the CVLT-2 and D-KEFS and receives royalties from the tests.

    View full text
    Copyright © 2009 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.