Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated seasonal variations during IVF. Their results are contradictory, especially concerning fertilization and pregnancy rates. The aim of the present study was to re-evaluate these parameters using a large number of IVF cycles. METHODS: A total of 7368 IVF cycles conducted in Switzerland between 1995 and 2003 were retrospectively analysed. To avoid a bias in the evaluation of the fertilization rate, only IVF cycles without ICSI were considered for analysis. Cycles were assigned to seasons according to the date of the beginning of stimulation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the seasons concerning the fertilization, the pregnancy and the implantation rates. However, statistically significant variables deciding on the outcome of an IVF cycle are age, centre, aetiology of infertility and day of transfer. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant seasonal differences in central Europe (Switzerland) that influenced the outcome of IVF treatment. The only statistically significant variables of IVF outcome were age, centre, aetiology of infertility and day of transfer. A change to routine fertility treatment concerning the different seasons should therefore not be taken into account.

Introduction

Every physician and biologist working in the field of reproductive medicine keeps wondering about variable pregnancy rates, because success rates are fluctuating without visible reason from excellent to very poor. This is often not explained by the group a patient belongs to (e.g. advanced age of the woman, poor responders, primary infertility of the female, multiple infertility factors) nor by cultural conditions, technical failures or other comprehensible reasons. Thus, the question arises whether the different seasons of the year can have good or bad influences on the characteristics of the oocytes and on the fertilization and pregnancy rates during assisted reproductive technologies in humans. If this were the case, it would be possible to avoid IVF treatment cycles in the ‘bad months’ in order to enhance pregnancy rates.

All over the world, seasonal changes in the reproductive life of animals are well known. The question arises whether human reproduction is also affected by such seasonal differences, although sexual activity of human beings is not bound to seasons. Several epidemiological studies point to a variation in natural conception and birth rates not only in animals but also in humans (Odegard et al., 1977; Mathers and Harris, 1983; Roenneberg et al., 1990a,b; Lam et al., 1991), being reduced during the spring in warm climates in non-equatorial regions (Huntington, 1938; Lamar et al., 1943; Rosenberg, 1966; Becker, 1981). The reasons for this phenomenon are not very well understood; possible explanations might be the variations in semen quality, showing a significantly lower sperm count in the summer compared to the winter (Tjoa et al., 1982; Levine et al., 1988; Reinberg et al., 1988; Politoff et al., 1989; Saint Pol et al., 1989; Levine et al., 1990; Levine, 1991), variations in the ovulation rate (Timonen et al., 1964; Kivela et al., 1988; Rameshkumar et al., 1992) and variations in endometrial function (Timonen et al., 1964; Kottler et al., 1989) throughout the seasons: these variations might be linked to the light–dark effect of the female reproductive axis (Rojansky et al., 1992). On the other hand, inconsistent frequencies of intercourse (Odegard et al., 1977; Ehrenkranz et al., 1983; Abas and Murphy, 1987; Jacobsen et al., 1987), possibly increasing during holidays (Rosenberg, 1966; Wrigley and Schofield, 1981; Cesario, 2002), might also be an explanation. Others, however, did not confirm the occurrence of varying frequencies of intercourse as a function of season (Udry et al., 1967; Levine et al., 1990).

Studies on reproductive outcome of assisted technologies in primates have shown significant variations throughout the seasons, the oocyte maturation being much poorer in winter months (Smith et al., 1978; Chan et al., 1982). The most intriguing finding in these above-mentioned studies is the persisting seasonal effect on the maturation of retrieved oocytes during IVF, despite the administration of exogenous gonadotrophins and constant environmental conditions.

Possible seasonal variations during assisted reproductive treatment of humans have been suggested by several studies (Wood et al., 1985; Stolwijk et al., 1994; Chamoun et al., 1995; Ossenbühn, 1998; Rojanski et al., 2000; Weigert et al., 2001), although variations of the ovulation rate due to varying endogenous gonadotrophin secretion are suppressed by the hormonal therapy given during IVF treatment. Furthermore, lower sperm counts in non-treated ejaculates (observed during the summer months) are compensated in IVF treatment cycles by utilizing a concentrated and constant amount of motile sperm to inseminate the oocytes. Other studies could not confirm the presence of seasonal variations (Casper et al., 1988; Daya et al.,1993; Fleming et al., 1994).

Considering these controversial data, we retrospectively evaluated the outcome of 7368 IVF cycles, conducted over a 9 year period throughout Switzerland and encompassing all four seasons of the year.

Materials and methods

Patients

A total of 7368 IVF cycles, conducted in all 18 IVF clinics of Switzerland between 1995 and 2003, were retrospectively analysed (4688 patients, 62.3% with one cycle, 25.5% with two, 7.1% with three, 5.1% with more than three cycles). For this analysis, the national IVF data register (FIVNAT) has been used.

To avoid a bias in the evaluation of the fertilization rate, only IVF cycles were considered for analysis. No cycles with ICSI were included. The indications for the IVF treatment were tubal factors in 34.6%, male factor in 11.7%, idiopathic infertility in 9.5%, endometriosis in 5.1% and multiple causes in 29.7%, while other causes accounted for 9.4%. Patients had in 60.7% of the cycles a primary infertility and in 39.3% a secondary infertility.

The decision for IVF treatment had been made before the start of the study and all patients have been treated routinely. Because all data have been rendered anonymous when entered in the computerized data base, approval of the ethical committee was not necessary.

Methods

The seasons were defined before analysing the data, according to the calendar definitions of the seasons for Europe, each season lasting 3 months: Spring: March 21–June 20; Summer: June 21–September 20; Autumn: September 21–December 20; Winter: December 21–March 20.

Because the season may not only have an impact on embryo development and implantation, but also influence the oocyte during its development at the time of IVF treatment, the attribution of the patients to the corresponding seasons was made according to the date of the beginning of stimulation.

Complete infertility investigation of both partners (hormonal evaluation, gynaecological ultrasound, hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy to evaluate tubal patency and semen analysis) preceded the IVF treatment.

In all, 68.2% of patients were stimulated with the long protocol, 32.8% with the short protocol. Down-regulation was achieved with triptorelin (daily injection or depot preparation; Decapeptyl®, Ferring pharmaceuticals, Wallisellen, Switzerland), goserelin depot preparation (Zoladex®, Astra Zeneca, Zug, Switzerland) or nafarelin nasal spray (Synrelina®, Pharmacia, Dübendorf, Switzerland). Gonadotrophins used for stimulation were in 24.3% recombinant FSH (Gonal-F®, Serono Pharma, Geneva, Switzerland; or Puregon®, Organon Pharmaceuticals, Pfäffikon, Switzerland), in 34.2% highly purified FSH (Metrodin HP®, Serono; Fostimon®, IBSA, Pambio-Noranco, Switzerland) and 40.4% HMG, (Pergonal®, Serono; Humegon®, Organon; Menogon®, Ferring pharmaceuticals; Merional®, IBSA). The different stimulation protocols and gonadotrophins were statistically equally distributed among the different groups of patients divided according to the seasons, thus excluding any bias.

Thirty-five to 36 h after hCG administration, oocytes were retrieved by needle aspiration, with transvaginal ultrasound guidance and under routine intravenous sedation or general anaesthesia.

Cycles with micromanipulation (e.g. ICSI, subzonal injection of sperm etc.), with gamete or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer as well as cryocycles were excluded. The laboratory work (preparation of oocytes and the ejaculate, fertilization, incubation and embryo transfer) was performed by the use of previously described standard techniques (Lewin et al., 1986). Fertilization was assessed 17 h (range 15–20) after IVF. Only normal pronucleids [normally fertilized oocytes with two pronuclei (PN) and two polar bodies] were considered for embryo transfer and freezing was done if more than two or three pronucleids were available. Those with the highest PN score and with the best morphological grade were selected for transfer in each treatment cycle. They were cultured for another 20–30 h at 37°C in fresh CO2-equilibrated IVF medium. All remaining pronucleids were cryopreserved in the 4-cell embryo or PN stage, for later transfers. Since the beginning of the year 2001, no embryos, but only pronucleids, are allowed to be frozen according to Swiss law.

The pregnancy rate after IVF is defined by the proportion of patients with a positive HCG value, ≥14 days after embryo transfer. The fertilization rate is defined by the proportion of only mature oocytes with one polar body resulting in pronucleids. The implantation rate is defined by the proportion of the number of embryos transferred resulting in gestational sacs ultrasonographically diagnosed 2 weeks after the positive pregnancy test, including ectopic gestations. Mean embryo quality could not be calculated, because the different IVF centres used different classifications for the evaluation of the embryo quality, making statistical analysis impossible.

Statistical methods

Categorical variables were compared for homogeneity within seasons and months using χ2 for goodness of fit. Continuous variables were compared using one-way parametric analysis of variance and multivariate regression. IVF results of the cycles in the different seasons and months were assessed first using χ2 goodness of fit and subsequently using a multivariate logistic model adjusting for centre, age, indication, infertility type and year of stimulation. In a subsequent analysis considering only cycles with embryo transfer, two additional covariates—the number of transferred embryos and the day of transfer—were considered. The significance level was set to α = 0.05 two-tailed and all calculations were performed using SAS vs 8.02.

All statistical analyses were repeated considering the first treatment cycle only.

Results

A total of 7368 IVF cycles (first treatment cycle in 62.2%, second cycle in 25.6%, ≥ third cycle in 12.2%) were analysed. To exclude any potential bias due to repeated observations, a subsequent statistical sub-analysis was carried out for the 4688 IVF first cycles. The results from the sub-analysis performed with the 4688 first cycles did not differ from those obtained by the analysis of all the cycles (data not shown). Therefore, all IVF cycles could be evaluated.

Table I shows the distribution of the clinical parameters of the patients (age, primary/secondary infertility, aetiology of infertility and number of IVF cycles) in the different seasons. There were no significant differences for the type of infertility (primary/secondary) within the seasons, but the aetiology of infertility (P < 0.01) and the number of IVF cycles conducted within the different seasons varied significantly. The number of IVF cycles performed was lowest in summer and autumn and highest in winter and spring (P < 0.0001).

Table I.

Distribution of the age of the patients, infertility type (primary/secondary), aetiology of infertility (treatment indications) and number of IVF cycles in the different seasons.

Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
Age of patients (mean ± SD)35.5 ± 4.435.5 ± 4.235.0 ± 4.535.6 ± 4.4<0.0001
Infertility type
    Primary59.361.262.260.3NS
    Secondary40.738.837.839.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes30.529.828.130.3NS
    Tubal36.134.134.633.6NS
    Male10.910.312.412.8NS
    Endometriosis5.65.24.65.1NS
    Idiopathic7.910.610.88.90.01
    Others (not specified)9.010.19.49.3NS
Initiated IVF cycles [n (%)]1895 (25.7)1667 (22.6)1764 (23.9)2042 (27.7)<0.0001
Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
Age of patients (mean ± SD)35.5 ± 4.435.5 ± 4.235.0 ± 4.535.6 ± 4.4<0.0001
Infertility type
    Primary59.361.262.260.3NS
    Secondary40.738.837.839.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes30.529.828.130.3NS
    Tubal36.134.134.633.6NS
    Male10.910.312.412.8NS
    Endometriosis5.65.24.65.1NS
    Idiopathic7.910.610.88.90.01
    Others (not specified)9.010.19.49.3NS
Initiated IVF cycles [n (%)]1895 (25.7)1667 (22.6)1764 (23.9)2042 (27.7)<0.0001

Values are percentages unless otherwise specified.

P-Values were obtained by one-way ANOVA for continuous variables and goodness of fit χ2 test for categorical variables.

NS = not significant.

Table I.

Distribution of the age of the patients, infertility type (primary/secondary), aetiology of infertility (treatment indications) and number of IVF cycles in the different seasons.

Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
Age of patients (mean ± SD)35.5 ± 4.435.5 ± 4.235.0 ± 4.535.6 ± 4.4<0.0001
Infertility type
    Primary59.361.262.260.3NS
    Secondary40.738.837.839.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes30.529.828.130.3NS
    Tubal36.134.134.633.6NS
    Male10.910.312.412.8NS
    Endometriosis5.65.24.65.1NS
    Idiopathic7.910.610.88.90.01
    Others (not specified)9.010.19.49.3NS
Initiated IVF cycles [n (%)]1895 (25.7)1667 (22.6)1764 (23.9)2042 (27.7)<0.0001
Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
Age of patients (mean ± SD)35.5 ± 4.435.5 ± 4.235.0 ± 4.535.6 ± 4.4<0.0001
Infertility type
    Primary59.361.262.260.3NS
    Secondary40.738.837.839.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes30.529.828.130.3NS
    Tubal36.134.134.633.6NS
    Male10.910.312.412.8NS
    Endometriosis5.65.24.65.1NS
    Idiopathic7.910.610.88.90.01
    Others (not specified)9.010.19.49.3NS
Initiated IVF cycles [n (%)]1895 (25.7)1667 (22.6)1764 (23.9)2042 (27.7)<0.0001

Values are percentages unless otherwise specified.

P-Values were obtained by one-way ANOVA for continuous variables and goodness of fit χ2 test for categorical variables.

NS = not significant.

Table II presents the results of the number of IVF cycles, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of pronucleids obtained, the number of embryos transferred, the pregnancy rates and the implantation rates for the IVF cycles done in the different seasons. Pregnancy rates were not found to be different between the seasons.

Table II.

Number of initiated cycles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of pronucleids (normally fertilized oocytes with two pronuclei and two polar bodies) obtained, number of embryos transferred, pregnancy rates and implantation rates for IVF cycles in the different seasons

Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
No. of initiated IVF cycles1895166717642042<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)1730 (91.3)1539 (92.3)1622 (92.0)1864 (91.3)<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)1544 (81.5)1343 (80.6)1435 (81.3)1693 (82.9)<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.8 ± 6.18.5 ± 5.99.2 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.2 ± 4.34.9 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.1NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.0NS
Clinical pregnancies361322353411
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.119.320.020.1NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval20.920.921.822.0NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle23.424.024.624.3NS
Implantation rate13.113.413.214.3NS
Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
No. of initiated IVF cycles1895166717642042<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)1730 (91.3)1539 (92.3)1622 (92.0)1864 (91.3)<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)1544 (81.5)1343 (80.6)1435 (81.3)1693 (82.9)<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.8 ± 6.18.5 ± 5.99.2 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.2 ± 4.34.9 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.1NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.0NS
Clinical pregnancies361322353411
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.119.320.020.1NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval20.920.921.822.0NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle23.424.024.624.3NS
Implantation rate13.113.413.214.3NS

Values given are mean and range; P values for continuous variables were obtained by Student’s t-test and for categorical variables with χ2 for goodness of fit.

NS = not significant.

Table II.

Number of initiated cycles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of pronucleids (normally fertilized oocytes with two pronuclei and two polar bodies) obtained, number of embryos transferred, pregnancy rates and implantation rates for IVF cycles in the different seasons

Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
No. of initiated IVF cycles1895166717642042<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)1730 (91.3)1539 (92.3)1622 (92.0)1864 (91.3)<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)1544 (81.5)1343 (80.6)1435 (81.3)1693 (82.9)<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.8 ± 6.18.5 ± 5.99.2 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.2 ± 4.34.9 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.1NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.0NS
Clinical pregnancies361322353411
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.119.320.020.1NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval20.920.921.822.0NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle23.424.024.624.3NS
Implantation rate13.113.413.214.3NS
Clinical parameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterP
No. of initiated IVF cycles1895166717642042<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)1730 (91.3)1539 (92.3)1622 (92.0)1864 (91.3)<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)1544 (81.5)1343 (80.6)1435 (81.3)1693 (82.9)<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.8 ± 6.18.5 ± 5.99.2 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.2 ± 4.34.9 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.1NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.0NS
Clinical pregnancies361322353411
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.119.320.020.1NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval20.920.921.822.0NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle23.424.024.624.3NS
Implantation rate13.113.413.214.3NS

Values given are mean and range; P values for continuous variables were obtained by Student’s t-test and for categorical variables with χ2 for goodness of fit.

NS = not significant.

Table III presents the results of the pregnancy and implantation rates for IVF cycles per month during the whole observation period. There were no significant differences in pregnancy and implantation rates, but there was in the number of embryos transferred. Also after correction for the number of embryos, age, infertility type (primary/secondary), aetiology of infertility and day of transfer, there were no significant differences in adjusted pregnancy and implantation rates (data not shown).

Table III.

Pregnancy and implantation rates for all IVF cycles by month over the entire observation period

Clinical parameterJanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecP
Initiated cycles715737714637766414371655737731669222<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)91.991.691.691.290.392.591.993.090.092.993.787.4<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)82.482.885.481.579.082.979.281.477.983.382.779.3<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.3 ± 5.48.8 ± 6.08.4 ± 5.88.5 ± 5.78.9 ± 6.18.7 ± 6.39.1 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.68.3 ± 6.19.3 ± 6.89.5 ± 6.69.3 ± 6.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)4.8 ± 3.85.2 ± 4.25.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.35.3 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.54.7 ± 4.04.8 ± 4.25.2 ± 4.45.3 ± 4.65.5 ± 4.4NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.01.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.7 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.01.7 ± 1.00.01
Clinical pregnancies148157145109143826812514714012855
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle (%)20.721.320.317.118.719.818.319.119.919.219.124.8NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval (%)22.523.322.218.820.721.419.920.522.220.620.428.4NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle (%)25.125.723.821.023.623.923.123.525.623.023.131.3NS
Implantation rate (%)14.715.113.512.012.814.112.513.613.912.911.817.8NS
Clinical parameterJanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecP
Initiated cycles715737714637766414371655737731669222<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)91.991.691.691.290.392.591.993.090.092.993.787.4<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)82.482.885.481.579.082.979.281.477.983.382.779.3<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.3 ± 5.48.8 ± 6.08.4 ± 5.88.5 ± 5.78.9 ± 6.18.7 ± 6.39.1 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.68.3 ± 6.19.3 ± 6.89.5 ± 6.69.3 ± 6.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)4.8 ± 3.85.2 ± 4.25.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.35.3 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.54.7 ± 4.04.8 ± 4.25.2 ± 4.45.3 ± 4.65.5 ± 4.4NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.01.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.7 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.01.7 ± 1.00.01
Clinical pregnancies148157145109143826812514714012855
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle (%)20.721.320.317.118.719.818.319.119.919.219.124.8NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval (%)22.523.322.218.820.721.419.920.522.220.620.428.4NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle (%)25.125.723.821.023.623.923.123.525.623.023.131.3NS
Implantation rate (%)14.715.113.512.012.814.112.513.613.912.911.817.8NS

NS = not significant.

Table III.

Pregnancy and implantation rates for all IVF cycles by month over the entire observation period

Clinical parameterJanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecP
Initiated cycles715737714637766414371655737731669222<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)91.991.691.691.290.392.591.993.090.092.993.787.4<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)82.482.885.481.579.082.979.281.477.983.382.779.3<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.3 ± 5.48.8 ± 6.08.4 ± 5.88.5 ± 5.78.9 ± 6.18.7 ± 6.39.1 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.68.3 ± 6.19.3 ± 6.89.5 ± 6.69.3 ± 6.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)4.8 ± 3.85.2 ± 4.25.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.35.3 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.54.7 ± 4.04.8 ± 4.25.2 ± 4.45.3 ± 4.65.5 ± 4.4NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.01.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.7 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.01.7 ± 1.00.01
Clinical pregnancies148157145109143826812514714012855
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle (%)20.721.320.317.118.719.818.319.119.919.219.124.8NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval (%)22.523.322.218.820.721.419.920.522.220.620.428.4NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle (%)25.125.723.821.023.623.923.123.525.623.023.131.3NS
Implantation rate (%)14.715.113.512.012.814.112.513.613.912.911.817.8NS
Clinical parameterJanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecP
Initiated cycles715737714637766414371655737731669222<0.0001
Cycles with oocyte retrieval (% of initiated cycles)91.991.691.691.290.392.591.993.090.092.993.787.4<0.0001
Cycles with transfer (% of initiated oocyte retrieval cycles)82.482.885.481.579.082.979.281.477.983.382.779.3<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.3 ± 5.48.8 ± 6.08.4 ± 5.88.5 ± 5.78.9 ± 6.18.7 ± 6.39.1 ± 6.68.5 ± 5.68.3 ± 6.19.3 ± 6.89.5 ± 6.69.3 ± 6.8NS
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)4.8 ± 3.85.2 ± 4.25.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.35.3 ± 4.45.0 ± 4.25.1 ± 4.54.7 ± 4.04.8 ± 4.25.2 ± 4.45.3 ± 4.65.5 ± 4.4NS
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)1.9 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.01.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.11.7 ± 1.11.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.01.7 ± 1.00.01
Clinical pregnancies148157145109143826812514714012855
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle (%)20.721.320.317.118.719.818.319.119.919.219.124.8NS
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval (%)22.523.322.218.820.721.419.920.522.220.620.428.4NS
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle (%)25.125.723.821.023.623.923.123.525.623.023.131.3NS
Implantation rate (%)14.715.113.512.012.814.112.513.613.912.911.817.8NS

NS = not significant.

Table IV shows the distribution of the number of IVF cycles, the age of the patients, the type infertility (primary/secondary), the aetiology of infertility, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of pronucleids obtained and the number of embryos transferred in the different years of the observation period. For all these parameters—with the exception of the type of infertility—significant differences have been seen between years of stimulation.

Table IV.

Distribution of the clinical parameters and number of IVF cycles in the different years of the observation period

Clinical parameter199519961997199819992000200120022003P
No. of IVF cycles662737952960852829756864756<0.0001
Age of patients (years) (mean ± SD)34.8 4.434.7 4.434.7 4.335.2 4.335.5 4.335.9 4.435.9 4.436.0 4.435.9 4.5<0.0001
Type of infertility
    Primary62.860.862.362.258.061.258.660.160.3NS
    Secondary37.239.237.737.842.038.841.439.939.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes28.723.625.222.424.229.144.338.034.3<0.0001
    Tubal28.935.133.538.139.136.831.633.333.20.015
    Male17.414.012.811.311.211.07.88.112.7<0.0001
    Idiopathic5.04.74.85.25.85.12.46.46.70.003
Endometriosis7.39.19.99.112.011.29.07.310.10.017
Others (not specified)12.813.413.814.07.96.94.96.93.0<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.4 6.08.4 5.98.0 5.48.4 5.98.7 6.08.9 5.99.8 7.19.1 6.49.3 6.1<0.0001
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.1 4.44.9 4.24.5 3.94.7 4.04.8 4.25.1 4.35.7 4.75.5 4.45.4 4.2<0.0001
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)2.1 1.22.0 1.11.9 1.11.8 1.11.8 1.11.9 1.01.8 1.01.7 0.91.7 0.9<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.818.915.017.119.120.519.424.723.4<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval21.120.516.118.620.722.522.027.225.7<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle24.023.118.321.324.024.723.930.028.5<0.0001
Implantation rate12.812.09.611.713.713.814.117.917.7<0.0001
Clinical parameter199519961997199819992000200120022003P
No. of IVF cycles662737952960852829756864756<0.0001
Age of patients (years) (mean ± SD)34.8 4.434.7 4.434.7 4.335.2 4.335.5 4.335.9 4.435.9 4.436.0 4.435.9 4.5<0.0001
Type of infertility
    Primary62.860.862.362.258.061.258.660.160.3NS
    Secondary37.239.237.737.842.038.841.439.939.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes28.723.625.222.424.229.144.338.034.3<0.0001
    Tubal28.935.133.538.139.136.831.633.333.20.015
    Male17.414.012.811.311.211.07.88.112.7<0.0001
    Idiopathic5.04.74.85.25.85.12.46.46.70.003
Endometriosis7.39.19.99.112.011.29.07.310.10.017
Others (not specified)12.813.413.814.07.96.94.96.93.0<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.4 6.08.4 5.98.0 5.48.4 5.98.7 6.08.9 5.99.8 7.19.1 6.49.3 6.1<0.0001
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.1 4.44.9 4.24.5 3.94.7 4.04.8 4.25.1 4.35.7 4.75.5 4.45.4 4.2<0.0001
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)2.1 1.22.0 1.11.9 1.11.8 1.11.8 1.11.9 1.01.8 1.01.7 0.91.7 0.9<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.818.915.017.119.120.519.424.723.4<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval21.120.516.118.620.722.522.027.225.7<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle24.023.118.321.324.024.723.930.028.5<0.0001
Implantation rate12.812.09.611.713.713.814.117.917.7<0.0001

NS = not significant.

Table IV.

Distribution of the clinical parameters and number of IVF cycles in the different years of the observation period

Clinical parameter199519961997199819992000200120022003P
No. of IVF cycles662737952960852829756864756<0.0001
Age of patients (years) (mean ± SD)34.8 4.434.7 4.434.7 4.335.2 4.335.5 4.335.9 4.435.9 4.436.0 4.435.9 4.5<0.0001
Type of infertility
    Primary62.860.862.362.258.061.258.660.160.3NS
    Secondary37.239.237.737.842.038.841.439.939.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes28.723.625.222.424.229.144.338.034.3<0.0001
    Tubal28.935.133.538.139.136.831.633.333.20.015
    Male17.414.012.811.311.211.07.88.112.7<0.0001
    Idiopathic5.04.74.85.25.85.12.46.46.70.003
Endometriosis7.39.19.99.112.011.29.07.310.10.017
Others (not specified)12.813.413.814.07.96.94.96.93.0<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.4 6.08.4 5.98.0 5.48.4 5.98.7 6.08.9 5.99.8 7.19.1 6.49.3 6.1<0.0001
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.1 4.44.9 4.24.5 3.94.7 4.04.8 4.25.1 4.35.7 4.75.5 4.45.4 4.2<0.0001
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)2.1 1.22.0 1.11.9 1.11.8 1.11.8 1.11.9 1.01.8 1.01.7 0.91.7 0.9<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.818.915.017.119.120.519.424.723.4<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval21.120.516.118.620.722.522.027.225.7<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle24.023.118.321.324.024.723.930.028.5<0.0001
Implantation rate12.812.09.611.713.713.814.117.917.7<0.0001
Clinical parameter199519961997199819992000200120022003P
No. of IVF cycles662737952960852829756864756<0.0001
Age of patients (years) (mean ± SD)34.8 4.434.7 4.434.7 4.335.2 4.335.5 4.335.9 4.435.9 4.436.0 4.435.9 4.5<0.0001
Type of infertility
    Primary62.860.862.362.258.061.258.660.160.3NS
    Secondary37.239.237.737.842.038.841.439.939.7NS
Treatment indications
    Multiple causes28.723.625.222.424.229.144.338.034.3<0.0001
    Tubal28.935.133.538.139.136.831.633.333.20.015
    Male17.414.012.811.311.211.07.88.112.7<0.0001
    Idiopathic5.04.74.85.25.85.12.46.46.70.003
Endometriosis7.39.19.99.112.011.29.07.310.10.017
Others (not specified)12.813.413.814.07.96.94.96.93.0<0.0001
Oocytes retrieved (mean ± SD)8.4 6.08.4 5.98.0 5.48.4 5.98.7 6.08.9 5.99.8 7.19.1 6.49.3 6.1<0.0001
Pronucleids obtained (mean ± SD)5.1 4.44.9 4.24.5 3.94.7 4.04.8 4.25.1 4.35.7 4.75.5 4.45.4 4.2<0.0001
Embryos transferred (mean ± SD)2.1 1.22.0 1.11.9 1.11.8 1.11.8 1.11.9 1.01.8 1.01.7 0.91.7 0.9<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by initiated cycle19.818.915.017.119.120.519.424.723.4<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval21.120.516.118.620.722.522.027.225.7<0.0001
Pregnancy rate by transfer cycle24.023.118.321.324.024.723.930.028.5<0.0001
Implantation rate12.812.09.611.713.713.814.117.917.7<0.0001

NS = not significant.

Table V presents the pregnancy results of all initiated IVF cycles adjusted for season, age of the patient, infertility type, treatment indications, year of treatment and centre. The odds of becoming pregnant do not differ between the season (OR 0.98; CI: 0.83–1.17 for summer, OR 1.02; CI: 0.85–1.21 for autumn and OR 1.11; CI: 0.94–1.31 for winter, taking spring as reference), whereas age, indication for treatment, year of stimulation and centre are significant factors: the odds of a patient aged <30 years are 4.4-fold those of a patient aged ≥40 years (OR CI: 3.6–5.7), for patients aged 30–34 years they are 3.4-fold (OR CI: 2.7–4.3) and for patients aged 35 years 2.8-fold (OR CI: 2.3–3.6). The odds for the indication for treatment are unfavourable for a male factor (OR 0.74; CI 0.60–0.91).

Table V.

Pregnancy status for IVF-initiated cycles by season: multivariate odds ratios

FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.447 (NS)
    Summer0.981 (NS)0.8251.165
    Autumn1.015 (NS)0.8531.208
    Winter1.110 (NS)0.9391.313
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <304.375a3.3595.698
    30–343.429a2.7134.333
    35–392.840a2.2593.570
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0066
    Endometriosis0.959 (NS)0.7261.267
    Idiopathic1.207 (NS)0.9761.492
    Male0.737a0.5960.911
Others (not specified)0.957 (NS)0.8291.104
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.0734 (NS)
    Secondary1.122 (NS)0.9891.272
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0015
    19960.888 (NS)0.6781.165
    19970.628a0.48010.823
    19980.722a0.5540.941
    19990.781 (NS)0.5971.023
    20000.819 (NS)0.6251.072
    20010.782 (NS)0.5921.032
    20021.053 (NS)0.8061.376
    20030.954 (NS)0.7381.285
Centre, bP < 0.0001
FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.447 (NS)
    Summer0.981 (NS)0.8251.165
    Autumn1.015 (NS)0.8531.208
    Winter1.110 (NS)0.9391.313
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <304.375a3.3595.698
    30–343.429a2.7134.333
    35–392.840a2.2593.570
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0066
    Endometriosis0.959 (NS)0.7261.267
    Idiopathic1.207 (NS)0.9761.492
    Male0.737a0.5960.911
Others (not specified)0.957 (NS)0.8291.104
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.0734 (NS)
    Secondary1.122 (NS)0.9891.272
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0015
    19960.888 (NS)0.6781.165
    19970.628a0.48010.823
    19980.722a0.5540.941
    19990.781 (NS)0.5971.023
    20000.819 (NS)0.6251.072
    20010.782 (NS)0.5921.032
    20021.053 (NS)0.8061.376
    20030.954 (NS)0.7381.285
Centre, bP < 0.0001
a

Significant favourable/unfavourable factor, P < 0.05.

bDetailed odds ratios by centre not shown.

NS = not significant.

Table V.

Pregnancy status for IVF-initiated cycles by season: multivariate odds ratios

FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.447 (NS)
    Summer0.981 (NS)0.8251.165
    Autumn1.015 (NS)0.8531.208
    Winter1.110 (NS)0.9391.313
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <304.375a3.3595.698
    30–343.429a2.7134.333
    35–392.840a2.2593.570
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0066
    Endometriosis0.959 (NS)0.7261.267
    Idiopathic1.207 (NS)0.9761.492
    Male0.737a0.5960.911
Others (not specified)0.957 (NS)0.8291.104
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.0734 (NS)
    Secondary1.122 (NS)0.9891.272
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0015
    19960.888 (NS)0.6781.165
    19970.628a0.48010.823
    19980.722a0.5540.941
    19990.781 (NS)0.5971.023
    20000.819 (NS)0.6251.072
    20010.782 (NS)0.5921.032
    20021.053 (NS)0.8061.376
    20030.954 (NS)0.7381.285
Centre, bP < 0.0001
FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.447 (NS)
    Summer0.981 (NS)0.8251.165
    Autumn1.015 (NS)0.8531.208
    Winter1.110 (NS)0.9391.313
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <304.375a3.3595.698
    30–343.429a2.7134.333
    35–392.840a2.2593.570
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0066
    Endometriosis0.959 (NS)0.7261.267
    Idiopathic1.207 (NS)0.9761.492
    Male0.737a0.5960.911
Others (not specified)0.957 (NS)0.8291.104
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.0734 (NS)
    Secondary1.122 (NS)0.9891.272
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0015
    19960.888 (NS)0.6781.165
    19970.628a0.48010.823
    19980.722a0.5540.941
    19990.781 (NS)0.5971.023
    20000.819 (NS)0.6251.072
    20010.782 (NS)0.5921.032
    20021.053 (NS)0.8061.376
    20030.954 (NS)0.7381.285
Centre, bP < 0.0001
a

Significant favourable/unfavourable factor, P < 0.05.

bDetailed odds ratios by centre not shown.

NS = not significant.

The year of stimulation is also a significant factor: being stimulated in 1997 (OR 0.6; CI 0.5–0.8) or 1998 (OR 0.7; CI 0.6–0.9) gives significantly worse odds for a pregnancy, as compared to 1995.

Table VI presents the pregnancy results limited to IVF cycles with embryo transfer adjusted for season, age of the patient, infertility type, treatment indication, number of transferred embryos, day of transfer, year of treatment and centre. The odds of becoming pregnant do not differ between the seasons (OR 0.94; CI: 0.79–1.13 for summer, OR 1.00; CI: 0.83–1.20 for autumn and OR 1.09; CI: 0.91–1.30 for winter, taking spring as reference). In contrast, age, indication for treatment, number of transferred embryos, day of transfer, year of stimulation and centre are significant factors deciding on the outcome: the odds of a patient aged <30 years are 4.0-fold those of a patient aged ≥40 years (CI 3.0–5.3), for patients aged 30–34 years they are 2.9-fold (CI 2.3–3.7) and for patients aged 35 years 2.5-fold (OR CI 2.0–3.2). The odds for the indication for treatment are more favourable to idiopathic (OR 1.3; CI 1.0–1.6) when taking as reference the female indication.

Table VI.

Pregnancy status for IVF cycles with embryo transfer by season: multivariate odds ratios

FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.4297 (NS)
    Summer0.943 (NS)0.7881.129
    Autumn0.999 (NS)0.8331.198
    Winter1.086 (NS)0.9121.294
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <303.979a3.0145.252
    30–342.898a2.2723.696
    35–392.496a1.9693.163
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0453
    Endometriosis1.051 (NS)0.7871.404
    Idiopathic1.290a1.0331.611
    Male0.852 (NS)0.6821.064
    Others (not specified)1.081 (NS)0.9321.255
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.4863 (NS)
    Secondary1.048 (NS)0.9191.193
No. of embryos transferred (reference class: 2), P < 0.0001
    1 embryo0.389a0.3010.503
    ≥3 embryos1.175a1.0081.371
Day of transfer (reference class: day 2), P = 0.0119
    Day 31.211 (NS)0.9971.470
    Day 4 or later1.687a1.1612.451
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0107
    19960.919 (NS)0.6931.217
    19970.697a0.5260.924
    19980.793 (NS)0.5981.052
    19990.838 (NS)0.6271.120
    20000.795 (NS)0.5931.065
    20010.776 (NS)0.5731.051
    20021.124 (NS)0.8351.513
    20031.019 (NS)0.7491.385
Centre, bP < 0.0001
FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.4297 (NS)
    Summer0.943 (NS)0.7881.129
    Autumn0.999 (NS)0.8331.198
    Winter1.086 (NS)0.9121.294
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <303.979a3.0145.252
    30–342.898a2.2723.696
    35–392.496a1.9693.163
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0453
    Endometriosis1.051 (NS)0.7871.404
    Idiopathic1.290a1.0331.611
    Male0.852 (NS)0.6821.064
    Others (not specified)1.081 (NS)0.9321.255
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.4863 (NS)
    Secondary1.048 (NS)0.9191.193
No. of embryos transferred (reference class: 2), P < 0.0001
    1 embryo0.389a0.3010.503
    ≥3 embryos1.175a1.0081.371
Day of transfer (reference class: day 2), P = 0.0119
    Day 31.211 (NS)0.9971.470
    Day 4 or later1.687a1.1612.451
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0107
    19960.919 (NS)0.6931.217
    19970.697a0.5260.924
    19980.793 (NS)0.5981.052
    19990.838 (NS)0.6271.120
    20000.795 (NS)0.5931.065
    20010.776 (NS)0.5731.051
    20021.124 (NS)0.8351.513
    20031.019 (NS)0.7491.385
Centre, bP < 0.0001
a

Significant favourable/unfavourable factor, P < 0.05.

bDetailed odds/ratios by centre not shown.

NS = not significant.

Table VI.

Pregnancy status for IVF cycles with embryo transfer by season: multivariate odds ratios

FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.4297 (NS)
    Summer0.943 (NS)0.7881.129
    Autumn0.999 (NS)0.8331.198
    Winter1.086 (NS)0.9121.294
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <303.979a3.0145.252
    30–342.898a2.2723.696
    35–392.496a1.9693.163
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0453
    Endometriosis1.051 (NS)0.7871.404
    Idiopathic1.290a1.0331.611
    Male0.852 (NS)0.6821.064
    Others (not specified)1.081 (NS)0.9321.255
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.4863 (NS)
    Secondary1.048 (NS)0.9191.193
No. of embryos transferred (reference class: 2), P < 0.0001
    1 embryo0.389a0.3010.503
    ≥3 embryos1.175a1.0081.371
Day of transfer (reference class: day 2), P = 0.0119
    Day 31.211 (NS)0.9971.470
    Day 4 or later1.687a1.1612.451
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0107
    19960.919 (NS)0.6931.217
    19970.697a0.5260.924
    19980.793 (NS)0.5981.052
    19990.838 (NS)0.6271.120
    20000.795 (NS)0.5931.065
    20010.776 (NS)0.5731.051
    20021.124 (NS)0.8351.513
    20031.019 (NS)0.7491.385
Centre, bP < 0.0001
FactorsPoint estimate95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Season (reference class: spring), P = 0.4297 (NS)
    Summer0.943 (NS)0.7881.129
    Autumn0.999 (NS)0.8331.198
    Winter1.086 (NS)0.9121.294
Age (years) (reference class: ≥40 years), P < 0.0001
    <303.979a3.0145.252
    30–342.898a2.2723.696
    35–392.496a1.9693.163
Indication (reference class: tubal), P = 0.0453
    Endometriosis1.051 (NS)0.7871.404
    Idiopathic1.290a1.0331.611
    Male0.852 (NS)0.6821.064
    Others (not specified)1.081 (NS)0.9321.255
Infertility type (reference class: primary), P = 0.4863 (NS)
    Secondary1.048 (NS)0.9191.193
No. of embryos transferred (reference class: 2), P < 0.0001
    1 embryo0.389a0.3010.503
    ≥3 embryos1.175a1.0081.371
Day of transfer (reference class: day 2), P = 0.0119
    Day 31.211 (NS)0.9971.470
    Day 4 or later1.687a1.1612.451
Year (reference class: 1995), P = 0.0107
    19960.919 (NS)0.6931.217
    19970.697a0.5260.924
    19980.793 (NS)0.5981.052
    19990.838 (NS)0.6271.120
    20000.795 (NS)0.5931.065
    20010.776 (NS)0.5731.051
    20021.124 (NS)0.8351.513
    20031.019 (NS)0.7491.385
Centre, bP < 0.0001
a

Significant favourable/unfavourable factor, P < 0.05.

bDetailed odds/ratios by centre not shown.

NS = not significant.

The number of transferred embryos is also a significantly predictive factor: when taking as reference two transferred embryos the odds are significantly unfavourable for one embryo (OR 0.4; CI 0.3–0.5) and favourable for three or more embryos (OR 1.2; CI 1.0–1.4). The day of transfer is a significantly favourable factor when the transfer is done on day 4 or later, as compared to day 2 (OR 1.7; CI 1.2–2.5), while transfers performed on day 3 do not show a significant advantage compared to day 2 (OR 1.21; CI: 1.00–1.47). The year of stimulation is also a significant factor: being stimulated in 2002 (OR 1.7; CI 1.3–2.2) or 2003 (OR 1.5; CI 1.2–2.0) gives significantly higher odds for pregnancy, as compared to 1995.

Discussion

Studying carefully the literature on seasonal variations in the outcome of IVF cycles, the extent of discrepancies between these studies is remarkable. One point is the difference in the stimulation protocols used. In some studies, cycles with down-regulation were included, in others not. In addition, there was no agreement between the studies about the criterion for the inclusion of a patient to the corresponding season: in some studies it was the day of the beginning of stimulation, in others it was the day of oocyte retrieval, resulting in a difference up to 17 days. Also, the published studies have been conducted in different climates. Because of the widely diverse environments with different temperatures and light changes, the different studies are not comparable. Regarding the heterogeneous study results, it is also remarkable that the seasonal effects observed are very complex. Rojanski et al. (2000) for example showed that even though the fertilization and the embryo quality rates were best in spring, the pregnancy rates were worst in spring. On the other hand, he found the worst fertilization and worst embryo quality rates in autumn, but the best pregnancy rates at that time (Rojanski et al., 2000).

The results between the different studies were highly inconsistent, some showing the best pregnancy rates in the months of November, December, January and February (Stolwijk et al., 1994), others showing the worst pregnancy rates in the months of January, February and March in IVF cycles with spontaneous LH surge (Casper et al., 1988), whereas no differences were seen in IVF cycles with HCG administration (Casper et al., 1988).

Our results showed no significant seasonal differences in the fertilization rate nor in the pregnancy or implantation rates. Our findings are in agreement with other studies also showing no differences in the results of assisted reproductive techniques done in the different seasons of the year (Casper et al., 1988; Daya et al., 1993; Fleming et al., 1994). One explanation why no differences in IVF success rates were found is that the lower sperm count observed during the summer months in non-treated ejaculates is compensated in IVF by utilizing a concentrated and constant amount of motile sperm to inseminate the oocytes. Another explanation is the elimination of a seasonal influence on oocyte growth and ovulation by the suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis through down-regulation by GnRH analogues and the exogenous administration of gonadotrophins for ovulation induction during the IVF cycle.

Our results also show no significant seasonal differences in the implantation rate, pointing to an absence of a seasonal change in endometrial receptivity.

Comparing our analysis of the different months, the best pregnancy and implantation rates were found in December, despite a significantly lower number of embryos transferred. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. In a study conducted in Austria (Weigert et al., 2001), having roughly the same climate as Switzerland and having also included a large number of patients in a similar time-frame (8184 IVF cycles from 1992 to 1999), the best pregnancy rates were also found in December, and reaching statistical significance. Our results correspond only partly to the analysis of Stolwijk et al. (1994) from The Netherlands (quite a similar climate, too) who reported a better fertilization rate, embryo quality and pregnancy rate in the period from November to February. These European findings are difficult to explain. One hypothesis of seasonal fluctuations in fertilization and pregnancy rates is the correlation with the annual changes in sunlight exposition; hypothalamic–pituitary output, neurotransmitters and melatonin are suspected to be causally related. The mechanism of the suspected seasonal variation in human fertility has been attributed to a direct melatonin or neurotransmitter effect on the end-organ (Kauppila et al., 1987; Yie et al., 1995; Malpaux et al., 1999), but the role of melatonin in reproduction has been not well defined until now. However, influences of the light/dark cycle on the female reproductive process have been demonstrated (Timonen et al., 1964; Kivela et al., 1988; Kottler et al., 1989; Rojansky et al., 1992), with a reduced ovulation rate and endometrial receptivity in winter months in spontaneous cycles. These findings are in frank contradiction to the cited studies on IVF cycles, where the best pregnancy rates were found in the winter. However, spontaneous cycles cannot be compared with IVF cycles, because of the suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis through down-regulation by GnRH analogues and the exogenous administration of gonadotrophins for ovulation induction during in assisted reproduction treatment.

Our finding of the significantly different aetiologies between the seasons is difficult to explain and might be a coincidence. In contrast, the decrease of the male factor as an indication for IVF treatment from 1995 to 2003 is well explained by the increased use of ICSI for this aetiology since the mid-1990s.

Comparing the success rates in the different years of the observation period, a big increase in the quality of IVF treatment can be observed. The pregnancy rate increased significantly even though the number of transferred embryos significantly decreased and the mean patient age significantly increased. There exist also statistically significant differences in the success rates between the different centres, but no single IVF centre showed a seasonal variation or other statistically significant variations during the year in its results.

Our results showed that the statistically significant variables influencing the outcome of an IVF cycle are age, aetiology of infertility, day of transfer and centre. This concurs with the assisted reproductive technologies data report of 2002 (http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/ART02/PDF/ART2002.pdf), conducted by the Centers for Disease Control.

In conclusion, by the analysis of a large number of IVF cycles, we confirmed that statistically significant variables for IVF outcome are age, aetiology of infertility, the day of transfer and centre. However, the suspected seasonal variability of the outcome of IVF cycles has not been confirmed: there is no statistically significant variability in fertilization, implantation or pregnancy rates between the seasons in IVF. A change of routine fertility treatments concerning the different seasons should therefore not be taken into consideration.

Acknowledgements

20 IVF centres (Baden; Basel (3); Bellinzona; Bern (2); Chene-Bougeries; Geneve; Kreuzlingen; Lausanne (2); Locarno; Lucern; Schaffhausen; St Gallen; Winterthur; Zurich (3)) of the FIVNAT-CH group participated in the study.

References

Abas
M
and Murphy D (
1987
) Seasonal affective disorders: the miseries of long dark nights?
Br Med J
295
,
1504
–1505.

Becker
S
(
1981
) Seasonality of fertility in Matlab, Bangladesh.
J Biosoc Sci
13
,
97
–105.

Casper
RF
, Erskine HJ, Armstrong DT, Brown SE, Daniel SA, Graves GR and Yuzpe AA (
1988
) In vitro fertilization: diurnal and seasonal variation in luteinizing hormone surge onset and pregnancy rate.
Fertil Steril
49
,
644
–648.

Cesario
SK
(
2002
) The “Christmas Effect” and other biometeorologic influences on childearing and the health of women.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
31
,
526
–535.

Chamoun
D
, Udoff L, Scott L, Madger L, Adashi EY and McClamrock HD (
1995
) A seasonal effect on pregnancy rates in an in vitro fertilization program.
J Assist Reprod Genet
12
,
585
–589.

Chan
PJ
, Hutz RJ and Dukelow WR (
1982
) Nonhuman primate in-vitro fertilization: seasonality, cumulus cells, cyclic mononucleotides, ribonucleic acid and viability assays.
Fertil Steril
38
,
609
–615.

Daya
I
, Garcia JE, Smith RD and Padilla SL (
1993
) Seasonal variation in in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rate: an analysis of 2,674 oocyte retrievals.
Infertility
15
,
21
–26.

Ehrenkranz
JR
(
1983
) Seasonal breeding in humans: birth records of the Labrador Eskimo.
Fertil Steril
40
,
485
–489.

Fleming
C
, Nice L, Hughes AO and Hull MGR (
1994
) Apparent lack of seasonal variation in implantation rates after in vitro fertilization.
Hum Reprod
9
,
2164
–2166.

Huntington
E
(
1938
) Season of birth: its relation to human abilities. John Wiley, New York.

Jacobsen
F
, Wehr R, Sack D and Rosenthal N (
1987
) Seasonal affective disorders, a review of the syndrome and its public health implications.
Am J Publ Hlth
77
,
57
–59.

Kauppila
A
, Kivela A, Parakrinen A and Vakkuri O (
1987
) Inverse seasonal relationship between melatonin and ovarian activity in humans in a region with a strong seasonal contrast in luminosity.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
65
,
823
–838.

Kivela
A
, Kauppila A, Ylostalo P and Vakkuri O (
1988
) Seasonal, menstrual and circadian secretions of melatonin, gonadotrophins and prolactin in women.
Acta Physiol Scand
132
,
321
–327.

Kottler
ML
, Coussieu C, Valensi P, Levy F and Dergrelle H (
1989
) Ultradian, circadian and seasonal variation of plasma progesterone and LH concentrations during the luteal phase.
Chronobiol Int
6
,
267
–277.

Lam
DA
and Miron JA (
1991
) Seasonality of birth in human population.
Soc Biol
38
,
51
–78.

Lamar
JK
and Rodgers R (
1943
) Season and human fertility in Galveston, Texas.
Anat Rec
87
,
453
–454.

Levine
RJ
, Bordson BL, Mathew RM, Brown MH, Stanley JM and Starr TB (
1988
) Deteriorations of semen quality during summer in New Orleans.
Fertil Steril
49
,
900
–907.

Levine
RJ
, Mathew RM, Chenault CB, Brown MH, Hurtt ME, Bentley KS, Mohr KL and Working TK (
1990
) Differences in the quality of semen in outdoor workers during summer and winter.
New Engl J Med
323
,
12
–16.

Levine
RJ
(
1991
) Seasonal variation in human semen quality. In Zorginotti AW (ed) Temperature and Environmental Effects on the Testis. Plenum Press, New York, pp
89
–96.

Lewin
A
, Laufer N, Rabinowitz R and Schenker JG (
1986
) Ultrasonographically guided oocyte recovery for in vitro fertilization: an improved method.
J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer
3
,
370
–373.

Malpaux
B
, Thiery JC and Chemineau P (
1999
) Melatonin and the seasonal control of reproduction.
Reprod Nutr Dev
39
,
355
–366.

Mathers
CD
and Harris RS (
1983
) Seasonal distribution of births in Australia.
Int J Epidemiol
12
,
326
–331.

Odegard
O
(
1977
) Season of birth in the population of Norway, with particular reference to the September birth maximum.
Br J Psychiatr
131
,
334
–339.

Ossenbühn
S
(
1998
) Exogenous influences on human fertility: fluctuations in sperm parameters and results of in-vitro fertilization coincide with conceptions in the normal population.
Hum Reprod
13
,
2165
–2171.

Politoff
L
, Birkhaeuser M, Almendral A and Zorn A (
1989
) New data confirming a circannual rhythm in spermatogenesis.
Fertil Steril
52
,
486
–489.

Rameshkumar
K
, Thomas JA and Mohammed A (
1992
) Atmospheric temperature and anovulation in south Indian women with primary infertility.
Ind J Med Res
96
,
27
–28.

Reinberg
A
, Smolensky MH, Halleck M, Smith KD and Steinberger E (
1988
) Annual variation in semen charcteristics and plasma hormone levels in men undergoing vasectomy.
Fertil Steril
49
,
309
–315.

Roenneberg
T
and Aschoff J (
1990a
) Annual rhythm of human reproduction. I. Biology, sociology or both?
J Biol Rhythm
5
,
195
–216.

Roenneberg
T
and Aschoff J (
1990b
) Annual rhythm of human reproduction. II. Environmental correlations.
J Biol Rhythm
5
,
217
–239.

Rojansky
N
, Benshuhan A, Meirsdorf S, Lewin A, Laufer N and Safran A (
2000
) Seasonal variability in fertilization and embryo quality rates in women undergoing IVF.
Fertil Steril
74
,
476
–481.

Rojansky
N
, Brezinsky A and Schenker JG (
1992
) Seasonality in human reproduction: an update.
Hum Reprod
7
,
735
–745.

Rosenberg
HM
(
1966
) National Center of Health Statistics. Seasonal variation of births: United States
1933
–63. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 21, No. 9 (PHS publication no. 1000). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Saint
Pol
P, Beuscart R, Leroy-Martin B, Hermand E and Jablonski W (
1989
) Circannual rhythms of sperm parameters of fertile men.
Fertil Steril
51
,
1030
–1033.

Smith
DM
, Conaway CH and Kerber WT (
1978
) Influences of season and age on maturation in vitro of rhesus monkey oocytes.
J Reprod Fertil
54
,
91
–97.

Stolwijk
AM
, Reuvers MJCM, Hamilton CJCM, Jongbloet PH, Hollanders JMG and Zeilhuis GA (
1994
) Seasonality in the results of in-vitro fertilization.
Hum Reprod
2300
–2305.

Timonen
S
, Franzas B and Wichmann K (
1964
) Photosensitivity of the human pituitary.
Ann Chir Gynecol Fenn
53
,
165
–170.

Tjoa
WS
, Smolensky MH, Hsi BP, Steinberger E and Smith KD (
1982
) Circannual rhythm in human sperm count revealed by serially independent sampling.
Fertil Steril
38
,
454
–459.

Udry
JR
and Morris NM (
1967
) Seasonality of coitus and seasonality of birth.
Demography
4
,
673
–679.

Weigert
M
, Feichtinger W, Kulin S, Kaali SG, Dorau P and Bauer P (
2001
) Seasonal influences on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
J Assist Reprod Genet
18
,
598
–602.

Wood
C
, McMaster R, Rennie G, Trounson A and Leeton J (
1985
) Factors influencing pregnancy rate following an embryo transfer.
Fertil Steril
43
,
245
–250.

Wrigley
EA
and Schofield R (
1981
) The population history of England,
1541
–1871: a reconstitution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Yie
SM
, Brown GM, Liu GY, Collins JA, Daya S, Hughes EG, Foster WG and Younglai EV (
1995
) Melatonin and steroids in human pre-ovulatory follicular fluid: seasonal variations and granulosa cell steroid production.
Hum Reprod
10
,
50
–55.

Author notes

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Berne, Berne and 2Department of Economics and Social Sciences (DSAS), University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland